![]() |
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss
ntl are simply doing what the market will stand. People are allowed to take phone without TV, so the issue only occurs when you want TV only.
People in that situation have 4 main choices 1. Analogue or Freeview - Free, so cable can't compete on price 2. Top-up TV - A lot cheaper, but no where near the choice 3. Sky - Cheapest package about £20 + BT phone line rental 4. Cable - Cheapest package about £20 INCLUDING line rental. If you look at it like that, its actually quite a good deal. I can't imagine it costs ntl £10/month to have a phone line connected in your house, therefore it seems to me that some of that price is going towards the cost of the TV. Yes, they could offer say a £5 discount if you don't take the phone line, but then they would also lose phone call income. Why bother, when they already have a successful and competitive package? |
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss
Quote:
|
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss
When is a mobile phone cheaper then a landline? I have always found it shocking that people when at home choose to use a mobile over a landline.
|
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss
Quote:
When the call rate on the mobile is less than the call rate on the landline which can be the case particularly with contract phones at certain times and to certain destinations. For a very brief call which can cost less than say the same call on a NTL landline which has a connection charge plus a time related charge. Haven't you seen the Vodaphone "stop the clock" adverts where you pay for 3 minutes and get up to an hour on the call for no extra charge? |
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss
Quote:
|
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum