![]() |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
Does it look damn pretty into the bargain? Thought not. ;) |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
|
Re: FAO Ipod people
Not really but that's something I don't need. And I can make playlists with it actually, just that I don't want to.
It's too expensive for what it is, a 40GB 2.5" HDD is about £40 now, put an external hard drive case on top of that and that's about £50 altogether for a drive you can carry around. So why the extra £100+ for a battery, LCD screen and the ability to play MP3's? |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
I don't understand how you can compare a CD player, even one that plays mp3 CDs, with a 40gb hard disk-based device. And while I'm sure you can mix playlists and put them on your CDs, I can't believe it's as effortless as doing it with a HDD machine. Plus, of course, an iPod is smaller seeing as it doesn't have to have a CD in it. Does your CD player fit in your inside pocket? |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
|
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
|
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
/dons flame retardant suit and hopes the iPod was invented first :D |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
|
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
The big problem with CD portables IMHO is that they are too big, it feels like you are carrying 12in vinyl around. iPod is to an extent style over substance, but its the same argument with buying cars of travelling business class a Mercedes or Business class seat get you to the same destination at about the same time, they just do it more stylishly. |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
|
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
My new MZ-NH1 is as sexy as it gets and has all the functions that you mentioned din your previous post :) https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2005/01/16.jpg |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
Why I oughta........ :) To be honest, the ipod is sexier than the jukebox - but GB for bucks, the jukebox is a better deal. Lack of fire wire port is a bit of a pain, but not a show stopper. the juke box is also a little bit bigger than the ipod - especially with the leather case - but not amazingly so... I know the battery issue with the ipod is not really an issue any more, but the ability just to take the front of the jukebox and replace the battery is a big plus in my opinion. |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
Finally, that 8,000 songs is stored on a unit a little bigger than a packet of cigarettes. Even at 600 songs per CD, you would still have to carry 13 discs to match the storage of the iPod. Obviously a CD player is more bulky than the iPod (especially so if you take 13 CDs with you) The advantages with your CD player are that it can play Audio CDs and because it uses standard batteries, if it should die while you are out and nowhere near a PC, you can just buy another set of batteries. With the iPod, you can't play Audio CDs and if the battery dies, you can't replace it easily.. So, as the saying goes, it's swings and roundabouts. The iPod is more expensive, but gives you more storage in a smaller package. The CD player is cheaper, but bulkier. |
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
|
Re: FAO Ipod people
Quote:
I find it nice to have the choice though. When I was using a CD player, I sometimes found I wanted to listen to a song I left at home. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum