![]() |
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
You could greatly improve the road system for £100bn ... even build that fabled east coast motorway.
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
Thameslink - Thameslink Programme is an ambitious 10-year programme of extensive infrastructure enhancements and the delivery of 115 new trains that will bring faster, more frequent, more reliable, better connected journeys for passengers – transforming north-south travel through London. Crossrail - The Elizabeth line will link Reading and Heathrow in the west with Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east, via new 21km tunnels under central London Crossrail2 - A number of options are being considered for Crossrail 2. These include a major new tunnel across London from Wimbledon to Alexandra Palace, with an option to connect to existing rail networks between south west and north east London. This would create routes from stations such as Kingston and Surbiton through central London to Tottenham Hale and beyond. Crossrail 2 would serve London Victoria station and the proposed new high-speed terminal at London Euston. East West Rail - The East West Rail scheme will re-establish a rail link between Cambridge and Oxford to improve connections between East Anglia and central, southern and western England. |
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
The HS2 system is about longer journeys. In the London area there is a huge demand for local commuter travel. That needs addressing. It's not spending just for the sake of spending. The demand is undeniably there. |
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
I don't have extensive experience of the public transport around the UK, but I've got family in the Midlands and the North. Whenever I visit them, I find it noticeably harder to get public transport to actually get to them (I can't drive), and usually end up getting a cab. Get off the train near most London stations and it's likely the longest you'll have to wait for a bus is 20 minutes. Obviously, I haven't seen all the figures for HS2, but from what I have seen, I don't think the scheme has been justified. Maybe it will help by reducing congestion on existing tracks and services. I actually think it's likely because whenever I've been to chester, if the service goes via Birmingham, a lot of people get on or off.. |
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Anyone want to open a book on how much the costs and timeline will soar?
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
---------- Post added at 09:14 ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
chronic waste of money that could cripple this country for decades. So many better uses, social care, the NHS, foodbanks, the crumbling branch lines in the North, flood and coastal defence. Seems more like a trophy piece, for a spoilt rich boys train set.
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
https://trl.co.uk/sites/default/file...0go%20next.pdf |
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
Improve the bloody roads you muppets. :dozey: |
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Buses are important for people who can't drive.
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
|
Re: Review “strongly advises” not to can HS2
Quote:
Apart from a few small sections when you get to Alnwick and Berwick, it’s all Dual Carriageway. And they made it proper motorway from Leeds to Scotch Corner, plus remove all the roundabouts. I don’t think there can be many complaints on the investment on the A1. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum