![]() |
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
Charge: Using, causing or permitting to be used a motor vehicle on a road or other public place when there is not force a policy of insurance or security against third party risks. Road Traffic Act 1988, s. 143. Section 144 lists the exceptions 144 Exceptions from requirement of third-party insurance or security (1) Section 143 of this Act does not apply to a vehicle owned by a person who has deposited and keeps deposited with the Accountant General of the Supreme Court the sum of £15,000, at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner’s control. (2) Section 143 does not apply (a) to a vehicle owned (i) by the council of a county or county district in England and Wales, the Common Council of the City of London, the council of a London borough, the Inner London Education Authority, or a joint authority (other than a police authority) established by Part IV of the [1985 c. 51.] Local Government Act 1985, (ii) by a regional, islands or district council in Scotland, or (iii) by a joint board or committee in England or Wales, or joint committee in Scotland, which is so constituted as to include among its members representatives of any such council, at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner’s control, (b) to a vehicle owned by a police authority or the Receiver for the Metropolitan Police district, at a time when it is being driven under the owner’s control, or to a vehicle at a time when it is being driven for police purposes by or under the direction of a constable, or by a person employed by a police authority, or employed by the Receiver, or (c) to a vehicle at a time when it is being driven on a journey to or from any place undertaken for salvage purposes pursuant to Part IX of the [1894 c. 60.] Merchant Shipping Act 1894, (d) to the use of a vehicle for the purpose of its being provided in pursuance of a direction under section 166(2)(b) of the [1955 c. 18.] Army Act 1955 or under the corresponding provision of the [1955 c. 19.] Air Force Act 1955, (e) to a vehicle which is made available by the Secretary of State to any person, body or local authority in pursuance of section 23 or 26 of the [1977 c. 49.] National Health Service Act 1977 at a time when it is being used in accordance with the terms on which it is so made available, (f) to a vehicle which is made available by the Secretary of State to any local authority, education authority or voluntary organisation in Scotland in pursuance of section 15 or 16 of the [1978 c. 29.] National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978 at a time when it is being used in accordance with the terms on which it is so made available. I don't think proving you can pay is in there...... ;) |
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
|
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
|
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
|
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
They deserve everything they get.
No insurance = no car, simple. |
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
|
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
How the hell do I know?? I was passing information on that was given to me by a serving Policeman in the Nottinghmashire force regarding the Police Fire and Ambulance not having insurance. ---------- Post added at 17:25 ---------- Previous post was at 17:24 ---------- Quote:
Ermm section 1 says it all doesn't it? |
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
I reckon the chances of any of these folk having deposited anything with the Accountant General of the Supreme Court are exactly ZERO!
I don't think they should be able to get their cars back under any circumstances and any money generated from the sale of confiscated vehicles should be put into the fund for the victims of uninsured drivers. |
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
So no insurance no tax disc.Driving a vehicle without a tax disc is also an offence as it is without insurance. |
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
The other thing with uninsured cars is as well as the fine/points you get the car also gets nabbed and taken away so they have to pay removal/storage costs as well as providing insurance details before the car is released back to the owner. Quote:
|
Re: Best steer clear of Bradford then.....
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are Cable Forum