Cable Forum
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   HD : Should Virgin introduce an HD charge (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33680876)

howardmicks 03-09-2011 20:05
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDFootyMan (Post 35296088)
I agree with the Batman. :p:


Given enough time, we'll have a "Should Virgin increase the cost of their HD charge?" thread, after Sky announce that Virgin want Sky Atlantic 2 HD on the cheap.
VM want every HD channel on the cheap,Thats why we aint getting any new ones.:(

Digital Fanatic 03-09-2011 20:18
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
All the UKTV HD channels will launch this Autumn.

Gavin-D 03-09-2011 20:26
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35296151)
All the UKTV HD channels will launch this Autumn.
So Dave HD, Watch HD and Good Food HD will be launching in the Autumn and Alibi HD in 2012? If so that's a start but we need ITV 2, 3 and 4 HD plus History HD as a minimum.

alwaysabear 03-09-2011 20:29
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Not Forgetting ESPN America in HD:D

pythagoras 03-09-2011 20:58
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear (Post 35296156)
Not Forgetting ESPN America in HD:D
I doubt VM will spend any money on a channel hardly anyone watches.

Firmsky 03-09-2011 21:55
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
I'm watching college football on ESPN America right now wishing it was in HD! Think you'll find it's more popular than people think!

But going back to the HD charge I wouldn't pay anymore than I already do, yes the premium HD charge is absorbed in my VIP package but regardless I'm still paying £7 P/M somewhere so I don't feel I should pay anymore when I get less HD than Sky for a tiny £3.25 P/M less than what they do for lots more HD.

pythagoras 03-09-2011 22:21
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firmsky (Post 35296173)
I'm watching college football on ESPN America right now wishing it was in HD! Think you'll find it's more popular than people think!

But going back to the HD charge I wouldn't pay anymore than I already do, yes the premium HD charge is absorbed in my VIP package but regardless I'm still paying £7 P/M somewhere so I don't feel I should pay anymore when I get less HD than Sky for a tiny £3.25 P/M less than what they do for lots more HD.
It's average viewing figures, and this includes sky and vm sd and hd combined, is less than 9000. I think we all make the mistake of thinking if we like something most people do to.

Regards

John

Firmsky 03-09-2011 22:30
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Fair enough and thanks for enlightening me John, surely at those poor figures VM could negotiate the channel even with their tiny budget!!

HDFootyMan 03-09-2011 22:41
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras (Post 35296161)
I doubt VM will spend any money on a channel hardly anyone watches.
Ditto for Sky Atlantic. :D;)

alwaysabear 03-09-2011 23:16
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras (Post 35296178)
It's average viewing figures, and this includes sky and vm sd and hd combined, is less than 9000. I think we all make the mistake of thinking if we like something most people do to.

Regards

John
Do tell where did you get your figures from? I am watching Minnesota @ USC.

pythagoras 03-09-2011 23:25
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear (Post 35296193)
Do tell where did you get your figures from?
I was rather generous on the 9000 average;) I got my figures from here:

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes?

You'll have to select espn america manually, as I can't get a direct link.

Regards

John.

---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by HDFootyMan (Post 35296184)
Ditto for Sky Atlantic. :D;)
Sky atlantic gets considerably more viewers than espn america

If your up for a challenge, alwaysabear, find me a channel that has lower viewing figures than espn america

muppetman11 03-09-2011 23:31
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras (Post 35296195)
I was rather generous on the 9000 average;) I got my figures from here:

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes?

You'll have to select espy america manually, as I can't get a direct link.

Regards

John.

---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ----------



Sky atlantic gets considerably more viewers than espn america

If your up for a challenge, alwaysabear, find me a channel that has lower viewing figures than espn america
Maybe that is the reason why more people choose satellite be it through Sky or Freesat to gain access to these niche channels that VM don't deem worthy to broadcast.

alwaysabear 03-09-2011 23:33
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras (Post 35296195)
I was rather generous on the 9000 average;) I got my figures from here:

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes?

You'll have to select espy america manually, as I can't get a direct link.

Regards

John.

---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ----------



Sky atlantic gets considerably more viewers than espn america

If your up for a challenge, alwaysabear, find me a channel that has lower viewing figures than espn america
The trouble with all Barb figures is that they are taken from so few homes that are not representative of actual viewers watching.

pythagoras 03-09-2011 23:36
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
What has worthy got to do with it? Espn america is on virgin, they just don't want to pay extra for HD for the tiny amount of people that watch it. And I have to say I agree with that decision. Its a commercial one not a question of taste or worthiness.

Regards

John

---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear (Post 35296199)
The trouble with all Barb figures is that they are taken from so few homes that are not representative of actual viewers watching.
I think you will find they are more representative than the few tens of us that post in these threads.

muppetman11 03-09-2011 23:43
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras (Post 35296200)
What has worthy got to do with it? Espn america is on virgin, they just don't want to pay extra for HD for the tiny amount of people that watch it. And I have to say I agree with that decision. Its a commercial one not a question of taste or worthiness.

Regards

John

---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ----------



I think you will find they are more representative than the few tens of us that post in these threads.
I wasn't just referring to ESPNA HD I was meaning others such as CBS Action , CBS Drama , Al Jazeera News , Numerous music channels , Premier Sports etc.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:26.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum