![]() |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
There are probably a couple of possible reasons why the speed increases were announced at the same time by TW and NTL.
I would imagine that both companies know fairly well in advance what the other is going to do, from information gained by fair means or foul. TW having a less complex structure could gain an agvantage over NTL if they so wished. With all the talk of an imminent merger of the two companies it makes sense for them to be offering roughly the same products prior to the merger. Does it really matter who was first as long as customers get an improved service at the end of the day. What you have to realise is that NTL (and all companies) have to juggle product enhancements and pricing in order not to just remain competitive but also to maximise revenue. This can mean that sometimes pricing may not appear competitive but the higher price being charged would generate more revenue even after allowing for customers leaving because of the price than a lower price would generate with no churn. |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
|
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
|
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
After all as you have stated they clearly arent bringing it inline with ADSL which is getting cheaper and cheaper so this to me does seem like the only viable reason. |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
|
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
NTL compete with BT, AOL etc (all ADSL broadband), and as such, they were cheaper for the 1M service than their competitors. NTL dropped the price from 50 to 35, the others did not drop as low as NTL, so they can afford to up the price and still be competetive. That is not to say those of us currently on the 1M service are not understandably peeved that the price is going up, when the general trend is down, just that from a purely business viewpoint, NTL can get £3 per moth more from N customers, without losing the ability to draw in more. Yes, they may well lose customers to the 600k tier (especially when it goes to 750), but from NTLs point of view, that is not a huge problem, as this will free up some bandwidth for others.. As always - Just my 2c :angel: |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
|
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
i just think NTL is camparing their price to BTs
as BT is the main broadband supplier |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
Not only that, but there are no caps/"guidelines" in place, & no 12 month contract. :tu: http://www.cpbb.co.uk/index.htm |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
|
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
I would imagine NTL could fairly easily write a program that searches their database of customers and fairly accurately identifies what xDSL service each customer may be able to get. That would give them an indication of possible loss of customers to xDSL on each service level and the degree of competitaveness (is that a word?) required.
|
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
:D |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
Do remember that Bulldog is only 512 during the day, and 2M off peak. :angel: |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
However I think people posted on this thread are looking too much at cost. Simply because you pay less doesnt mean your anywhere near likely to get 'that' level of service. We'll take CP as an example - they're a datastream provider and as such can not provide pings less than 50 - a major downfall for competitive gamers. So I expect someone to tell me - they're not a gamer, they dont worry about pings. Ok fair point, but dont for one minute expect to get your full 2mbps download rates consistently, datastream is well known for its contention at a local level, so instead of 15,000 users contending on 1 155mbps pipe, you end up contending with 50 people on 2mbps with only 1 1mbps pipe. Same contention ratio, however the odds of you actually experiencing contention just went up 100 fold. Something everyone on any forum discussing broadband or any product should bare in mind is that you pay for what you get, bar a few companies who are extortionate for the services they provide you must find a balance between the amount of money you pay and the service levels you receive. NTL generally is quite good at that (in its areas that dont suffer from major contention on upstreams and the alike) I would just like to point out that ADSL is not the holy grail people make it out to be. Just because some of the providers are cheaper - it most certainly does not mean they're worth signing up for - not if you expect to see a decent service. ADSL is a great deal harder to understand as there are also so many variants of it: IPstream, Datastream, LLU, etc. All of which operate at different levels. Oh and at risk of offending you Neil, I do have to point out Pipex's mail servers are probably just as reliable (or not in this case) as NTL's). Sorry, but it is within the theme of my post, and the original topic :) |
Re: NTL price increase and their reasons
Quote:
ADSL broadband is more like mobile phone companies, and their various forms of tarriffs reflecting what kind of service you want, what kind of additional services you want applied to your connection, and how fast you want it to go. This can make it very confusing. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum