![]() |
Re: I call this stupidty
Quote:
I have worked in a number of companies that have had dress codes (suits, ties, no trainers, smart dress) - not one had a requirement for women to to wear high heels. |
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Common sense prevails..but not without someone speaking out.I wonder how many didn't?
|
Re: I call this stupidty
Quote:
|
Re: I call this stupidty
Quote:
Quote:
It is perfectly reasonable for an employer to have a dress code, it is not reasonable for a dress code to conform to sexist stereotypes in an office! PwC are an auditing firm, not Hooters for crying out loud. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
It's still happening in other industries - I'd cite Airlines as a good modern example.
You'd think Elf n Safety would trump all, given as it's medically proven that those things cause problems with health later in life, It'll need a succession of ppl suing and claiming I expect, for things to change. Bad publicity helps too though ;) |
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Quote:
I also approve of lipstick, big sexy business spectacles and simpering. If DC and her Maj can speak their minds, so can I :D |
Re: I call this stupidty
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Nomad there are legal limits to what an employer can demand their employees wear. They can't get away with it by attempting to get them to agree to it before hand.
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Quote:
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Quote:
Quote:
It boils down to the word "reasonable" dress code demands. I do not feel that having the option of wearing smart, black, flat shoes to be unreasonable. It's not comparable to wearing a tie etc as you don't suffer potential injury from wearing a tie (Unless if you were a complete idiot). |
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
I think that if there is a hell that is specific to the individual it will be nice if the idiot who comes up with these rules gets to spend eternity in 6 inch high heels.
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
I like the equivalent level of smartness.
Virgin is pretty relaxed in dress, there are some uniforms and safety gear rules but else where it's nice and appropriate. I hate it where us fellows have to wear suit and tie all year and the women can dress more in keeping with the weather, or more usually pretty much how they liked (within reason). |
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
I bet Virgin Airlines isn't so relaxed.
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Quote:
|
Re: Woman sent home for refusing to wear high heels at work
Most women, who dress to impress other women probably even more than they dress to impress men, know that heels elongate the leg and change the position of the hips so as to flatter the female form. After some practice, deportment is improved and self confidence enhanced through improved height, stature and that feel good factor.
Dress codes always produce victims; those who feel demeaned or objectified but who will be fluttering the eyelashes with pretend vulnerability just as soon as the opportunity arises. And there is always a dearth of male champions ready to defend her honour :sleep:. Heels look good. Be really thankful the dress code isn't a full body covering of Hessian sack and a pair of hobnailed boots. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum