![]() |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
You got a larger version of that :) |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
|
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
I said 'We should not offer charity to others until our own are looked after, I have a relative (not close) in her early 30's who is now wheelchair bound. The NHS will not operate until she is at least 60 years old, because the remedial work only lasts about 10 years' I think I am very clear in saying we should look after UK residents before looking after others. I have not said I think other people deserve to suffer the same, just that UK residents should be dealt with first before charity cases. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
|
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
The whole point though is that perhaps further resources would be available if they were not being used on foreign visitors. The foreign visitors who come here for major operations may be low in number, and now and again we will see a touching story in the news (perhaps on the highly regarded BBC !) where somone has been brought to this country for a life saving operation on the NHS. These cases are not common place but they are costing the UK taxpayer. The NHS is not a charity, it was set up to provide a level of healthcare for people living in the UK, further advances in medical technology has meant a better level of care but also more financial burden on the syste. The top priority of the health service should be to provide a sufficient level of care for UK residents. I am well aware of the drains put on the NHS as my girlfriend works on a long term care ward, they deal with mainly cancer patients, those who need care before able to return home, those who the council need to find accomodation for, and those who will not leave because it's a warm bed and a hot meal on offer. They do have a fairly high number of foreign people on her ward, and she does get very annoyed with some nationalities of people who expect the NHS service to provide this that and the other. earlier this year she had one patient who had signed her house over to her son and would not leave, she expected the hospital to provide her with a house. the hospital dealt with social services and the local authority toget her a house, then she complained that the house they offered was not new, it did not have the furniture she wanted etc etc etc. The hospital bent over backwards wasting lots of resources just to get her out of a bed needed by people who were much more in need. The son refused to learn how to give his mother her daily injections because he expected everything to be provided on a plate. The women was discharged from the hospital and moved into the accomodation provided, and there is now a court case because she is not happy with the level of care provided. It should of been a simple matter in this case of delivering the woman to her own house that she had conveniently signed over to her son! This is just one example, yes one of the more extreme that I hear of on a regular basis. The most annoying thing about these people who want something for nothing is the British tax payer is footing the bill. The NHS is not a charity. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
|
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
As I've said before, if my gf needed hospital treatment, we'd be screwed. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
Some people unfortunately take the pi** out of the system, she constantly tells me stories of the attitudes of families who make extreme demands and expect the NHS to provide for their every whim. On the subject of your gf getting ill over here it you may find the following interesting. One of the filipino friends of my gf came here also to work as a nurse, unfortunately after about 12 months into her contract (I think it was poss a 3yr contract but dont quote me) she fell ill and was unable to work. Under the terms of her visa covering her to work for that particular health trust, she could not receive any medical treatment and had to return home. During this period of sickness she had spent all her money and there was no chance of getting her visa renewed when it run out, it meant that her collegues had to club together to pay for her flight back home. I am just relaying that story because even working for a NHS trust doesn't guarantee health treatment, even if they are paying tax and NI. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
That's the sick situation immigrants are forced into, if they can't afford health treatment, and we're talking mostly in thousands of pounds not a few hundred, health care as you know is expensive, then you don't get it, even if it would put your life at risk, no matter how much tax and NI you've given.
"No recourse to public funds" on your visa means you're stuffed. No JSA if you find yourself out of work, no hospital care even if you're dying (especially if you're dying as they're not likely to get you to pay for it!), yet you still have to contribute. A friend of mine sold his house when he got divorced and used his share to buy his parents' house so that he could help look after his mum who suffers from bad alzheimer's. When it was decided she was to be put into care, they investigated the sale of the property thoroughly to ensure that it wasn't just signed over to get out of paying for the care (several thousand a month). Thankfully they saw that the sale was genuine and so he only has to make affordable contributions to her care, but if they had decided the sale was an attempt to get out of paying they would have sent him the bill and taken him to court if he didn't pay, which would have resulted in reposessing the house. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ukr...s/publicfunds/ Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
GP time is not health care. That's all you get free from the GP, their diagnosis skills.
If they refer you to a hospital for actual treatment such as an operation, expect to get a hefty bill, or refusal if you are unable to pay, even if you require the operation to live. My dad's in hospital with a broken shoulder after a motorbike accident, if he wasn't British, the patch up in A&E would be covered, but the physio, or the injections and pills to treat the blood clots on his lungs, and the stay in hospital would not be. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
Checkin at a US hospital and along with your name address etc you need your SSN (NI Number) and insurance details (or details that there are none). In an A&E situation they are still required to treat and stabilise you then bill you even if you have no means to pay. The NHS captures information to treat you and then if you are honest enough they will capture details to bill you, even then I have heard stories of them not bothering to do the invoicing as the cost of producing the invoice and recovering the funds vs the cost of the procedure (for lower cost procedures, say an A&E visit for with antibiotics) is uneconomic. ---------- Post added at 10:25 ---------- Previous post was at 10:21 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:27 ---------- Previous post was at 10:25 ---------- Quote:
I'll take Charlies - once you have lived here for a year approach. Is backed up with a pretty definative web link also. ---------- Post added at 10:41 ---------- Previous post was at 10:27 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
Quote:
Assuming his mother's immigration status was such that she was liable for costs that is. My personal view is if you're working here and contributing to the state, then the state should have a duty of care to you. IE you pay tax and NI, then you should get access to what those contributions are for such as JSA and healthcare. |
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Quote:
|
Re: Going Over There, Using Their Health Service
Oh to be able to go to ILR in just one year.
Faulty has to find £400 next month to extend her ancestry visa by 1 year thanks to this governmnet being money grabbing *******s and extending the time requirements before getting ILR then making it retroactive*, and then another bucket of money next year for ILR, and more the year later for British Citizenship. Think of the poor people who were 1 day away from getting ILR only to be told "sorry chaps, Gordon Brown wants another £400 from you" |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum