Re: Richard III discovered?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/bl...enet-king-live
seems its is him and some very interesting stuff come about the burial.
Quote:
Buckley shows an image of the grave and an image of the skeleton. He says the hands may have been tied at the time of burial.
|
Makes me wondered was he alive before being bound raising questions was he murdered.
DNA been positively identified to the best they can
Quote:
Geneticist Dr Turi King says both the individuals who helped with the DNA analysis are "the last of their line" – so in a generation this would not have been possible.
DNA analysis of the remains was difficult, but they did manage to get a sample of DNA to work with.
The DNA confirms this is a male.
She shows part of Michael Ibsen's DNA sequence, which verified the family tree Schürer set out.
There is a DNA match from the descendents of Richard III and the skeleton at Grey Friars.
The DNA evidence points to these being the remains of Richard III, she says.
|
What happens now. Was it common in those days to bound king chuck in unmarked grave.
Seems to me he may got wounded in battle bosworth. Whether those wounds was likely cause death who knows.
This definately adds more questions how and why was there fowl play involved in his death.
|
