![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Probably find VM are unashamedly indifferent to the customer loss.
http://investors.virginmedia.com/ima...DetailsID=1113 They were largely low value customers. • 36k net customer loss • 90% of which were single or dual-play • 29% of churn were single-play • 25k net quad-play add http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011...6000-customers I do have some issue with the idea that it's not in their psyche to chase unprofitable business though. Think Mr Berkett needs to remind his retentions teams of that one. |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
After watching the Q&As Berkett & co defined low value customers as those spending less than £40 per month. That must include a huge number of lost mid market customers. One insightful investor question asked if they had increased prices too much thus creating customer churn. I'm not an expert but I think that these figures are far worse than the VM board and Investor Relations people are spinning. I'm not saying they are about to go bust, just that the figures are disappointingly mediocre.
My other observation of VM, and this comes from personal experience, is that as soon as there is even the slightest expense regarding connecting a customer to their network they desperately peddle cheapo ADSL services rather than investing in that potential customer. To me that is not concentrating on acquiring and retaining high value customers. So, either they forgot to communicate their strategy to sales, which is unlikely, or they are trying to pull the proverbial wool over investors' eyes. |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
That is a very good point Denphone and it is one that Berkett made too. What would interest me is if they quantified it or whether they just used it as a throw-away defensive point. I must admit I just skipped to the Q&A, maybe I'll take another look.
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
I found Berkett's body language very telling in this afternoon's web cast. He may be talking the talk and saying how wonderful things are, but he looked very unhappy, bordering on angry in my opinion. Yes, this quarter is usually bad for vm, but to lose 36K customers is not good at all, and I don't believe its all down to students and people moving off-net that Berkett claims. Tivo is a vast improvement over cable's previous EPG efforts. VOD (on demand) is great, when it works. But all this is a means to an end. What good is a better TV guide, if you don't have the content? The lack of news on HD channels and SD channels is deafening. The competition commission is to report next month into Sky's dominance over first run Hollywood film rights. Sport and films are what drives subscriptions. If vm cannot get their hands on Sky's films at a better rate and/or launch their own film service, as Berkett has always wanted. Then VM will never grow tv subs much beyond what they are now. |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
---------- Post added at 16:36 ---------- Previous post was at 16:34 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 16:48 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Does anyone know how the second quarter of this year compares to previous years - did a little looking and found a 9,100 increase in customers last year and a 27,000 drop the year before.
Can anyone confirm or correct? |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
3 Months to Net Change (Cable customers) 30-Jun-11 -36,000 31-Mar-11 20,200 31-Dec-10 17,100 30-Sep-10 14,100 30-Jun-10 7,100 31-Mar-10 38,300 31-Dec-09 28,600 30-Sep-09 8,100 30-Jun-09 -26,200 31-Mar-09 7,100 31-Dec-08 14,800 30-Sep-08 8,300 30-Jun-08 -19,500 31-Mar-08 4,900 31-Dec-07 24,400 30-Sep-07 13,000 30-Jun-07 -70,300 31-Mar-07 -46,900 31-Dec-06 -37,000 30-Sep-06 -37,300 30-Jun-06 -18,900 :eeek: |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
I think what's more telling isn't the headline 36000 'lost' customers, but the changes in TV subs. The 22000 connects in the corresponding quarter of 2010 has become 21000 disconnects in 2011. Must go someway to explaining the dramatic Tivo pricing chahge. Of course this pricing might have been in the plan all along - do 50000 of you fancy lending me £50 for the next few months?
Cheers Grim |
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
My gut instinct tells me that the lack of Sky Atlantic is not a major reason for churn. At the end of the day it's just another channel with American imports and there are plenty more where that came from. As Grim says it's the pricing that's the key and probably a pervading sense of rip off Britain.
|
Re: Virgin Media Notification of Second Quarter 2011 Results
Quote:
There aren't plenty more of the same quality as on Sky Atlantic - some people can be very dismissive of the channel if they like, but there are many others who see it as a gaping hole in VM's TV service. I too have watched the channel and 'poop' does not describe the standard of programme on it, I would describe it as 'great'. It will be interesting to see the figures for the next couple of quarters to see how many of these 36,000 come back. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum