![]() |
high level nhs meeting with cameron but critics of the reforms not invited
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17083357
How far will this government go to bully ahead changes when profesional people denied audiance to ally there fears help shape NHS reforms. Government showing they will tread on everybody shoes unles your CEO, Banker or someone hoarding millions negating paying you tax by arranging accounts to fluffy your dog. Day after day we see cameron and cronies further lose the plot and it surely at some point even most ardent government supporters will wain from support. Surely if the NHS needs reforms then ALL parts NHS bodies HAVE RIGHT to SHAPE it. That includes the ELECTORATE. |
Re: high level nhs meeting with cameron but critics of the reforms not invited
The "ELECTORATE" did shape it - it was called the 2010 General Election.
|
Re: Despite growing pressure from professionals/back bench Lansley adamant on reform
Please stop creating new threads every time you fancy having a go at the NHS reforms. We only need one.
Merged. |
Re: Despite growing pressure from professionals/back bench Lansley adamant on reform
Quote:
:clap: |
Re: high level nhs meeting with cameron but critics of the reforms not invited
Quote:
In fact before the 2010 General Election David Cameron was even saying "No more top down reform of the NHS" |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
The electorate didnt shape anything.
it seems its fine for a party to say one thing and do another after elected without legal repurcussions. not to mention the majority of the country has little to no voting power in a general election. |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Quote:
Quote:
Actually most if not all the changes where in the conservative manifesto for the 2010 general election http://www.general-election-2010.co....y-back-the-nhs a few snippets We will strengthen the power of gPs as patients’ expert guides through the health system by: • giving them the power to hold patients’ budgets and commission care on their behalf; • linking their pay to the quality of their results; and, • putting them in charge of commissioning local health services. trust healthcare professionals |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Have not got time to reply in full heres amother snippet.
. We will stop the forced closure of a&e and maternity wards, so that people have better access to local services, and give mothers a real choice over where to have their baby, with nhS funding following their decisions. We will create local ‘maternity networks’ to ensure that mothers can safely access the right care, in the right place, at the right time. Chase farm hospital is about to lose its A/E dept in an enforced closure so much for that then.:erm: |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Quote:
erm ....it's not a forced government closure ,it was recommended to the government by the IRP (Independent Reconfiguration Panel),i would assume because of the main A&E at Barnet a couple of miles down the road Quote:
|
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Right i can reply a bit more in length now where in the conservative manifesto in 2010 did it state up to 49% of beds in NHS hospitals could be used for private patients.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16337904 Thats quite a major change from the way it stands now. I also did not see any mention of deregulated tariffs for hospitals. Currently hospitals have to charge a fixed tariff for a specific procedure, but under the reforms, they will be allowed to charge lower, more competitive prices. The British Medical Association has "concerns over the use of... deregulated tariffs in the NHS, because this system brings with it price competition, which can risk basing decisions on price rather than on clinical need". Read more: http://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/85...#ixzz1mpt9Ajpi This is what David Cameron said about chase farm A/E . But Cameron indicated his support for Chase Farm in October that year when, as leader of the opposition, he visited the hospital and said: "What I would say to Gordon Brown is if you call an election on 1 November we'll stop the closure of services at this hospital on 2 November." Ms Fonyonga, 28, held a copy of the Evening Standard aloft at the conference showing Mr Lansley with a "hands off Chase Farm A&E" pledge card. This month the Government backed a panel's recommendations on Chase Farm's services. |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Quote:
Quote:
yes they did ,the deregulated tarriffs will be in conjunction with "best practice" for each procedure so no matter what is charged the same standard must be adhered to I repeat Chase farm A&E was not closed by the government it was a recommended closure by the IRP If you think that political parties put all proposals in minute detail into their manifestos then you are mistaken ,however in the case of NHS reform it was quite comprehensively covered ,so you can't say that the voting public didn't have a chance to vote for it . |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Quote:
And them recommending closures and ministers agreeing sounds enforced to me! unless the local public have their say and are listened to. GP fund holding might work but i have very deep reservations about the rest as i have linked to,in our area the GPs are not very keen on fundholding anyhow,as they can see arguments with patients who believe that GPs may withold treatment due to budgets and very frosty patient doctor relationships might develop as a result. |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
You could always have just googled it.
IRP It was set up in 2003 by the previous Government, and here are its Terms of Reference |
Re: The NHS reform discussion thread
Quote:
The last Labour government were also very wrong abolishing the community health councils.:mad: |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum