![]() |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
My original hometown, I lived in Port Talbot for close to 35 years, my father worked in the steelworks for 40 years, I'd hazard a guess at more than 99% of the population there know someone who works or worked at the plant and this will have a devastating effect on the community.
He used to tell me stories about during the 70s it employed more than 20,000 people (now around 4000) and it was well known that some people would clock in at the start of a shift then nip off down the pub for a few hours. Others would have a kip in the mess room for a couple of hours on a night shift with people taking turns watching out for the foreman. For years it was badly run like that. There's not much to brag about in PT, the eastern end at Margam (where the steelworks is mainly situated) always smells of something, usually sulphur but the plant always feels like the heart of the town and in a way that's unlikely to be understood by outsiders the residents have a kind of pride about it. I understand there's something like 100m tonnes of coal under the steelworks and if TATA was allowed to mine it they would save a fortune on running costs which would go a long way to safeguarding jobs but for some reason permission has constantly been denied. Given what Thatcher did to the town in the 80s regarding the miner's strikes plus Cameron shaking hands with the Chinese for their steel let NOBODY be surprised at how much the Tories are generally hated in and around Port Talbot. |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
First, for all of your bluster, unemployment is lower in the UK than most of Europe, so we aren't doing that badly as a whole. Secondly, your post twists and turns so fast I'm not even sure you know what you're saying. If there's too many cheap imports of a certain product, how can we compete without being either cheaper or using subsidy? If we can't go down the first route as it would depress wages, the 2nd would basically make for an even worse race to the bottom as each country like China and the rest of the EU etc dashes to prop up their own industry. We've seen this before, hence current EU rules. I am a proponent of free markets, as harsh as they can be sometimes. Commodities especially have cycles, and if you ride the highs, you must be prepared for the lows. As for your taxes argument: 1: Corporation Taxes are already being lowered in this parliament, I don't think a few % points either way is going to do much to an industry that has a massive over-supply problem. 2: The other option, subsidies and bailouts, have to be paid for somehow. Would you back a rise in income tax to pay for a fund that bails out every industry in trouble? Not only will this not fly, it wont actually make our economy any better. Oh, and the procurement issue is a complete red herring. I'm sure everyone wants to buy British, until it costs us more. Also, if every country did this, many UK companies that DO compete on a international level will find their access to government contracts elsewhere cut off, which will end up with just as many companies screwed as it will help. In any market, if you face competition you can do 3 things. 1: Be Cheaper 2: Be Better 3: Be Different. If you can't do any of those things, I don't think going cap in hand to the government should be option number 4. |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
The key there is for local government to encourage a vibrant mix of business to exist and never rely on one large "good thing", especially for nostalgia reasons as Port Talbot have now found to their detriment. Again, the answer isn't to try to prop up an industry that has been pummelled, but find uses for the skills this community has in innovative ways that can compete on a local and international level. Not easy, and the pull towards an industry that most of the community knows is strong. One must sometimes break the links with the past to get on and calling to save the woefully outmoded steel plants (Blast furnaces, really. Look at the US for examples of modern steel works that are far more efficient and can be scaled to meet demand, rather than simply be "off" or "on") wont help anyone in the long run. |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
There is a polish family near me with disabled twin daughters, they managed to move country's an get their home refitted for the 2 disabled kids. So ya know......... I think some British need a wake up call. All this "nice politics" bull is getting stupid sometimes you have to roll up your sleeves an get knee deep in crap inorder to get out the crap. Not just sit back being a victim |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
http://www.northeastlabour.eu/confir...ved-steelworks |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
Quote:
The "extra costs" I referred to, are the climate change ones. |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
Social housing why? So much of the new development I live on had to have social housing on it. People like you are a massive part of what's wrong with this country. Why should it matter if they live in social housing/private rented/home owner?? |
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
DC was more worried about corruption in tennis than steel.
|
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 00:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum