![]() |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
I have done the game server download by downloading 4 large files 700mb-1gb and working out the speed and that again only yields results of between 8MB - 12 MB and not the 20 MB I should get. |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
If you are a Virgin Media customer then the best speedtest is from the links below. click on these 2 gamefiles battlefield_2142_demo.exe and bfme2demo_english_final.exe and save them to your desktop, and then wait a couple of minutes then write down the transfer rates on the files that are running add them together then multiply them by 8 and you will get a truer download speed. Remember to stop and delete the files. i.e : 250Kbps X 8 = 2Mbps, 500Kbps X 8 = 4Mbps, 1250Kbps X 8 = 10Mbps, 2500Kbps X 8 = 20Mbps Then add 10% to the final figure to account for any processes running on your computer. http://www.virginmedia.com/testmyspeed/manual.php |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
|
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
|
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
downloadng them 2 large files form the game server here are my results download rate 90 kb/sec 80 kb/sec add together and multiply that by 8 =1360 does that mean I am getting 1.3 MB speed that is truly shocking and just to confirm this https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2009/10/8.png |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
If you are getting those sort of speeds then the is an issue somewhere and needs to be checked, you need to call in again.
Try on Monday after 0800 for s UK call centre. |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Jellyfish, it does sound like it could be unacceptable levels of oversubscription in your area. You may well have been moved to a new UBR when you upgraded. To save you time trying to troubleshoot a non-existent problem, it would be well worth your your time posting on the newsgroup to see if you have oversubscription problems on your current UBR. You'll get a reply within 4 working hours and if it is oversubscribed then there is no point in any more troubleshooting from your end, if it isn't oversubscribed then carry on with reporting it to Virgin customer support. Click on the connection link at the top of this page to find your UBR but it might be worth asterisking out the CUST number when you post.
|
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
10:00 15 Mbps Kids/students still in bed 11:00 10 Mbps Kids/students have stirred 12:00 05 Mbps Kid/students are busy 13:00 06 Mbps Kids/students munching lunch 14:00 04 Mbps Kids/students seriously at it again 15:00 09 Mbps Kids/students doing/watching sport stuff |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
1000 kb/sec 1250 kb/sec with calc comes to 19.8 MB but my argument is never had any issued when I was on 10 MB only since going to 20 MB will monitor it thru the day and see |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Great that you've got good news for now.
I think what we're asking you to do going forward is to view the issue through the traffic contention lens. Cheers |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
if lets assume the issue is oversubscription on the UBR how long does it take for VM to look at the issue and then resolve it
lets assume I moved to 50 MB would I get pushed a new UBR ? I assume each BB speed you subscribe to has its own UBR (10, 20 and 50) |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
So far as I know, the UBRs are DOCSIS sensitive (there are other experts who know the full skinny). 50 Mbps is DOCSIS 3 and use UBRs other than those used for 10/20 Mbps which I believe can share UBRs (DOCSIS 1.1).
I haven't moved to 50 Mbps from 20 because I prefer the capping (STM) to be in place to protect my average service. The 50 Mbps service currently has no STM and so there is a subscription overload (IMO) that makes contention in some places very high as kids/students go mad with downloading, streaming or gaming. To resolve contention is a balance that VM have to strike against their reputation, versus investment cost, versus STM policies. I'm quite sure that VM will look at a speed complaint, do their line test (probably with a QoS override from their IP address) and declare the line to be OK if they don't see unexpected attenuation or SNR. And that would be right. It's an "up to" service and to some extent a postcode lottery (see Manchester for details). VM know where they have to increase capacity (again see Manchester for details) and can choose between capping or infrastructure investment. Hope that answer helps. |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
I finally got my 50Mb working on Thursday and www.speedtest.net showed 50.4Mb on it's London server - all others showed lower.
As of yesterday The London server has been showing 22-28Mb so I wasn't happy. Having read this thread I tried downloading some of the Game Demos and got: Adding up the speeds of the 5 files I was downloading consecutively was giving me a steady speed of 6.52Mb/Sec - which works out at 52.16Meg I'm happy with that :) |
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
|
Re: and I though it couldnt get any worse
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum