![]() |
Re: 3D boxes
Quote:
|
Re: 3D boxes
as I said we will see. Sony is a competitor for Murdock and Panny isnt small. I spose we will wait to see what the porn industry back. As I said it is the start of a format war early doors
|
Re: 3D boxes
Which have demoed and reviewed both Pany and sky's recent attempts at 3D TV
http://www.which.co.uk/news/2010/01/...y-3d-tv-193559 |
Re: 3D boxes
Shutter glasses have been available for some time for PC monitors and a number of flight sim enthusiasts have used them. They do need to be controlled either wirelessly or wired.
Search the forums in the various flight sim web sites for users impressions. However I would have thought that the passive polarised glasses would be more convenient provided the image quality is good. |
Re: 3D boxes
Quote:
|
Re: 3D boxes
Been discussing this further with the old man lol
Sony Panny and Samsung are behind shutter glass 3d these are the 3 best tv manufacturers in the world Apparently there are 3 different lenticular formats in the war sky being one of them The TV to view Skys offering will have to have polorizing filters built into the screen meaning A. Viewing angles are poorer B. the backlights will need to be brighter ergo more energy needed From what I can assertain the shutter glass method would only require the mechanism that sends the information to the shutter glasses and a 100hz and above screen the rest is standard meaning the screens need only be say a grand at a guess. Yes you will need a new blu ray player and pvr but this can still be done under the 2.5 grand. Woopie doo LG are gonna be the first with a tv for 2 grand lol Hitachi to follow Sony and Samsung are releasing their versions around the same time but they are using LED backlight models so early TVs are expected to be 3 grand but there will be cheaper models as led backlights are not obligatory for this tech. They are also releasing blu ray players at the same time Panasonic demoed Avatar at there 3d shutter glasses expo and for me its where the movie industry goes that matters. Ok we could watch a bit of sport on Sky for 30 quid a month in 3d but id rather be able to watch movies and if shutter glasses win the movie scene Sky can go sing ;) Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolog...-by-April.html |
Re: 3D boxes
The PS3 helped win the last format war for Bluray.
Now the new 3D bluray specification has been specifically designed, it appears, to make sure that PS3's will need only a firmware upgrade to be able to run 3D bluray disks. Given this one it would be hard not to assume that whatever kit works best in 3D with the PS3 is going to come out the winner? Remember there are 3D games, such as avatar, available now so Sony have a head start on recruiting the early adopters. --------- Also I can see this possibly driving the use of projectors in the home over TV's. You can get 3D ready HD projectors for a lot less than a grand so we could have the situation where a 3D projector and huge screen costing less than a 3D TV. |
Re: 3D boxes
if polarized wins you will need a bloody expensive screen
|
Re: 3D boxes
http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/bravia-lcd...ces|4952660471 Sony Bravia with Active shutter tech
http://ces.cnet.com/8301-31045_1-10427983-269.html panasonics 3d tv with yes active shutter tech http://www.kikatek.com/product_info....source=froogle samsungs active shutter please note the possible price http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/...ected-cell-tv/ oh look Toshiba and guess what yes active shutter ;) Dreamworks it appears is also backing active shutter tech and if other movie studios does the same well..... And their competition is who oh yes LG lmao wonder who has the power there then http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/24237/lg-3d/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum