Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/con (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33673804)

mersey70 12-01-2011 08:44

Re: Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/c
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ahardie (Post 35151142)
I would guess you are right as Sky don't give their own customers that option so it would be surprising if they gave customers of other platforms that choice.

Quite, if you want (pay) HD channels on Sky you pay the £10.25 charge whether you have 1 pack or all 6, kerching!

Digital Fanatic 12-01-2011 11:45

Re: Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/c
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mersey70 (Post 35151145)
Quite, if you want (pay) HD channels on Sky you pay the £10.25 charge whether you have 1 pack or all 6, kerching!

does seem a "cash-cow" for Sky, but people are paying it. Although I do agree that Sky have invested in this area.

mersey70 12-01-2011 14:26

Re: Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/c
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic (Post 35151196)
does seem a "cash-cow" for Sky, but people are paying it. Although I do agree that Sky have invested in this area.

Indeed, amongst other areas they have invested millions in HD at their new HQ at Osterley but my word will they get it back, that HD charge alone generates about £300 million a year before costs. Definitely kerching!

Although good business I suppose.

nomadking 12-01-2011 14:39

Re: Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/c
 
I wonder what are the extra costs for broadcasters of HD. I wouldn't have thought that it would be the broadcast rights to programmes, as nowadays things are shot in HD anyway. It would be the SD version which required extra processing. Do Sky have to pay more for the satellite capacity and are unfairly passing on part of that cost to VM?

mersey70 12-01-2011 14:47

Re: Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/c
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35151289)
I wonder what are the extra costs for broadcasters of HD. I wouldn't have thought that it would be the broadcast rights to programmes, as nowadays things are shot in HD anyway. It would be the SD version which required extra processing. Do Sky have to pay more for the satellite capacity and are unfairly passing on part of that cost to VM?

I would guess there are all manner of extra costs associated with HD. I know Sky invested many millions in their HD studios and suites at Osterley. Of course Sky have to rent more transponder space to broadcast their HD channels so I suppose as a business that maybe they recoup some of those costs from other platforms who choose to broadcast their channels. I don't think that is really unfair personally, the same could be said for Disney, ESPN, DNE, any of the channel providers.

VM have chosen not to be a channel provider for much longer, it was their own business decision.

Doug P 17-01-2011 10:55

Re: Is it just me or is this £7 extra just for Sky Sports HD 1/2 a complete rip-off/c
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joedm45 (Post 35150472)
That is my view too and precisely why I do not pay the £7 HD charge as a Sky Sports only subscriber.

I have said all along that £7 for all movies and sports 1 & 2 is good value considering Sky charge £10. As much as I like my footy, £7 for SS 1 & 2 in HD I cannot justify so will not pay

The perfect answer! It's fine if you can afford it. If not you have the choice. Easy....


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum