Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36180399)

That’s my first bet up for £35 now if she can win in November that’d be another £100 (£20 at 4/1 shortly after the debate fiasco, sadly didn’t add to it when she went back out).

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36180397)

“Selected”. It’s like saying no one objected to Charles being named king.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36180400)

Have you got an accumulator going?

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36180399)

That’s my first bet up for £35 now if she can win in November that’d be another £100 (£20 at 4/1 shortly after the debate fiasco, sadly didn’t add to it when she went back out).

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36180400)

Have you got an accumulator going?

---------- Post added at 22:35 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ----------



Having recently been to see Hamilton, I’m confident that very few Americans on either side would agree with you.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36180446)

As Trump feels under pressure, the more he goes off script and gifts Harris voters. She's looking like the challenger to the previous two presidencies of white old men and Trump an incumbent.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36180447)

He's running away from any more debates... Wonder why?

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36180481)

It's odd how effective the 'weird' tag has been for them. Considering all the allegations you can direct at the Republican ticket this one has stuck the most. They can't seem to deal with it without it looking weirder either.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36180486)

I think the weird tag also works because it plays on Trump's undoubted insecurity and also the insecurities of his supporters.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36180779)

I'll be honest that took me 4 attempts to make it all the way through.

The answer is no chance, in case you too forgot he actually starts asking a question.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36180778)

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1722979539

[img]Download_Failed_Error_2[/img]

Seems a bit weird…

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36180789)

Perfectly lucid, my translation services are always available.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36180789)

Perfectly lucid, my translation services are always available.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36180827)

You look at the energy the Democrats now have and wonder why it took them so long to make this change.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36180825)

For someone who claims not to care that much, you don’t half love simping for the Donald.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36180826)

To be generous, I think he either thought they’d stick with Biden or they’d tear themselves apart picking a new nominee. Harris didn’t poll well before the unifying effort which was expertly done.

I agree there was no contingency plan for a unifying candidate that got a decent bump.

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36180799)

I see the weird comment went straight over your head.

You do need to try and keep up, spending less time trying to be clever would probably help.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36180921)

Harris is now slight favourite on Skybet. 5/6, with Trump being 10/11.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36180921)

Harris is now slight favourite on Skybet. 5/6, with Trump being 10/11.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36180976)

Those odds go to show why bookies always win ;)

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181185)

Whether any of that is true or not.

1. Who would keep flight records of a helicopter trip from 25 yrs ago?

2. At least the article is very specific about who is white and who is black.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181185)

Whether any of that is true or not.

1. Who would keep flight records of a helicopter trip from 25 yrs ago?

2. At least the article is very specific about who is white and who is black.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181185)

Whether any of that is true or not.

1. Who would keep flight records of a helicopter trip from 25 yrs ago?

2. At least the article is very specific about who is white and who is black.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181193)

He probably has got it wrong, not exactly watergate though is it?

And the Washington Post, not really playing down the middle are they?

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181185)

Whether any of that is true or not.

1. Who would keep flight records of a helicopter trip from 25 yrs ago?

2. At least the article is very specific about who is white and who is black.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181185)

Whether any of that is true or not.

1. Who would keep flight records of a helicopter trip from 25 yrs ago?

2. At least the article is very specific about who is white and who is black.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36181201)

The NTSB might - an incident involving an aircraft in which the occupants’ safety might be at risk must be reported as a matter of law. You would imagine the pilot would keep their own record to prove an incident report was filed as it’s a legal requirement.

Seriously, stop simping for the Donald. It’s weird.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181194)

Not sure what’s not "playing down the middle" by reporting the fact that Trump told that number of lies, which is relevant to the point that this story is another lie…

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36181201)

Seriously, stop simping for the Donald. It’s weird.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181203)

What is weird is everyone with TDS gobbling up everything with eager abandon that is spoon fed to them.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181210)

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181213)

That’s an opinion, you can’t “fact check” an opinion……you can disagree with it.


Still part of the same sentence of the opinion, which they fail to really refute anyway


Still part of the initial sentence, they cite Afghanistan, but fail to mention China, which I would argue Trump is really referring to.



“Could” opinion again. Ok it didn’t takes decades to recover, but it took a decade.



Opinion, not a lie.

I could go on and on, that article and the so called “fact checking” is absolutely laughable as to be comedic

It’s full of this:



Wow …lock him up.




So he’s not wrong here, just insulting.

A wager, Hugh saw a great headline, but then never actually read the supposed lies and untruths being reported, if you had, I doubt you would posted it.

And again as for me simping for Trump, Again. I’m just not swallowing wholesale a lot of the crap that is being fed out……….unlike some, by the looks of it.

---------- Post added at 15:24 ---------- Previous post was at 15:09 ----------

Some more belters from that lying sum’ma,bitch.







It’s been widely reported that Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, went to see Biden and gave him that ultimatum.



And? Is that a fact check?



?..



Well they haven’t defined the metric of extremely, so not a fact check


Anyway.


Not a fact check by any definition.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36181224)

Weird. He is most definitely not OK. At this point it’s not even odd to wonder if he’s going to make it to November as the GOP candidate.

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36181219)

So you managed to find a problem with 17 of 162?

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181222)

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36181224)

Weird. He is most definitely not OK. At this point it’s not even odd to wonder if he’s going to make it to November as the GOP candidate.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181229)

It’s been doing the rounds on X that the photo of AF2 and crowd is fake/AI, and the conspiracy theorists have all piled in on it.

But there’s no evidence it is fake and a video posted debunks the claim.

Trump would do well to hold fire commenting on such things.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181229)

And there you lose me and any credibility you think you have or had.

He mistakenly says NBC instead of ABC, in regards to the next debate and you’re calling that a “lie”…………….pretty pathetic.

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36181246)

You're already lost, you're in Don Old's cult…………that's what he's been saying on lie social

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181247)

I’m not on Truth Social, only Trumphiles are……………….

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181210)

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36181292)

Trump did an interview with Elon Musk yesterday. Most of it was the same kinda stuff but he said there is another country with an Iron Dome that no one knows about......

Did he reveal something or was he lying?

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36181292)

Trump did an interview with Elon Musk yesterday. Most of it was the same kinda stuff but he said there is another country with an Iron Dome that no one knows about......

Did he reveal something or was he lying?

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36181292)

Trump did an interview with Elon Musk yesterday. Most of it was the same kinda stuff but he said there is another country with an Iron Dome that no one knows about......

Did he reveal something or was he lying?

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181298)

No, sorry, for those trying to push that particular narrative will have try something else.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36181300)

Biden can be quite lucid when in front of a teleprompter too.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181298)

Someone tried to shut it down, they suffered DDOS attack, according to Musk. Delayed the interview by 30 mins and eventually went out audio only.

I listened to about an hour of it.

There was nothing amazing about it, but in conversation, I couldn’t hear any signs of his alleged cognitive decline. No pauses, no stutters, no loss of direction or train of thought. Musk did well do get a few words in here and there.

No, sorry, for those trying to push that particular narrative will have try something else.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36181300)

Biden can be quite lucid when in front of a teleprompter too.

Funny there was no video, I find it impossible to believe that this Billionaire tech genius couldn't have got the video to work if he'd really wanted it to. ;)

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36181302)

Did you fact check it?

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181298)

I listened to about an hour of it.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181301)

I don’t much about DDOS attacks, but they’re designed to overwhelm a site.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36181321)

Wonder if Elon is on a promise (of something/many things). Seem like Don might be a President he can easily manipulate for his own profit.

Apparently Donny has developed a new lisp. Minor stroke, or his teeth are falling out? Some dentist is going to cop it big time...

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36181326)

How sad. :erm:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181335)

When they tell you who they are, believe them…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1723572285

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1723572285

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181337)

Who’s he telling you he is?

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181333)

Well if I am going to comment on the topic, I might as well be informed. Besides I had nothing better to do.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36181338)

Panicked and racist come to.mind.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36181458)

He’s got form for that kind of thing with John McCain has he not?

Listening to a podcast yesterday (openly Democrat supporting) one suggested to guard against complacency that although Biden 2020 won the popular vote by 7 million votes and was outside the margin of error (sometimes comfortably) the Electoral College came down to 40,000 votes in just three states. Harris is polling closer to that than Biden was in 2024.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36181460)

Only the Yanks could turn their electoral process into a spectator sport.

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36181460)

Only the Yanks could turn their electoral process into a spectator sport.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36181462)

I did think that’s a lot of words for “dunno, it’s a toss up this far out”.

Not that it stops us all spectating. :)

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181457)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ose-rcna166855



The Congressional Medal of Honor is the US equivalent of the Victoria Cross.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181466)

But before this, it was forecast as an almost certainty for Trump…

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181459)

On that point…

https://wapo.st/3WLWLyA

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181468)

It’s a joke, in poor taste, but funny none the less

Indeed much like the VC most recipients are killed in action.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181471)

Ah, the old "BuT iT wAs A jOkE!!!!" line...

Turning the barrel over to scrape for excuses now...

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181490)

Surely you mean "for those who have severe TDS*, and can easily translate Trump-speak to English" it’s obviously** a joke"

* will defend Trump no matter what he says or does

**was meant at face value, in line with his previous "suckers and losers" and "what’s in it for them" comments, but once the negative feedback occurred, the old "it was a joke" excuse came out…

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181501)

He didn’t say receiving it was better, he said it was better….



But you carry on Trumpsplaining…

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181492)

Or he was making a joke that receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom, is a lot better than receiving the Congressional Medal of Honor, because if you’re receiving the Congressional Medal of Honor….you’re most likely dead, or severely injured.

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36181501)

He didn’t say receiving it was better, he said it was better….
But you carry on Trumpsplaining…

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36181508)

Still works, still funny.