Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Who the hell wants to drive an expensive car like a Porsche in the rat runs of London.There is nowhere to park and driving anywhere in the city is a nightmare and sooo stressful.If I was wealthy enough to afford a Porsche and living in London I'd rather spend the money on Taxis..If there were less of such cars in the centre of London then the buses would be able to run more efficiently

In fact this country being as impacted by cars as it is it's hardly viable to have a car that you cannot drive up to the speeds that they are so obviously bought for.Why buy a Ferrari or similar when you cannot legally drive at the speeds that they capable of?

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

I'll ask again...Does not really answer it and well adding costs for illegal parking is not really a justification that the charge itself is unreasonable. In fact if the charge keeps these cars out of the parking and delivery bays your former employer might get less parking tickets. 1 parking ticket = 2 days of congestion charges, that will add up quick.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Actually, I suspect it was a case of the opposite. Londoners voted for him because they found him slightly less offensive than the tory candidate, the liberals continually make the mistake of being open and saying their policies will cost money (nothing seems to frighten voters off quicker than the thought of higher taxes) andall the minority parties are a little bit "out there" for the mainstream voters..

---------- Post added at 14:28 ---------- Previous post was at 14:22 ----------

Name one. Better public transport is one, but is currently hampered by the stupid system of privatisation in place on both tube and trains, and buses are hampered by the number of cars on the road.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

My Mrs, a born (and half-bred) Londoner, votes for him because she remembers him fighting for London against Thatcher in the 1980s, particularly things like Fares Fair, and going down in flames. Don't overestimate the power of martyrdom, being the little guy who gets up and carries on swinging.

While obviously that political capital isn't inexhaustible, it does explain why he won against the odds back in 2000 - nice though Frank Dobson is, no one was going to vote in a candidate deliberately parachuted in to stop Livingstone. He also has a track record of fighting central government and being proved right, for instance on Metronet and London Overground, which is one reason I'm voting for him - see his 2004 manifesto and compare against reality:

2 are waffle (I get high-quality childcare, but I'm not sure he had a lot to do with it), 1 (the housing) I've no idea about, one is half-done (no trams yet, thanks to the Tories and NIMBYs) and the rest I think he gets a tick in the box.

So not quite 'love him', perhaps, but people certainly see him as a true Londoner and thus, fundamentally, on their side, since he generally does what he says he's going to do.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Sticking it to Thatcher is one of the main reasons I vote for him and I think that goes for a lot of people who can remember the 80's.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

It's been 15 years, guys - time to move on ;)

By harking back to the memory of her, you keep it alive (imho).

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

When she dies I will move on.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Hi BB King, my point, that you have asked is this, we pay too much in taxation in this country, l worked in Central London, for about ten years, and everywhere you go, it cost money, when l stated about major stores, it is up to these stores, to put a stop to him, the US Embassy, has already said that they won't pay the CC, if you live in London or live near a major city, everywhere you go, there is a traffic warden, giving you grief,, but it seems to Ken, that we have a bottomless pocket, to pour money into his pocket, my reason for the thread, is that it is about time a company (it could have been any company) stood up to him, l just hope and pray, he doesn't get in again, as what will happen next.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

I dont like Ken Leninspart, I dont like him for what he used to stand for and for what he stands for now. If I want to drive my Porsche or X5 through london why should I be penalised. Why should I have to pay because of my emmisions being slightly more than a fart when there are a huge amount of oil burners still poluting London passing themselves off for taxi's and buses.


Regardless of what guise it comes in, its another tax and NOT a charge for a service.
We pay vehicle tax already, we pay through the nose for fuel (due to the governments taxation on fuel) and now we get taxed if we drive through London.

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Most cars can travel over 70mph, so why do you think people buy them then?

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

a) because you're having an effect on the environment of the people who live and work there
b) because you're taking up road space which could be used more efficiently
c) because there's a perfectly good alternative
d) because the people who live there want you to, it's called democracy

I've paid it precisely once, which as I've said before I've more than saved in discounts by using Oyster and because bus fares in London are cheaper than the rest of the country and in real terms (and tube fares in the suburbs are a ridiculous bargain of a quid anywhere). If it really were a tax the proceeds of it (legally ringfenced for public transport) wouldn't be spent on measures designed to help people avoid paying it, would they? It's precisely what it says on the tin, a charge designed to encourage modal shift, provide money for public transport (does anyone sane seriously think Ken sticks it in his Swiss bank account?) and reduce air pollution. Now it's proposed to extend this to reducing CO2 emissions, but only after an election.

Next. Incidentally, Mr. Leninspart would like you to know that:

He's nowhere near the stereotypical Red Ken these days, he's as likely to borrow ideas from the US and Singapore and have lunch with a businessman than he is to big up Venezuela and visit a lesbian co-op in Hackney. Read the whole article (yes, obviously it's the Guardian, so go and read Boris' campaign website - http://www.backboris.com/ - for some balance if you want).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/20...tone.interview

Even the ones in Kingston-upon-Thames, 10+ miles outside the CC zone? Why would they bother? They exist to sell things and make a profit, not campaign against things that enjoy mass support.

Try walking. Free as the air.

Try the tube. Guaranteed free of traffic wardens.

Given his past record, what will happen is precisely what he said would happen. As the article says, what he's really done is end-run the Whitehall Sir Humphreys and lo-and-behold that means things get done faster, better and more efficiently. So if you like hands on politicians and dislike Civil Service bureaucracy...

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Well, there is a simple solution if you don't like the Congestion Charge or fuel duty. Don't drive if you don't need to. You won't have to pay either for the journey then. Also, you won't get any grief from traffic wardens. Also, if you do need/want to drive, but still want to avoid wardens, the choice is simple. Don't park illegally. If you don't, and get a ticket, appeal.

And while we are at it, I'll ask the same question I asked Mick: Bearing in mind that for London to function efficiently, we need to reduce the amount of traffic (how many millions, or even billions of pounds are lost to UK companies because their staff are stuck in traffic?), how would *you* reduce the traffic in London?

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

Try not to be so patronising it doesn't suit you.

If I want to use the car - I'll use the car - if I want to walk - I'll walk. My choice just as much as the next persons.

People shouldn't have to be forced into doing something just because something else costs more money - it isn't the answer. It just enables those with the money to carry doing what they want because they can afford to. Thus creating a nation of Rich vs The Poor.


And what happened to Freedom of choice? Why should people be bullied by financial penalties to reduce such problems.

Saying 'Don't drive if you don't need to' is completely ridiculous especially from someone who doesn't drive, isn't that right Stuart. :rolleyes:

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

just dont see the attraction of driving these days, such a pain finding parking etc and motorways jammed 24/7. always prefer the train into town and very impressed with londons transport systems (yes i know it could be better and cheaper).

Re: Nice One Porsche
 

People talk about Freedom of Choice, but surely we have some responsibilities as well as rights.

If so many people are using their cars, clogging up the roads and adding to local pollution levels (as well as the lost productivity / reduced quality of life caused by sitting in traffic jams), surely if some one puts it as a manifesto item that he/she is going to try and reduce this congestion, and he/she is voted for by the majority voting, isn't that the democracy that we all want to live under.

It's not as if RK is advocating shooting all motorists - he is saying (and giving the electorate a chance to vote on it) "here's what I will do to alleviate this problem".

I travel to/through London quite a lot, and I can't understand why anyone would want to drive in/through it (in a car), as the public transport is, on the whole, miles better than most other conurbations in the UK (imho).

OK, it can sometimes be a bit smelly and crowded on the train/tube/bus, but at least you can read, which is not recommended whilst you're driving.

I don't see anyone offering any alternatives, unless they are saying that there isn't a congestion problem in Central London. It seems that people are against Congestion Charging (as they are perfectly entitled to be), but I don't see any other solutions offered.