![]() |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Also, as there is 1/2 a Billion quid excess from tax on tobacco, shouldn't the government be encouraging more smoking rather than trying to ban it in some places? Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Smoking directly causes lots of diseases. Lung cancer is the well known one. But there are others for example; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Disease, Other cancers (Throat, nose, mouth, pancreas, leukaemia etc), Circulatory problems, impotence, asthma, etc etc) People often use the "Well I could go out today and get run over by a bus, so I might as well enjoy myself smoking...." To that I reply that being run over by a bus is probably a kinder way to die than smoking. Believe me, I have seen many people die from smoking and it is painful, degrading, scary (as you can't breathe) and slow. You have to balance the pain/gain. Any ban I would support wholeheartedly |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
- so far, since then, I have been able to stop smoking. ;) |
Re: smoking and the pub
FFS, they'll be banning cars and peanuts next..... :rolleyes:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
I will be pleased to attend non-smoking pubs, theres nothing worse than getting home at 3am being drunk but still having to jump in the shower to get the terrible smell of smoke off your body and out of your hair. (I dont suppose Russ will appreciatem it) :D
I dont think smokers realise how badly the stuff smells to people who dont smoke, I never complain about smoking and accept it in the pub. I will certainly be happy to be without it though! |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
I'm all for more non-smoking pubs or smoke-free sections, as this increases that freedom of choice. Taking that choice away is part of a bigger issue of control over people - which for a government obessessed with 'liberating' other countries is somewhat hypocritical in my opinion. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Smoking per se should not be banned as that would then fulfill your point above but I wouldn't call this removing choice so much as creating a law for the good of everyone. My not smoking could not offend or harm the person next to me...but someone smoking next to me would. If the smoker enforces his right/choice to smoke then he will be removing mine, not to. If I don't smoke I will not affect him. The smoking ban would ensure that I could exercise mine. The smoker, however can go outside or pop home etc... Quote:
Maybe I shouldn't make wild guesses..... |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
[prepares for egg on face and lifts coat towards shoulder] |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum