![]() |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
I have a lowly 10Mb connection.
Speed tests rarely report anything above 3Mbps and usually lower. If I get a good download speed going ie > 500Kbps then the cable modem stops working within a few minutes. All cat5e cabling has been replaced, the router has been replaced and the above problems persist. Of course it could be cable modem or VM network issues but anytime I contact support and ask there is no problem with their network or the cable modem. Maybe it is something to do with the number of people hanging off the same cable section(?) - or whatever the terminology is. My finally arrived at point is that I do not see the connection speed I am paying for. But VM tell me there is no problem... |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:01 ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Hi bomber_g
What does "saturating your connection" mean? I maybe should have stated that this occurs even if only 1 system is active here so there is only 1 download of any sort going on - no other connection at all. That is not exactly a case of over-straining a connection. Regards Pete |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
You obviously know what you're doing, especially spreading your tests around different servers. As I've said in other threads, Speedtest.net is unreliable IMHO. I did what you did and in a c. 1 minute period did three tests at Maidenhead, London & Rome followed by two more tests immediately at Rome. (I'm on a 20 Mbps servive using a Homeplug bridge which keeps me down to c. 15 Mbps). Maidenhead: 3.2 Mbps London: 9.8 Mbps Rome: (1) 13.2 (2) 10.9 (3) 7.9 Mbps This told me what webcrawler250 has already told you. Namely (but in other words) that on the internet, anything could be happening at any time anywhere in terms of linbe or server contention. I noticed also that my ping time to Rome was the same as to London (same number of hops). This is a common pattern. One of the constants in this is the uselessness of the Maidenhead server. It always depresses results and that is why you were completely right in spreading your tests. The wise men here correctly say that downloading a very large file or even two concurrently will provide a better picture over a longer snapshot period. These longer periods will more typically represent the instant changes that occur across the internet and the VM system. It is clear to me from what you'gve written that you are "victim" of this instantaneous change when you call VM - a few seconds later, and the picture could have been entirely different. So Speedtest.net and its ilk might be a tempting starting point but the acid test and basis of decision for clling VM when you think things are going slowly is to measure the time it takes to download a large file (say > 250 MB) and then to do it at least twice at different periods of the say. Sort of thing. |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2009/10/5.png
Tried to numerous servers and this is the best result. I'm on 20Mbit... Is this weekend throttling in action? Downstream Receive Power Level : 0.7 dBmV Downstream SNR : 37.3 dB |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
What about real downloads and web experience? Speedtest.net is notriously unreliable. |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
As for hitting the threshold, I know I definitely haven't reached it on the PC anyway. I have been playing a lot of PES2010 PS3 online though, but I wouldn't have thought that would be bandwidth intensive... surely? It's only this weekend I've noticed it. |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Well the past few days speedtest has been consistantly reporting the previous low connection speeds, just to make sure I checked the other test Virgin ask and began downloading 200Mb+ files from the gamefiles.virginmedia.com site.
When I checked this during the last bout with Virgin's support the first downloaded at a little over 1Mb/s, trying two other files at the same time brought the same download rate for all three; three downloading at just over 1Mb/s each. Checking the past few days hasn't shown anything like this. Tonight the there downloads were: 158kb/s, 167kb/sec and 168kb/s. The modem has the following downstream figures: Downstream Lock : Locked Downstream Channel Id : 6 Downstream Frequency : 331000000 Hz Downstream Modulation : QAM256 Downstream Symbol Rate : 5360.537 Ksym/sec Downstream Interleave Depth : taps32Increment4 Downstream Receive Power Level : 2.9 dBmV Downstream SNR : 39.6 dB Upstream hasn't been an issue, its always about the same, here are the figures anyway: Upstream Lock : Locked Upstream Channel ID : 1 Upstream Frequency : 18800000 Hz Upstream Modulation : QPSK Upstream Symbol Rate : 2560 Ksym/sec Upstream transmit Power Level : 47.0 dBmV Upstream Mini-Slot Size : 2 |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
|
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
Testing on pingtest.net shows no packet loss, Rome is 65ms, Milton Keynes is 25ms. Two Windows 7 PCs and 1 Mac Snow Leopard laptop are all showing pretty much the same results. Download speeds remain very poor though for a 20Mb line. Not sure where to go after this. |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
Also if 1 file downloads at rate X and if each of three concurrent downloads from the same source work at the same rate X what does that tell you? That the source is oversubscribed? Network problem? You're half duplex? |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
To answer your second question(s): Like I said the issues are the same whether wireless or wired, Mac or Windows. The router and modem have been replaced and no network problems are reported in any of the tests I've tried, or in the system logs of the individual systems. I've checked various download sources at various times. On Sunday morning for example, the Virginmedia games site had the following download speeds: D3Demo.exe running at 173kb/s CallofDutyDemo.zip 194kb/s Third download ran at 194kb/s All remained constant. When I checked this while troubleshooting with Virgin support the speeds were over 1Mb/s, that's what I should be getting according to them. Microsoft Technet was running at 50kb/s Since there seems to be such a disagreement about the reliability of various tests and methods, is there somewhere, someone or something that can give an accurate connectivity reading? |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
I suspect you've got your Mb and MB confused. A 10 Mbps line equates to c. 1 MBps (8 bits per byte + overheads).
If that's the case, 173+194+194 = 561 Mb/s. It could be, as I said, that the games site is overloaded with people downloading; or the network is busy with people downloading stuff like mad. Can we sort this Mb/MB thing out please? |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
Quote:
As I said, I'm on a 20Mb line, 20Mbits/s (well up to anyway). The downloads experienced from the virgin games site during checks with Virgin support were 1Mbits/s each for the three concurrent downloads. checking over the past few days has shown lesser speeds, typically the 173kbits/s - 194kbits/s for the same. The speeds have been around the same at Sunday morning as they are this evening. I hope this has answered your questions. |
Re: Is Virgin at it?
The problem is that you said in post #27: All remained constant. When I checked this while troubleshooting with Virgin support the speeds were over 1Mb/s, that's what I should be getting according to them.
You should be getting more than 1 Mb/s so what did VM mean? Very confusing and we've only got your story to work on. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum