![]() |
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
The test transmission on astra 1 is currently using between 15 and 17Mb/s. A cable multiplex can carry approx 38Mb/s. |
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
|
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
You can't even convince some people to go digital, I think HDTV will only appeal to the technology hungy like some of us. Its more popular in the states and Japan as they used NTSC up until now and NTSC's resolution is lower than PAL's. |
Re: Future of TV?
Guys, I strongly recommend that you check out some of the clips on this link:
http://www.wmvhd.com/ If you have a widescreen monitor, set it to 1280x768 (the correct resolution for viewing them) or 1280x1024 for a usual monitor. 1024x768 is better than nothing. I wish I'd never discovered these because watching a regular DVD on my PC is just not the same - I notice the low resolution a lot more now... :cry: |
Re: Future of TV?
HDTV has been around decades - literally
I first saw it at a CES show in las vegas in around 1990 (where I also saw my first gas plasma screen btw) |
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
Do you have the TV that can view HD broadcasts too? |
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
|
Re: Future of TV?
As far as costs go there of course massive costs in TV production to go to HDTV. Not just the filiming and editing equipment either. As it produces a higher definition sets that look ok on 'normal' TV show up all sorts of 'flaws' in HDTV and thus set production etc is much more expensive as well.
|
Re: Future of TV?
The Blakes7 and DrWho sets would not stand up well to that sort of scrutiny!
|
Re: Future of TV?
Thanks for the reply guys :) Think i got it, something to do with lines yeah :D
|
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
For over-the-air free television, such as CityTV or ABC or NBC etc., you need a digital receiver box. Some HDTVs have it built in. Ours don't. If you don't have it built in, you need an external receiver which runs about 50 to 100 pounds. For cable, you need a digital receiver which most people have, but it also needs to be HDTV compliant, which most people don't have. My cable company offers a 350 pound Motorla HDTV receiver, but it also has a 80 GB DVR included. For satellite, it is pretty much the same thing. You need a HDTV receiver. As for material, well, as I said, all the major networks broadcast in digital already. For example, CityTV is a free channel. I can get the regular CityTV, or I can view CityTV HD. Same programming, but the shows that are available in HD are broadcasted in HD on the HD signal. |
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
|
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
More on the content. I have satellite television (well, my parents have it, but I bought my own HDTV receiver), and I get the following HDTV enabled channels: https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/2.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/3.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/4.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/5.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/6.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/7.gif https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/8.gif and of course, 5 regular porn channels plus one in HD: (so you don't miss the details...) https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2004/04/9.gif |
Re: Future of TV?
One more post... Compare the regular TV:
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i.../compare2a.htm With the HDTV: http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i.../compare2b.htm Amazing huh? Oh and, my folks have this TV: http://www.samsung.ca/cgi-bin/naseca...rojection+HDTV I'd love one, but I can't afford one, so I watch stuff on my computer monitor. |
Re: Future of TV?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 23:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum