![]() |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Quote:
Apparently, Keir Starmer (Director of Public Prosecutions) Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
I always thought people convicted lost peerage so why is Archer kept his too. Although Zing makes valid point the peers have kept some scandalous bills from seeing light of day. Its corrupted by governments giving peerage to make sure the onus is balanced into there favour so there crazy bills get in. Its scandalous they not forced to pay back what they stole even worse allowed back they should be stripped and jailed. £300 a day criminally disgusting wage. Most are millionairres although deserve a pay it should be token £100 a day still healthy £500 a week. |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
For some reason the link in my previous post no longer works so here it is again:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1dhk1ZRKj :confused: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
I still can't believe these people had the gall to try to resume their offices at all! |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Does not surprise me they have their snouts in the trough on the wider issue why do they do it,because they can i guess is the answer, and because uintil caught they think they are immune from the rules that govern us ie the non elite of society, its all very corrupt sadly.:( ---------- Post added at 15:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ---------- Quote:
Its hard to see how those in the House of lords who have done time is some cases,and will not repay fiddled expenses in others have the gall to return,if it was me i would never show my face again.:mad: ---------- Post added at 15:14 ---------- Previous post was at 15:09 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Their Lordship's aren't paid (for being a peer at least). That said they should obey the spirit of the law as that's really what counts. They should have expenses paid where reasonable but shouldn't claim where they don't need to. That said sometimes the letter of the law means they have to claim that way even when it's "silly".
As for those peers gaoled, they should pay back before they resume their seats and maybe even not be allowed to affect laws linked to the crimes they have been found guilty of. (Some still have good brains and abilities that it would be a waste to not use.) |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-2031031.html As for letting them carry on sitting well nobody is indispensable despite having brains,i am sure brainy people are frothing at the mouth to get in for all the privelidge the title brings with it, for example if i robbed a bank (many would say those peers robbed the public bank) i doubt wether i would get a job ever again in the financial service sector,or anywhere else perhaps and i would be sacked from my current one without a doubt. Yet these peers are allowed to remain well surely if their brains were that good they would never have got themselves into the mess they did,their brains would have told them it was not worth it.!;) |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Breathtaking gall!! :mad: |
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
|
Re: Peers at the trough?
Quote:
Yet another? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 00:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum