![]() |
Re: Superhub 2
Would like to hope this will be rolled out sooner, but I would assume if they have loads of testing etc. to carry out it could be months before Superhub 2 become available to the masses & that's on the assumption it’s not just an option for new customers or a chargeable upgrade.
Still very positive news that VM are looking at a replacement. |
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Put simply, public knowledge per se is not harmful. What most companies do consider harmful is letting their competitors know the capabilities of their products before they are ready for release. They don't want to give their competitors advance notice of those capabilities as that would give their competitors time to react. You don't think Sky and BT have employees that check out public forums from time to time? I don't know about BT (although I would be surprised if they didn't do it), but I have it on good authority that Sky do. |
In regards to apple their staff aren't even allowed to discuss their pay.
It's why pay is never advertised on their job adverts and also won't easily find somebody online mentioning their pay either as its all in their NDA when they got the job. |
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Simply put VM are not reliant on the exclusivity of their bundled CPE to compete for customers. Nobody switches to VM because their "Superhub (2)" has exclusive features you cannot get elsewhere. |
Re: Superhub 2
Its in testing, everything I have ever tested for VM/NTL has usually come with an NDA.
That is why they want it out of the public eye until its ready to be released. |
Re: Superhub 2
But as we know from the last time, they 'tested it' back then, in secrecy and with a limited bunch of customers. And from what I hear, they ignored complaints about the wifi, dragged their heels on modem mode and we got the superhub we all know and love.
|
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub 2
They did indeed test it, I was on the trial it lasted many months.
However that's not the point, NDA are put in force to keep new products in the public eye until testing is over, usually as said products aren't stable enough or companies want it to be a secret to prevent others seeing or copying designs or hardware. |
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Are you still under NDA and can't divulge what was tested and what instructions you were given? |
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
It's says Netgear on it, and it has "modem mode" written on the back. I wont post any pictures because they will want to launch it properly and not by some dodgy photos on a forum. I haven't divulged anything sensitive, we all knew the new hub was coming. All I've said is I've seen it. |
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:53 ---------- Previous post was at 19:52 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Superhub 2
5 Antennae isn't unusual at all for a decent router. This might actually not be terrible for wireless.
I'd still rather have my own router, though, but only because I appreciate the likes of Tomato - if they give the SH2 decent wireless capabilities then it'll be fine. |
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
When the Superhub first appeared, they stopped handing out the Ambit 300 to 50meg and higher customers, but to get rid of the old stock they started giving them to people on the lower tiers. I remember a lady calling in to activate her Ambit 300 Modem on a 10mbit connection. As an aside, the Ambit 300 really doesn't like 10Mbit speeds. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 22:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum