Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Other Telco Services Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=65)
-   -   BT say no (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33685342)

g0mit 05-02-2012 19:31

Re: BT say no
 
They replaced a pole in my road and took my old line down.when a asked engineer he said after 2 years they take them down

Digi Tel 05-02-2012 19:47

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g0mit (Post 35376421)
They replaced a pole in my road and took my old line down.when a asked engineer he said after 2 years they take them down

He was clearly speaking with forked tongue.

Peter_ 05-02-2012 20:21

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digi Tel (Post 35376414)
Good point. That was before the days of competition. (Although historians would point out that pre-competition there was always a shortage of lines.)

I left BT for Telewest (now Virgin Media) six years ago. I still have a dial tone on my BT line because they know that in order to win me back, I would not entertain an installation charge.

I removed my BT line myself when my soffit and fascia boards were replaced and wrapped it around the telephone pole, BT removed some time later no idea exactly when but who cares.

Tarantella 08-02-2012 06:11

Re: BT say no
 
If there is no BT line then should there be no line rental?

Peter_ 08-02-2012 07:19

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tarantella (Post 35377971)
If there is no BT line then should there be no line rental?

You do not pay BT if you have no connection or phone line to the property.

Tim Deegan 08-02-2012 08:43

Re: BT say no
 
I presume BT have now changed their policy. They replaced the telegraph pole outside my house 2 or 3 years ago. I said to the engineers at the time that there was no point re-connecting the line to my property, as I was with VM. But they said that they had to re-connect all lines, even if they were not active.

Peter_ 08-02-2012 09:05

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35378015)
I presume BT have now changed their policy. They replaced the telegraph pole outside my house 2 or 3 years ago. I said to the engineers at the time that there was no point re-connecting the line to my property, as I was with VM. But they said that they had to re-connect all lines, even if they were not active.

I would not have allowed them on my property.

Tim Deegan 08-02-2012 09:17

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35378038)
I would not have allowed them on my property.

They were doing their job, and they asked nicely. Also the house was for sale, so it gave the buyer an option.

Peter_ 08-02-2012 10:13

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35378048)
They were doing their job, and they asked nicely. Also the house was for sale, so it gave the buyer an option.

If for sale no issue, but I would not have a BT line on my property.

Tim Deegan 08-02-2012 10:59

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35378073)
If for sale no issue, but I would not have a BT line on my property.

Well I can see your point. I wouldn't buy a bed from Dreams...same sort of thing I suppose.

Peter_ 08-02-2012 11:24

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Deegan (Post 35378095)
Well I can see your point. I wouldn't buy a bed from Dreams...same sort of thing I suppose.

I just dislike BT nothing more.

MovedGoalPosts 08-02-2012 15:55

Re: BT say no
 
Why have the line reinstated if it's not going to be used. Every chance that if someone did want it at some time in the future a fault would have developed sopmewhere that would need it replaceing at that futuer use date. Just seems rather wasteful of effort to me.

A lot of companies describe stuff as "installation" fees. BT used to have a fairly "reconnection" fee too. Virgin Media have often also charged installation fees for services like the hubs and TiVo. None of these meant you owned the kit of had a permanent right to them. Perhaps though the companies involved need to use better English to desribe why the charge arises and what it covers to avoid these frequent misconceptions from their customers.

blackthorn 10-02-2012 08:36

Re: BT say no
 
Update.
Contractors put up a new pole yesterday and after having a chat with the guys, he put my line back up. The reason I wanted it put back was because if I ever did want to go back I didnt fancy paying out again for a new line.

colin25 10-02-2012 13:32

Re: BT say no
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthorn (Post 35379230)
Update.
Contractors put up a new pole yesterday and after having a chat with the guys, he put my line back up. The reason I wanted it put back was because if I ever did want to go back I didnt fancy paying out again for a new line.

Happy ending... :D

Kymmy 11-02-2012 12:07

Re: BT say no
 
A few simple facts (some already mentioned)

1# BT won't redo a line to a non-active property
2# The monies they claim back from insurance will be for work done so BT won't get paid for not putting your line back..
3# There's been lots of instances where even though the physical line is still there it might not be connected at the exchange and for that BT will charge full price which is currently only £40 (free if they take BB)

Remember that the line isn't yours and the £250 you paid was purely for that contract.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum