![]() |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
TNA makes better ratings over here tht in the US and the live shows over here do better than there US live shows, it would make sence for someone to pick them up if they have to. Also if Sky bought the channels and WWE said to get rid of TNA then that could be seen as an anti-competative move and could show WWE as trying to create a monopoly on US wrestling shows broadcast in the uk. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
They would be crazy to sell Virgin Media Television! It would mean less on-demand content,higher subscription fees and lower chance of competiting with Sky.
By keeping Virgin Media Television,its hold Virgin TV security in competiting with Sky. I mean Living is the UK's most popular channel! What the hell! |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
As everyone knows, l have always been critical of VM Tv etc, and l believe if Sky does buy VM channels, it will benefit the consumer, and that is paramount.
Even though, they have had arguments before, between them, if the customers gets a better deal, then l am for it. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
In my personal opinion, VM make very little from the TV service as they always lost money from it and is mainly used as a retention tool. That is why you used to have to have a phone to get the TV service and currently you can only get the free package (size m) if you have a phone line.
Phone and BB make money, TV doesn't, so the only investment into TV is to keep customers on the BB and phone! (minimum to stop churn) This isn't my perfessional opinion! (If you want that, PM me) hic! :drunk: |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
monkey, VM TV and the cable TV package are completely different things. Nothing will change with regards to cable TV, VM TV are the ones who product Virgin 1, etc.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
This is how Virgin TV,Virgin Media Television and UKTV Channels are:
Virgin TV: Cable TV platform and service provider with multiple choice of channels from a range different broadcasters such as BBC,Virgin Media Television,UKTV,Sky,Discovery,Viacom,MTV and a few more. Virgin TV delivers direct to the consumer. The TV channels and on-demand content are brought to you by Virgin Media limited, each cable franchise is listed as a private limited company of its own and is owned by Virgin Media which is a plc for example, Cable London Limited which covers Enfield,Camden,Harringey,Hackney and Islington of north London. That way it makes it easier to sell of individual franchises if they are under performing. Virgin Media Television: This is a TV channel broadcaster for the UK Pay-TV and Digital terrestrial market. It is also content provider for Virgin TV. The company owns and broadcasts Living,Living 2,Living+1,Living+2,Challenge TV,Challenge+1,Challenge Jackpot,Bravo,Bravo+1,Bravo 2,Virgin 1 and Virgin1+1. Virgin Media Television also owns a percentage of Setanta sports news. Virgin Media Television previously was part of United Artists group and became wholly owned by the Telewest Broadband group in 2000. Orignally,the broadcaster aired Bravo,The Childrens Channel(TCC)(Now Trouble),The Family Channel(Now Challenge TV) and in 2005 Player which became Bravo 2 and FTN which is now Virgin 1. Living became part of the group in the mid-90's,previously UKTV held Living and was called UK Living. UKTV channels: This is also a broacaster and airs the following channels; Watch,Watch+1,Alibi,Alibi+1,G.O.L.D,Dave,Dave+1,Ed en,Blighty,Home,Home+1,YEsterday,UKTV Food and UKTV gardens. It is a 50/50 joint venture between the BBC and Virgin Media Television. The broadcaster airs is channels across: Virgin TV,Sky,Tiscali TV,Smallworld Media TV,Wight Cable and Freeview as well as Top up TV. Virgin Media Group has planned to offload its 50% share in UKTV channels. This is not the whole of Virgin Media Television. It is recommendable as it will release a lot of cash,Virgin Media doesn't really provide much content for these channels anyway and popularity for these channels is decreasing which is why they have all been rebranded! I don't think Virgin Media is 100% sure it wants to sell Virgin Media Television, Living TV has aired exclusive shows and provides Virgin Media,Tiscali TV and BT Vision customers a lot of on-demand content. This channel is very popular and must bring in a lot of revenue! Furthermore, Virgin Media has also looked into the possibility of acquiring Playboy, why would they be interested in buying that if they no longer want to be a content provider??? As mentioned above Virgin Media do use Virgin TV as a tool to keep Phone and broadband customers,however Virgin Media also use Broadband and phone and even Virgin Mobile to keep Virgin TV subscribers. And you don't have to take Virgin phone to get Virgin TV, You can still order Virgin TV as a stand alone product through tele-sales. Bare in mind there are some streets and franchises that do not have Virgin's own telephone service. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
has the sky offer gone through is there a time limite any new news on whats going on as it all seems to have gone quiet
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Why would they bother to do that if they did not intend to decline Sky's bid?
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
So that if Sky win the bid they fork up as much as possible for them because VM know they can afford it :D
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
I think that making a quick buck selling these channels to Sky would be a huge mistake, and would possibly be something the Competition Commission would need to be made aware of. Sky have a ridiculous level of control in the market as it is, and with Living in their grasp I'm tempted to believe that Sky would simply charge what they like for them.
I guess the way around it would be to build a set carriage cost in to the sale, but still I don't fancy it. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Mistake, but if Sky are offering the highest bid VM have to come up with some seriously good reasons to their shareholders why they declined it.
The clause is not an uncommon one - it should be remembered that VM and News Corp, through their holding in BSkyB, are competitors! No doubt there will also be a clause there guaranteeing VM carriage of all the channels for the foreseeable future also. It's not about sticking it to 'the man' it's just business. VM are perfectly happy to sell to Sky but are not naive enough to underestimate Sky's 'Uncle Rupert' and the reach of his company. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Looks like it's back on again according to Media Guardian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010...b-virgin-media Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum