![]() |
Re: community service
Quote:
|
Re: community service
Quote:
|
Re: community service
a tricky one, so are we going to consider the mentality of the teens in question ?
is someone going to suggest we do a 'softly softly' approach to 'rehabilitating' these teens ? what drove them to do such things ? psychiatric help ? teens who are 'too young' to understand because of there habitual drinking lifestyles ? personally i would throw the book at them, jail time for you lot......... |
Re: community service
Quote:
|
Re: community service
Quote:
Inhumane - lacking pity or compassion. I do feel pity for criminals, that's not pity for them because they have been caught and punished but pity for the fact that they either felt a crime was necessary or that they thought it was okay to commit a crime (that's my thoughts on what is a crime and what isn't, which isn't the same as that stated by law). It is my belief that chaining people up lacks compassion and to reiterate what I said earlier, if you treat people without compassion and more like animals, you damage the rehabilatory aspects of punishment...if you treat people like animals, they are more likely to behave like animals. |
Re: community service
Quote:
Not sure about the whole "chain gang" side of this - I cerainly agree with the notion of making the offenders do hard physical work that brings a benifit to the community that they have harmed... The old/american (we don't have them, per se, in the uk) idea of chaining a load of convicts together and making them break rocks for no other reason than they are told to is, to my mind, barbaric, inhumane, demeaning and pointless... Criminals do not learn respect for their fellow man by being treated in this way, what they learn is that they had better not get caught next time. Taking a group of teenagers who got drunk and started their own mini-riot and forcing them to make ammends by doing unpaid work within the community is, IMO, the best way to deal with them. Putting them in jail may make them decide never to do such a thing again, but it may just make them think - ah well, if thats all I get - then I'll carry on.. Or worse they could end up learning more about criminal life and start moving forward in the criminal scheme of things. Forcing them to do the types of task they are likely to get as part of their community service (tend to include canal cleaning and other physically hard and messy jobs) will hopefully make them consider those around them, whilst avaiding a custodial sentance will leave them at the mercy of their parents and other family figures who are likely to be key in helping them to choose the correct path for the remainder of their lives. Just my 2c ;-) |
Re: community service
I see nothing wrong with it. Its not hurting them and it prevents them from running away or escaping.
|
Re: community service
Quote:
So *why* are they going to "run away or escape" (isn't that a tautology?!). Where are they going to go? Are they going to spend their life on the run? Is there really any *NEED* to chain them up? They could quite easily be "tagged" with GPS transponders if you wanted to know where they were. There's no need to chain them like animals. |
Re: community service
All you voiced is your opinion that it isn't necessary. Perhaps. You made no argument against it though.
|
Re: community service
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In the case of hardened criminals, then maybe more would be required, as they would probably see an advantage to a life on the run, as opposed to a life in a prison cell. However we are discussing teenagers here - not hardened criminals.... |
Re: community service
Quote:
Look: Years ago we used to have criminals secured with a ball and chain around their ankle. We long ago decided that it wasn't necessary. What this seems to propose is a return to that sort of thing without a good reason. Now if there *isn't* a good reason for doing something *why* do it? |
Re: community service
We still use it over here...
And I already mentioned the good reason. It prevents them from running away. |
Re: community service
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: community service
Quote:
We have got rid of the death penalty, chain gangs and the like - other countries have not.. That is their right, as it is our right to disagree..... In this case - the people involved will be returning to their own homes at the end of their work - they will be able to live relatively normal lives (apart from doing the community service, and getting serious grief from their parents :naughty: ) - there is no incentive for them to run away.. In fact, after 1 session when they were chained up, I feel fairly certain that they would be less than willing to return for the next session (and would therefore end up with a custodial sentance) as they would (IMO rightly) feel that prison is less demeaning than the other option they were given.. :( I am not going to get into a discussion about the rights and wrongs of various countries penal codes and systems. This thread is about the use of community service as a form of punishment - not whether other countries have better/worse methods.. :angel: |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum