![]() |
Re: Channel renumbering
Another option would be to do something similar to how Sky deal with this issue and renumber just small chunks of the EPG at a time, onto a coherent numbering system that matches on both Bromley and Langley, with information going out on Channel 119, Interactive, mailshot and/or Email to inform customers too.
Information could say something along the lines of "from XX of .... ntl will begin a process of restructuring your EPG numbers..." But then, would that be far too logical?:D |
Re: Channel renumbering
If NTL moved a few channels per week they could slowly reorder the line-up without causing much inconvenience. There is plenty of free space available to make it easy.
For example they could move Sky1 from 140 to 150 and put a message on channel 140 informing of the move. That way people would not need to ring up as they would be presented with a simple message such as "Sky1 is now on channel number 150" on channel 140. It might take a while to reorder all of the channels but they would not need to do a mail-shot or anything. |
Re: Channel renumbering
Quote:
|
Re: Channel renumbering
Problem with that is what happens if you want to move a channel to a space that is already occupied? And for quite a while, you'd end up with an even more confused numbering system. My opinion is that it's better to get it all over with in one hit, and send out LOTS of promo material for two months beforehand, maybe including a sticker to go on the back of the remote with the most popular channels on (Sky One, E4, etc.). Also have info on IVRs, myntlhome (Channel 119), the bills, the customer magazine, ntlworld.com, ntl.com, and a special free telephone number with recorded messages for people who can't find their required channel!
|
Re: Channel renumbering
Quote:
Langley had a reasonable structure to the line up when I first switched to digital. 101-110 expected stuff 110-130 News 200 PPV 300 - Entertainment 400 - Comedy entertainment 700 - Movies 900 - Adult However new chanels are going in the same place on both platforms so they get stuffed into the 900s as they are free on both platforms leading to the mishmash that now exists. |
Re: Channel renumbering
Sorry I dont rate renumbering as a high priority issue, and I doubt we would all agree what the ordering or logical structure should be.
It would be interesting to compare the ordering that people have made up using the change channel order option. I would much rather the resources were spent on improving the software and fixing bugs. |
Re: Channel renumbering
I don't think you're alone there, Mark - and I would guess that's why it's not been done yet. Better to have stable software and a slightly dodgy channel numbering system than buggy, crashing software and a perfectly logical numbering system.
*awaits comments about buggy software and dodgy channel numbering* ;) |
Re: Channel renumbering
Quote:
|
Re: Channel renumbering
Quote:
Its a pain in the bum to do mind, takes ages, as you've got to move 1 channel at a time... |
Re: Channel renumbering
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Channel renumbering
I know, this is totally off topic.
Quote:
|
Re: Channel renumbering
have i not saw proppin' on this forum too?
|
Re: Channel renumbering
i have organised my channels to just how i want them and on top of that i buy the daily mail on a saturday that has by far the best tv guide for the whole week with all the channel numbers . I would like more RED button features from ntl 1st
|
Re: Channel renumbering
Quote:
He did explain his decision to leave a while back, but then stayed a little longer after that. He has obviously chosen to follow through with what he said. Browneggsandham :( |
Re: Channel renumbering
bring back proppin!!
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:17. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum