![]() |
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
How do they arrive at this figure, seems grossly over valued to me.
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Quote:
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Marketing specialists purporting to be manufacturers of premium audio equipment sue marketing specialists purporting to be manufacturers or premium audio equipment. Whatever next?
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
At least Bose make products that receive professional acclaim and are rated highly irrespective of the label on them...
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
I'd had an Apple voucher for ages that I finally cashed in the other day and bought the standard iPhone/iPod earphones.
I'd been using these Sony earphones for ages as they had the full compatibility functional in-line remote and the sound was really good but any vibration or knocks against the cable (such as when I was out on a run) could be heard through the sound. As the voucher was for 25 and the standard earphones are 24.99 I figured I had nothing to lose and to be honest I can't fault the sound. As I only tend to music from my iPhone when running I'm not all that interested in full frequency reach, just the ability to hear my tunes really well when I'm on the road and they do exactly that. I can't see Apple widely supplying iPods and iPhones with anything other than these basic units and to be honest I don't see that as much of a bad thing. If people want upper or top-end can they can pay the extra for them - as I'm sure they'll have to when Apple officially launch Beats as their own. |
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Bah.. a while ago we had the misfortune of playing a gig through a Bose L1 system. It was utterly hopeless: so much distortion and mid-range nastiness (once you show it more than an acoustic guitar and an SM58) that I think the engineer left his calculator in the PA stage.
I had to disconnect my gear and run the single SRM450 I took along as a stage monitor. 3000 for a loud, not very good hi-fi system masquerading as a compact PA. iirc Bose tried to sue QSC for trying to produce something better for cheaper. You cannae change the laws of physics. ..although the 901's are quite decent home speakers, unfortunately you can buy much better for far less which is the case imho with most of their consumer and pro gear. Add a dash of snake-oil and they'll charge what they want. |
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Quote:
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Quote:
Bose won, much to my surprise. I now have at home (paid list price for) Bose SoundDock (lounge/dining room), SoundLink mini (kitchen/garden), and QuietComfort3 Noise Cancelling headphones (rail/air travel). I like the sound quality, and they will last for decades - value/cost equation. |
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:58 ---------- Previous post was at 22:57 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:01 ---------- Previous post was at 22:58 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Apple to buy Beats for $3.2 Billion
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum