![]() |
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Time is purely a human invention due to our mortal existence and everything we perceive having a beginning and an end of course the opposite is true time as we know it is infinite both past and future as is distance its just because we are born live then die we have no way of grasping infinity. As for time travel and paradoxes we could be in one as we speak we would not know. If something was changed we would have no conscience knowledge of it. Germany may well have won WWII but someone from the future may have traveled back in time and constantly spiked Hitlers drinks with LSD for all we know
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Okay I'm not doing the fancy quote-a-dozen-people thing. In point form:
- If you're going to write a serious article about time travel and have a pic of the delorian in it, I'm sorry but your target audience is most likely at a higher level of maturity than I am. :LOL: - The comment made about wombles vs. wormholes did not help me re-read the article in a serious manner. For which I thank you. :D - I'm not entirely sure on the details of the Twins Paradox, but there's a smutty comment to be made about that in there somewhere. Ever since I read A Wrinkle In Time as a child I've hoped that time travel would one day be possible and perhaps even commonplace. But realistically? I won't see it in my lifetime. Which is a shame, because I am curious about a few things. If you want your hubby to bring home milk & eggs, does he run to the future and grab a cow and a chicken? ;) Edited to add: I don't want it to become 'Year Zero', I've only just gotten used to writing 2008.. |
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
If someone did travel back from the future, would you believe them? Especially if it's like the Terminator where only living organisms can travel - they wouldn't easily be able to prove it.
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
Sigh.......................! |
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
The mistake you are all making is assuming that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff.
So there. |
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
1. There are Atlantic air flows that can increase the air speed if you are travelling with them as opposed to against them. 2. On way you will be flying with the earths rotation (back?) and another the earth will be rotating towards you. Theoretically you could go up and stay in the same place and the earth would do all the moving. That would make for a longer flight though. |
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Quote:
|
Re: Time travellers from the future 'could be here in weeks'
Er, assuming time travel was possible, why can't you travel back further than when time travel was first invented?
If you fly to America, the plane doesn't drop out of the sky when you get to Ohio (where the Wright Brothers made the first powered flight). That sounds more like a movie plot device to me :) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum