Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710979)

richard-john56 08-10-2022 19:13

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
I wonder how many forests he could grow or save with that $44 billion.

pip08456 28-10-2022 15:11

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Well he's done it. Moved in yesterday.

Quote:

Elon Musk has officially bought Twitter.

Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal, CFO Ned Segal, legal affairs chief Vijaya Gadde were all immediately fired, per Reuters.

Hugh 31-10-2022 17:10

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/e...-b2214457.html

Quote:

Elon Musk dissolves Twitter’s board and makes himself ‘sole director’
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Pierre 31-10-2022 17:13

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
We can’t lose.

He makes Twitter less of cesspit - win

He destroys Twitter and it goes under - win

Damien 31-10-2022 17:55

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
In all likelihood the same commercial and legal pressures that made Twitter hard to manage for its last directors will hit him as well

TheDaddy 31-10-2022 17:56

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138940)
We can’t lose.

He makes Twitter less of cesspit - win

He destroys Twitter and it goes under - win

He can lose 44 billion

This twitter cesspit thing I keep hearing about on here but never seeing on there is odd, anyone who annoys me gets blocked, simple as

Pierre 31-10-2022 18:23

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36138949)
He can lose 44 billion

This twitter cesspit thing I keep hearing about on here but never seeing on there is odd, anyone who annoys me gets blocked, simple as

Ahh, but that’s the very thing about Twitter and Social Media in general.

You pick the groups and people you like and agree with, and block anyone you don’t like. So everyone festers in the filth of their own echo chambers.

I look at Twitter, but on this site you get proper debate, we’ll debate at least. Yes, you can ignore people on here too, but I get the sense most don’t.

TheDaddy 31-10-2022 18:35

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138950)
Ahh, but that’s the very thing about Twitter and Social Media in general.

You pick the groups and people you like and agree with, and block anyone you don’t like. So everyone festers in the filth of their own echo chambers.

I look at Twitter, but on this site you get proper debate, we’ll debate at least. Yes, you can ignore people on here too, but I get the sense most don’t.

That's not really how I use it, if you're not annoying I don't block you and am happy to discuss most things, ends amicably enough most of the time, I only remember blocking one this year for instance, a maga nut that kept saying I was in the fbi

Paul 31-10-2022 19:06

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138940)
We can’t lose.

He makes Twitter less of cesspit - win

He destroys Twitter and it goes under - win

I would like option B (and take Fakebook/Instacrap with it) Please. :D

Mad Max 31-10-2022 19:13

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36138960)
I would like option B (and take Fakebook/Instacrap with it) Please. :D


Totally agree.

TheDaddy 31-10-2022 20:43

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36138962)
Totally agree.

Think I do to, it's no good for democracy how easy it is for lies to spread and become fact on this behemoth sites, 200 people on the midterm ballots in America believe the last US election was rigged despite all the evidence to the contrary, these people shouldn't be anywhere near office, they'd be treated like the monster raving looney candidate at elections here but they've got a platform because of nonsense on sites like this being peddled as fact

jfman 31-10-2022 20:50

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36138963)
Think I do to, it's no good for democracy how easy it is for lies to spread and become fact on this behemoth sites, 200 people on the midterm ballots in America believe the last US election was rigged despite all the evidence to the contrary, these people shouldn't be anywhere near office, they'd be treated like the monster raving looney candidate at elections here but they've got a platform because of nonsense on sites like this being peddled as fact

While true, the mainstream media and politicians have a share of the blame.

Dude111 02-11-2022 23:29

Its sad he is already ruining it...... The N word being used more,etc......

What a disgrace........

Damien 04-11-2022 09:43

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Looks like he has fired UK staff this morning without any consultation periods or anything: https://twitter.com/MartinSFP/status...43443034046464

Musk is going to run into UK employment law.

mrmistoffelees 04-11-2022 12:11

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36139285)
Looks like he has fired UK staff this morning without any consultation periods or anything: https://twitter.com/MartinSFP/status...43443034046464

Musk is going to run into UK employment law.


Indeed, offices closed, badge access disabled, employees disconnected from office email & slack....

Class action lawsuit filed over in SF too

nomadking 04-11-2022 12:39

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Standard type of procedure for IT staff. Otherwise who knows what info they could steal or damage they could do.

mrmistoffelees 04-11-2022 13:02

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36139310)
Standard type of procedure for IT staff. Otherwise who knows what info they could steal or damage they could do.

Tell me you don’t know anything about employment law without telling me you don’t know anything about employment law.

Due to the number of redundancies being made both in the U.K. and the US there are specific processes required to be followed.

You cannot legally do what he’s done

nomadking 04-11-2022 13:09

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36139315)
Tell me you don’t know anything about employment law without telling me you don’t know anything about employment law.

Due to the number of redundancies being made both in the U.K. and the US there are specific processes required to be followed.

You cannot legally do what he’s done

And people would whinge, if he didn't do things that way and data was stolen and systems compromised.

mrmistoffelees 04-11-2022 13:13

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36139320)
And people would whinge, if he didn't do things that way and data was stolen and systems compromised.

Again, you haven't a clue what you're talking about, the WARN Act applies in the US and we have pretty much the same here.

There is or should be tooling in place to monitor, alert & restrict data exfiltration.

Hugh 04-11-2022 13:47

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36139310)
Standard type of procedure for IT staff. Otherwise who knows what info they could steal or damage they could do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36139320)
And people would whinge, if he didn't do things that way and data was stolen and systems compromised.

Your comments are not congruent with actuality

Paul 04-11-2022 14:52

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
There are no laws that prevent a company locking you out of its systems.

As stated, thats standard practice. No one has been "fired" yet.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/business-63511430

mrmistoffelees 04-11-2022 15:30

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36139326)
There are no laws that prevent a company locking you out of its systems.

As stated, thats standard practice. No one has been "fired" yet.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/business-63511430

Odd, I've spoken to two UK employees & 3 in SF all confirming they have.

TheDaddy 04-11-2022 15:56

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Musk's twitter account has been suspended :rofl:

mrmistoffelees 04-11-2022 16:59

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36139330)
Musk's twitter account has been suspended :rofl:


Superb !!!!!

Hugh 04-11-2022 17:15

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36139326)
There are no laws that prevent a company locking you out of its systems.

As stated, thats standard practice. No one has been "fired" yet.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/business-63511430

Have to disagree, Paul - it happens in some exceptional circumstances, but I haven’t seen it as "standard practice" in the 40 years I worked in IT & Business (usually when someone is know to be a "problem").

I’ve been made redundant five times (and been put "at risk" two more times), and never been locked out of systems whilst the redundancy process took place; I’ve also had to run redundancy processes a couple of times, and only in one case did we lock someone out, and that was because they had made it known they were going to be a problem if redundancies were going to happen (but he was still paid until the redundancy process was completed, and his package was agreed).

Paul 04-11-2022 18:17

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36139335)
Have to disagree, Paul - it happens in some exceptional circumstances, but I haven’t seen it as "standard practice" in the 40 years I worked in IT & Business (usually when someone is know to be a "problem").

You can disagree all you want, that wont change the fact its normal.
I have been made redundant three times, and in all cases all my access was removed straight away.

I have also been the administrator of countless systems in my working life, and its always been standard practice to remove such access as soon as anyone is made redundant (or fired). In some cases, as soon as they resign (and go on "gardening" leave).

Hugh 04-11-2022 18:38

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
We’ve obviously had different experiences.

Pierre 04-11-2022 18:52

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
I think it depends on the employee and the role. I’ve seen people supervised by security and escorted from site, ensuring they do not access the network, no doubt their accounts would also have been immediately suspended, when made redundant/ fired.

And others have access whilst on garden leave right up until the day they officially leave.

Hugh 04-11-2022 19:14

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36139342)
I think it depends on the employee and the role. I’ve seen people supervised by security and escorted from site, ensuring they do not access the network, no doubt their accounts would also have been immediately suspended, when made redundant/ fired.

And others have access whilst on garden leave right up until the day they officially leave.

:tu:

mrmistoffelees 04-11-2022 19:21

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Removing access to slack and email is to minimise the internal chatter

Done properly code repositories should be protected by sso and adaptive mfa at a minimum
SSH keys can be easily rotated out and if ldap is used those accounts should be managed via the upstream iam/iga

These are the two most important things to protect

Dude111 05-11-2022 09:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul
There are no laws that prevent a company locking you out of its systems.

As stated, thats standard practice. No one has been "fired" yet.

Yes and if they are,they should all sue...... I dont think ya can just let someone go w/no reason??

Hugh 05-11-2022 09:55

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36139363)
Yes and if they are,they should all sue...... I dont think ya can just let someone go w/no reason??

I thought you lived in the USA?

49 out of the 50 States have "at will" employment laws…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment

Quote:

Definition

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all

Mick 05-11-2022 12:50

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Employment laws, or lack of them, is big issue in America.

Watch this U.S expat, explain differences between American employment vs UK’s.


Escapee 05-11-2022 21:50

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36139342)
I think it depends on the employee and the role. I’ve seen people supervised by security and escorted from site, ensuring they do not access the network, no doubt their accounts would also have been immediately suspended, when made redundant/ fired.

And others have access whilst on garden leave right up until the day they officially leave.

I'm that unlucky one that gets to work up until his last day, it's happened to me three out of four times when redundant now.

I applied and got voluntary redundancy back in May, I was accepted and could have gone the same day I was informed, but told them I wanted to work another two weeks to finish off the report I was working on (I had already told the customer that was my plan). The manager sent me comments on the report on the Friday afternoon which was my last day, he thought I was going to respond to them then, yea right!

In contrast, some people were sent off site immediately.

Ramrod 06-11-2022 22:24

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/jack-dorsey-makes-surprising-statement-about-elon-musk-laying-off-half-the-company
Quote:

Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey apologized to Twitter employees Saturday morning for growing the company too fast, which led to the current moment where new CEO Elon Musk has now laid off roughly half the company.

Dorsey’s comments come after Musk laid off 3,700 people on Friday in an email from the company’s workforce of 7,500 employees.

“Folks at Twitter past and present are strong and resilient,” Dorsey said. “They will always find a way no matter how difficult the moment. I realize many are angry with me. I own the responsibility for why everyone is in this situation: I grew the company size too quickly. I apologize for that.”

TheDaddy 07-11-2022 13:00

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Apparently some of the sacked workers are now being asked to come back, apparently they were sacked before the management realised how important they are to the company

I'm struggling to believe this tbh

Apparently the engineers were ranked by lines of code written and the bottom percentage fired, meaning the got rid of their best people working on the most challenging projects

How likely is this?

Chris 07-11-2022 13:28

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
I’ve seen multiple accounts on twitter itself over the past several days referencing the ‘lines of code’ criterion for sacking people. It depends who was running the dismissals I guess. I’ve seen some pretty crass redundancy processes in my time and (with apologies to anyone here working in HR) I’ve seen some pretty ludicrous HR procedures ostensibly intended to facilitate managing a large workforce but actually doing little more than to reduce the HR department’s workload and to allow them to claim certain tasks have been done when in reality nothing could be further from the truth. I’ve seen people made redundant who should never have been made redundant, I’ve seen people get internal promotions where their single skill is gaming the HR department’s ‘competency based interview’ process. I’ve seen people subjected to patronising ‘support’ interviews for being sick for a week, despite it being their only illness in years, simply because a number on a database triggered a procedure.

Yes, if Twitter’s HR department is anywhere near the process, I’d say these reports are entirely credible.

TheDaddy 07-11-2022 14:42

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36139493)
I’ve seen multiple accounts on twitter itself over the past several days referencing the ‘lines of code’ criterion for sacking people. It depends who was running the dismissals I guess. I’ve seen some pretty crass redundancy processes in my time and (with apologies to anyone here working in HR) I’ve seen some pretty ludicrous HR procedures ostensibly intended to facilitate managing a large workforce but actually doing little more than to reduce the HR department’s workload and to allow them to claim certain tasks have been done when in reality nothing could be further from the truth. I’ve seen people made redundant who should never have been made redundant, I’ve seen people get internal promotions where their single skill is gaming the HR department’s ‘competency based interview’ process. I’ve seen people subjected to patronising ‘support’ interviews for being sick for a week, despite it being their only illness in years, simply because a number on a database triggered a procedure.

Yes, if Twitter’s HR department is anywhere near the process, I’d say these reports are entirely credible.

Just seems shambolic, to have spent this much on it to be making these mistakes is ridiculous, mind you so is driving off your advertisers and users in droves, starting to think musk might not be as smart as he's led us to believe

Damien 07-11-2022 15:21

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
The Times also reported that people were asked to submit written proof of code. They're reporting today that Twitter is now telling some of those fired to come back because they were mistakenly made redundant, possibly because some idiot decided to fire them because of a smaller volume of code which could well mean firing those working on the most complex problems.

It's hard to know what to make of Musk because with PayPal, Telsa and SpaceX he is obviously not an idiot but his public profile over the last couple of years has been eccentric, to say the least. He has made very questionable public decisions and it's hard to tell how much of this is designed to attract attention as part of a well-thought-out plan and how much of it is just him being a megalomaniac. It's not clear if this Twitter purchase was one of these stunts gone wrong or not. He certainly seemed to try and get out of it until it became clear he couldn't without a big cost.

Mick 07-11-2022 17:28

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
BREAKING: New Twitter owner, Elon Musk, a former Democrat voter, comes out endorsing the Republican Party, for the midterm elections, voting day is tomorrow. On Twitter, he wrote:

Quote:

To independent-minded voters:

Shared power curbs the worst excesses of both parties, therefore I recommend voting for a Republican Congress, given that the Presidency is Democratic.

Paul 08-11-2022 00:26

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Based on whats happened since it 'owned' it, twitter seems an appropriate name ... :angel:

Mick 08-11-2022 05:44

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
I don’t know, Republican Party is the better party then Democrats. Democrats have gone too woke, crashed the economy, crime is up, inflation up, they have a serious cognitive issue with President Biden, their message has gotten lost, they’re going on about Midterms being about reversing Roe Vs Wade, when all Americans actually care about is the cost of living crisis.

Republicans are due to take back control of the House of Representatives, Senate, may be a harder target for them, but Biden is in trouble for 2024, if he lasts that long, it’s elder abuse keeping him in office, every day is gaffe day, the other week he said there was 54 States, in another speech, he started waffling on about Iraq, then blamed his son dying there for randomly bringing it up (His son died in an American hospital of recurring Brain cancer).

So I don’t know, Elon switching for Republicans, is fairly significant. I know Twitter isn’t for everyone, but I find it can be very resourceful, I get most news on there before it’s announced on various networks.

TheDaddy 08-11-2022 05:50

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36139502)
The Times also reported that people were asked to submit written proof of code. They're reporting today that Twitter is now telling some of those fired to come back because they were mistakenly made redundant, possibly because some idiot decided to fire them because of a smaller volume of code which could well mean firing those working on the most complex problems.

It's hard to know what to make of Musk because with PayPal, Telsa and SpaceX he is obviously not an idiot but his public profile over the last couple of years has been eccentric, to say the least. He has made very questionable public decisions and it's hard to tell how much of this is designed to attract attention as part of a well-thought-out plan and how much of it is just him being a megalomaniac. It's not clear if this Twitter purchase was one of these stunts gone wrong or not. He certainly seemed to try and get out of it until it became clear he couldn't without a big cost.

The thing with tesla, space x and paypal is he didn't invent them, they already existed, he invested in someone elses idea which is perfectly reasonable, I just don't see how that qualifies him as a genius, very good at marketing and with a fantastic eye for an opportunity but the way people go on about him you'd think he was Einstein or something. I think you're right about attention seeking to, he used to troll famous people on twitter for attention after all

Maggy 08-11-2022 08:59

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36139542)
Based on whats happened since it 'owned' it, twitter seems an appropriate name ... :angel:

:rofl:

TheDaddy 11-11-2022 02:10

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
So far tonight I've seen

a verified Tony Blair talking to a verified George Bush about how much they miss killing Iraqis

a verified Joe Biden talking about stroking a very intimate part of himself

a verified OJ Simpson admit he done it

and a host of other verified Pope's, politicians, actors and dead people making all sorts of claims involving all manner of things and it's been quite funny for me, in the main, right up until someone listed some of them to Musk, he found it hilarious, kind of stopped being funny for me then and became quite sad

Hugh 11-11-2022 13:17

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
2 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1668172645

https://twitter.com/mikesington/stat...jdi7y3K-JBISgA

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1668172762

Hugh 11-11-2022 19:06

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes…

https://www.investors.com/news/techn...-free-insulin/

Quote:

Eli Lilly Dives After Fake Twitter Account Promises Free Insulin; Takes Novo Nordisk, Sanofi With It

Elon Musk's new pay-for-play verification system on Twitter shook pharmaceutical mainstay Eli Lilly (LLY) — leading LLY stock to skid Friday — after a fake account claimed "insulin is free now."

The tweet went live around 1:30 p.m. on Thursday from an account claiming to be Eli Lilly. It remained online for several hours, gaining steam from hundreds of retweets and thousands of likes. As of Friday morning, the fake account is no longer verified and its tweets are now private.

But that didn't stop LLY stock from falling 2.2% near 360.70 in morning trades on today's stock market.

"We apologize to those who have been served a misleading message from a fake Lilly account," the company said from its official account…

… The LLY stock slide also extended to its rivals. Novo Nordisk shares fell 3.2% near 111.80. Sanofi stock lost 4%, trading near 42.60.

Paul 11-11-2022 20:13

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
As far as Twitter is concerned, Musk seems to be a completly clueless plonker.

Hugh 11-11-2022 20:19

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/11/...ertising-pause

Quote:

Another major ad agency recommends pausing Twitter ad campaigns / Omnicom Media Group is recommending its clients pause spending on Twitter, citing the ‘potential serious implications’ for advertisers on the platform since Elon Musk’s takeover late last month.

By MIA SATO
Nov 11, 2022 at 7:57 PM GMT

Omnicom, one of the world’s biggest ad firms, representing brands like McDonald’s, Apple, and PepsiCo, is recommending clients pause spending on Twitter, according to an internal memo obtained by The Verge.

Omnicom Media Group is recommending clients “pause activity on Twitter in the short term,” according to a note titled “Twitter - Continued Brand Safety Concerns.” The memo cites recent events in the last few days that have “potential serious implications” for brands running ads on the platform.

The memo cites the deep layoffs of Twitter trust and safety teams, the resignations of high-profile executives, and the slew of “verified” impersonation accounts as being key issues for advertisers. “Evidence that the risk to our clients’ brand safety has risen sharply to a level most would find unacceptable,” the memo reads. “We recommend pausing activity on Twitter in the short term until the platform can prove it has reintroduced safeguards to an acceptable level and has regained control of its environment.”

The memo goes on to say that Omnicom has “formally requested that Twitter assure us that these issues will not impact compliant processes, operations, products, brand safety and client investment on the platform in any way” but that “seemingly due to the lack of senior leadership now in these areas, Twitter has not been able to give those assurances.”

Julian 11-11-2022 23:05

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Seriously who gives a funk?

Hugh 11-11-2022 23:16

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36139832)
Seriously who gives a funk?

Sequoia Capital, Binance, Qatar Investment Authority, AM Management and Consulting, BAMCO, DFJ Growth IV Partners, Honeycomb Asset Management, Key Wealth Advisors, Lawrence J. Ellison Revocable Trust, Litani Ventures, Strauss Capital LLC, Tresser Blvd 402 LLC (Cartenna), Witkoff Capital, Brookfield, VyCapital, AH Capital Management, Aliya Capital Partners, Fidelity Management & Research, Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Mizuho, Morgan Stanley, MUFG, and Societe Generale, who have helped fund the buyout, and around 200 million active daily users…

Paul 12-11-2022 01:43

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36139832)
Seriously who gives a funk?

Twitter employees (those who managed not to get sacked ... yet).

TheDaddy 12-11-2022 13:09

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Thanks to paid verification Lockheed Martin and Eli Lilly both lost billions in market value thanks to fake verified tweets

Ooh 18000 posts

Paul 12-11-2022 13:30

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
What on earth made him think that was a good idea, it was obvious what would happen, the guy is clueless.

Damien 12-11-2022 16:52

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36139839)
What on earth made him think that was a good idea, it was obvious what would happen, the guy is clueless.

Yup, they've paused it for now: https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ostor-accounts

It does seem he has just got high on his own supply and is making decisions based on how wacky they'll be or how much they'll 'trigger' people. :rolleyes:

There is also this: https://twitter.com/GergelyOrosz/sta...37099496255490

Quote:

Scoop from within Twitter: small things are breaking, not enough engineers to fix them.

Noticed that notification counts are not showing? The BE service powering it is down since Thursday. A bug was filed, but the team that would fix it is full on with verification work.

Mick 13-11-2022 21:59

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
1 Attachment(s)
Jesus got to be verified too… :rofl:

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1668376652

Damien 13-11-2022 22:12

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Credit to whoever got that name 16 years ago!

Mick 14-11-2022 12:08

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
1 Attachment(s)
We can mock Elon for his woes, that said, I’ve subbed to Twitter Blue, for shits n giggles, just before they paused subscriptions. I thought with all the backlash of fake accounts using branded names, past leaders and getting verified, Elon would reverse verification on sub accounts, but we got to keep it for now. No new account after Nov 9th can get verified, once verified via Twitter Blue, name changes aren’t allowed, but Elon tweeted this morning that function will be allowed from Friday, so some other changes are incoming, we shall see.

That verification is a powerful tool, not coz of the tick, in the sense that before Elon changed it all, only elites noticed elites and there is a reason for that, verified users can ignore everyone else, if they choose to, most do, so all those who vent at verified folk in their replies, no notifications will be sent.

I’ve already ranted at Rishi Sunak, Keir Starmer, Suella Braverman, using their handles, they’ll certainly have a better chance to notice it, even if they select to get notifications from verified users only.

Elon it seems wants a level playing field.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1668426345

BenMcr 15-11-2022 13:00

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36139922)
only elites noticed elites

The original Twitter verification program wasn't to create elites, it was to fight impersonation and fraud

https://blog.twitter.com/official/en...ying-ball.html

Quote:

Verified Accounts Beta (A Sneak Peak)

We do recognize an opportunity to improve Twitter user experience and clear up confusion beyond simply removing impersonation accounts once alerted. We’ll be experimenting with a beta preview of what we’re calling Verified Accounts this summer.

Not Playing Ball
Verified Accounts will feature a special seal.

The experiment will begin with public officials, public agencies, famous artists, athletes, and other well known individuals at risk of impersonation. We hope to verify more accounts in the future but due to the resources required, verification will begin only with a small set.
https://help.twitter.com/en/managing...ication-policy

Quote:

The blue Verified badge on Twitter lets people know that an account of public interest is authentic. To receive the blue badge, your account must be authentic, notable, and active.
It's a recent skewing of the reason for the ticks by some groups that has turned it an assumption of it being an 'elite' symbol

https://news.yahoo.com/twitters-blue...173746328.html

Quote:

While the “blue check” (which is actually a white checkmark in a blue frame, or black checkmark in a white frame if you are using Twitter in dark mode) has come to be viewed in some circles as an elite status symbol for the rich and famous, its purpose has always been to ensure that the people and accounts tweeting are who they say they are. As such, it benefited Twitter as much — if not more — as it benefitted the accounts that were verified, by clamping down on impersonations.

TheDaddy 18-11-2022 02:31

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Twitters offices will be closed until monday 21st, it's being speculated that it's because thousands of staff reacted badly to musks work long hours intensely or leave email and took up the option to quit, not sure if this is accurate or being reported yet but there could be as few as 2000 employees left when offices reopen, what a mess....

jfman 18-11-2022 08:29

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
It’s looking really bad for that other well known left-leaning snake pit.

Chris 18-11-2022 09:21

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36140291)
Twitters offices will be closed until monday 21st, it's being speculated that it's because thousands of staff reacted badly to musks work long hours intensely or leave email and took up the option to quit, not sure if this is accurate or being reported yet but there could be as few as 2000 employees left when offices reopen, what a mess....

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1668763248

This graphic seems to be getting a lot more use lately.

Hugh 18-11-2022 09:58

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
1 Attachment(s)
h/t @MisterABK

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1668765471

https://twitter.com/misterabk/status...ZLUktO5Z-9GS9A

TheDaddy 18-11-2022 11:18

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
I thought this was a joke,

someone tweeted they were in charge of badge access in the HQ building and were laid off, musk himself called him after the lay off and asked if he could come back and help them regain access to the building as everyone was accidentally locked out,

I thought that pretty amusing until I scrolled through the thread and there was musk saying

thanks for helping out, you're a life saver

:shrug:

Chris 18-11-2022 11:20

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Maybe he paid off the guy’s mortgage?

Paul 18-11-2022 12:59

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Would you have gone back after they fired you ?

I suppose if the offer was good enough, most people would - it seems a bit odd though, you would have expected their access to have been killed when they left, so how would bringing them back help ...

Chris 18-11-2022 17:25

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Has anyone here set themselves up on one of the Mastodon servers? An increasingly large number of people are doing so, especially judging by the fact that it’s almost impossible to access mastodonapp.uk at all this afternoon, and the original, mastodon.social, is extremely slow, albeit actually working.

I’m on mastodon.scot, which has a fairly niche appeal so hasn’t been hit hard today and is working fine. But I have a sneaky backup account set up on mastodonapp.uk as I’m not sure how viable any of the smaller services are likely to be in the long run as they’ll be harder pressed to attract the advertising or the volunteer moderator support that will inevitably be needed if Mastodon really takes off. If Mastodon.scot looks to be in danger of shutting down, at that point I can download/import into mastodonapp.uk which I suspect will have greater longevity, once it sorts out its immediate resource requirements.

Paul 18-11-2022 18:09

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Havent bothered with twatter for years, so not really concerned about joining a rival.

I wonder how well it will cope given how its funded and the need to upgrade its servers.

Quote:

Mastodon is crowdfunded and does not contain ads. Since 2021, it has been registered as not for profit ("gemeinnützige GmbH"). As of November 2022, it was supported by 3500 people.

Chris 18-11-2022 18:18

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36140359)
Havent bothered with twatter for years, so not really concerned about joining a rival.

I wonder how well it will cope given how its funded and the need to upgrade its servers.

Well, it is decentralised so not all users are ever going to be a member of the original Mastodon.social server. What’s supposed to happen is you sign up on a server in your part of the world or which reflects your interests (Mastodonapp.uk is a popular one here; I’m on Mastodon.scot). Obviously each of these is still volunteer run, but each individual community presumably has a much more modest server load and only needs to be moderated locally.

Even though you join one Mastodon server you can chose to follow users from any other server and you can still search across the entire network for hashtags etc. The caveat to that is that each local Mastodon server has to know about all the others. All the main ones should interconnect easily enough but there’s no guarantee of universal cross-connectivity, especially if the admin on the server you’re a member of, takes exception to something about the way another one is run.

What all of this means for the costs and the time commitment of running a Mastodon server remains to be seen. The data you’ve found is for the non-profit organisation in Germany that develops the software and runs the original Mastodon.social server. It’s not currently possible to sign up for an account on Mastodon.social, though as described, it’s not necessary to be a member of that one directly.

Pierre 18-11-2022 20:41

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36140340)
Would you have gone back after they fired you ?

I suppose if the offer was good enough, most people would.

Correct, I would go back under renewed terms, no problem.

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36140359)
Havent bothered with twatter for years, so not really concerned about joining a rival.

I wonder how well it will cope given how its funded and the need to upgrade its servers.

Twitter will prevail as there is no alternative, I mean there are alternatives, but none that Twitter uses will use.

Hugh 18-11-2022 21:01

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36140340)
Would you have gone back after they fired you ?

I suppose if the offer was good enough, most people would - it seems a bit odd though, you would have expected their access to have been killed when they left, so how would bringing them back help ...

Nope -

Not after some of the firing/hiring managers’ comments on the Twitter internal Slack, where they said they were only taking some back to get over the current issues, then were going to bin them again…

https://www.businessinsider.com/twit...2-11?r=US&IR=T

Hugh 19-11-2022 13:09

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1668863339

Mick 20-11-2022 01:04

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
BREAKING: Elon Musk just tweeted that Former U.S President Donald Trump will have his Twitter account reinstated after a poll in which a total of over 15 Million voted and 52% of those who voted, vote yes to bring him back.

Hugh 20-11-2022 01:10

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
There goes Truth Social…

TheDaddy 20-11-2022 05:50

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36140460)
BREAKING: Elon Musk just tweeted that Former U.S President Donald Trump will have his Twitter account reinstated after a poll in which a total of over 15 Million voted and 52% of those who voted, vote yes to bring him back.

He's not coming back, prefers truth social and says twitter has problems ahead, musk lost dozens of major advertisers and thousands of accounts for nothing, imagine how badly you're running a business for a guy who bankrupted two casinos to comment

Mick 20-11-2022 14:08

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36140464)
He's not coming back, prefers truth social and says twitter has problems ahead, musk lost dozens of major advertisers and thousands of accounts for nothing, imagine how badly you're running a business for a guy who bankrupted two casinos to comment

It was 6 actually. ;)

He’s got a huge following on Twitter, he’d be mad to ignore a large user base, more than he’ll ever have on his own Truth social site.

Musk isn’t bothered about losing Advertisers, says direction of Twitter should not be controlled by commercial interests or Wall Street, why he’s implemented a subscription service, that is due to be reactivated on 29th November, this after they’ve ironed out the ability to spoof a popular or branded account.

Jack Dorsey, one of the founders and prior CEO’s, regretted Twitter being stuck with just advertisers revenue keeping the site going.

1andrew1 20-11-2022 14:25

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36140464)
He's not coming back, prefers truth social and says twitter has problems ahead, musk lost dozens of major advertisers and thousands of accounts for nothing, imagine how badly you're running a business for a guy who bankrupted two casinos to comment

Trump could decide to close his Twiitter account himself but he's currently left it live without any new Tweets.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

Mick 20-11-2022 15:00

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36140473)
Trump could decide to close his Twiitter account himself but he's currently left it live without any new Tweets.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

If Trump isn’t interested, then why did he urge people to vote on the poll on his TS site?

His Narcissistic tones, will get the better of him and he’ll return for the attention, I think.

TheDaddy 22-11-2022 01:39

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36140476)
If Trump isn’t interested, then why did he urge people to vote on the poll on his TS site?

His Narcissistic tones, will get the better of him and he’ll return for the attention, I think.

Wonder if he has any contractual obligations to truth social preventing him tweeting...

Hugh 22-11-2022 11:14

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36140564)
Wonder if he has any contractual obligations to truth social preventing him tweeting...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/madelin...h=f4ac2e365ca0

Quote:

As a part of the Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) “Social Media Exclusivity Term,” Trump has agreed to wait six hours before posting the same content from Truth Social on any other sites, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission filing.

The former president is allowed, however, to make posts from his personal account related to “political messaging, political fundraising or get-out-the vote efforts” at “any time” on any social media site.

Paul 22-11-2022 14:47

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
I thought he owned it ? Seems odd he would have restrictions on using it.

1andrew1 22-11-2022 16:07

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36140596)
I thought he owned it ? Seems odd he would have restrictions on using it.

Only some of it.

1andrew1 24-11-2022 15:02

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Closure of Twitter Brussels office prompts online safety fears

Digital policy executives’ departure elicits unease over adherence to EU rules on disinformation and hate speech

Julia Mozer and Dario La Nasa, who were in charge of Twitter’s digital policy in Europe, left the company last week, according to five people with knowledge of the departures.

Other Twitter executives in the small but vital Brussels office, seen as a crucial conduit to European policymakers, had left at the start of the month during company-wide cuts that removed around half of its 7,500-strong workforce.

Mozer and La Nasa survived the initial cull, but no longer work there after the company’s new owner Elon Musk issued an ultimatum last week for staff to commit to a “hardcore working culture”. It is unclear whether the pair resigned or were made redundant.
https://www.ft.com/content/f9fdace4-...b-e34861fa0521

Paul 24-11-2022 19:12

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
They wont have anyone left at this rate.
I hope Musk is good at keeping servers online.

Dude111 24-11-2022 19:40

He is sure making a mess out of that site!!

I heard he told Donny he could come back but he hasnt,im not sure why...

Mr. Musk didnt treat him badly.........

TheDaddy 01-12-2022 01:31

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Ffs, twitter got hacked night before last night and 5.5 million peoples email address and phone numbers were stolen, probably got the bank or credit card details of anyone who paid for anything on there to I shouldn't wonder, who didn't see this coming when he sacked all the engineers, the genius running the place didn't even have the decency to tell anyone, norton did though fortunately

Pierre 01-12-2022 10:00

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36141021)
Ffs, twitter got hacked night before last night and 5.5 million peoples email address and phone numbers were stolen, probably got the bank or credit card details of anyone who paid for anything on there to I shouldn't wonder, who didn't see this coming when he sacked all the engineers, the genius running the place didn't even have the decency to tell anyone, norton did though fortunately

No it didn't.

Quote:

It is believed that hackers obtained the information in “December 2021
https://punchng.com/5-4-million-twit...hacked-report/

Paul 01-12-2022 13:58

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Indeed, the data was available in the summer.

Quote:

It was gathered that user data was first posted on a hacking forum with a $30,000 price tag in July, but the recent sale offered this information for free, according to Bleeping Computer.

It was obtained using an API bug that was patched in Jan 2022.

Quote:

Twitter confirmed in August that bad actors took advantage of the vulnerability but patched the flaw in January 2022.

There is no evidence they obtained "bank or credit card details".
In fact, they already had peoples information, this flaw just allowed them to get a twitter id.
(So no email address and phone numbers were stolen either).

Quote:

[it allowed] people to submit phone numbers and email addresses into the API to retrieve the associated Twitter ID

Ramrod 04-12-2022 14:39

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Just in case anyone here has been living under a rock. Musk is doing good work with his aquisition:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...-laptop-story/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/musk-...rship-decision
:)

Paul 05-12-2022 03:01

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
By "living under a rock" you mean generally ignoring social media ?

What good work has he done (besides slowly destroying twitter) ?

Maggy 05-12-2022 09:06

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36141193)
By "living under a rock" you mean generally ignoring social media ?

What good work has he done (besides slowly destroying twitter) ?

I'd like to know how he is the saviour of the universe as well.

Chris 05-12-2022 11:23

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36141193)
By "living under a rock" you mean generally ignoring social media ?

What good work has he done (besides slowly destroying twitter) ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36141196)
I'd like to know how he is the saviour of the universe as well.

The ‘good work’ Ramrod is talking about is described in the links he provided. Something to do with publishing censored tweets about Joe Biden’s son. Whether or not that’s good work I can’t be bothered to decide.

Ramrod 05-12-2022 12:16

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36141193)
By "living under a rock" you mean generally ignoring social media ?

What good work has he done (besides slowly destroying twitter) ?

Why don't you read the links?

ianch99 05-12-2022 12:34

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36141196)
I'd like to know how he is the saviour of the universe as well.

Don't worry he isn't. He may think he is but that's what being an arrogant, over-entitlement billionaire does for you. The man is a petulant bully: he sacks anyone who stands up to him and tells him thinks he does not want to hear and, at the same, time pretends he is the saviour of "free speech".

Don't worry, the only "free speech" he is interested in is what suits his personal and, now conservative, agenda. His definition of free speech is to allow back allow back neo-Nazis and white supremacist nut jobs to allow them to vent their bile.

Chris 05-12-2022 12:40

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
While I’m not going to defend him as ‘saviour of the universe’, he has had quite a profound effect in a couple of important areas - his advocacy of reusability and rapid prototyping has pushed rocket launch technology forward at a pace, so that SpaceX really is in the vanguard now. Spacex’s Starship programme is so impressive NASA has commissioned the company to produce a version of it as its next generation lunar lander. These sorts of bleeding edge projects are routinely handed by NASA to the likes of Boeing and Northrop-Grumman with little more than a nod and wink, so don’t underestimate Spacex’s disruptive ability here.

Also, Tesla, for all its imperfections, has grown from nothing to be a major, recognisable marque on our roads, has single-handedly shown up the established motor manufacturers’ half-hearted electrification programmes and forced them to up their game.

Damien 05-12-2022 13:17

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Elon Musk is someone who bet lots of money on big gambles that paid off. He certainly had a knack for identifying investment opportunities and then for throwing everything at those investments to ensure they paid off.

I think after SpaceX the subsequent fame has gone to his head a bit and we're seeing a very public midlife crisis. He started to enjoy provoking reactions on Twitter, he tries to position himself as an 'alpha male' tech bro, he would always be seen with celebrities at Hollywood shows and I believe that this Twitter acquisition was a stunt that went wrong. He let the notoriety that surrounded his public persona run away from him and ended up making a $40 billion deal that he tried, then failed, to get out of.

Mick 05-12-2022 13:35

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36141206)
Don't worry he isn't. He may think he is but that's what being an arrogant, over-entitlement billionaire does for you. The man is a petulant bully: he sacks anyone who stands up to him and tells him thinks he does not want to hear and, at the same, time pretends he is the saviour of "free speech".

Don't worry, the only "free speech" he is interested in is what suits his personal and, now conservative, agenda. His definition of free speech is to allow back allow back neo-Nazis and white supremacist nut jobs to allow them to vent their bile.

Utter lefty typical nonsense.

While it was a mistake, to allow “Ye” aka Kanye West back on Twitter, he’s now banned again, & he is black btw so how he can be a “White supremacist”, is beyond me.

Elon Musk had not allowed back White supremacists on, under old regime at Twitter HQ, Trump should never have been banned, he was a sitting president, the same stupid lefty pricks at Twitter, now fired and rightly so, given their inability to be impartial and only targeting Conservative/Republican accounts, allowed Putin and leaders of other dubious Human rights record to post their propaganda bullshit, but I didn’t and still don’t see you whinging about their accounts Being allowed on.

But he’s not unbanned Alex Jones, who I agree is a nut job.

Musk previously voted Democrat, but because of their stupid woke policies, stupidity during covid responses (that are still ongoing in some states) and the fact every city they run, turns to shit with high crime and high homelessness, he’s switched sides, serves the pathetic Democrats right, they have senile dementia ridden president, that if they cared much about, they would 25th Amendment him. :rolleyes:

Chris 05-12-2022 13:45

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36141209)
Elon Musk is someone who bet lots of money on big gambles that paid off. He certainly had a knack for identifying investment opportunities and then for throwing everything at those investments to ensure they paid off.

I think after SpaceX the subsequent fame has gone to his head a bit and we're seeing a very public midlife crisis. He started to enjoy provoking reactions on Twitter, he tries to position himself as an 'alpha male' tech bro, he would always be seen with celebrities at Hollywood shows and I believe that this Twitter acquisition was a stunt that went wrong. He let the notoriety that surrounded his public persona run away from him and ended up making a $40 billion deal that he tried, then failed, to get out of.

Yes, though I don’t think it’s correct to characterise him as simply the money man. At SpaceX, in particular, he consciously backed a particular approach to rocket development (and continues to do so), and was willing to back it to the limit of his available funds. The original Falcon One rocket was proven more or less at the last gasp. Obviously he’s not a rocket scientist himself but he clearly grasps enough of the history and potential of rocket design to make useful leadership decisions at SpaceX.

Then he leaves it to the likes of Jessie Anderson to actually build the things* and tell us all how clever they are. At least I think that’s what she’s saying, I get a bit distracted. :romance:

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1670247932

* She’s a bona-fide Falcon 9 production engineer as well as front-person for SpaceX launch day webcasts

Pierre 05-12-2022 14:06

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36141206)
Don't worry he isn't. He may think he is but that's what being an arrogant, over-entitlement billionaire does for you. The man is a petulant bully: he sacks anyone who stands up to him and tells him thinks he does not want to hear and, at the same, time pretends he is the saviour of "free speech".

Don't worry, the only "free speech" he is interested in is what suits his personal and, now conservative, agenda. His definition of free speech is to allow back allow back neo-Nazis and white supremacist nut jobs to allow them to vent their bile.

This post will be filed under "I don't really know the facts and just follow the narrative"

---------- Post added at 14:06 ---------- Previous post was at 13:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36141200)
The ‘good work’ Ramrod is talking about is described in the links he provided. Something to do with publishing censored tweets about Joe Biden’s son. Whether or not that’s good work I can’t be bothered to decide.

Well he has exposed that Twitter withheld a legitimate news story in an election cycle at the behest of the DNC that may have harmed Biden's campaign. I'm sure that is just the tip of the iceberg.

Twitter is not the centre of the universe, but it does exert more influence than it probably deserves and "Big Tech" should not be in the business of deciding what is fit for our consumption.

Mick 05-12-2022 14:06

Re: [Updated] Elon Musk $44 Billion Twitter deal back on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36141213)
This post will be filed under "I don't really know the facts and just follow the narrative"

Spot on.

What’s really going on, is that the left now hate the fact they don’t control the narrative. Twitter was their breeding ground for promoting woke policies, anyone who previously argued with them, ultimately got banned, they felt an extra sense of protection, but not any more and the left don’t like it.

It’s why all these pathetic lefty echo chambers are popping up all over the place, as an “alternative”. Makes me want to puke.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum