Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : SH for Business Users modem only mode (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33696545)

qasdfdsaq 29-01-2014 02:56

Re: SH for Business Users modem only mode
 
What exactly are you actually wanting to do with the additional IPs?

Sephiroth 29-01-2014 10:29

Re: SH for Business Users modem only mode
 
I'm glad Qasi has joined this part of the conversation. He was the other guru I alluded to on the VM forum.

Nathan666 29-01-2014 11:19

Re: SH for Business Users modem only mode
 
Thanks Seph

So one IP is for exchange (OWA), one is for citrix (XenApp) and there are a few others that are setup along with a couple more that will be used for testing in the future.


I am now wondering if I need to put in place some sort of reverse NAT (perhaps wrong terminology) public address to a private address. Does that sound possible?

Thanks again.

qasdfdsaq 29-01-2014 18:56

Re: SH for Business Users modem only mode
 
I was more wondering how you planned to use those IPs on a network level.

Do you want those computers to "bypass" the NAT and have publicly accessible addresses dedicated to them?

Or do you just want to provide access to a Citrix and OWA server? If the latter, "reverse NAT" or PAT would do just fine - though your additional IPs would go to waste.

---------- Post added at 17:56 ---------- Previous post was at 17:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35666938)
I'm glad Qasi has joined this part of the conversation. He was the other guru I alluded to on the VM forum.

Given my frequently expressed hatred of all things Cisco I'm surprised you thought I could be of any help here :p:

ccarmock 29-01-2014 23:54

Re: SH for Business Users modem only mode
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan666 (Post 35666947)
Thanks Seph

So one IP is for exchange (OWA), one is for citrix (XenApp) and there are a few others that are setup along with a couple more that will be used for testing in the future.


I am now wondering if I need to put in place some sort of reverse NAT (perhaps wrong terminology) public address to a private address. Does that sound possible?

Thanks again.

If you are not using one of the public IP addresses directly on the server then yes you will need to run NAT or PAT on the ASA that sits behind the Superhub.


My setup is just that too - private address space internally with the public IP addresses all sitting on the WAN interface of the router connected to the Superhub and then the router is configured to NAT those to the internal addresses.

It works well.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:37.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum