![]() |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
I'm not sure it was wise for the BBC to pay Fearon although there is a logic to it in the context of providing a rounded picture to ensure a rounded debate. I'm certain though that picking up one tiny element of BBC programme decision making does not constitute a solid argument against the licence fee.
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
BBC 1 - A Question of sport (yawn), Top of the Pops (double yawn), Eastenders (more yawnage), My Hero (*GAG*), Comic Relief does Fame Academy (Sorry if it sounds heartless, it may well be for charity but it's still fame academy and it's still tediously boring), then the news (which I can watch on any news channel) then MORE bloody Fame Academy. BBC 2 - Bill Oddies "How To Watch Wildlife" (wow .. I'm bristling with anticipation over this one :rolleyes: ), Gardeners World, Timewatch, Dear Television, Grumpy old women then newsnight. This is the sort of utter crap I fund with my license fee? It's a disgrace! |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
They also do many programs that teach people, such as the current push to teach people about china. Also the school programs they do. Then too mention all the documentrys they do and all the projects they fund too find talennt and help people. How many other people have an action line oopen after programs to help people deal with the issues raised? Watch a eposide of eastenders which has a tragic story and at the end they show a number peoople can ring if affected. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
I have to admit that I don't watch an awful lot of television, but, when I do, it tends to be the BBC channels (mainly 1 and 2), Channel 4 and (increasingly) Channel 5. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Don't take this the wrong way Damien, but at 18, you really haven't got a clue. Last month, I paid over £1k in tax an NI. To go towards stupid bloody child trust funds, and free housing for pikeys who can't be arsed to work amongst other. I strongly believe I should have a right to decide whether more of my hard earned wages goes towards a broadcasts of a Corporation that I have no interest in, just because I choose to own a tv :mad:. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Frankly, yes. A grand a month I think is plenty to involuntarily contribute. I work my arse of at two jobs, have never been unemployed or claimed benefit, yet I get jack ***** out of the state. I'm ******ed off with funding other peoples wants and needs. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
And as someone said in another thread words to the effect that: "If you don't like it, why don't you leave the country" |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Quote:
So, from the horse's mouth. If you don't receive TV broadcasts, you don't need a licence and you don't need to tell TV licencing anything. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Some on you should really see the type of programming countrys in europe show. Anything NEAR the quality of the BBC is no where to be seen. In france there main channels all jostle for ratings by showning the lowest programs.
Any comedy programs are focused on the worst type of cheap comedy. Current affiers comedy is reducing to people wearning masks of famous people and putting on funny voices (really! and this program is very popular). The news is VERY anti-american, they always refer to the iraqi war as 'ilegal' and so on. They also show a lot of items about englush yobbishness. They present some storys as the sun would here. Over there it is a FACT that the war was for oil and that blair did it to suck up to america. This isnt presented as a opinion. its news. While they dont focus that in the last election they had a choice between a nazi and a crook. Drama over there is about the same as a soap here. Eastenders would be seen as a very good drama there (and eastenders is awful!). ALso forget about doucmentrys getting anywhere near the big channels (unless its a negative story about briten and america or a postive story aboout france!). Horzion, newnight? No chance, they just do not have that sort of programming. Its too heavy and requires too much attentsion for them. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Edit: Oh and my partner works with disadvantaged youth. Try getting by on what they do. Now that is a tough life. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
A lot of countrys still have a licence fee but dont have channels like the BBC!
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
I was talking about french tv. American TV does come up with some good dramas. Although (unlike the bbc) they are spread across many channels.
I challenge you to find one company that has producing as much good tv as the bbc |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Hardly fair to compare the output of multiple companies to one. Bear in mind that due to the amount of TV the Americans produce, they are bound to produce at least some good shows. Hollywood does produce tens of thousands of hours of TV a week. Bear in mind that generally, we only see the better ones. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
All this could be Irrelevant soon any way.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/03/pc_tax/ |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
I think your being a bit harsh
Quote:
I don't think she thinks herself more important, just ****ed off Quote:
Quote:
And it's not just this single point that is the argument against the Licence fee, this is just one of many. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
I'm no apologist for Fearon but he was paid because he was the only other person present when a 16 year old boy was shot in the back (not a typical self defence strategy hene Tony Martin's conviction). Without his input rounded coverage of the event would not be possible because Fearon's voice had not previously been heard. Martin's version of events, on the other hand, have been widely publicised and one newspaper paid him a six figure sum for his story. The answers aren't easy and as I said I'm not sure it was wise to pay Fearon, precisely because of the media furore that has transpired. Not to have paid him though, would have meant the rug would have been pulled from under the reasoning behind the programme in the first place, so it would have had to have been pulled. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Martin had been robbed umpteen times, he'd had enough. These two toe rags decide to try and rob him, he's waiting for them and disturbs them. They run away and he shoots one of them. We all know what happened after that. Whether you think him right or wrong. But you can see what angle the PCBBC are going to be playing this one before they've made it. You can see who the poor victims are going to be. :( |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
as long as im not left with another itv1 im happy i couldnt handle more rubbish appealing to LCD
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Bit off topic but I'm a little annoyed. I've been red repped because of my opinions regarding the Tony Martin programme on the grounds that "I'd change my mind if I was robbed at 2 a.m" For the record I've had three cars stolen (only one recovered) and been burgled 3-4 times (one time disturbing the the buggers) assautled on the street and assaulted in my mate's home by strangers who knocked on the door. So my opinion is grounded in a fairly active reality of the impact of criminal behaviour.
(I should point out that not all these things happened in Bury; wouldn't want to upset the tourist people!). Rant over. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
We all now know the facts of the Martin case. I cannot condone what he did, but I can sympathise. Fearon and his accomplice went into that house knowing it was not their property and to steal from it. They had a choice from the outset. Martin who had been broken into many times also had a choice. Make no mistake, Martin deserved to be charged and convicted for what he did, but also make no mistake Fearon and his accomplice had it coming. So if it is portrayed like that I'll have no complaints. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum