![]() |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
Sandboxie is an ideal home and individual security system where there are no pressures of immediate response, queues of customers waiting or program manipulation etc. And who cares about commercial concerns ? I and the other millions of Sandboxie home users don`t. We are concerned here with ordinary domestic users, not industry. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
"Lose out on absolute security for convenience of operation"?
Have you any idea the scale of inconvenience/disruption that would occur if a major corporate/institution had a breach of security, and their excuse to the auditors/ICO was that they didn't have the best security "for convenience of operation"? Have you ever had to support / manage on a Corporate scale? |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
To explain my comments in a nutshell - Sandboxie is not convenient for commercial purposes. Please read my post again it is quite precise. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
I wasn't arguing that point - I was pointing out the fallacy of your statement that corporates would
Quote:
|
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
|
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
I really don't mind what others think about the programs I use and mostly don't like to argue about them. I used to do that quite a bit but not so much now. I know Sandboxie is right for me and that's good enough. Been using it since 2006 and will continue to do so. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
"Sandboxie is right for me and that's good enough." No Mart, it is not good enough, Sandboxie is right for every private user and there is nobody that can seriously criticise the security of the program other than engage in mischievous technical nitpicking, which they have not the guts to do on the Sandboxie Forum. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
You also appear to have missed the point of Hugh's post. In your first post, you appear to be suggesting that SandboxIE is a far better security option than keeping your machine up to date or using Anti virus/trojan programs. You even go so far as to say that you stopped patching your system as the patches were just clogging up the machine. As such, you appear to be using SandboxIE as a replacement for any other security. This is bad, and from what I can gather is not what SandboxIE is intended for. Hugh's point was that if this system is so perfect, why are enterprises not using it instead of spending (potentially) hundreds of thousands of pounds a year on other security systems? That is a valid question, whether you care about corporate use or not. I don't think he phrased it well, but qasd does raise a valid point. OK, so he used an undocumented API that sandboxie does not apparently protect, but if he was able to use that API, the Malware authors are able to use it as well, and I dare say they will. It also appears to offer little or no protection against attacks where a virus infects another machine on the network, then starts scanning that network for other machines it can infect. All they need is a network share with bad security and the ability to create processes on a remote machine. Both things that SandboxIE probably will not protect against, and therefore would be unable to sandbox the virus. If you are advising people to use SandboxIE in addition to other security products/practices including patching, I think that is good advice. If you are advising people to use it as a replacement for other security products/practices, I think that is highly irresponsible. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
MOD EDIT - Image too large, added it as an attachment instead ---------- Post added at 13:31 ---------- Previous post was at 13:26 ---------- Quote:
Based on Hugh's statement above, if it's right for every private user, why do no consumer computing stores sell it? Why do no consumer laptop manufacturers preload it? Why does any laptop a "private user" buys come preinstalled with <insert any major antivirus here> and not Sandboxie? Seems you can't stand your grandiose delusions about your favourite application being questioned. All you've done is tried to insult me several times but so far you've failed to substantiate a single one of your claims. Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:36 ---------- Previous post was at 13:31 ---------- Quote:
Corporates almost always choose to lose out on convenience of operation in the pursuit of absolute security. Not that such a thing as "absolute" security exists. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
@ Stuart
Stuart, your post is a reasonable one, but it is not up to me to say what Sandboxie can or cannot do in glorious technicolour. I am just a mere user who has had 10 years of brilliant, flawless and highly efficient service from the program. If you wish to go into intimate detail concerning Sandboxie`s capabilities and limitations or have some criticisms to make, I am not the person to satisfy your curiosity. I suggest you put your comments and queries etc. direct to the Sandboxie experts, either by joining their Forum or by direct contact. The Forum is - http://forums.sandboxie.com/phpBB3/ and you will find an abundance of enthusiasm to answer your questions in ex[licit detail. |
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
|
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
|
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
|
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
|
Re: Sandboxie - A Virtual Protection
Quote:
The inaccurate claims our members are disputing are yours rather than those put forward by the developers of Sandboxie when they advertise what it was designed to do. You were the one to make inaccurate claims so why would our members need to visit a site that they have no argument with? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum