Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   The Chronicles of Rishi (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711430)

Chris 26-10-2022 11:59

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
For the sake of a balanced discussion … he has a mandate from the one place he actually needs one. From the King, acting on advice, that he’s the one most likely to enjoy the confidence etc etc etc.

At the risk of taking this off on a tangent, I’m curious to hear other posters’ ideas for how this system should be reformed. Because it seems to me that simply holding another general election doesn’t actually address the claimed problem (we don’t elect a prime minister and it’s clear from detailed polling and regional variations in people’s reasons for voting for various candidates that most people understand that’s not what they’re doing).

ianch99 26-10-2022 12:04

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138506)
Absolute Tosh.

What has she said that is anti-trans?
Presuming you actually know what the word fascist means, which I doubt. Explain to me how she is a fascist and what freedoms she is removing?
I can't think of anything, what damage do you think she can do?

Well someone has to.

Typical baseless rant, this isn't twitter you know.

Calm down dear, just because the truth is uncomfortable, it does not mean it is wrong.

Regarding the new (again) Home Secretary, here is her recent signature piece that would not be out of place in Putins's Russia or North Korea:

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/pub...-anti-protest/

Quote:

Suella Braverman is quietly handing herself new powers to clamp down on the government’s political opponents, civil right advocates have warned.

The home secretary pushed through a last-minute amendment to a widely criticised anti-protest bill on Tuesday that would allow her to apply for injunctions against anyone she deems ‘likely’ to carry out protests that could cause ‘serious disruption’ to ‘key national infrastructure’, prevent access to ‘essential’ goods or services, or have a ‘serious adverse effect on public safety’. The proposal would also give police the power to arrest anyone they suspect to be breaching such an injunction.

Police would be given powers to stop and search people or vehicles even if they have no “reasonable grounds” to do so, if a senior officer believes protest offences are likely to take place in an area. Currently, authorities are only supposedly allowed to carry out so-called “suspicionless” stop and search when there is an imminent threat of serious violence.
So true:

Quote:

The road to fascism is lined with people telling you to stop overreacting
The fact that Sunak has re-appointed her means he is complicit in this (continuing) lurch to the right.

Chris 26-10-2022 12:13

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
All of those grounds are things a judge would have to review before deciding whether to grant an injunction. The bill empowers the Home Secretary to ask, not to act.

Presumably there’s some addendum to Godwin’s Law aimed at people who have totally devalued the word ‘fascism’ by using it against anyone minded to believe the police should have the power to ensure public safety rather than simply carrying a bottle of Loctite De-Bonder on their belt loops.

jfman 26-10-2022 12:29

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138521)
For the sake of a balanced discussion … he has a mandate from the one place he actually needs one. From the King, acting on advice, that he’s the one most likely to enjoy the confidence etc etc etc.

Which, ironically, is what makes it so flimsy.

Quote:

At the risk of taking this off on a tangent, I’m curious to hear other posters’ ideas for how this system should be reformed. Because it seems to me that simply holding another general election doesn’t actually address the claimed problem (we don’t elect a prime minister and it’s clear from detailed polling and regional variations in people’s reasons for voting for various candidates that most people understand that’s not what they’re doing).
Even if we accept there is no better system (which I doubt, but that’s an aside) it doesn’t change the challenges he faces sitting behind him in the chamber due to the circumstances of his appointment, rather than election. His party membership voted for someone else a mere seven weeks ago.

Just as well he’s not leading a left wing socialist Government in South America or an oil rich one in the Middle East. It’d be grounds for US intervention.

Mick 26-10-2022 13:07

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
I’m no Sunak fan, I still think a GE should have happened. But we are, where we are. I do think in PMQs he gave Starmer a pasting, Starmer tried to attack him on the Nom-dom issue, but Sunak just threw it back regarding Starmer being the guy propping up Putin apologist, Jeremy Corbyn.

Pierre 26-10-2022 13:10

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138522)
Calm down dear, just because the truth is uncomfortable, it does not mean it is wrong.

Regarding the new (again) Home Secretary, here is her recent signature piece that would not be out of place in Putins's Russia or North Korea:

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/pub...-anti-protest/



So true:



The fact that Sunak has re-appointed her means he is complicit in this (continuing) lurch to the right.

I'm happy to debate this in another thread, but we've been told to stick to the PM

Mick 26-10-2022 13:17

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138527)
I'm happy to debate this in another thread, but we've been told to stick to the PM

Discussing his cabinet picks is fine, so long as it’s not going on and on about another one specific issue, with one of his picks.

Damien 26-10-2022 13:42

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138521)
At the risk of taking this off on a tangent, I’m curious to hear other posters’ ideas for how this system should be reformed. Because it seems to me that simply holding another general election doesn’t actually address the claimed problem (we don’t elect a prime minister and it’s clear from detailed polling and regional variations in people’s reasons for voting for various candidates that most people understand that’s not what they’re doing).

I don't think the system should be reformed. It needs to be clear that we don't elect PMs. There should just be an understanding from the Government not to push their luck and assume they've been appointed to do whatever they want when they want.

The issue with Truss was she tried to bulldoze through a completely different agenda claiming she had a mandate for this because Tory Members elected her for it. That blew up so they change PM again and this time with a different agenda. He has paid lip service to following the mandate from 2019 but let's see what actually comes out.

We need to allow governing parties to change leaders - especially when it becomes clear the leader is a buffoon - but if these changes precipitate a big shift in ideology and policy then they should seek a mandate from the entire country rather than this self-absorbed melodrama we've seen from them this summer. A lot of this chaos has happened because the Tories wanted to have an internal debate on who they should be as a party.

We elect parties on a general idea of who they are. We don't hand them the keys for 5 years to use the country as a test subject which they can use to experiment with their internal competing ideas.

1andrew1 26-10-2022 13:58

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Rishi Sunak brings back fracking ban lifted by Truss.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2210893.html

Damien 26-10-2022 13:59

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
We might also see triple-locked pensions not triple-locked again: https://twitter.com/JasonGroves1/sta...50247009189889

Quote:

Sunak policy agenda getting clearer after #PMQs:
* Fracking ban brought back
* Commitment to cut immigration
* Energy bill help to continue until the spring
* Supply side reforms ditched
* Pension triple lock and previous tax pledges in doubt

Pierre 26-10-2022 14:04

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138531)
Rishi Sunak brings back fracking ban lifted by Truss.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2210893.html

Doing as he's told by Agent Schwab.

jfman 26-10-2022 14:05

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36138530)
I don't think the system should be reformed. It needs to be clear that we don't elect PMs. There should just be an understanding from the Government not to push their luck and assume they've been appointed to do whatever they want when they want.

The issue with Truss was she tried to bulldoze through a completely different agenda claiming she had a mandate for this because Tory Members elected her for it. That blew up so they change PM again and this time with a different agenda. He has paid lip service to following the mandate from 2019 but let's see what actually comes out.

We need to allow governing parties to change leaders - especially when it becomes clear the leader is a buffoon - but if these changes precipitate a big shift in ideology and policy then they should seek a mandate from the entire country rather than this self-absorbed melodrama we've seen from them this summer. A lot of this chaos has happened because the Tories wanted to have an internal debate on who they should be as a party.

We elect parties on a general idea of who they are. We don't hand them the keys for 5 years to use the country as a test subject which they can use to experiment with their internal competing ideas.

Indeed, it’s completely disingenuous to portray the passing of the torch from Johnson resigning in disgrace, then Truss being unable to govern and Sunak taking up the mantle being the ordinary set of circumstances as envisaged in a completely unwritten constitution.

Damien 26-10-2022 14:10

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
I think there is also a question of how much can a country change before it's better to just go back to the public and say that you need a new mandate.

It'll be disingenuous to hold the Tories to everything in the 2019 manfesto after COVID, after Ukraine and with high inflation across the world. That's why I think parties should govern to a theme/idea rather than explicitly the words as written in a prior time.

However, if the change is so fundamental that it requires a fundamental shift in governing approach then wouldn't it be healthier to seek a new mandate?

Chris 26-10-2022 14:13

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138524)
Which, ironically, is what makes it so flimsy.

Hardly.

Our constitution is decorated by pageantry and crown authority but the reality is the King can’t do this without advice, and the advice is always that the leader of the largest party in the Commons is the choice for PM.

The largest party in the Commons is put there by the electorate which understands it is voting for a batch of local MPs who will support one of a range of published manifestos for a period of up to 5 years. And the electorate also understands that manifesto commitments do not override prevailing political or economic conditions, and also that the next opportunity to judge the party of government against its manifesto is the next election.

I know some people want to constantly paint this place like some sort of banana republic but the mess of the past few weeks ultimately shows that we are anything but. Truss and her fellow travellers tried to tear up the rules and conventions by force of will and they failed. The worst political instability in decades has simply demonstrated just how stable a system we fundamentally have.

If Sunak can stabilise the ship in the coming weeks, then he should have the two-and-a-bit years left to led the party elected to government, to try to implement its manifesto. And then we will get a vote on whether to allow them to continue. Meanwhile nobody is going to park tanks on College Green, take over the BBC or start yelling viva la revolución from the palace balcony.

If there’s one lesson to be learned here it’s that the constitutional position of the PM must be respected, and that means changing the leader mid-term must only be a job for those whose confidence the incomer requires, namely the Commons. Polling the wider party membership risks electing a Liz Truss and also gives succour to those who want to make ill-informed demands for a nationwide say in the process.

Quote:

Just as well he’s not leading a left wing socialist Government in South America or an oil rich one in the Middle East. It’d be grounds for US intervention.
The USA can’t even agree whether to intervene to put down its own tin-pot revolutionaries right now … I think we’re safe enough.

1andrew1 26-10-2022 14:18

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138533)
Doing as he's told by Agent Schwab.

More like adhering to the manifesto the Conservative government were elected on in 2019.

jfman 26-10-2022 14:23

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138537)
Hardly.

Our constitution is decorated by pageantry and crown authority but the reality is the King can’t do this without advice, and the advice is always that the leader of the largest party in the Commons is the choice for PM.

Snipped as I know how the system works.

Regardless of how many words you choose to describe it it’s neither a mandate from the party membership (who indeed chose someone else when he was on the ballot) nor from the electorate itself.

If anything the Truss debacle undermines our democratic credentials rather than reinforces it. By your measure she had a mandate to deliver until she didn’t. Removing the right of a party membership to elect it’s leader is profoundly undemocratic. In turn when it picks a PM it evokes more images of Putin’s Russia than home of the self-styled mother of all Parliaments.

Ramrod 26-10-2022 14:31

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138533)
Doing as he's told by Agent Schwab.

Indeed :tu:

Pierre 26-10-2022 14:34

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138538)
More like adhering to the manifesto the Conservative government were elected on in 2019.

I'll quote another member of this forum in response to that.

Quote:

It'll be disingenuous to hold the Tories to everything in the 2019 manfesto after COVID, after Ukraine and with high inflation across the world
We're in an energy crisis, there nothing wrong with pivoting on Shale Gas.

TheDaddy 26-10-2022 14:43

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138484)
The unsuccessful Rwanda plan and the inability post Brexit to return asylum seekers to France do not make her programme popular. Like Truss, her actions speak louder than her words.

I thought Sunak had appointed her to try and unify the Party and not for her track record. I'm now hearing that it was likely a reward for her crucial endorsement.

Unsuccessful Rwanda plan is one way of putting it, we gave them.20 million extra on top of the agreed 120 million a few days back, for what? It's barely been mentioned how much has been wasted on this pointless exercise

Ramrod 26-10-2022 14:47

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Until the Tories bring in a properly Conservative prime minister, I'm not voting for them again.

1andrew1 26-10-2022 14:56

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138541)
I'll quote another member of this forum in response to that.

We're in an energy crisis, there nothing wrong with pivoting on Shale Gas.

I think Sunak understands the logic:
- The UK's too populated for fracking so some towns and villages would be negatively impacted.
- Any gas would be sold to the highest bidder globally and there would not be enough to impact global prices.
- It would take several years for gas to be extracted so would come on stream when the immediate crisis is over.

jfman 26-10-2022 14:57

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138533)
Doing as he's told by Agent Schwab.

While I don’t necessarily buy into the view that personalises much of this against Schwab - he’s just a front man - Sunak is certainly constrained by prevailing economic orthodoxy.

papa smurf 26-10-2022 15:00

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 36138546)
Until the Tories bring in a properly Conservative prime minister, I'm not voting for them again.

Now that i'm a pensioner no triple lock means i vote for someone else

Pierre 26-10-2022 15:00

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138548)
I think Sunak understands the logic:
- The UK's too populated for fracking so some towns and villages would be negatively impacted.

Have you seen a fracking site? they are very compact. Have you ever flown over the UK in a plane? it's very unpopulated. That's just weasel words to not do it.

Quote:

- Any gas would be sold to the highest bidder globally and there would not be enough to impact global prices.
And he has the power to change that.

Quote:

- It would take several years for gas to be extracted so would come on stream when the immediate crisis is over.
That mentality is what has got us into this very situation. How about making sure the UK is energy independent for the next crisis?

1andrew1 26-10-2022 15:10

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
I don't want to go too much off-topic on this but to respond to your points.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138551)
Have you seen a fracking site? they are very compact. Have you ever flown over the UK in a plane? it's very unpopulated. That's just weasel words to not do it.

That's not been the experience to date in this country. Fracking favours large, less populated countries like the US.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138551)
And he has the power to change that.

I think he will see himself as a Conservative and not a market interventionist lefty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138551)
That mentality is what has got us into this very situation. How about making sure the UK is energy independent for the next crisis?

It's called reality, but we need energy sovereignty by not trying the same thing again and again that doesn't work.

ianch99 26-10-2022 15:21

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138523)
All of those grounds are things a judge would have to review before deciding whether to grant an injunction. The bill empowers the Home Secretary to ask, not to act.

Presumably there’s some addendum to Godwin’s Law aimed at people who have totally devalued the word ‘fascism’ by using it against anyone minded to believe the police should have the power to ensure public safety rather than simply carrying a bottle of Loctite De-Bonder on their belt loops.

Glad you are content with the continuing erosion of our civil liberties. The "ability of the police to have the power to ensure public safety" is a continuum of positions. You seem to be happy to move this position to the right of where we have historically been in this country.

Chris 26-10-2022 15:37

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138554)
Glad you are content with the continuing erosion of our civil liberties. The "ability of the police to have the power to ensure public safety" is a continuum of positions. You seem to be happy to move this position to the right of where we have historically been in this country.

I’m not sure which civil liberties you’re lamenting here? Perhaps you could be more specific. What is it you personally are worried you will no longer be able to do should this become law?

Ramrod 26-10-2022 16:16

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138549)
While I don’t necessarily buy into the view that personalises much of this against Schwab - he’s just a front man

Schwab is on video boasting how he has planted WEF people into most Western governments.

ianch99 26-10-2022 16:26

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138555)
I’m not sure which civil liberties you’re lamenting here? Perhaps you could be more specific. What is it you personally are worried you will no longer be able to do should this become law?

I was quite specific in my post above. Anyway, here's a brief video of the Liberty director explaining the threat to MPs: https://twitter.com/i/status/1535271620738269186

---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138539)
Snipped as I know how the system works.

Regardless of how many words you choose to describe it it’s neither a mandate from the party membership (who indeed chose someone else when he was on the ballot) nor from the electorate itself.

If anything the Truss debacle undermines our democratic credentials rather than reinforces it. By your measure she had a mandate to deliver until she didn’t. Removing the right of a party membership to elect it’s leader is profoundly undemocratic. In turn when it picks a PM it evokes more images of Putin’s Russia than home of the self-styled mother of all Parliaments.

What is interesting is that, following Chris's logic on "we elect a Party, not a PM", if the markets had not been so spooked as they were, Liz Truss's jihadi libertarian crusade could have been allowed to play out for long enough to seriously damage the structural integrity of the economy. Under the rules, she was still a Tory PM and so allowed to depart from the 2019 manifesto and trash the place. Proof that the rules need changing. IMO, we no longer vote for a Party as much we vote for a specific person leading that party. Look at the Thatcher, Blair and Johnson elections ...

I think that if a PM is changed, we should mandate a GE.

Chris 26-10-2022 16:34

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138559)
I was quite specific in my post above. Anyway, here's a brief video of the Liberty director explaining the threat to MPs:

... in which she is not specific at all, but is concerned about a 'paradigm shift' in what is considered criminal behaviour. Likewise, you were earlier not specific at all (unless you're referring to a post earlier than the one I previously replied to?)

Spurrier's submission is hardly bringing anything novel to the discussion in any case. New acts of parliament often bring activities that previously were not criminal into the purview of criminal law. That's sort of the whole point. People find new and inventive ways of imposing themselves on others; eventually the put-upon majority decides enough is enough and begins to demand action. Sooner or later, politicians hear the clamour, realise it's a popular issue, and act on it.

jfman 26-10-2022 16:58

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138562)
... in which she is not specific at all, but is concerned about a 'paradigm shift' in what is considered criminal behaviour. Likewise, you were earlier not specific at all (unless you're referring to a post earlier than the one I previously replied to?)

Spurrier's submission is hardly bringing anything novel to the discussion in any case. New acts of parliament often bring activities that previously were not criminal into the purview of criminal law. That's sort of the whole point. People find new and inventive ways of imposing themselves on others; eventually the put-upon majority decides enough is enough and begins to demand action. Sooner or later, politicians hear the clamour, realise it's a popular issue, and act on it.

Germany 1933 undertones all through that second paragraph.

Chris 26-10-2022 17:00

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138563)
Germany 1933 undertones all through that second paragraph.

Please see my earlier comments re: debasement of references to fascism by mindless overuse.

jfman 26-10-2022 17:03

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138564)
Please see my earlier comments re: debasement of references to fascism by mindless overuse.

I think it’s an entirely appropriate use to be fair.

To paraphrase you essentially say a majority can elect away the rights of minorities should they feel suitably aggrieved without reference to any protections of fundamental rights (for example that to protest, or that to strike). Both among the first to go as fascism rises, usually with a democratic mandate.

Chris 26-10-2022 17:09

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138565)
I think it’s an entirely appropriate use to be fair.

To paraphrase you essentially say a majority can elect away the rights of minorities should they feel suitably aggrieved without reference to any protections of fundamental rights (for example that to protest, or that to strike). Both among the first to go as fascism rises, usually with a democratic mandate.

That’s not a paraphrase of anything I’ve actually posted here. It’s just a list of dog whistle issues that get a certain section of the British left all riled up.

jfman 26-10-2022 17:15

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138566)
That’s not a paraphrase of anything I’ve actually posted here. It’s just a list of dog whistle issues that get a certain section of the British left all riled up.

I can see no other logical interpretation of this part:

Quote:

People find new and inventive ways of imposing themselves on others; eventually the put-upon majority decides enough is enough and begins to demand action. Sooner or later, politicians hear the clamour, realise it's a popular issue, and act on it.
Essentially your suggestion is to invent crimes for previously legal activities based upon populism. Without limits, that’s absolutely fascism in action.

Although I did make a mistake in my previous post because I almost implied if this Government did so it had democratic mandate for it.

ianch99 26-10-2022 17:21

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138562)
... in which she is not specific at all, but is concerned about a 'paradigm shift' in what is considered criminal behaviour. Likewise, you were earlier not specific at all (unless you're referring to a post earlier than the one I previously replied to?)

Spurrier's submission is hardly bringing anything novel to the discussion in any case. New acts of parliament often bring activities that previously were not criminal into the purview of criminal law. That's sort of the whole point. People find new and inventive ways of imposing themselves on others; eventually the put-upon majority decides enough is enough and begins to demand action. Sooner or later, politicians hear the clamour, realise it's a popular issue, and act on it.

Some details on the new Public Order Bill:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...more-difficult

Quote:

Here are the key provisions it includes:

New protest-related offences of “locking-on” – a protester attaching themselves to other people, objects or buildings to cause disruption – and “going equipped to lock-on”, as well as causing serious disruption by tunnelling, obstructing major transport works, and interfering with key national infrastructure. The penalties include unlimited fines and prison sentences of up to 12 months.

Serious disruption prevention orders, which will allow courts to bar an individual from associating with other activists, being in a specific place, having particular items like bike locks or superglue, or encouraging others to commit a protest-related offence. They may be enforced by the imposition of an electronic tag, and breaches could lead to six months in prison or an unlimited fine.

New stop and search powers for protest, which will allow police to intervene if they believe somebody has an object intended to help them to commit a protest-related offence like wilful obstruction of a highway – a category that could include the aforementioned bike locks but also posters or placards. Police will also be granted new powers to stop and search people attending a protest, even if they have no grounds for suspicion that they are carrying such an item, but think others in the area might be.
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2022/10/9.jpg

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ection-protest

Quote:

Under the public order bill, anyone who has protested in the previous five years, or has encouraged other people to protest, can be forced to “submit to … being fitted with, or the installation of, any necessary apparatus” to monitor their movements. In other words, if you attend or support any protest in which “serious disruption to two or more individuals or to an organisation” occurs, you can be forced to wear an electronic tag. “Serious disruption” was redefined by the 2022 Police Act to include noise.


---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138564)
Please see my earlier comments re: debasement of references to fascism by mindless overuse.

Please see my earlier quote:

Quote:

The road to fascism is lined with people telling you to stop overreacting

Chris 26-10-2022 17:22

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138569)
Some details on the new Public Order Bill:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...more-difficult


https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ection-protest



---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------



Please see my earlier quote:

Thanks - finishing some work now but will engage more thoroughly later :)

(And just because you predict someone will say you’re over-reacting, does not mean that they’re wrong) ;)

Ms NTL 26-10-2022 18:20

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138569)
Some details on the new Public Order Bill:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...more-difficult


https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ection-protest



---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------



Please see my earlier quote:

Bloody hell. A repeat of the Tottenham riots is needed for these idiots to get their head right. It will happen. Soon.

Sephiroth 26-10-2022 19:13

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138569)
Some details on the new Public Order Bill:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...more-difficult


https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ection-protest



---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------



Please see my earlier quote:

Apart from your ridiculously large text, you're completely mad.

The right to block roads (and by corollary allow people to die in ambulances) should be severely curtailed.

In some ways, it's a pity that the law won't prescribe that people glued to walls should be left there so that they pee their pants, shit their clothes and end up with the worst of it.



Damien 26-10-2022 22:09

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
The former Chairman of the Conservative Party has said there were multiple breaches of the ministerial code from Braverman's

https://twitter.com/PiersUncensored/...61104062058508

Quote:

"From my own knowledge, there were multiple breaches of the ministerial code."

Sacked Conservatives chairman Jake Berry addresses Home Secretary Suella Braverman's alleged security breach.

1andrew1 26-10-2022 22:14

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Peston reporting here that Sunak is believed to have over-ruled cabinet secretary Case in re-appointing Suella Braverman.

He notes that this raises important constitutional issues, particularly the role of the Cabinet Secretary in preventing ministers from becoming a security risk.

William Wragg, Chair of the Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, is being urged to investigate this.

https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1585321216318898176

Dave42 26-10-2022 22:20

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138531)
Rishi Sunak brings back fracking ban lifted by Truss.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2210893.html

good move from Sunak

Chris 26-10-2022 22:32

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138569)
Some details on the new Public Order Bill:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...more-difficult

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ection-protest



---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------



Please see my earlier quote:

So, at the risk of playing the man rather than the ball … George Monbiot? Really?

I repeat my point from earlier, the proposal is to grant the Home Secretary the power to ask, not to act. A judge would decide whether the situation satisfied what is clearly quite a high legal bar in terms of the seriousness of disruption. Insinuating that people who attend a half-million march through London in 2023 face any significant prospect of getting caught in some neo-fascist dragnet any time up to 2028 is absurd.

But then his nickname isn’t Moonbat for nothing. This is the man who thinks 75 million ha.of agricultural land in continental Europe should be ‘rewilded’. Ukraine has 41m ha, and look how close some parts of the developing world are to serious food shortages this winter just because *some* of what’s grown there can’t get out.

Pierre 26-10-2022 23:18

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36138593)
good move from Sunak

Terrible move.

---------- Post added at 23:18 ---------- Previous post was at 23:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138592)
Peston reporting here that Sunak is believed to have over-ruled cabinet secretary Case in re-appointing Suella Braverman.

Good, this is an issue why?

papa smurf 27-10-2022 06:36

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36138593)
good move from Sunak

Will you feel the same when you're freezing to death in the future.

Maggy 27-10-2022 07:46

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
So business as usual?Hopefully until the GE.

BenMcr 27-10-2022 09:47

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36138599)
Will you feel the same when you're freezing to death in the future.

Fracking won't help

https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/e...ergy-security/

Quote:

Prof Jon Gluyas, Director of the Durham Energy Institute, Durham University, said:

“Can fracking for shale gas alleviate the UK’s energy supply crisis? No!
....
The resource is indeed huge but the reserve – that which can be won by drilling and fracking is tiny and indeed to date the proven commercial reserve for the UK is zero. We have, to put it bluntly the wrong kind of shale.
Quote:

Prof Andrew Aplin, from the Department of Earth Sciences at Durham University, said:

“Risks associated with fracking in the UK are manageable within a strict regulatory framework. But shale gas would only make a significant dent to UK imports if, over the next few years, thousands of successful wells are drilled at hundreds of sites across northern England. This isn’t realistic so shale cannot make a material difference to our energy supply over the next few years – even with public approval for fracking.

Mick 27-10-2022 10:22

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Have never been convinced of fracking argument, plus, the sheer amounts of shale gas, is not guaranteed for UK domestic markets, it will be extracted and sold to highest bidder.

It was the stupidest idea ever, to cease our storage capacity of gas, become too reliant on imports, no one ever thinking that one day, that supply is rationed as Europe suffers with energy stocks, thanks to Putin.

BenMcr 27-10-2022 10:46

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138595)
Good, this is an issue why?

Yeah, why?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cerns-MI5.html

Quote:

Suella Braverman was embroiled in probe over leak that raised 'concerns' at MI5
...
Suella Braverman was probed by Government officials as part of an inquiry into the leak of a sensitive story involving Britain's security services, the Daily Mail can reveal today.

The Home Secretary was included in an investigation this year by a little-known unit within the Cabinet Office that handles leak inquiries.

1andrew1 27-10-2022 11:22

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36138550)
Now that i'm a pensioner no triple lock means i vote for someone else

There's no general election at the moment and unlikely to be one for a couple of years. By then, I'm sure the Conservatives and perhaps other Parties will have reinstatement of the Triple Lock on their manifesto (assuming it's paused) as they all know the power of the pensioner vote, particularly the Conservatives.

ianch99 27-10-2022 11:41

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138582)
Apart from your ridiculously large text, you're completely mad.

The right to block roads (and by corollary allow people to die in ambulances) should be severely curtailed.

In some ways, it's a pity that the law won't prescribe that people glued to walls should be left there so that they pee their pants, shit their clothes and end up with the worst of it.

It is not my "ridiculously large text", I linked to the "small" image variant on Twitter (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FfaYtzVW...jpg&name=small) but for some reason vBulletin has chosen to copy the image to its local cache (https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2022/10/9.jpg) without the "small" parameter. Maybe Paul knows the reason ..

1andrew1 27-10-2022 11:43

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138595)
Good, this is an issue why?

Only not an issue when national security is not an issue.

ianch99 27-10-2022 11:46

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138594)
So, at the risk of playing the man rather than the ball … George Monbiot? Really?

I repeat my point from earlier, the proposal is to grant the Home Secretary the power to ask, not to act. A judge would decide whether the situation satisfied what is clearly quite a high legal bar in terms of the seriousness of disruption. Insinuating that people who attend a half-million march through London in 2023 face any significant prospect of getting caught in some neo-fascist dragnet any time up to 2028 is absurd.

But then his nickname isn’t Moonbat for nothing. This is the man who thinks 75 million ha.of agricultural land in continental Europe should be ‘rewilded’. Ukraine has 41m ha, and look how close some parts of the developing world are to serious food shortages this winter just because *some* of what’s grown there can’t get out.

Serious whataboutery here. BTW, I also linked to a summary video from the Liberty director also. You seem to not comment on the actual provisions of the Act which are the points in question but ramble on about a man and his rewilding ideas.

A more complete summary of the Act:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2022/10/10.jpg

Chris 27-10-2022 11:55

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138617)
Serious whataboutery here. BTW, I also linked to a summary video from the Liberty director also. You seem to not comment on the actual provisions of the Act which are the points in question but ramble on about a man and his rewilding ideas.

Another good summary of the Act:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2022/10/11.jpg

Moonbat’s preoccupation with rewilding is highly relevant, because it seems clear to me that the sorts of protesters the bill is aimed at - the eco loons who glue themselves to roads or chuck soup at priceless works of art - are precisely the sorts of people George is instinctively supportive of and would like to see continuing in the same vein.

All I’m hearing, in protest against this bill is self-serving demands that those who think they’ve found a means of holding society to ransom in pursuit of their political goals, should be allowed to carry on, and the rest of us should just let them get on with it, or, worse, abandon our own convictions and give in to their blackmail.

Well I’m sorry but no. If people want to bring the M25 to a halt, cause millions in lost business and prevent tens of thousands of people from going about their business, then I’m more than happy for them to spend a few weeks in jail in recompense. If nothing else, it will weed out the dilettantes who think this lunacy is an attractive way of virtue signalling to their mates.

(Edit) And references to Russia, Iran and Egypt are simply more contemptible left-wing dog whistling, and nonsensical to anyone who is actually familiar with what human rights abuses in those countries actually look like.

Mick 27-10-2022 11:59

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
BREAKING: Speaker suspends Commons for an hour due to Penny Mordaunt no-show - Independent.

1andrew1 27-10-2022 12:02

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36138619)
BREAKING: Speaker suspends Commons for an hour due to Penny Mordaunt no-show - Independent.

Hopefully just an admin mistake and nothing too serious.

Mick 27-10-2022 12:05

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Update: Penny met with King Charles III, as part of her remit of Lord President of the council, while she was due to answer leader of the house questions in Parliament. - Guido.

Pierre 27-10-2022 13:02

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36138611)

What were the findings of this “probe”?

Hugh 27-10-2022 13:31

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138630)
What were the findings of this “probe”?

From the article

Quote:

The Mail understands that the investigation ultimately found no 'conclusive evidence' of who the leaker was. A Whitehall source said: 'They did not find conclusive evidence of who the leaker was. There was a wide field of potential leakers.' The source added: 'If there had been solid knowledge of who was responsible, the matter wouldn't have been left to rest there.'

Last night, a Cabinet Office spokesman: 'We do not comment on alleged leak investigations.'

jfman 27-10-2022 13:54

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138618)
(Edit) And references to Russia, Iran and Egypt are simply more contemptible left-wing dog whistling, and nonsensical to anyone who is actually familiar with what human rights abuses in those countries actually look like.

Nice to see you are still over-indulging in the soup of British exceptionalism rather than addressing the points actually made by ianch99.

Sephiroth 27-10-2022 14:03

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138639)
Nice to see you are still over-indulging in the soup of British exceptionalism rather than addressing the points actually made by ianch99.


John, ian is off on one. He ignores the need for such a law and focuses only on the comparison with Russia. Totally ridiculous.


ianch99 27-10-2022 14:37

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138618)
Moonbat’s preoccupation with rewilding is highly relevant, because it seems clear to me that the sorts of protesters the bill is aimed at - the eco loons who glue themselves to roads or chuck soup at priceless works of art - are precisely the sorts of people George is instinctively supportive of and would like to see continuing in the same vein.

All I’m hearing, in protest against this bill is self-serving demands that those who think they’ve found a means of holding society to ransom in pursuit of their political goals, should be allowed to carry on, and the rest of us should just let them get on with it, or, worse, abandon our own convictions and give in to their blackmail.

Well I’m sorry but no. If people want to bring the M25 to a halt, cause millions in lost business and prevent tens of thousands of people from going about their business, then I’m more than happy for them to spend a few weeks in jail in recompense. If nothing else, it will weed out the dilettantes who think this lunacy is an attractive way of virtue signalling to their mates.

(Edit) And references to Russia, Iran and Egypt are simply more contemptible left-wing dog whistling, and nonsensical to anyone who is actually familiar with what human rights abuses in those countries actually look like.

A prime example of self centred right wing rationalising to justify erosion of our civil liberties and a classic use of the "lunatics holding society to ransom" trope to justify draconian changes in the law. You seem to be content to let this Government take away our freedoms but I am not.

---------- Post added at 14:37 ---------- Previous post was at 14:35 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138643)

John, ian is off on one. He ignores the need for such a law and focuses only on the comparison with Russia. Totally ridiculous.


Don't be patronising, I am making a serious point here.

jfman 27-10-2022 14:44

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138643)

John, ian is off on one. He ignores the need for such a law and focuses only on the comparison with Russia. Totally ridiculous.


He probably is off on one, but there’s been no demonstration of a need for such a law or that the proposals are in any way proportionate.

At a literal reading it has the potential to outlaw protest and removes rights under the Human Rights Act for peaceful assembly and association among people who haven’t actually committed any offences at all.

Over decades and centuries the history of this country is littered with protests. In no way, shape or form can anyone claim that disruption now meaningfully disrupts people’s lives any more than at any point in history.

It’s a lazy right wing trope to claim that they do. But when your economic policies (not you personally) are shot to pieces I suppose that’s all they have left.

Paul 27-10-2022 15:04

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
I really cant be bothered to read through pages of more arguments, so someone please tell me - What exactly has all this got to do with the topic (Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister) ?

Sephiroth 27-10-2022 15:23

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138648)
A prime example of self centred right wing rationalising to justify erosion of our civil liberties and a classic use of the "lunatics holding society to ransom" trope to justify draconian changes in the law. You seem to be content to let this Government take away our freedoms but I am not.

---------- Post added at 14:37 ---------- Previous post was at 14:35 ----------



Don't be patronising, I am making a serious point here.


I’m not being patronising. I am criticising your paranoia.

Pierre 27-10-2022 17:26

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36138636)
From the article

I thought that would be the case.

---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36138611)

So as suspected, nothing came of it. So yeah, why?

ianch99 27-10-2022 18:15

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36138651)
I really cant be bothered to read through pages of more arguments, so someone please tell me - What exactly has all this got to do with the topic (Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister) ?

Unless there is another thread where we discuss the Sunak government & its policies, it seems fair to post here.

---------- Post added at 18:15 ---------- Previous post was at 18:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138654)

I’m not being patronising. I am criticising your paranoia.

It is not "my paranoia", I wish it was.

Here's an article from Justice on the dangers of the Bill: https://justice.org.uk/public-order-bill/

There is even an article on Conservative Home :)

MPs must make a stand against the Public Order Bill’s restrictions on free speech

Chris 27-10-2022 22:15

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36138639)
Nice to see you are still over-indulging in the soup of British exceptionalism rather than addressing the points actually made by ianch99.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman
Wastng your time with Chris

Nice to see you giving me reps you probably intended to give someone else :rofl:

jfman 27-10-2022 22:27

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
:rofl:

1andrew1 28-10-2022 10:04

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
I don't think there's been a backlash here about Sunak's race, as alleged in the US's Daily Show. There will always be some people that hold this view but I don't think it's a significant proportion of the electorate.
He's of course received criticism over Suella Braverman's appointment and for his wife's former tax status.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...6b8d18f8606559

Pierre 28-10-2022 10:21

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138688)
I don't think there's been a backlash here about Sunak's race, as alleged in the US's Daily Show. There will always be some people that hold this view but I don't think it's a significant proportion of the electorate.
He's of course received criticism over Suella Braverman's appointment and for his wife's former tax status.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...6b8d18f8606559

I've seen it all over the twitterverse, it's works in America as they are just so consumed about race.

As far as I can tell the evidence for this "backlash" is based solely on one idiot that called into LBC or Talk TV.

I don't think anyone (apart from the usual nutters) could care less about his ethnicity, we just want him to sort this mess out.

Damien 28-10-2022 10:24

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
The US commentary on the U.K is almost always very bad. They can't help but see everything through their own lens. That's why they think Boris Johnson was Trump.

That Noah commentary is awful. First of all anyone who says 'the Prime Minister of England' should then be ignored when commenting on British politics but he sets up a strawman so he can have a US-Centric argument. He even said it was ironic Brexiters ended up with an Asian PM which makes no sense at all.

ianch99 28-10-2022 11:41

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36138690)
He even said it was ironic Brexiters ended up with an Asian PM which makes no sense at all.

This makes a lot of sense. A fair number of people who voted for Brexit were racist and so the last person they would welcome as PM is Sunak. For the racist Brexit voters, it is very ironic.

---------- Post added at 11:41 ---------- Previous post was at 11:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36138675)
Nice to see you giving me reps you probably intended to give someone else :rofl:

But he is not wrong, though :erm:

Sephiroth 28-10-2022 12:24

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138691)
This makes a lot of sense. A fair number of people who voted for Brexit were racist and so the last person they would welcome as PM is Sunak. For the racist Brexit voters, it is very ironic.[COLOR="Silver"]

<SNIP>

I know what you mean, but perhaps it's a big strong to assign the term 'racist' to such an implicitly large cohort of Brexiteers.

"Xenophobic" may be a better term. Every faction has its proportion of racists so picking on Brexiteers, especially in the context of Sunak, is poor rhetoric.

Pierre 28-10-2022 13:24

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138691)
A fair number of people who voted for Brexit were racist

What's fair number? A fair number that voted Remain were also racist.

ianch99 28-10-2022 15:58

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138696)
I know what you mean, but perhaps it's a big strong to assign the term 'racist' to such an implicitly large cohort of Brexiteers.

"Xenophobic" may be a better term. Every faction has its proportion of racists so picking on Brexiteers, especially in the context of Sunak, is poor rhetoric.

Pick you terms carefully. I said a fair number, not a large number. Let's be clear though, a number large enough to make a difference in tight elections. I do agree that the number who might be classed xenophobic is larger.

Assigning precise numbers is difficult due to the complexity and nuance in the competing factors that went into the 2016 decision. Here is an interesting article in Nature on this precise subject: Prejudice and the Brexit vote: a tangled web

Sephiroth 28-10-2022 18:12

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138707)
Pick you terms carefully. I said a fair number, not a large number. Let's be clear though, a number large enough to make a difference in tight elections. I do agree that the number who might be classed xenophobic is larger.

Assigning precise numbers is difficult due to the complexity and nuance in the competing factors that went into the 2016 decision. Here is an interesting article in Nature on this precise subject: Prejudice and the Brexit vote: a tangled web



I’ve read that article - it is a very bad article, imo.

It lumps all of the ”nuances” of prejudice such as Islamophobia, Homophobia etc into equating prejudice with racism. Clearly this is where you get to use the term “racism”, possibly to emphasise your point but the article on which you rely explains why it does not use the word "racism".

So the first think to debunk is the article’s equivalence of prejudice with racism. We all have prejudices to a certain degree (nuance). For example, people may be prejudiced against Germans because of what happened 80 years ago; even though it’s ridiculous to be prejudiced against all Germans, it can’t be said to be racist, although the article includes that sort of prejudice and classifies this as racist.

Quote:

We have deliberately tried to avoid using the term ‘racism’ in this paper where possible as we follow Brown’s (2010) belief that the term ‘prejudice’ can be regarded as synonymous in the social psychological perspective with sexism, racism, homophobia, and so on.
Next is the weak argument made at the foot of the quote pasted below. It’s clear to me that the authors are leaning towards nationalism being a racist belief (see text below). The absurdist part of the argument being put forward below is that people voting for sovereignty needn’t have bothered because we had proportional representation on all the EU’s committees; as in being outvoted by others which did happen, as you know.

Finally, the paper falls down on the first sentence of the extract pasted below.

Quote:

It is difficult to provide a clear narrative on how much prejudice attitudes played a role in the Brexit vote, largely because a multitude of social issues were caught up in a binary referendum question of whether to leave the EU or remain a member. However, there can be no doubt that issues relating to prejudice were paramount in many of the discussions leading up to the vote in 2016 (Berry, 2016; Geddes, 2016; Vasilopoulou, 2016). Those that may appear to be straightforward, such as the focus upon immigration numbers, are tied to additional areas such as availability of jobs or funding of additional services such as in schools and hospitals. Even those issues that do not appear to have a direct link to individuals and groups, such as the argument that leaving the EU would allow the UK to maintain sovereignty and make its own laws, lean towards concepts of nationalism; ‘we’ will not be told what to do by ‘others’ from the continent. Despite having a proportional representation on all EU parliaments and committees, the discourse that ‘they’ are in charge of the EU and would



ianch99 28-10-2022 19:20

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138713)


I’ve read that article - it is a very bad article, imo.

It lumps all of the ”nuances” of prejudice such as Islamophobia, Homophobia etc into equating prejudice with racism. Clearly this is where you get to use the term “racism”, possibly to emphasise your point but the article on which you rely explains why it does not use the word "racism".

So the first think to debunk is the article’s equivalence of prejudice with racism. We all have prejudices to a certain degree (nuance). For example, people may be prejudiced against Germans because of what happened 80 years ago; even though it’s ridiculous to be prejudiced against all Germans, it can’t be said to be racist, although the article includes that sort of prejudice and classifies this as racist.

Next is the weak argument made at the foot of the quote pasted below. It’s clear to me that the authors are leaning towards nationalism being a racist belief (see text below). The absurdist part of the argument being put forward below is that people voting for sovereignty needn’t have bothered because we had proportional representation on all the EU’s committees; as in being outvoted by others which did happen, as you know.

Finally, the paper falls down on the first sentence of the extract pasted below.

I am not relying on this article. I linked it as it explains the complexity & nuance of the proposition. Anyway, we are down a rabbit hole here. I was responding to the irony of us getting an Indian PM to a section of our society that voted for Brexit for exactly the opposite outcome.

Sephiroth 28-10-2022 20:42

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138717)
I am not relying on this article. I linked it as it explains the complexity & nuance of the proposition. I know I am right as I was born in the North East of England (note that there are other parts of the country that also apply) and I know what I observed growing up. You may chose to deny this reality but I do not, it explains a lot.

Anyone, we are down a rabbit hole here. I was responding to the irony of us getting an Indian PM to a section of our society that voted for Brexit for exactly the opposite outcome.

We don't have an "Indian PM". We have a British PM, born here (unlike Boris).

I can't imagine that the section of your regional compatriots who voted for Brexit voted to avoid a PM of Asian heritage.

That article was rubbish and you did rely on it to support your notion of racism, preferring the term to "prejudice". Very naughty but it fits your narrative of regarding Brexiteers as somewhat despicable. Naught but not nice.

TheDaddy 28-10-2022 21:31

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138725)
We don't have an "Indian PM". We have a British PM, born here (unlike Boris).

I can't imagine that the section of your regional compatriots who voted for Brexit voted to avoid a PM of Asian heritage.

That article was rubbish and you did rely on it to support your notion of racism, preferring the term to "prejudice". Very naughty but it fits your narrative of regarding Brexiteers as somewhat despicable. Naught but not nice.

I actually agree somewhat, brexit was never about Indian's, yes being sick of people coming over here and doing the jobs we don't want to and filling huge swathes of the workforce was part of it but considering migration here from nationals outside the EU was greater than those from it in the years running up to the vote you'd have thought that'd gain traction somewhere, plus of course it's quite hard to be racist when the people you're attacking are of the same ethnicity, unless we're really disappearing down the rabbit hole of far right untermenschen, which I don't think we are and the vast majority of brexit voters would be disgusted to be associated with that kind of thing

ianch99 28-10-2022 23:01

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138725)
We don't have an "Indian PM". We have a British PM, born here (unlike Boris).

I can't imagine that the section of your regional compatriots who voted for Brexit voted to avoid a PM of Asian heritage.

That article was rubbish and you did rely on it to support your notion of racism, preferring the term to "prejudice". Very naughty but it fits your narrative of regarding Brexiteers as somewhat despicable. Naught but not nice.

You need to get out of Wokingham and Waitrose and see the world how it really is. Your one-dimensional Brexit world view needs changing, the reality is far more complex that you would like it to be. The causes & reasons behind how people voted are many and varied. Like it or not, racism and xenophobia are part of that equation. You need to accept that.

---------- Post added at 23:01 ---------- Previous post was at 22:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36138731)
I actually agree somewhat, brexit was never about Indian's, yes being sick of people coming over here and doing the jobs we don't want to and filling huge swathes of the workforce was part of it but considering migration here from nationals outside the EU was greater than those from it in the years running up to the vote you'd have thought that'd gain traction somewhere, plus of course it's quite hard to be racist when the people you're attacking are of the same ethnicity, unless we're really disappearing down the rabbit hole of far right untermenschen, which I don't think we are and the vast majority of brexit voters would be disgusted to be associated with that kind of thing

I would tend to agree with you, but we always need to be aware of things we may be disgusted by and how these traits are encouraged and who encourages them, the Farage breaking point poster being a prime example.

Anyway, that's enough on the irony of Sunak.

Sephiroth 29-10-2022 07:51

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36138731)
I actually agree somewhat, brexit was never about Indian's, yes being sick of people coming over here and doing the jobs we don't want to and filling huge swathes of the workforce was part of it but considering migration here from nationals outside the EU was greater than those from it in the years running up to the vote you'd have thought that'd gain traction somewhere, plus of course it's quite hard to be racist when the people you're attacking are of the same ethnicity, unless we're really disappearing down the rabbit hole of far right untermenschen, which I don't think we are and the vast majority of brexit voters would be disgusted to be associated with that kind of thing

Quite right.


---------- Post added at 07:51 ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36138734)
You need to get out of Wokingham and Waitrose and see the world how it really is. Your one-dimensional Brexit world view needs changing, the reality is far more complex that you would like it to be. The causes & reasons behind how people voted are many and varied. Like it or not, racism and xenophobia are part of that equation. You need to accept that.<SNIP>

Maybe - but you led on racism; you promoted that notion.

1andrew1 29-10-2022 23:26

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Just when the government was looking cohesive, who pops up to give Starmer a helping hand?
Quote:

No 10 alarm as Boris Johnson plans to attend Cop27 climate summit

A row over prime minister Rishi Sunak’s refusal to attend the Cop27 climate summit took an extraordinary twist on Saturday night as the Observer was informed that his predecessor but one – Boris Johnson – is planning to attend the event.

Several sources said they had been told that Johnson is intending to go to the crucial meeting of world leaders in Egypt to show his solidarity with the battle against the climate crisis.

Johnson’s attendance would be potentially explosive just days after Sunak took over as prime minister and decided he did not have time to attend.

Johnson’s involvement would be seen as both an implicit criticism of Sunak for not going and an attempt to maintain and bolster his profile just a week after he abandoned his own attempts at a dramatic comeback to No 10. Several sources close to Johnson did not deny that he was set to go.

On Saturday night there were signs of a row at the highest levels of government over Johnson’s intentions, and indications that efforts may be under way to get the former prime minister to change his mind.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...f181c2128072fe

Paul 30-10-2022 00:24

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
TBH, I dont give a flying **** about who attends COP27.

No doubt that annoying teenager will be there.

Ms NTL 30-10-2022 00:24

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138828)
Just when the government was looking cohesive, who pops up to give Starmer a helping hand?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...f181c2128072fe

Princess Nut Nut told him to go.

1andrew1 08-11-2022 21:56

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Some more changes:
- Williamson has resigned over the bullying allegations
- Investment zones are due to be axed in the Autum statement
https://news.sky.com/story/sir-gavin...lying-12742023

Hugh 11-11-2022 09:56

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Ah, the old "It wasn't me, Guv!" excuse...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63592909

Apparently, a big girl made him do it, then ran away...

Quote:

Former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has said he warned Liz Truss she was going too fast with her ill-fated economic plans.

In his first interview since he was sacked by the then PM, Mr Kwarteng told TalkTV he had warned her to "slow down" after September's mini-budget.

He said he told her it was "mad" to fire him, and she would only last "three or four weeks" if she did.

"Little did I know it was only going to be six days," he added.

Mr Kwarteng was dramatically fired by Ms Truss in October, two weeks after their tax-cutting mini-budget sparked turmoil on financial markets.

She then ditched almost all of the plan in a bid to stay in power, but announced her resignation a few days later - less than seven weeks after taking office - as support from Conservative MPs ebbed away.

Speaking to TalkTV, Mr Kwarteng said that he had warned Ms Truss about going at a "breakneck speed" with economic measures after the mini-budget.

"She said, 'Well, I've only got two years' and I said, 'You will have two months if you carry on like this'. And that is, I'm afraid, what happened."

He also said: "I think the prime minister was very much of the view that we needed to move things fast. But I think it was too quick."

RichardCoulter 11-11-2022 17:10

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36139786)
Ah, the old "It wasn't me, Guv!" excuse...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63592909

Apparently, a big girl made him do it, then ran away...

Truss tried to blame him and now he's putting the blame on her.

They used to be good friends, I bet they aren't any more.

Damien 11-11-2022 18:24

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Most of the leaks around the time did suggest it was Truss who was the more bullish of the two on the mini-budget. Besides she said she was going to do this in her leadership bid so she can't claim otherwise.

Mr K 11-11-2022 19:51

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36139822)
Most of the leaks around the time did suggest it was Truss who was the more bullish of the two on the mini-budget. Besides she said she was going to do this in her leadership bid so she can't claim otherwise.

I think Lizzie would make a great Pizza chef. Time for a change of career, she needs to think outside the box.

1andrew1 11-11-2022 21:30

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36139820)
Truss tried to blame him and now he's putting the blame on her.

They used to be good friends, I bet they aren't any more.

They used to be more than good friends. ;)

Mr K 15-11-2022 21:11

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 50% (+1)
CON: 26% (-2)
LDEM: 9% (-2)
GRN: 5% (+1)

via
@RedfieldWilton
, 13 Nov
Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 50% (+3)
CON: 27% (-2)
LDEM: 6% (-3)

via
@DeltapollUK
, 10 - 14 Nov
Didn't get much of a 'honeymoon' did he?

Never mind I'm sure there's goodies for all in the Budget this week. I have faith that 12 years of austerity/the Tories, plus our Brexit bonus is about to be rewarded..

1andrew1 15-11-2022 21:32

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36140049)
Didn't get much of a 'honeymoon' did he?

Never mind I'm sure there's goodies for all in the Budget this week. I have faith that 12 years of austerity/the Tories, plus our Brexit bonus is about to be rewarded..

Appointing the incompetents Braverman and Williamson to Cabinet roles won't have helped his popularity.

Not going so well with that other one, Raab.
Quote:

New developments tonight:

Top MoJ officials have now ruled there should always be senior civil servant in room for meetings with Raab.

DExEU perm sec understood to have shared general concerns about his behaviour with Cab Sec after officials raised them.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...e_iOSApp_Other

denphone 16-11-2022 06:22

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36140049)
Didn't get much of a 'honeymoon' did he?

Never mind I'm sure there's goodies for all in the Budget this week. I have faith that 12 years of austerity/the Tories, plus our Brexit bonus is about to be rewarded..

The thing is they can't blame anybody else now because when a government has been in power for 12 years the public knows who is at fault for many of the problems we are seeing now.

And with worse to come..

1andrew1 16-11-2022 08:13

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
I think we reached rock bottom with Truss. The last few Prime Ministers have been successively worse but Sunak is an improvement on Truss but not without his mistakes.

Dominic Raab will be taking PMQs today. This surely can't go well given the bullying allegations hanging over him.

Sephiroth 16-11-2022 08:37

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36140092)
The thing is they can't blame anybody else now because when a government has been in power for 12 years the public knows who is at fault for many of the problems we are seeing now.

And with worse to come..

. …. Yes - Labour.

Mr K 16-11-2022 08:45

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36140099)
. …. Yes - Labour.

Hard to see how they could be worse than this rabble. But as you've acknowledged, we're going to find out.

1andrew1 16-11-2022 08:49

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36140099)
. …. Yes - Labour.

I think even if Corbyn was leader, Labour would now win given the Conservative Party's performance over the last couple of years!

denphone 16-11-2022 09:22

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36140099)
. …. Yes - Labour.

Whataboutery on a major scale Sep as do not the Conservatives own these last 12 years.

Sephiroth 16-11-2022 19:25

Re: Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36140102)
Whataboutery on a major scale Sep as do not the Conservatives own these last 12 years.

"Whataboutery" is a wildly misused expression on this forum. It's recklessly deployed to dismiss valid points.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum