Cable Forum
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33686381)

denphone 17-03-2012 14:42
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35401307)
Avoided or evaded ? you consistently get mixe up between the two .I have just avoided paying nearly £5,000 in tax ,perfectly legaly ,does that make me worthy of your disgust ?
Yes it seems Alan is disgusted with nearly everything or anybody in his fantasy world apart from his own fantasy like rantings.:)

Alan Fry 17-03-2012 14:51
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35401307)
Avoided or evaded ? you consistently get mixe up between the two .I have just avoided paying nearly £5,000 in tax ,perfectly legaly ,does that make me worthy of your disgust ?
Evading is wrong and illegal

Avoiding is wrong and legal

My main compliant is not people like you, but people who avoid billions

Sirius 17-03-2012 15:02
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35401307)
Avoided or evaded ? you consistently get mixe up between the two .I have just avoided paying nearly £5,000 in tax ,perfectly legaly ,does that make me worthy of your disgust ?
:clap:

---------- Post added at 14:02 ---------- Previous post was at 14:01 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35401311)
Yes it seems Alan is disgusted with nearly everything or anybody in his fantasy world apart from his own fantasy like rantings.:)
spot on :tu:

martyh 17-03-2012 15:03
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35401315)
Evading is wrong and illegal

Avoiding is wrong and legal

My main compliant is not people like you, but people who avoid billions
so you want to be selective about who the law of the land applies to

Alan Fry 17-03-2012 15:08
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35401332)
so you want to be selective about who the law of the land applies to
No I would deal with the big tax evaders and avoiders first and work my way down

martyh 17-03-2012 15:11
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35401338)
No I would deal with the big tax evaders and avoiders first and work my way down
how far down ?,where would you stop and say "i will allow them to avoid some tax" will there be a fixed limit or will it change whenever your world government needs more money to annex another nation that is harbouring tax avoiders and wealthy people

denphone 17-03-2012 15:12
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35401332)
so you want to be selective about who the law of the land applies to
The only law Alan is interested in is his own law to suit his own political and monetary ends.

Alan Fry 17-03-2012 15:23
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35401339)
how far down ?,where would you stop and say "i will allow them to avoid some tax" will there be a fixed limit or will it change whenever your world government needs more money to annex another nation that is harbouring tax avoiders and wealthy people
Eventually I plan to deal with all tax evaders and avoiders

Sirius 17-03-2012 15:28
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35401340)
The only law Alan is interested in is his own law to suit his own political and monetary ends.
Would that be the law of "Whats yours is MINE but whats MINE is my own so get your hands OFF"

---------- Post added at 14:28 ---------- Previous post was at 14:26 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35401343)
Eventually I plan to deal with all tax evaders and avoiders
You have NO chance as your fantasies are just that FANTASIES

Alan Fry 17-03-2012 15:33
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35401345)
You have NO chance as your fantasies are just that FANTASIES
The only fantasies are ones by defenders and promoters of a failed social, poltical and economic system

denphone 17-03-2012 15:40
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35401349)
The only fantasies are ones by defenders and promoters of a failed social, poltical and economic system
So your system is the one that all democracy's should adopt then.

Alan Fry 17-03-2012 16:01
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35401352)
So your system is the one that all democracy's should adopt then.
It certainly better than the system we got

denphone 17-03-2012 16:03
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry (Post 35401366)
It certainly better than the system we got
No, no dear Alan.:nono::nono:

Osem 17-03-2012 16:10
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Sandwich short of a picnic...... :nutter:

Sirius 17-03-2012 16:16
Re: Incapacity tests reject 37% of claimants
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35401369)
Sandwich short of a picnic...... :nutter:
I prefer one card short of a full deck


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:37.
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum