Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   HD : Picture Quality on VM (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33695073)

passingbat 16-09-2013 19:11

Re: Picture Quality on VM
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Risco (Post 35621608)
As to Warm 2, DaMac is correct but it is not the best setting for watching TV.


Just wondering why you would say that?

I have the Sony 40W4000 and have mine set to Warm 2 and it gives a great picture.

HDTVTest did an extensive review of he TV using calibration equipment and came up with Warm 2 as the best setting.

Now I know that all Sony 40W4000 TVs won't be exactly the same as the one they had on test, but I played around extensively with the settings and always came back to Warm2 as the best, as per the HDTVTest results.

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/Sony-KDL40W4000/Settings/

It says in the notes that it is a personal thing and some people may prefer warm 1, but to infer that warm 2 is not a good setting to use is wrong, because for the guys at HDTVtest and myself, it is the best.

dieseldip 16-09-2013 20:34

Re: Picture Quality on VM
 
Picture settings tend to be a matter of taste..

I see some TV pictures on good quality TVs and it looks as though the people on the screen have been on a sunbed for a month because the colour is so high..

passingbat 16-09-2013 20:46

Re: Picture Quality on VM
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dieseldip (Post 35622492)
Picture settings tend to be a matter of taste..

I see some TV pictures on good quality TVs and it looks as though the people on the screen have been on a sunbed for a month because the colour is so high..


That is true, but calibration using professional equipment will give a better idea of what the settings should be, and you can tweak from there.

Often, the correct settings can take a while to get used to, but once you have, they are a lot better. Backlight is often a setting that people set too high, and the reduced level seems very dim in comparison to start with, but once you have adjusted, it can give a better picture.

Most people can't afford professional calibration, so reliable review sites like HDTVTest, that do use calibration, along with forums such as AVFORUMS can be a good guide, and my first port of call, before and after buying a new TV.

spankysmagicpian 16-09-2013 21:27

Re: Picture Quality on VM
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaMac (Post 35621551)
i have an award winning Panasonic which i have calibrated myself with a meter and pro software

/me puts kettle on for DaMac while he's calibrating my set

---------- Post added at 22:27 ---------- Previous post was at 22:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 35621509)
Not in most cases. VM receive most channels off satellite where the data is already compressed, and VM can't add information that was lost in the original compression.

But a few channels such as Animal Planet HD and Channel 5 SD are received as uncompressed video by landline, and VM decide the bit-rate.

When did VM (NTL etc) stop getting the feeds direct from Sky? Was it around the carriage dispute time?

spiderplant 17-09-2013 07:12

Re: Picture Quality on VM
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spankysmagicpian (Post 35622508)
When did VM (NTL etc) stop getting the feeds direct from Sky? Was it around the carriage dispute time?

Yes it was then.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum