Cable Forum
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Why pay them wages ? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33695646)

Taf 03-11-2013 17:19
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
The Welsh assembly (spit) is demanding a doubling of their numbers as they "work too hard". That will mean more seats on the gravy train.

SMG 03-11-2013 22:33
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx (Post 35640271)
We are hearing the word revolution more and more now, it could be the start of something good. Hats off to Russel Brand for helping get the word etched in to the minds of more people!

Nearly all the politicians are living comfortably enough to not need to claim all these expenses at a cost to the tax payer. Greedy pigs.

There are a few "Underground" sites that discuss & predict civil war. I`m in total agreement, but its late in the day now for action.

tizmeinnit 03-11-2013 22:42
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMG (Post 35640414)
There are a few "Underground" sites that discuss & predict civil war. I`m in total agreement, but its late in the day now for action.

There will never be a revolution. The army would never back it no other nation would ever support it plus the brits never really protest well either

TheDaddy 03-11-2013 23:11
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tizmeinnit (Post 35640415)
There will never be a revolution. The army would never back it no other nation would ever support it plus the brits never really protest well either
Do it in the week when the army is at their other jobs then. People can only be pushed so far, I know for a fact if there are more riots I won't be working those nights no matter how much I'm offered.

Qtx 04-11-2013 05:02
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35640419)
Do it in the week when the army is at their other jobs then.
:D

Million Mask March is the thing for Tuesday around the world and is being covered by the RT news channel. Doubt it will raise a blip on the other channels but you never know. The occupy movements started out small but over time got enough press and got more thinking about the 99% vs 1% figure. Maybe the anonymous/Vendetta masks will grow in numbers and be a spark for more action to change.

martyh 04-11-2013 07:58
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35640238)
Top Banana, Yes, but it still does not make sense.

If MPs can claim expenses for everything, then WHY pay them wages. Wasn't it last year that an MP claimed so much money on expenses to watch a porn channel.
your making stuff up again Arthur ,MP's don't claim expenses for everything and they certainly don't get expenses for watching porn .Go here to see exactly what they do get

http://parliamentarystandards.org.uk...d92d&NewsId=57

Osem 04-11-2013 08:30
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35640452)
your making stuff up again Arthur ,MP's don't claim expenses for everything and they certainly don't get expenses for watching porn .Go here to see exactly what they do get

http://parliamentarystandards.org.uk...d92d&NewsId=57

They have been known to try, however, as former Labour Home Secretary Jacqui Smith knows only too well.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12535038

Quote:
Jacqui Smith has revealed she felt "frozen rather than angry" when told her husband had entered a parliamentary expenses claim for pornographic films...

... Ms Smith said she had not gone "through the expense form closely enough...
Thanks to Arthur for giving me the opportunity to remind everyone... :D

martyh 04-11-2013 08:40
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35640457)
They have been know to try, however, as former Labour Home Secretary Jacqui Smith knows only too well.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12535038



Thanks to Arthur for giving me the opportunity to remind everyone... :D
yep, there are still some that try to get away with it but thankfully a more transparent system means the voters can check exactly what they are claiming for ,it should also be said that claiming for something doesn't mean they will get it

tizmeinnit 04-11-2013 08:50
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35640460)
yep, there are still some that try to get away with it but thankfully a more transparent system means the voters can check exactly what they are claiming for ,it should also be said that claiming for something doesn't mean they will get it
but it does show the character of those in power

Osem 04-11-2013 08:54
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35640460)
yep, there are still some that try to get away with it but thankfully a more transparent system means the voters can check exactly what they are claiming for ,it should also be said that claiming for something doesn't mean they will get it
Yes, it'd be interesting to know that they'd have done had the claim gone through successfully and Ms Smith has subsequently discovered the mistake.

Stuart 04-11-2013 09:27
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Personally, I have no problem with expenses. If they are needed. The trouble is, most of the expenses claims we have seen from MPs are arguably not needed.

Why should we be paying one MP to heat his estate? Why should we be subsidising their meals so heavily? Why should we be helping them with their rent/mortgages?

Yes, MPs are sometimes required to work late. Fair enough. So are Doctors. So are Nurses. Yet, they don't get heavily subsidised second homes. They don't get heavily subsidised quality meals. They (in my experience) get the same sort of food you get at BHS for slightly more than you pay at BHS.

I believe that the government has been actively encouraging trusts to sell off the on-site accommodation that used to be available to Nurses, doctors and (in some cases) other hospital staff.

Yet, in the event of a major accident or emergency, these people would be expected to be available and in work within a few minutes. Everyone from the cleaning, maintenance and catering staff through to the medical and surgical staff can be called in with little notice. I know people don't think about the cleaning, maintenance and catering staff, but even in a major emergency, the hospital needs to be kept clean, the equipment may need repair and the staff and patients need feeding.

MPs seem to believe they need second homes more than the aforementioned hospital staff, yet how many times does Parliament sit in the evening or at night?

Take my local MP. She claimed for a second home near parliament. Why? Is her constituency hundreds of miles from Parliament. No. It's 15 miles. Should she have ever been required to stay late for a session, she could have been driven back to the constituency in less than 40 minutes. I know, I've done the opposite journey on many an occasion.

Wish I got the expenses they do. Unfortunately, working in the public sector, all I get is either 30p a mile, or my fare by the cheapest route (this is checked) paid and some money toward one meal. This is IF I am called to work off campus for whatever reason. If I am working on campus (even if it's after hours) I am expected to do it as part of my job, even if it's out of hours.

tizmeinnit 04-11-2013 09:32
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35640491)
Personally, I have no problem with expenses. If they are needed. The trouble is, most of the expenses claims we have seen from MPs are arguably not needed.

Why should we be paying one MP to heat his estate? Why should we be subsidising their meals so heavily? Why should we be helping them with their rent/mortgages?

Yes, MPs are sometimes required to work late. Fair enough. So are Doctors. So are Nurses. Yet, they don't get heavily subsidised second homes. They don't get heavily subsidised quality meals. They (in my experience) get the same sort of food you get at BHS for slightly more than you pay at BHS.

I believe that the government has been actively encouraging trusts to sell off the on-site accommodation that used to be available to Nurses, doctors and (in some cases) other hospital staff.

Yet, in the event of a major accident or emergency, these people would be expected to be available and in work within a few minutes. Everyone from the cleaning, maintenance and catering staff through to the medical and surgical staff can be called in with little notice. I know people don't think about the cleaning, maintenance and catering staff, but even in a major emergency, the hospital needs to be kept clean, the equipment may need repair and the staff and patients need feeding.

MPs seem to believe they need second homes more than the aforementioned hospital staff, yet how many times does Parliament sit in the evening or at night?

Take my local MP. She claimed for a second home near parliament. Why? Is her constituency hundreds of miles from Parliament. No. It's 15 miles. Should she have ever been required to stay late for a session, she could have been driven back to the constituency in less than 40 minutes. I know, I've done the opposite journey on many an occasion.

Wish I got the expenses they do. Unfortunately, working in the public sector, all I get is either 30p a mile, or my fare by the cheapest route (this is checked) paid and some money toward one meal. This is IF I am called to work off campus for whatever reason. If I am working on campus (even if it's after hours) I am expected to do it as part of my job, even if it's out of hours.
Agree with all of that it is shameful specially in light of the 11% increase in wages they are getting as well

Osem 04-11-2013 12:37
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35640491)
Personally, I have no problem with expenses. If they are needed. The trouble is, most of the expenses claims we have seen from MPs are arguably not needed.

Why should we be paying one MP to heat his estate? Why should we be subsidising their meals so heavily? Why should we be helping them with their rent/mortgages?

Yes, MPs are sometimes required to work late. Fair enough. So are Doctors. So are Nurses. Yet, they don't get heavily subsidised second homes. They don't get heavily subsidised quality meals. They (in my experience) get the same sort of food you get at BHS for slightly more than you pay at BHS.

I believe that the government has been actively encouraging trusts to sell off the on-site accommodation that used to be available to Nurses, doctors and (in some cases) other hospital staff.

Yet, in the event of a major accident or emergency, these people would be expected to be available and in work within a few minutes. Everyone from the cleaning, maintenance and catering staff through to the medical and surgical staff can be called in with little notice. I know people don't think about the cleaning, maintenance and catering staff, but even in a major emergency, the hospital needs to be kept clean, the equipment may need repair and the staff and patients need feeding.

MPs seem to believe they need second homes more than the aforementioned hospital staff, yet how many times does Parliament sit in the evening or at night?

Take my local MP. She claimed for a second home near parliament. Why? Is her constituency hundreds of miles from Parliament. No. It's 15 miles. Should she have ever been required to stay late for a session, she could have been driven back to the constituency in less than 40 minutes. I know, I've done the opposite journey on many an occasion.

Wish I got the expenses they do. Unfortunately, working in the public sector, all I get is either 30p a mile, or my fare by the cheapest route (this is checked) paid and some money toward one meal. This is IF I am called to work off campus for whatever reason. If I am working on campus (even if it's after hours) I am expected to do it as part of my job, even if it's out of hours.
Blimey I used to get 12p a mile back in 1985 and felt hard done by...

Hom3r 04-11-2013 17:34
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
This is the solution, build/obtain a hotel near Parliament, and every MP is given a room, and they are not paid for a 2nd home.

The hotel would include a restaurant(s) and rooms for each of the main parties to have private meetings, this would save us a shed load of cash.

Mick Fisher 04-11-2013 17:47
Re: Why pay them wages ?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35640758)
This is the solution, build/obtain a hotel near Parliament, and every MP is given a room, and they are not paid for a 2nd home.

The hotel would include a restaurant(s) and rooms for each of the main parties to have private meetings, this would save us a shed load of cash.
Thats common sense, they will never go for it. :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:17.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum