![]() |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
I am Wiccan of origin, and I see nothing wrong with this, in fact I see it as a positive thing, he still is a human being, just one who has done things which require his removal from society for the greater good and safety of others.
But being able to visit his fathers grave, is something I could not refuse, it would just have to be at the prisons own time. And of course under heavy supervision to make sure he didnt scarper. |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
Quote:
I believe in an eye for an eye if evidence is perfect for a conviction. And you being a Christian will except my views.;) I hate getting into an argument with you.:erm: You scare me :tu: |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
In reply to thought, of the familes who was affected by his crimes, they would be informed and assured that he would be under heavy guard.
Such a heavy guard should ensure while he has peace to visit the grave, he is under heavy guard. I could not refuse anyone the right to pay his respects, or go church, but like I stated above it would be at the prisons own time. |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
____________ Quote:
The families will no doubt say that he should be strung up/ left to rot/ whatever, but they cannot (nor should we expect them to) look at this from an impartial point of view. Regrettably, however there are also those who aren't family members who think the same way. If we want to think that we *are* "better" than Peter Sutcliffe, we need to *prove* that by, for instance, showing compassion where he didn't. PS I'm an atheist...!! :D |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
As a Christian, I respect your right to your views, but I also have the right to say if I think you're wrong. ;) Some words from Jesus: "You have heard it said, 'an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth' - but I say to you, don't resist an evil person, but if someone hits you on your right cheek, turn to him your left cheek as well." But I shall say no more on this that would turn the discussion into a religious thread. I hope I scare you in a good way ... :erm: :D |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I dont need to prove nothing! never been arrested never murdered and never raped. And never will. I don't need to show Compassion. I show compassion for the families who are far more important in my eyes than Sutclife Quote:
|
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
Quote:
If we are *better* than him we must consider *everyone* to be of equal worth, *NO MATTER* what our personal, emotional, opinions may be of what they have done. There are plenty of examples of atrocities committed in this world when one group has decided that another is "less than human" or "less worthy" etc. Do you *really* think that is a good way of dealing justice?? |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
|
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
But, and this is only a suggestion, maybe he should have visited the graves of his many victims first, and asked for some forgiveness before visiting his fathers. PS I was born into catholicism, and got out as soon as I could. I now worship the almighty dollar. |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
Quote:
Can you imagine how the Tabloids would likely play that? "Can they NEVER rest in peace?" "Ripper is freed to visit victims' graves - Families distraught" "This man should never have been let out," said one grief stricken relative. "To let him visit my sister's grave is like allowing him to desecrate it"... etc etc with much foaming at the mouth. |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Well it was only a suggestion.
The reason I made it was, letting him out to visit his fathers grave was an act of compassion by the authorities that a) they did not have to do and b) he did not deserve. I just thought the pill may be sugared a bit if it shown that in order to earn his visit he had to show similar compassion for his victims. The tabloids may have played it Quote:
|
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
<LI>30 Oct 1975: Wilma McCann, 28, Leeds
<LI>20 Jan 1976: Emily Jackson, 42, Leeds <LI>5 Feb 1977: Irene Richardson, 28, Leeds <LI>23 Apr 1977: Patricia Atkinson, 32, Bradford <LI>26 Jun 1977: Jayne MacDonald, 16, Leeds <LI>1 Oct 1977: Jean Jordan, 20, Manchester <LI>21 Jan 1978: Yvonne Pearson, 21, Bradford <LI>31 Jan 1978: Helen Rytka, 18, Huddersfield <LI>16 May 1978: Vera Millward, 40, Manchester <LI>4 Apr 1979: Josephine Whitaker, 19, Halifax <LI>2 Sep 1979: Barbara Leach, 20, Bradford <LI>20 Aug 1980: Marguerite Walls, 47, Leeds 17 Nov 1980: Jacqueline Hill, 20, Leeds The victims why should we show compasion?????? |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
At the end of the day, there is no risk to the public for a number of reason - security will be very tight, he was almost blinded by a fellow inmate a few years ago, and he is fully aware that there is very little chance of him ever being released. Producing a list of the women that he killed is somewhat pointless - everyone is aware of 'The Yorkshire Ripper' and what he did. However, why should he be denied a basic right, just because some people don't agree with it - we might not like it but, ultimately, it will make no difference. |
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Ripper visits father's ashes site
(Somebody correct me if I have the facts wrong here)
Didn't peter sutcliffe refuse to tell the police and victims families where he had buried his victims, therefor refusing them the right to grieve for their loved ones at a grave. shouldn't Peter Sutcliffe have been given the same answer? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 23:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum