![]() |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
In fact ITV are probably gaining by their agreement with sky, as ITV 2,3 & 4 HD are subscription channels.
Thought ITV had signed a deal with VM. We'll have to wait and see what tier VM adds them to |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
Where i have my difference is when vm sold their tv buisiness to sky the deal involved sky arts HD 1 and HD 2 no sign of either appearing some 6 months later.:confused: and for a cummunications company no word from vm to customers. I understand sky sports red button is on its way hopefully. IF sky are holding any of these up they should not be as virgins side of the channels sale has been handed over to sky, lock stock and barrell,and they are now in the buisiness of closing some of the said channels. For all their good work the thing that lets vm down is their communication with the people who pay the wages sadly.:( |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
We don't have Sky Sports Red Button or 3 HD channels that output about half a minute of HD a year so VM are negating TV? What a heap.
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
What?
They have spent loads of money on unifying the network and clearing up the mess of having lots of legacy kit in jumbled network. They are doing things the correct way, they are getting their house in order first and making sure that the foundations they have are stable to build upon. It may not mean much to the end customer but the network we have now means everyone is on a level playing field and all parts of the network can get the same services. They have added a whole load of HD channels, there simply are not many SD channels launching now as SKY has closed the SD launch queue and unless a channel can launch on Sky it won't be able to launch anywhere else. The Tivo investment would have been quite substantial especially with a bespoke box being made for it. The sale of VMtv will be for the greater good, they have secured a longterm carriage deal with for the Sky Basics, have given customers access to Sky Movies HD and Sports HD and what might turn out to be a master stroke access to Sky VOD, that is really going to rock with the 7 look back function on Tivo. All the money they have spent might not be obvious but the TV platform is now in a much better shape then it has ever been and hopefully they can build to deliver more content. |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
Quote:
Ofcom have intervened in Sky's premium TV situation yes, but getting Sky 1 HD for example was through Virgin's deal with Sky over Virgin's selling them their Living TV franchise. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You are entitled to your opinion, but I think a few here, including myself think your opinion is wrong. |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Ridiculous original post on this thread. I don't claim to have any insight into the amount of money VM invests in the difference services it provides, but it must be apparent to most that they've invested significant amounts in the TV side this year.
If the OP is talking specifically about channel content, then VM said some time back that they did not plan to compete with Sky in that game and was concentrating on sorting out the operational side of TV and class-leading broadband. This is a company supporting considerable debt that has to make investments where it can secure the best return. I think Berkett and co had a strong 2010 and this year looks just as good. Some folk seem to just want more and more and more, never appreciating what they have (best in class broadband and VoD for a start). |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Like most, if not all people on here I have no idea how much money VM have invested in their TV offer recently, if ever.
But I think I am right in saying that VM's (unlike Sky's) core business isn't television, it is broadband and telecommunications so any investment in television surely must be balanced against any potential return. I think the Tivo product indicates this, it isn't connected to a broadcaster like launching a whole load of channels would be so (I assume) will not drastically increase their payments to the likes of Sky or any other broadcaster for that matter. How much of a draw it will be remains to be seen, probably not as much as lots more channels but not as expensive either. Maybe it's a way of differentiating it's offer without the burden of increasing their wholesale payments, but as like most people on here I don't really know. |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
One company, one investment budget. If VM has elected to invest more in broadband then something has to give.
Incidentally, does anyone else find it odd that some of the folk complaining about Sky Atlantic not being on VM have been dismissive in the past of VM's VoD content, which featured the majority of that Sky Atlantic HBO archive drama and comedy in HD for years? |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
But they only had a handfull of shows in the HBO hub and sometimes they just played the same season over and over. With Atlantic they will actually be showing new shows as well.
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Depends on the size of your hands I guess. HBO series formerly on VM VoD (from memory):
Angels in America Big Love Carnivale Curb Your Enthusiasm Eastbound & Down Entourage Flight of the Conchords Generation Kill Hung In Treatment Sex in the City Six Feet Under Tell Me You Love Me The Sopranos The Wire True Blood When the Levee Breaks |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
Far from it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum