![]() |
re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
You can disagree with his politics, You can question some of the alleged antics in his personal life, but he has been a significant figure in Scottish politics for quite sometime.
As I overheard one Granny say to her purple rinsed friend on the train tonight - "If it wisnae for Tommy Sheridan we'd still have yon Poll Tax". Not quite true but he did become a prominent figure then and went to Jail for it. Maybe he just likes porridge ;) |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-west-12059037
Quote:
So then... guilty of perjury (although he can still seek to appeal the verdict). What I want to know, & haven't seen mention of, is... as he has been found guilty of lying in court during his successful libel action against the News of the World, does this mean that he will have to pay back the damages he obtained from the News of the World? |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
I would think so. This is what happened with Lord Archer:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1448075.stm I wonder if Sheridan employed Jonathan Aitken's "simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of British fair play".... |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
This whole sorry story is extremely distasteful. It starts with an unnecessarily intrusive report on someones private life, a fool who really should have known better and should have kept his mouth shut, a so-called friend's treachery and now he may face jail for something that should never have gotten as far. I think it is about time the test of, "in the public interest," is re-examined.
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
He shouldn't have won the original case. Even he seemed to indicate at the time, that he only won it because he from the Left.
IIRC the case with Lord Archer, was where they changed the day anything was supposed to have taken place at the very last minute before trial. In that situation, could anyone have dealt with something where you had an provable alibi for a specific day before, but now faced having to provide an alibi for a day that you couldn't(eg you were home on your own). |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Guilty :D
If he'd accepted that he had done wrong rather than trying to wriggle and squirm his way out of things he wouldn't be looking at the wrong end of a prison sentence, the damages award being overturned and possibly losing his house. The trial was pretty ridiculous with everyone and their granny lining up to shoot him down and only a couple of family members (including one who miraculously remembered after the trial started *exactly* what was doing on a specific evening 10 years ago) still clinging to the story that it was a huge setup. |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
3 years in jail. Well about 14 months in reality. :)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-west-12280552 |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Yeah but he's only been sent down because of his lifelong fight against 'injustice and inequality'....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12287231 :rolleyes: |
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Quote:
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Quote:
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Quote:
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Quote:
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Quote:
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
Bit of a mega bump but Andy Coulson has been cleared of committing perjury during the previous perjury trial not because he didn't lie but because the PF couldn't prove his lies had an effect on the case.
Confused? Me as well but on the bright side Mr Sheridan is going absolutely tonto with rage right now. :D http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-32962263 Quote:
|
Re: Tommy Sheridan found guilty of perjury [Updated Bump]
It seems am uncharacteristically fair and sensible decision to me. I am surprised that the law has been drafted well enough to allow it happen. The alternative is that there would be scope for an overzealous prosecution to convict someone of perjury, a serious offence that carries a jail term, for telling a irrelevant minor lie in court.
I.E Someone lies about where they going when they witnesses a crime. They might say they were off to work but really they had decided to take the day off. Is that really worth of being illegal? I am not sure. We have enough laws written with enough leeway to convict people for stupid things. Remember that guy who was convicted of terrorism offences after tweeting a joke? Everyone knew it was stupid but the law meant they just had to stick with it. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum