![]() |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
She sued him. She lost. Someone has to pay the winner's costs. Her solicitors will have advised her of the implications of taking the case to trial. She chose to carry on. If someone sues you and the court gives judgement in your favour, why should you have to pay the costs you incurred at the behest of the loser? It may seem harsh, but if she didn't want to risk the possibility of having to pay his costs she shouldn't have brought the proceedings. |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
:rolleyes: :walk: |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
link |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
He's not a ******* because of his choice of artwork; he's a ******* because of what he did to that woman. |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
If i like music i'd have a figure of a guitar or something, if i get a kick out of raping/attacking/control/hurting, i might enjoy looking at a human figure with blood coming from the crotch. |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
basically he raped her and as his financial position has improved she has decided that it's worthwhile now seeking compensation. appears logical and fair to me. shame the law has a time limit which should be revoked/increased so if someone rapes someone then if they in the future have a windfall, they should then pay compensation.
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Ok just my pov in this dont bite my head off for it ...
She saw that he had won millions of money and wanted some of it (greed) she locked onto this and was determined to get some, ignored advice given to her and was just after the money. The court saw this and made an example of her so other people wont be so foolish and that she wont be able to try again |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Ok this is a sensative thing, because this guy lives in the region I do.
However..... 1) He did NOT rape this woman, he was convicted of attempted rape on her 2) she suffered psychological injuries AFTER this happened. 3) since 1989 she had not thought to claim compensation, but because he suddenly gained a few million she decided that getting a share of that would miraculously make things better? The judge was right, if the time limit is 6 years then the time limit is 6 years, it doesnt matter what happened. The law is written down why should it be different just because this convicted and time served rapist has won the lottery? If she was allowed to sue him that would make a mockery of the law too as it would be making exceptions to the written law, and would open up a whole can of worms. This guy as evil as he is has served his time, his debt to society is paid in the eyes of the law, if the system is not carefull they will end up on the wrong side of european law as the guy is being hounded. To me its all jealousy that he was fortunate to win the lottery, would it even have made headlines if he hadnt? would he have been sued if he hadnt? No its just sheer greed and jealousy that has motivated this. __________________________________________________ ______________ Its like the double jeopardy law, A local woman Mrs Anne Ming is trying to overturn the law because of the murder of her daughter Julie hogg by a Mr Billy Dunlop. He was tried and found innocent, but has since confided in a prison officer that he did kill her. Why should the family not be able to receive justice? The answer is as awfull as it is that is the CURRENT LAW. __________________________________________________ ______________ I understand that the crime ATTEMPTED on the victim of Mr Hoare was a terrible one, however he has received his punishment, he is publically outed as a rapist. Because he now happens to be a millionaire does not excuse people trying to make a mockery of the law, if this woman wanted to sue hiom she should have done so within the permitted 6 years. The Fact she didnt makes me believe that it is money orientated and thats just another name for Greed. I stand by to be roasted in hell for this but I honestly 100% believe Mr Hoare should now be left alone. And this lady should be content with the criminal injuries compensation she will have received. What makes her more special than thousands of other women that have been raped or the victim of an attempted rape, should they all have an indefinate period to sue just in case the perpetrator of the crime should make somehting of themselves? £5000 criminal injuries, doesnt sound much does it, however When I was assaulted unprovoked when I was 13 I was awarded £750, since then and over 6 years after that happened I am now partially sited in one eye directly as a consequence of the assault and am likely to be blind in that eye later in life. I didnt have the option to pay back and go for more money, I have had mental problems associated with the violent attack, and if the guy that did it (and yes I still see him about) won the lottery I wouldnt expect to sue him. |
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
Re: Rapist to have legal costs paid for by his victim
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum