![]() |
Re: Slooow BB
For more information, the .com thread is full (of complaints mostly)
http://www.nthellworld.com/forum/sho...9&page=1&pp=30 |
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Then again:
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:06:47 UTC 1st 128K took 1021 ms = 128376 Bytes/sec = approx 1068 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 3114 ms = 42091 Bytes/sec = approx 350 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 3766 ms = 34804 Bytes/sec = approx 290 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 17976 ms = 7291 Bytes/sec = approx 61 kbits/sec and: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:10:02 UTC 1st 128K took 791 ms = 165704 Bytes/sec = approx 1379 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 3415 ms = 38381 Bytes/sec = approx 319 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 14691 ms = 8922 Bytes/sec = approx 74 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 1072 ms = 122269 Bytes/sec = approx 1017 kbits/sec and I'm on 1mb :dozey: |
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
I have been using my pc all night, and I ain't had a hic-up:p |
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
-edit- now it says thisTue, 14 Oct 2003 21:13:26 UTC 1st 128K took 881 ms = 148776 Bytes/sec = approx 1238 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 1051 ms = 124712 Bytes/sec = approx 1038 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 1081 ms = 121251 Bytes/sec = approx 1009 kbits/sec :confused: |
Re: Slooow BB
That was last night....or the early hours of this morning. It's a process that NTL do every week, if they need to re-balance upstreams, or re-segment the routers |
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
Otherwise see here: http://www.nthellworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47769 |
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Quote:
|
Re: Slooow BB
Superb quote over at .com
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum