Cable Forum - {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed}

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Internet Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=25)

- - {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed} (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=31760)

greencreeper

12-07-2005 18:54

Re: {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed}

Or use The Bat! - similar to Outlook, only not written by MS. Feature rich and secure.

Not a fan of HTML email neither.

Stuart

12-07-2005 21:26

Re: {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed}

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingPhoenix

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C

Or use Thunderbird, which requires you to push a button to download any images in an email..

So Does Outlook 2003 ;)

But Thunderbird is free...

ntl customer

12-07-2005 23:21

Re: {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed}

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.j.fry

Bah, html mail should be outlawed :mad: :)

Why? I find that HTML email when used properly is better than plain text. :)

Easier to read on screen, easier to print and generally nicer to look at, and easier to stress points by using bold, underline etc.

KingPhoenix

13-07-2005 06:19

Re: {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed}

But its also easier to hide dodgy links, collectable information etc. into html mails too... Whilst i prefer html mails too, it does make it easier for spam etc... :(

philip.j.fry

13-07-2005 08:59

Re: {spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed}

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntl customer

Easier to read on screen,

Not for the many people who use text only readers. I do use a mail reader that can handle html (Evolution) but do often check mail on my laptop and pda as well and they aren't capable of reading it.

All times are GMT. The time now is 16:25.

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page