Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33699934)

joglynne 25-01-2015 11:55

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
I too doubt whether race came into play in this case.

I think it was a question of bringing a charge that could be proved. With neither parent putting forward an explanation or being willing to give evidence that would have backed a murder charge I suspect that the CPS would have chosen a lesser charge over a charge of murder for which this man could have been found not guilty on the evidence held.

Osem 25-01-2015 12:02

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
That wouldn't surprise me, sadly. It's hard to stomach people who've done such an awful thing being able to effectively sidestep justice in that manner.

Gary L 25-01-2015 12:07

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
Just goes to prove that if you don't admit to anything. (even though it's obvious)
and/or you don't say anything.

you will get away with it.

papa smurf 25-01-2015 12:16

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35755070)
Just goes to prove that if you don't admit to anything. (even though it's obvious)
and/or you don't say anything.

you will get away with it.

i'm saying nothing :disturbd:

Russ 25-01-2015 12:19

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35755070)
Just goes to prove that if you don't admit to anything. (even though it's obvious)
and/or you don't say anything.

you will get away with it.

Except if you have some evidence or something in your favour you hide until court.

Gary L 25-01-2015 12:48

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35755071)
i'm saying nothing :disturbd:

Another one for you :)

When the police man asks you to sign something. and you say what's that for?
he tries to make it sound really casual and says "Oh it's nothing. it's just to say that I've spoken to you"

and you say "No thanks"

and from then on he starts getting a bit wound up just because you won't give him your autograph. so he gets his mate out. and his mate says "Why won't you sign it? it's just to say that you were stopped today"

and then you say "No thanks"

then they realise that they're not gonna get your autograph. even if they beat it out of you :)

---------- Post added at 11:48 ---------- Previous post was at 11:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35755073)
Except if you have some evidence or something in your favour you hide until court.

Eh?

devilincarnate 25-01-2015 14:49

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
They should just hang the B

Osem 30-01-2015 22:24

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
... and this is just the sort of sentence which puts into perspective what these 'parents' did the their punishment.

Quote:

Four burglars who took part in a violent raid which left a lecturer "unrecognisable" have been jailed.

Paul Kohler, 55, needed facial reconstruction surgery after the attack in Kings Road, Wimbledon, on 11 August.

Mariusz Tomaszewski, 32, and Pawel Honc, 24, received 19 years each after admitting causing grievous bodily harm with intent and aggravated burglary.

Oskar Pawlowicz, 30, and Dawid Tychon, 29, who admitted aggravated burglary, were sentenced to 13 years each
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-31056608

Yes the cases are different but there was clearly intent to do great, possibly, fatal harm to the vicitms in both cases, so how can gross and sustained abuse leading to the death of a totally helpless baby be treated so much more leniently? :shrug:

Ramrod 31-01-2015 00:50

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
1 Attachment(s)
Put me in a room with him, please.

greeninferno 31-01-2015 23:10

Re: 2 1/2 years for fatal child abuse
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35756240)
... and this is just the sort of sentence which puts into perspective what these 'parents' did the their punishment.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-31056608

Yes the cases are different but there was clearly intent to do great, possibly, fatal harm to the vicitms in both cases, so how can gross and sustained abuse leading to the death of a totally helpless baby be treated so much more leniently? :shrug:

Absolutely

doesn't make any sense.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum