![]() |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Strange that this interview, which was intended to happen long before any of these supposed incidents occurred, breaks privacy in an even bigger way. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
I had no idea she is [supposedly] "coloured", nor do I give a toss (about her at all). |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Harry said in the interview that his 'father'* stopped taking his calls for a time. * It's widely suspected that James Hewitt is actually his father. Let's not forget that many people of colour are against mixed marriages too and, the darker a persons skin is often viewed as inferior to those with lighter skin. I hope that this results in the royal family being severely trimmed down so that we don't have to fund the hangers on. The central royal family aid with tourism and the Queen is an important part of the democratic process too as she is unelected, so doesn't have to pander to the wishes of the electorate and can refuse to sign a bill that would make it become law. She is the final safeguard if an extremist Government was ever voted in. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
http://www.themortonreport.com/celeb...rry-look-like/
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
It was a daft question anyway, as a white looking woman who has a child to a white man is obviously going to have an even lighter coloured child. I've heard of gene throwbacks where a white couple have had a black baby and vice versa, but this is extremely, extremely rare and in some cases could have been used as an excuse because the woman had had sex outside the marriage. ---------- Post added at 18:01 ---------- Previous post was at 17:50 ---------- Quote:
It may not be Hewitts child, it could be another mans. Perhaps Diana wasn't being truthful about the details of the affair or even had a one night stand before an actual affair started. Alternatively, Harry could indeed be Charles's and just have different looks & personality to his father. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
They're a couple of spoiled brats imo, they have a privileged lifestyle, and will probably make millions by selling themselves to these chat shows with overpaid hosts, they should think themselves damned lucky that they're not one of the thousands of unfortunate people with no jobs, who have been affected terribly this past year due to the pandemic. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
They are also Hypocrites because didn't Harry foolishly wear a Nazi Uniform, whilst attending a party and got snapped by the press when he did so?
Didn't he refer to one of his soldier pals as his "paki friend." ? Shoe fits, Harry Markle/Meagain... ---------- Post added at 19:14 ---------- Previous post was at 19:11 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
|
Re: Meghan/Harry
Quote:
Perhaps Charles knows or suspects and this is why he felt able to refuse to take calls from him and finds his behaviour more annoying than if it were his own flesh & blood? If he isn't the biological son of Charles, Harry has a mother who was only royal by marriage, which was subsequently revoked and his father wasn't anything to do with the royal family, yet he's been given all the privilage of a prince- even more galling for the family that, after doing this for Harry, rightly or wrongly, he has caused embarrassing issues for them. |
Re: Meghan/Harry
If only I could afford to buy outright or pay the mortgage on a $10million home after being financially cut off by my family. He wouldn't know hardship if it came and kicked him in the you know what's.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum