Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media News Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33693126)

denphone 24-04-2013 17:17

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Media Boy (Post 35564652)
Rain?;)

Or some more malcontent's voicing their displeasure.;)

alwaysabear 24-04-2013 21:39

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
It seems to me that VM have gone in the right direction with their policies. Not confronting Sky head on would seem to be bearing dividends, as we have seen today.

qasdfdsaq 24-04-2013 21:50

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Virgin has also signed a five-year deal to provide Sky Broadband with network backhaul (between exchanges and the wider internet), along with mobile backhaul from cell towers for Telefonica (owner of O2) and an un-named 'large UK mobile operator'.
Hrmph. Looks like they have a monopoly on the UK mobile market now then.

They already provide backhaul for MBNL and EE, now O2 and "an un-named operator", there's only one other operator that that could be...

... Except said operator takes pride in being the only operator to own their own independent nationwide fibre network so no idea why they're getting into bed with VM...

Bogof 24-04-2013 23:00

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Yeah.... I can assure everyone people who know a lot more about the situation than we ever will, will have decided this is a good idea.

Virginmedia have a great asset, finding new ways to monetise that asset is sensible. Virginmedia don't always need to compete, sometimes they can make money complimenting. Also as the 4G rollout starts if Virginmedia can intergrate themselves deep I to as many 4G networks as they can then they become a critical component. Very very wise.

The thing with "QAS" is he likes to localise VM so he thinks his opinions count. He has zero inside knowledge to the network or management, but still wants us to think his opinion is fact, it isn't.

---------- Post added 25-04-2013 at 00:00 ---------- Previous post was 24-04-2013 at 23:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35564851)

... Except said operator takes pride in being the only operator to own their own independent nationwide fibre network so no idea why they're getting into bed with VM...

Why would you have any idea? You don't know anyone in management from either company. But rest assured each company knows what they're getting into and what they will get back.

Qtx 25-04-2013 09:37

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
The business arm of VM isn't doing so well at the moment. Is this down to the state of the economy or something else?

Sirius 25-04-2013 11:02

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Qtx (Post 35564927)
The business arm of VM isn't doing so well at the moment. Is this down to the state of the economy or something else?

I feel its "something else", Part of my job is to plan and design fibre upgrades for business and access networks and i have been kept busy by both sides of the business.

Mr Banana 25-04-2013 11:23

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Isn't it a timing thing Sirius, as they appear to have signed some massive deals but it takes time to plan build and install and threfore there is a gap between sale and revenue flows?

Sirius 25-04-2013 11:33

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Top banana (Post 35564985)
Isn't it a timing thing Sirius, as they appear to have signed some massive deals but it takes time to plan build and install and threfore there is a gap between sale and revenue flows?

Could well be, i do know as a planning group we feel our postions are safe. :).

Pierre 25-04-2013 14:35

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35564851)
Hrmph. Looks like they have a monopoly on the UK mobile market now then.

They already provide backhaul for MBNL and EE, now O2 and "an un-named operator", there's only one other operator that that could be...

... Except said operator takes pride in being the only operator to own their own independent nationwide fibre network so no idea why they're getting into bed with VM...

Sky have got their own national fibre network too.

The thing VM has that Sky and Vodafone don't have is the Access Fibre reach.

Also VM (as previous identity NTL) used to provide Vodafone backhaul until about 5 years ago. We are already fibre to their sites and masts so we can obviously be competitve on price and RFS dates.

craigj2k12 25-04-2013 17:18

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35565055)
Sky have got their own national fibre network too.

Yep, they own the easynet network (100Gbps)

Risco 25-04-2013 18:22

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
The only reason the broadband increased is because they are throttling the hell out of the network, thus releasing extra bandwidth that would not normally be there in previously oversubscribed areas. They are then able to sell headline speeds to customers that in reality they can barely reach for more than a few hours at a time if they want to download anything of significance such as you know streaming, PSN+, BBC iPlayer that require large downloads. Heaven forbid you want to multitask and game at the same time cause you can forget the ping and any hope of winning because you are lagging all over the map....

Pierre 26-04-2013 09:24

Re: Virgin Media first-quarter results 2013
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12 (Post 35565123)
Yep, they own the easynet network (100Gbps)

Correcto!

Under the guise of Sky Network Services.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum