Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710855)

Blackshep 25-02-2022 01:22

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
If the bad history isn't available how do so many know about it? of course because all the information is out there and not hard to find. My history curriculum in 1984 was China 1923 to 1949 and the British canal network I learnt most of my history because I read books including those with the bad bits such as Britain inventing concentration camps and the R.A.F using Indian villages to practise aerial bombing and a lot more besides.

If the history of other ethnic group's is to be taught then all of it must be taught such as the black and middle eastern people starting the slave trade, widow burning in India and the many massacres and genocides those groups carried out before they were colonised. That's not what modern liberals want they want to continue the evil imperialist white people narrative and their oppression and murder at the hands of said evil white people. How do we know that's the direction it will take simple because that's the direction it's been for the last couple of years.

Tearing down society while replacing it with nothing practical and capable of maintaining a society just woke homogeneous rubbish.

Paul 25-02-2022 04:37

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

There is a high take-up of the religion among children born to Muslim parents.
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36114619)
So you're against children learning their parents religion.

Thats one hell of a leap, would you please explain how you manage to draw that conclusion ?

Maggy 25-02-2022 09:20

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36114592)
oh look, another thread that descends into the pit of racism :rolleyes:

If people want to learn about the 'wider' UK history, there's Google to look at

Sadly if one uses the terms that fit one's own world view you can miss some very relevant links on Google.
:erm:

---------- Post added at 08:20 ---------- Previous post was at 08:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackshep (Post 36114624)
If the bad history isn't available how do so many know about it? of course because all the information is out there and not hard to find. My history curriculum in 1984 was China 1923 to 1949 and the British canal network I learnt most of my history because I read books including those with the bad bits such as Britain inventing concentration camps and the R.A.F using Indian villages to practise aerial bombing and a lot more besides.

If the history of other ethnic group's is to be taught then all of it must be taught such as the black and middle eastern people starting the slave trade, widow burning in India and the many massacres and genocides those groups carried out before they were colonised. That's not what modern liberals want they want to continue the evil imperialist white people narrative and their oppression and murder at the hands of said evil white people. How do we know that's the direction it will take simple because that's the direction it's been for the last couple of years.

Tearing down society while replacing it with nothing practical and capable of maintaining a society just woke homogeneous rubbish.

It's available if you want to find it..it's wanting to find it that's the relevant part.

BenMcr 25-02-2022 10:13

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36114628)
Thats one hell of a leap, would you please explain how you manage to draw that conclusion ?

The rest of the post and the preceding argument is that the country will end up with Muslim majority.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114616)
Oh for God's sake. Do the projection; I've estimated a majority within 90 years. As to voting intentions, you are being naive.

There is a high take-up of the religion among children born to Muslim parents.

The statement around take-up of faith in Muslim families and the linked website is to back up that claim.

However, unless you're singling out a specific religion for different treatment or restrictions, you either support parents teaching their religion to their children or you don't support it.

As the argument is that children learning Islam from their parents is a problem for the UK, then Sephiroth is arguing against all religious teaching of children.

---------- Post added at 09:13 ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 ----------

I am also aware and have unfortunately contributed to dragging this thread into yet another discussion specifically about Islam, which is unfortunate.

Islam is only a part of Black, Asian and minority history and the history of the UK, and any issues with the Muslim faith shouldn't override the wider points that the original letter raised to the Education Secretary.

Sephiroth 25-02-2022 10:31

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36114634)
The rest of the post and the preceding argument is that the country will end up with Muslim majority.



The statement around take-up of faith in Muslim families and the linked website is to back up that claim.

However, unless you're singling out a specific religion for different treatment or restrictions, you either support parents teaching their religion to their children or you don't support it.

As the argument is that children learning Islam from their parents is a problem for the UK, then Sephiroth is arguing against all religious teaching of children.

---------- Post added at 09:13 ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 ----------

I am also aware and have unfortunately contributed to dragging this thread into yet another discussion specifically about Islam, which is unfortunate.

Islam is only a part of Black, Asian and minority history and the history of the UK, and any issues with the Muslim faith shouldn't override the wider points that the original letter raised to the Education Secretary.

The Judeo-Christian ethic/culture contrasts with with its Islam counterpart as everyone knows. I will remind you of 9/11, 7/7 and the various terrorist incident since, causing death in the name of Islam. I've not the slightest doubt that the majority of Muslims in the UK are a credit to society. But I put it to you, that if they become the electoral majority, Muslim candidates will be the majority in Parliament and then the extremists will take over.

Quote:

However, unless you're singling out a specific religion for different treatment or restrictions, you either support parents teaching their religion to their children or you don't support it.
I don't give a monkey's. What I don't want is for the UK to become a Muslim or Muslim dominated state. This seems to me to be a perfectly reasonable position.


Pierre 25-02-2022 14:03

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36114603)
‘If" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there…

Wahhabism is 5% of Islam, and Muslims are 7% of the U.K. population - do the Maths…

somebody's already done it!

https://www.channel4.com/news/factch...tion.%E2%80%9D

---------- Post added at 13:03 ---------- Previous post was at 13:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114616)
Oh for God's sake. Do the projection; I've estimated a majority within 90 years. As to voting intentions, you are being naive.

90 years, we'll either be speaking Russian, Chinese or the globe will resemble a piece of burnt toast by then.

ianch99 25-02-2022 14:44

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36114667)
somebody's already done it!

https://www.channel4.com/news/factch...tion.%E2%80%9D

---------- Post added at 13:03 ---------- Previous post was at 13:02 ----------



90 years, we'll either be speaking Russian, Chinese or the globe will resemble a piece of burnt toast by then.

You missed out C4 factcheck's conclusion:

Quote:

FactCheck wouldn’t bet on the British Muslim population ever topping 10 per cent, let alone 50 per cent.

Chris 25-02-2022 15:21

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
These panic stories always point to the higher average birth rate amongst immigrant groups compared to indigenous, then assume that disparity continues indefinitely. However, as that Channel 4 piece notes, a demographic study in 2007 has already demonstrated that over time, the birth rate of immigrant populations falls to match the indigenous.

TheDaddy 25-02-2022 15:27

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36114671)
These panic stories always point to the higher average birth rate amongst immigrant groups compared to indigenous, then assume that disparity continues indefinitely. However, as that Channel 4 piece notes, a demographic study in 2007 has already demonstrated that over time, the birth rate of immigrant populations falls to match the indigenous.

And it does it as early as second generation

Sephiroth 25-02-2022 17:18

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36114671)
These panic stories always point to the higher average birth rate amongst immigrant groups compared to indigenous, then assume that disparity continues indefinitely. However, as that Channel 4 piece notes, a demographic study in 2007 has already demonstrated that over time, the birth rate of immigrant populations falls to match the indigenous.

Not if they're on a mission and under instructions.

Chris 25-02-2022 17:41

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114686)
Not if they're on a mission and under instructions.

Which ‘they’ aren’t. And if I might say so, to believe that ‘they’ are would be unhinged paranoia of the first water. Is this why you change all your posts to blue text?

Hugh 25-02-2022 17:56

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114686)
Not if they're on a mission and under instructions.

Are they 106 miles from Chicago, have a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and they're wearing sunglasses?



---------- Post added at 16:56 ---------- Previous post was at 16:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36114692)
Which ‘they’ aren’t. And if I might say so, to believe that ‘they’ are would be unhinged paranoia of the first water. Is this why you change all your posts to blue text?

Seph seems to be a staunch believer in Renaud Camus' "Great Replacement" theory (which is mildly amusing, as he has enormous antipathy to most things of French origin... ';) )

Maggy 26-02-2022 10:28

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114686)
Not if they're on a mission and under instructions.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Pierre 26-02-2022 11:41

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36114669)
You missed out C4 factcheck's conclusion:

I didn’t, I linked to the whole article.

Sephiroth 26-02-2022 11:42

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
A lot of head in sand going on with some people. Your descendants will get got because the bleedin’ obvious escapes you.

All this platitude stuff about cultures evolving - pure waffle in tthe UK context. It is not right that a culture so different from indigenous (evolving, perhaps) British culture should end up taking over; the two cultures are not compatible.

I’ve no problem with other Asian cultures that seem to fit in quite well and certainly don’t spawn extremist elements that murder our children and citizens.

Wake up.

Hugh 26-02-2022 12:08

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
1 Attachment(s)
Strangely enough, actual real data disproves your proposition - birth rates for those of Bangladeshi and Pakistani ethnicity (those most likely to be the ones carrying out your "Great Replacement" fears), have stayed constant over the last ten+ years, at approximately less than 10% per annum of "White British" births.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=%2fp...07to20192.xlsx

Carth 26-02-2022 13:03

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Imagine being the head of education in a country that encourages free speech, diversity, freedom from all manner of persecution, and believes everyone is equal.

Now imagine the headache of trying to fit the wishes of 18 different minority groups into teaching children everything . . . ethnic cultural history, religion, LBTGPQXY (or whatever), vegetarians, pacifists, global warming, etc etc . .

No wonder kids are bloody thick nowadays :rolleyes: :D

Blackshep 02-03-2022 13:45

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
No wonder more and more kids are having mental health issue's a problem area that we are extremely deficient in dealing with in the UK.

Mad Max 03-03-2022 17:23

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36114786)
Imagine being the head of education in a country that encourages free speech, diversity, freedom from all manner of persecution, and believes everyone is equal.

Now imagine the headache of trying to fit the wishes of 18 different minority groups into teaching children everything . . . ethnic cultural history, religion, LBTGPQXY (or whatever), vegetarians, pacifists, global warming, etc etc . .

No wonder kids are bloody thick nowadays :rolleyes: :D

Spot on, teach the kids things that will benefit them when they step into the world when they leave school, not all the other bollox as mentioned by Carth, especially the poxy LGBTXYZ rubbish.

ianch99 04-03-2022 11:01

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114772)
A lot of head in sand going on with some people. Your descendants will get got because the bleedin’ obvious escapes you.

All this platitude stuff about cultures evolving - pure waffle in tthe UK context. It is not right that a culture so different from indigenous (evolving, perhaps) British culture should end up taking over; the two cultures are not compatible.

I’ve no problem with other Asian cultures that seem to fit in quite well and certainly don’t spawn extremist elements that murder our children and citizens.

Wake up.

What I do not understand is that you clearly seem to support the UK invading & colonising countries in the past and us imposing our "culture" on those countries' peoples but have a problem when people from these countries bring their culture here.

What goes around, comes around ..

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 11:42

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36115532)
What I do not understand is that you clearly seem to support the UK invading & colonising countries in the past and us imposing our "culture" on those countries' peoples but have a problem when people from these countries bring their culture here.

What goes around, comes around ..

That is preposterous Ian. If it’s so clear that I support a colonial past, please quote chapter & verse. Our colonial past is nothing to do with me and you know it. I am pointing out the incompatibility berween the two cultures and the Saudi plot to eventually make us all face east. I have no problem with the other Asian cultures.

Hugh 04-03-2022 11:54

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
As has been previously pointed out, in most Christian Churches, we face East to pray….

Carth 04-03-2022 12:00

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36115532)
What I do not understand is that you clearly seem to support the UK invading & colonising countries in the past and us imposing our "culture" on those countries' peoples but have a problem when people from these countries bring their culture here.

What goes around, comes around ..

You do have a point there. If only we could go back 500 years or so and change things eh.
Just think, many of the people now advocating change would still be living in mud huts somewhere, no education, no medicines, no amenities, and free from all racism, persecution and slavery . . . well apart from that which was already going on of course.

The good old US of A wouldn't be much of a super power either, you know, with those bows & arrows fired from horseback.

Yep, pity that our forefathers didn't have the 'insight' to see how wrong they were.

Of course the Romans (and others) aren't completely blameless either, coming over here and giving us straight roads, sewers, baths etc etc . . . the rotters.

Anyway, can't stay, I'm hungry and need to go poach one of the Kings deer and hope I don't get set upon by brigands . . . why is there never a policeman when you want one?

ianch99 04-03-2022 12:29

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115536)
That is preposterous Ian. If it’s so clear that I support a colonial past, please quote chapter & verse. Our colonial past is nothing to do with me and you know it. I am pointing out the incompatibility berween the two cultures and the Saudi plot to eventually make us all face east. I have no problem with the other Asian cultures.

You regularly point out the "good" the British have done in their colonies which, implicitly, validates their presence there. If you disown our colonial past, it would be good to hear that from you.

So, to be clear, you have no problem with Muslim's coming here from our ex-colonies, just the followers of the extreme Wahabi sect?

---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36115541)
You do have a point there. If only we could go back 500 years or so and change things eh.
Just think, many of the people now advocating change would still be living in mud huts somewhere, no education, no medicines, no amenities, and free from all racism, persecution and slavery . . . well apart from that which was already going on of course.

The good old US of A wouldn't be much of a super power either, you know, with those bows & arrows fired from horseback.

Yep, pity that our forefathers didn't have the 'insight' to see how wrong they were.

Of course the Romans (and others) aren't completely blameless either, coming over here and giving us straight roads, sewers, baths etc etc . . . the rotters.

Anyway, can't stay, I'm hungry and need to go poach one of the Kings deer and hope I don't get set upon by brigands . . . why is there never a policeman when you want one?

I am not sure what history books you read but I'd try and get your money back.

Carth 04-03-2022 12:37

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
You're the one that mentioned the UK historically 'invading & colonising countries in the past' . .

I'm just pointing out how different it might be if we (and others) had kept to our own plot of land instead of running around invading and enslaving others.

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 13:38

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115539)
As has been previously pointed out, in most Christian Churches, we face East to pray….

Don't bother with that pedantic rubbish! Everybody knows what I mean. Including you.

Chris 04-03-2022 13:43

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115556)
Don't bother with that pedantic rubbish! Everybody knows what I mean. Including you.

I think he was commenting on the quality of your rhetoric rather than affecting ignorance.

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 13:48

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36115543)
You regularly point out the "good" the British have done in their colonies which, implicitly, validates their presence there. If you disown our colonial past, it would be good to hear that from you.

So, to be clear, you have no problem with Muslim's coming here from our ex-colonies, just the followers of the extreme Wahabi sect?[COLOR="Silver"]

<SNIP>

The good that the British did in their previous colonies was as follows:

1. Provide civil infrastructure (including water plants;

2. Provide a civil administration & justice system;

3. Hand over of the mineral or agricultural industries that Britain had established.

That's what I highlight - nothing to validate our past presence there, just our exit from those territories. You really are being preposterous.

The ex-colony to which you refer that has supplied Muslims to the UK is presumably Pakistan. Their culture is incompatible with ours as events of terrorism and Rotherham have demonstrated.

Assume that in 90 years time there is a Muslim majority in Parliament. No matter how benign those MPs might be, it will be the extremists with muscle that will take over government. Then we'll soon have to face east.

Do you want this? Or are you going to hide behind the stupid argument of cultures evolving? Islam does not evolve.


Hugh 04-03-2022 13:56

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36115545)
You're the one that mentioned the UK historically 'invading & colonising countries in the past' . .

I'm just pointing out how different it might be if we (and others) had kept to our own plot of land instead of running around invading and enslaving others.

Yes, the 95% of those who lived in the Americas and were wiped out in a couple of generations by the diseases we imported were probably very grateful…

---------- Post added at 12:56 ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115558)
The good that the British did in their previous colonies was as follows:

1. Provide civil infrastructure (including water plants;

2. Provide a civil administration & justice system;

3. Hand over of the mineral or agricultural industries that Britain had established.

That's what I highlight - nothing to validate our past presence there, just our exit from those territories. You really are being preposterous.

The ex-colony to which you refer that has supplied Muslims to the UK is presumably Pakistan. Their culture is incompatible with ours as events of terrorism and Rotherham have demonstrated.

Assume that in 90 years time there is a Muslim majority in Parliament. No matter how benign those MPs might be, it will be the extremists with muscle that will take over government. Then we'll soon have to face east.

Do you want this? Or are you going to hide behind the stupid argument of cultures evolving? Islam does not evolve.


No, we won’t - as has previously been pointed, at great length, this is impossible - the facts don’t back up your statement.

Chris 04-03-2022 14:00

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115558)
The good that the British did in their previous colonies was as follows:

1. Provide civil infrastructure (including water plants;

2. Provide a civil administration & justice system;

3. Hand over of the mineral or agricultural industries that Britain had established.

That's what I highlight - nothing to validate our past presence there, just our exit from those territories. You really are being preposterous.

The ex-colony to which you refer that has supplied Muslims to the UK is presumably Pakistan. Their culture is incompatible with ours as events of terrorism and Rotherham have demonstrated.

Assume that in 90 years time there is a Muslim majority in Parliament. No matter how benign those MPs might be, it will be the extremists with muscle that will take over government. Then we'll soon have to face east.

Do you want this? Or are you going to hide behind the stupid argument of cultures evolving? Islam does not evolve.


Your ignorance of history is extremely thorough.

The only reason we know anything about Classical Greek science and philosophy is because Arabic, Muslim scholars in the Byzantine empire preserved the texts while the inheritors of the western Roman Empire in Europe did not. These were rediscovered by Europeans from around the 13th century onwards and translated into Latin over the following 2-300 years. In the meantime the only way to learn any of it was to go and learn it directly from … Muslims.

What you perceive as unevolved Islam is in many ways an expression of pan-Arab nationalism that began to find its voice in the second half of the 20th century. Islamic countries have all had their high and low points, culturally speaking, just as supposedly Christian European ones have. You don’t have to go far back in history to see newsreel footage of Arab countries whose street scenes are shockingly cosmopolitan and secular compared to the way we tend to assume they look today.

Carth 04-03-2022 14:07

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115560)
Yes, the 95% of those who lived in the Americas and were wiped out in a couple of generations by the diseases we imported were probably very grateful…

Exactly right Hugh.

Of course eventually, even without intervention from European countries, they too would have got their heads around large scale farming/ranching, railways & bridges, electricity, cotton, oil wells and the internal combustion engine

. . . . . and gunpowder.

Chris 04-03-2022 14:18

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36115565)
Exactly right Hugh.

Of course eventually, even without intervention from European countries, they too would have got their heads around large scale farming/ranching, railways & bridges, electricity, cotton, oil wells and the internal combustion engine

. . . . . and gunpowder.

They might. On the other hand, civilisations in Asia, comparable to those of South America prior to European contact, managed not to invent any of those things for 1,000s of years. It is at least as likely that had these people remained isolated, they would be the same now as they were 500 years ago.

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 14:26

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115569)
They might. On the other hand, civilisations in Asia, comparable to those of South America prior to European contact, managed not to invent any of those things for 1,000s of years. It is at least as likely that had these people remained isolated, they would be the same now as they were 500 years ago.

Hugh and Chris would have us sleep walking into being overrun by an incompatible culture. Their arguments suppose there is no Saudi or similar long term plan; my argument supposes that there is a long term plan for Islam to take over.

There are no facts to prove me wrong - only opinions. Vigilance, my friends.


Carth 04-03-2022 14:26

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115569)
They might. On the other hand, civilisations in Asia, comparable to those of South America prior to European contact, managed not to invent any of those things for 1,000s of years. It is at least as likely that had these people remained isolated, they would be the same now as they were 500 years ago.

Thanks Chris, sort of proves my point that if we hadn't gone charging about all over the world, many of the people complaining that we did it wouldn't even be here to complain about it . . . or possibly know we even existed :D

Chris 04-03-2022 14:37

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115571)
Hugh and Chris would have us sleep walking into being overrun by an incompatible culture. Their arguments suppose there is no Saudi or similar long term plan; my argument supposes that there is a long term plan for Islam to take over.

There are no facts to prove me wrong - only opinions. Vigilance, my friends.


If both arguments are ultimately based on supposition, neither is more useful than the other.

However, I refute your claim that mine is based on supposition even as you admit that yours is. How extraordinary that you so readily admit to the essential weakness of your position.

Hugh 04-03-2022 14:57

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115571)
Hugh and Chris would have us sleep walking into being overrun by an incompatible culture. Their arguments suppose there is no Saudi or similar long term plan; my argument supposes that there is a long term plan for Islam to take over.

There are no facts to prove me wrong - only opinions. Vigilance, my friends.


So the data I posted from the ONS about U.K. birth rates are only "opinion’?

OK, then…

You have put forward a proposition that there is a long-term plan by the Saudi Wahabists (a small minority of 5% of all Muslims) to take over our country in 90 years by out-breeding the Brits, but provided no evidence to back this up - I have provided data to show that all Muslims fertility rate in the U.K. has remained constant over the last 15 years or so.

---------- Post added at 13:57 ---------- Previous post was at 13:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36115572)
Thanks Chris, sort of proves my point that if we hadn't gone charging about all over the world, many of the people complaining that we did it wouldn't even be here to complain about it . . . or possibly know we even existed :D

Or, if we hadn’t wiped out 95% of them, then took all their lands and resources, there might be more of them…

ianch99 04-03-2022 15:41

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115558)
The good that the British did in their previous colonies was as follows:

1. Provide civil infrastructure (including water plants;

2. Provide a civil administration & justice system;

3. Hand over of the mineral or agricultural industries that Britain had established.

That's what I highlight - nothing to validate our past presence there, just our exit from those territories. You really are being preposterous.

The ex-colony to which you refer that has supplied Muslims to the UK is presumably Pakistan. Their culture is incompatible with ours as events of terrorism and Rotherham have demonstrated.

Assume that in 90 years time there is a Muslim majority in Parliament. No matter how benign those MPs might be, it will be the extremists with muscle that will take over government. Then we'll soon have to face east.

Do you want this? Or are you going to hide behind the stupid argument of cultures evolving? Islam does not evolve.


You keep repeating the same ridiculous proposition with literally no proof. This is not a good look ..

BTW, "Rotherham" has proved nothing, in the same way that paedophilic Catholics priests does not prove that all Catholics are paedophiles.

Here are some interesting historical notes (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_...United_Kingdom)

Quote:

By 1911, the British Empire had a Muslim population of 94 million, larger than the empire's 58 million Christian population. By the 1920s, the British Empire included roughly half of the world's Muslim population.

More than 400,000 Muslim soldiers of the British Indian Army fought for Britain during World War I, where 62,060 were killed in action.

Muslim soldiers of the British Indian Army later fought for Britain against the Nazis in World War II, where Muslim soldiers accounted for up to 40% of the 2.5 million troops serving the British Indian Army.

David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister from 1916 to 1922, stated: "we are the greatest Mahomedan power in the world and one-fourth of the population of the British Empire is Mahomedan. There have been no more loyal adherents to the throne and no more effective and loyal supporters of the Empire in its hour of trial." This statement was later reiterated by Gandhi in 1920.

Winston Churchill also stated in 1942: "We must not on any account break with the Moslems, who represent a hundred million people, and the main army elements on which we must rely for the immediate fighting."

jonbxx 04-03-2022 16:20

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
I think we can safely put to bed the statement 'there's no islamophobia in the Conservative Party and their supporters' now I guess. Some of the statements in this discussion would get you sooooo fired in the workplace!

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 16:35

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115574)
If both arguments are ultimately based on supposition, neither is more useful than the other.

However, I refute your claim that mine is based on supposition even as you admit that yours is. How extraordinary that you so readily admit to the essential weakness of your position.

Yours is a supposition. Your polemic does not work.

---------- Post added at 15:35 ---------- Previous post was at 15:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36115594)
I think we can safely put to bed the statement 'there's no islamophobia in the Conservative Party and their supporters' now I guess. Some of the statements in this discussion would get you sooooo fired in the workplace!

My wariness is not a phobia. It's entirely rational.

As to the workplace, there is so much woke around that the subject dare not be raised. Indeed it should not be raised in the workplace because it has no relevance there..

TheDaddy 04-03-2022 16:59

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115558)
The good that the British did in their previous colonies was as follows:

1. Provide civil infrastructure (including water plants;

2. Provide a civil administration & justice system;

3. Hand over of the mineral or agricultural industries that Britain had established.

That's what I highlight - nothing to validate our past presence there, just our exit from those territories. You really are being preposterous.

The ex-colony to which you refer that has supplied Muslims to the UK is presumably Pakistan. Their culture is incompatible with ours as events of terrorism and Rotherham have demonstrated.

Assume that in 90 years time there is a Muslim majority in Parliament. No matter how benign those MPs might be, it will be the extremists with muscle that will take over government. Then we'll soon have to face east.

Do you want this? Or are you going to hide behind the stupid argument of cultures evolving? Islam does not evolve.


The thing I've always said about the British Empire is that it was better than the alternatives, that might sound like excusing our past but if people knew what the Spanish, Germans and even Belgiums got up to in their colonies they'd understand the point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115562)
Your ignorance of history is extremely thorough.

The only reason we know anything about Classical Greek science and philosophy is because Arabic, Muslim scholars in the Byzantine empire preserved the texts while the inheritors of the western Roman Empire in Europe did not. These were rediscovered by Europeans from around the 13th century onwards and translated into Latin over the following 2-300 years. In the meantime the only way to learn any of it was to go and learn it directly from … Muslims.

What you perceive as unevolved Islam is in many ways an expression of pan-Arab nationalism that began to find its voice in the second half of the 20th century. Islamic countries have all had their high and low points, culturally speaking, just as supposedly Christian European ones have. You don’t have to go far back in history to see newsreel footage of Arab countries whose street scenes are shockingly cosmopolitan and secular compared to the way we tend to assume they look today.

There's also medicine, where Muslim doctors/scientists willingly shared their discoveries with other cultures, unlike the Chinese...

jonbxx 04-03-2022 17:27

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115595)
Yours is a supposition. Your polemic does not work.

---------- Post added at 15:35 ---------- Previous post was at 15:27 ----------



My wariness is not a phobia. It's entirely rational.

As to the workplace, there is so much woke around that the subject dare not be raised. Indeed it should not be raised in the workplace because it has no relevance there..

I will just leave the definition of islamophobia here;

Quote:

dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.
You may consider you thoughts or opinions rational but can you also see that they can also be classified as islamophobic at the same time?

ianch99 04-03-2022 17:31

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36115599)
The thing I've always said about the British Empire is that it was better than the alternatives, that might sound like excusing our past but if people knew what the Spanish, Germans and even Belgiums got up to in their colonies they'd understand the point.

But that takes you nowhere. There is no "better" way of being invaded - if it wrong, there is no less wrong. This road leads to mitigation and validation.

---------- Post added at 16:31 ---------- Previous post was at 16:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36115604)
I will just leave the definition of islamophobia here;

You may consider you thoughts or opinions rational but can you also see that they can also be classified as islamophobic at the same time?

As we're dealing with definitions: rational

Quote:

based on or in accordance with reason or logic.
I see no reason or logic here, only supposition and conjecture.

Chris 04-03-2022 17:39

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36115605)
But that takes you nowhere. There is no "better" way of being invaded - if it wrong, there is no less wrong. This road leads to mitigation and validation.

Well, yes and no.

Unequivocally, we now see it as wrong. We believe in a rules-based world order which respects the right of nations to self determination; we promote economic and social development through trade and cultural exchange.

However, it is problematic to go too far down the road of applying modern understanding of the world on history. Our modern understanding can explain the reasons why things have changed but it doesn't necessarily help us understand the motives of the people who lived at the time. TheDaddy, for example, makes a perfectly valid point when he suggests the British empire might have been better than the alternatives. if you live in a 19th century Europe in which it is accepted, without question, that it is the duty of the white man to civilise the black man, or a 19th century Africa in which you are powerless to challenge that view or to resist it, the reality is that colonisation is going to happen, and thus it's a legitimate line of historical inquiry to ask whether one nation's colonial habits were better than another's.

None of this means we can't be critical, however it does us no good at all to pretend these circumstances didn't exist. To fail to understand history is to risk repeating it. 'Mitigation and validation' are things you can do with an understanding of history but they are not inevitable and should not be used to try to forbid legitimate lines of academic study.

ianch99 04-03-2022 17:48

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115608)
Well, yes and no.

Unequivocally, we now see it as wrong. We believe in a rules-based world order which respects the right of nations to self determination; we promote economic and social development through trade and cultural exchange.

However, it is problematic to go too far down the road of applying modern understanding of the world on history. Our modern understanding can explain the reasons why things have changed but it doesn't necessarily help us understand the motives of the people who lived at the time. TheDaddy, for example, makes a perfectly valid point when he suggests the British empire might have been better than the alternatives. if you live in a 19th century Europe in which it is accepted, without question, that it is the duty of the white man to civilise the black man, or a 19th century Africa in which you are powerless to challenge that view or to resist it, the reality is that colonisation is going to happen, and thus it's a legitimate line of historical inquiry to ask whether one nation's colonial habits are better than another's.

None of this means we can't be critical, however it does us no good at all to pretend these circumstances didn't exist. To fail to understand history is to risk repeating it.

Agreed but surely you can see the danger in starting to mitigate the colonising process. You run the risk of ending up with the position that we were the better choice of oppressor because we were "nicer". Of course there were countries who were worse than us in certain parts of the world. Belgium's record, for example, in the Congo was atrocious. Understanding of history should focus on what was wrong so we can prevent it repeating. It should not focus on who was the better invader.

Chris 04-03-2022 17:56

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36115610)
Agreed but surely you can see the danger in starting to mitigate the colonising process. You run the risk of ending up with the position that we were the better choice of oppressor because we were "nicer". Of course there were countries who were worse than us in certain parts of the world. Belgium's record, for example, in the Congo was atrocious. Understanding of history should focus on what was wrong so we can prevent it repeating. It should not focus on who was the better invader.

Also agreed. However the problem with academia in that respect is that as you climb the academic ladder to your PhD and beyond you inevitably focus on narrower and narrower areas of study. With a PhD in particular you have to choose an area in which you can make an original contribution. So someone, somewhere, is going to end up asking questions which, taken in isolation, seem to be interested only in establishing who was the better invader. Their freedom to do that should be respected, and so should the results of their research. It is the responsibility of those engaged in the discipline as a whole to see that the end result isn't a distorted view of history and to challenge those who misuse research to push unsavoury modern political agendas.

Carth 04-03-2022 18:00

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Just to take us back to the original posted subject . . .

How do all you people know so much about the stuff you're posting?

Were you taught all of it during history lessons at school . . . or has much of that knowledge been acquired over the years since you left?

;)

ianch99 04-03-2022 18:05

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115612)
Also agreed. However the problem with academia in that respect is that as you climb the academic ladder to your PhD and beyond you inevitably focus on narrower and narrower areas of study. With a PhD in particular you have to choose an area in which you can make an original contribution. So someone, somewhere, is going to end up asking questions which, taken in isolation, seem to be interested only in establishing who was the better invader. Their freedom to do that should be respected, and so should the results of their research. It is the responsibility of those engaged in the discipline as a whole to see that the end result isn't a distorted view of history and to challenge those who misuse research to push unsavoury modern political agendas.

Yes, well put. Of course, anyone can & should be able to focus & deep dive into specific aspects of history but these treatise should never be used as a context to misrepresent a wider historical narrative. It is often the case that a niche perspective on a past event is conflated into a justification for a wider program of action.

TheDaddy 04-03-2022 18:12

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36115605)
But that takes you nowhere. There is no "better" way of being invaded - if it wrong, there is no less wrong. This road leads to mitigation and validation.[

Or it leads to putting yourself in the shoes of the indigenous population and deciding what was the better outcome for them. It was wrong but it happened and was always going to happen by someone and looking at what they did, better it was by us than them, that's not excusing what we did although I don't doubt it'll be looked at by some as exactly that

---------- Post added at 17:12 ---------- Previous post was at 17:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115608)
Well, yes and no.

Unequivocally, we now see it as wrong. We believe in a rules-based world order which respects the right of nations to self determination; we promote economic and social development through trade and cultural exchange.

However, it is problematic to go too far down the road of applying modern understanding of the world on history. Our modern understanding can explain the reasons why things have changed but it doesn't necessarily help us understand the motives of the people who lived at the time. TheDaddy, for example, makes a perfectly valid point when he suggests the British empire might have been better than the alternatives. if you live in a 19th century Europe in which it is accepted, without question, that it is the duty of the white man to civilise the black man, or a 19th century Africa in which you are powerless to challenge that view or to resist it, the reality is that colonisation is going to happen, and thus it's a legitimate line of historical inquiry to ask whether one nation's colonial habits were better than another's.

None of this means we can't be critical, however it does us no good at all to pretend these circumstances didn't exist. To fail to understand history is to risk repeating it. 'Mitigation and validation' are things you can do with an understanding of history but they are not inevitable and should not be used to try to forbid legitimate lines of academic study.

I could have saved myself posting that now! :tu:

Mad Max 04-03-2022 19:57

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36115614)
Just to take us back to the original posted subject . . .

How do all you people know so much about the stuff you're posting?

Were you taught all of it during history lessons at school . . . or has much of that knowledge been acquired over the years since you left?

;)

Degrees in the stuff mate, degrees ;)

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 20:38

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36115604)
I will just leave the definition of islamophobia here;



You may consider you thoughts or opinions rational but can you also see that they can also be classified as islamophobic at the same time?


Quote:

dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.
Jon, that definition is one of dozens that circulate. None of them have any legal meaning. Even our Parliament has been unable to agree a definition in law.

The reason is simple: They are hung up on the phobia element of the term Islamophobia. A phobia must be irrational - so much can be proven by reference to accepted definitions. Also, racism towards Muslims must be shown to be discriminatory in the sense of violating or promoting violation of human rights. The woke brigade just don't think these matters through.

They need to find another word for it - like Anti-Islamism but then you have define Islamism. So you see the difficulty.

My argument is totally rational and cannot be classified as Islamophobic except by people who haven't thought this through.

Possibly, my critics may accuse me not thinking things through. My exposition and rationale shows that I have indeed given this significant thought. One of the arguments raged against me is that later generations of new cultures don't breed as prolifically as their forebears. Is that true if it is the tradition of the religion to breed? The take-up of Islam in the UK has been analysed by the BBC.

Quote:

Muslims in Wales and England practise and pass on their faith at much higher rates than any other religion, a Cardiff University study says.

Researchers found 77% of adult Muslims actively practise the faith they were brought up in, compared with 29% of Christians and 65% of other religions.

They also found 98% of Muslim children surveyed said they had the religion their parents were brought up in.

They said the research suggested religion helps minority communities.

The research found 62% of Christian children surveyed had the same religion of their parents, compared with 98% of Muslims and 89% of other religions.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-17023858

As I said before, wake up.


Hugh 04-03-2022 20:50

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36115614)
Just to take us back to the original posted subject . . .

How do all you people know so much about the stuff you're posting?

Were you taught all of it during history lessons at school . . . or has much of that knowledge been acquired over the years since you left?

;)

Well, it’s like most subjects - it’s easier to extend your knowledge of an area of knowledge if you’ve had a basic /introduction grounding in it…

---------- Post added at 19:50 ---------- Previous post was at 19:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115641)



Jon, that definition is one of dozens that circulate. None of them have any legal meaning. Even our Parliament has been unable to agree a definition in law.

The reason is simple: They are hung up on the phobia element of the term Islamophobia. A phobia must be irrational - so much can be proven by reference to accepted definitions. Also, racism towards Muslims must be shown to be discriminatory in the sense of violating or promoting violation of human rights. The woke brigade just don't think these matters through.

They need to find another word for it - like Anti-Islamism but then you have define Islamism. So you see the difficulty.

My argument is totally rational and cannot be classified as Islamophobic except by people who haven't thought this through.

Possibly, my critics may accuse me not thinking things through. My exposition and rationale shows that I have indeed given this significant thought. One of the arguments raged against me is that later generations of new cultures don't breed as prolifically as their forebears. Is that true if it is the tradition of the religion to breed? The take-up of Islam in the UK has been analysed by the BBC.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-17023858

As I said before, wake up.


Show us your working - how do you arrive at the point of Muslims being in a majority in 90 years?

I did a quick excel spreadsheet using some basic assumptions (starting at 3.4 million Muslims in this country at this time, 5 members in each family (2 parents and 3 kids, which is the current U.K. Muslim fertility rate, increasing this to 4 children per couple every 30 years)) - in 3 generations of 30 years, assuming no one died (doubtful, since the current generation would be over 120), the Muslim population would be 36 million out of the 2110 U.K. forecast population of 97 million…

This, of course, is totally rubbish, because that actual ONS forecast is that by 2030 the U.K. Muslim fertility rate is 2.5 per family - this backs up the Pew findings that 2rd and 3rd generation Muslims in Europe have less children than the original immigrants.

Mad Max 04-03-2022 21:08

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36114772)
A lot of head in sand going on with some people. Your descendants will get got because the bleedin’ obvious escapes you.

All this platitude stuff about cultures evolving - pure waffle in tthe UK context. It is not right that a culture so different from indigenous (evolving, perhaps) British culture should end up taking over; the two cultures are not compatible.

I’ve no problem with other Asian cultures that seem to fit in quite well and certainly don’t spawn extremist elements that murder our children and citizens.

Wake up.

Agree with you mate, this article from last summer backs up some of what you are saying, there's no way that there should be no-go areas here in the UK, utterly disgusting.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...white-men.html

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 21:15

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115642)
Well, it’s like most subjects - it’s easier to extend your knowledge of an area of knowledge if you’ve had a basic /introduction grounding in it…

---------- Post added at 19:50 ---------- Previous post was at 19:40 ----------

Show us your working - how do you arrive at the point of Muslims being in a majority in 90 years?

I did a quick excel spreadsheet using some basic assumptions (starting at 3.4 million Muslims in this country at this time, 5 members in each family (2 parents and 3 kids, which is the current U.K. Muslim fertility rate, increasing this to 4 children per couple every 30 years)) - in 3 generations of 30 years, assuming no one died (doubtful, since the current generation would be over 120), the Muslim population would be 36 million out of the 2110 U.K. forecast population of 97 million…

This, of course, is totally rubbish, because that actual ONS forecast is that by 2030 the U.K. Muslim fertility rate is 2.5 per family - this backs up the Pew findings that 2rd and 3rd generation Muslims in Europe have less children than the original immigrants.

I did it fag packet style a couple of years ago so don't have the workings to hand. if your first calculation is even vaguely correct, then 30+ million out of 97 million is alarming to me. Again on a fag packet basis of 2.5 per family, that's still in excess of 18 million. So, if my 90 years is wrong, then some time in the future it'll happen - because there is a design.

Mr K 04-03-2022 21:17

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Light the blue touch paper with the right words and subject and CF waffles away, showing up all that's wrong with this Country....

Carth 04-03-2022 21:48

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36115638)
Degrees in the stuff mate, degrees ;)

Good back in the day, but nobody listens to Motown stuff now mate :D

Hugh 04-03-2022 22:04

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115649)
I did it fag packet style a couple of years ago so don't have the workings to hand. if your first calculation is even vaguely correct, then 30+ million out of 97 million is alarming to me. Again on a fag packet basis of 2.5 per family, that's still in excess of 18 million. So, if my 90 years is wrong, then some time in the future it'll happen - because there is a design.

Evidence of this design?

My calculations are extreme case calculations, which are not backed up by any current data or trends - in fact, it’s going the other way, as U.K. Muslim fertility rates are decreasing, not increasing.

Mad Max 04-03-2022 22:06

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115661)
Evidence?

Just open your eyes, Hugh.

Hugh 04-03-2022 22:09

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36115662)
Just open your eyes, Hugh.

So that’s a "no", then…

Mad Max 04-03-2022 22:11

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115663)
So that’s a "no", then…

For you, yes.

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 22:16

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115661)
Evidence of this design?

My calculations are extreme case calculations, which are not backed up by any current data or trends - in fact, it’s going the other way, as U.K. Muslim fertility rates are decreasing, not increasing.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/saudi-arabia-largest-funder-of-extremism-in-uk-report-finds-1.3144020

... for example.

TheDaddy 04-03-2022 22:20

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36115647)
Agree with you mate, this article from last summer backs up some of what you are saying, there's no way that there should be no-go areas here in the UK, utterly disgusting.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...white-men.html

There aren't any that I know of

Sephiroth 04-03-2022 22:44

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36115668)
There aren't any that I know of

Then I beg you, and various others who disagree with my assertions to read this worrying article:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...white-men.html

A small extract follows:

Quote:

Among the Mosques: Author's study of Muslim Britain reveals a no-go area for white people, children 'attacked for being white', parents making families live under Taliban-like rules and women who can't leave home without permission

- Author Ed Husain visited places of worship across UK for "Among the Mosques"
- Would turn up unannounced to the largest weekly gathering, Friday prayers
- Spoke to taxi drivers, business owners, Imams and worshipers about religion
- Islam in Britain is dominated by ultra-orthodox sect promoted by the Deobandis
- Control over half of Britain's mosques, and gave birth to Taliban in Afghanistan
- One person described 'Bolton, Dewsbury and Blackburn' as 'different universe'
- Books for sale detail how women should be banned from leaving the house
- Mosque in Didsbury, in converted church, has a sign for the 'Sharia Department'
- White men revealed 'no-go areas' in Blackburn where they would be 'jumped'
- White woman in Bradford predicts it will become 'an apartheid city' in 30 years
A phobia, is it?


TheDaddy 04-03-2022 23:10

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115669)
Then I beg you, and various others who disagree with my assertions to read this worrying article:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...white-men.html

A small extract follows:



A phobia, is it?


Probably, I don't visit Bolton, Blackburn etc but I remember the same hoo-ha in London for what amounted to a few stupid stickers on lamp posts, I never had a problem there and tbh wouldn't have been to perturbed if there had been a problem

Hugh 05-03-2022 10:27

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115667)
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/saudi-arabia-largest-funder-of-extremism-in-uk-report-finds-1.3144020

... for example.

That article shows that Saudi Arabia are big founders of Wahhabism, which we all knew, and that they are illiberal and trying to gain influence - it doesn’t provide a shred of support for your proposition that the Muslims will be out-breeding us and will take over our Parliament in 90 years…

---------- Post added at 09:27 ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115669)
Then I beg you, and various others who disagree with my assertions to read this worrying article:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...white-men.html

A small extract follows:



A phobia, is it?


The Daily Mail writing an inflammatory anti-Muslim article - imagine my surprise and shock…

GrimUpNorth 05-03-2022 11:47

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115669)
Then I beg you, and various others who disagree with my assertions to read this worrying article:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...white-men.html

A small extract follows:



A phobia, is it?


France has a higher %age Muslim population than we do, maybe you should be more concerned about them?? ;)

Dewsbury is just down the road from here and yes the religious/racial makeup is different to some surrounding towns and cities but I go there quite often and haven't been mugged, converted, kidnapped, shot, stabbed or come to any harm whatsoever so I'm sorry to say it but you're talking a load of rubbish.

spiderplant 05-03-2022 12:48

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115669)
phobia, is it?

Yes, I'd say it was. I regularly visit Bolton, Blackburn, Dewsbury and Bradford and have never been knowingly 'jumped' (not quite sure what it is, mind).

I also visit Didsbury occasionally, but it's a bit posh for me ;)

jonbxx 05-03-2022 13:27

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115641)



Jon, that definition is one of dozens that circulate. None of them have any legal meaning. Even our Parliament has been unable to agree a definition in law.

The reason is simple: They are hung up on the phobia element of the term Islamophobia. A phobia must be irrational - so much can be proven by reference to accepted definitions. Also, racism towards Muslims must be shown to be discriminatory in the sense of violating or promoting violation of human rights. The woke brigade just don't think these matters through.

They need to find another word for it - like Anti-Islamism but then you have define Islamism. So you see the difficulty.

My argument is totally rational and cannot be classified as Islamophobic except by people who haven't thought this through.

Possibly, my critics may accuse me not thinking things through. My exposition and rationale shows that I have indeed given this significant thought. One of the arguments raged against me is that later generations of new cultures don't breed as prolifically as their forebears. Is that true if it is the tradition of the religion to breed? The take-up of Islam in the UK has been analysed by the BBC.



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-17023858

As I said before, wake up.


I kind of get what you are saying in that you need to define Islam to be anti-islamic or islamophobic. Not liking Islam without fully understanding what it is, is simple prejudice. However, by understanding more about Islam and then saying things like Islam is not compatible with British culture is surely defining Islam and would therefore I guess fall in to your definition of anti-Islamism

Sephiroth 05-03-2022 14:14

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36115700)
I kind of get what you are saying in that you need to define Islam to be anti-islamic or islamophobic. Not liking Islam without fully understanding what it is, is simple prejudice. However, by understanding more about Islam and then saying things like Islam is not compatible with British culture is surely defining Islam and would therefore I guess fall in to your definition of anti-Islamism

I don’t have a legal definition of Islamism, so anti-Islamism has to be personal judgement. The man in the street would identify Islamism with what’s happening as described in the MAIL article I quoted. I am close to the man in the street.

You’re sure that I’ve defined Islam because I say that it is culturally incompatible with indigenous British culture. Again, I refer you to the MAIL article which sets out the cultural difference that I deprecate and see as a threat to my culture.

Prejudice? Do you think I haven’t tried to understand the culture of Islam? It’s set out in the `Koran, which I’ve privately studied in English over a number of years. The MAIL article describes how that culture, set out in the Koran, is implemented on the ground. If that’s compatible with British culture then my whatsit’s a kipper.



Mad Max 05-03-2022 14:45

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36115696)
Yes, I'd say it was. I regularly visit Bolton, Blackburn, Dewsbury and Bradford and have never been knowingly 'jumped' (not quite sure what it is, mind).

I also visit Didsbury occasionally, but it's a bit posh for me ;)


So the mail article is wrong and it's just made up? Just because you haven't experienced any trouble while there doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

Sephiroth 05-03-2022 16:33

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36115696)
Yes, I'd say it was. I regularly visit Bolton, Blackburn, Dewsbury and Bradford and have never been knowingly 'jumped' (not quite sure what it is, mind).

I also visit Didsbury occasionally, but it's a bit posh for me ;)

How shallow.

nomadking 05-03-2022 17:28

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36115696)
Yes, I'd say it was. I regularly visit Bolton, Blackburn, Dewsbury and Bradford and have never been knowingly 'jumped' (not quite sure what it is, mind).

I also visit Didsbury occasionally, but it's a bit posh for me ;)

How come the violent crime figures for those areas is high, compare to their respective counties.


I remember a documentary from many years ago, where Ann Cryer went around Keighley talking to white people. They showed many accounts of girls being harassed when walking down the streets. They also interviewed a group of old people who had been "violently" forced out of sitting in one park, because of claims by a certain group that is was "Our area". They showed the elderly sitting in another park instead, and actually showed stones being thrown at them to force them out of that one. Of course in the documentary(possibly by Ann Cryer herself or David Aaronovitch) it was passed off as "youthful exuberance". Believe it or not, that was the term used. No way would that have been used in reference if the "races" were the other way around.


Not the same documentary:-
Link

Quote:

Mrs Cryer spoke of how she was approached by seven mothers in 2003, who said their young daughters were being sexually groomed by gangs of overwhelmingly Mirpuri Pakistani men outside their school gates.
She said these mothers complained of not being listened to by the authorities when they tried to seek help, adding that she also received no co-operation when she intervened on behalf of the women.
"Friends of mine in the Labour Party knew about it [grooming] for years and never mentioned it to me," she said.

Hugh 05-03-2022 17:33

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115703)
I don’t have a legal definition of Islamism, so anti-Islamism has to be personal judgement. The man in the street would identify Islamism with what’s happening as described in the MAIL article I quoted. I am close to the man in the street.

You’re sure that I’ve defined Islam because I say that it is culturally incompatible with indigenous British culture. Again, I refer you to the MAIL article which sets out the cultural difference that I deprecate and see as a threat to my culture.

Prejudice? Do you think I haven’t tried to understand the culture of Islam? It’s set out in the `Koran, which I’ve privately studied in English over a number of years. The MAIL article describes how that culture, set out in the Koran, is implemented on the ground. If that’s compatible with British culture then my whatsit’s a kipper.



Have you discussed this matter with any of your Muslim friends or neighbours, to see what they think about it?

Sephiroth 05-03-2022 18:12

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115713)
Have you discussed this matter with any of your Muslim friends or neighbours, to see what they think about it?

As it happens, yes.

In every case, they were taken aback in varying degrees that I'd broached the subject with them. I approached it from the Madrasas aspect and the high take-up of Islam among the children and whether they thought there would ever be a point where there would be more Muslims than ethnic British. My friends were ambivalent on that point, perhaps sensing somewhere that they wouldn't want to conversation to go. Some turned the question on its head and asked me what I thought; so I told them. I got answers ranging from a sort of "nah", through possibly not to another question: would I fear if that happened? I told them, obviously yes and I was stunned, sort of, when they asked my why? Incompatible cultures, I replied. Some of them then tested me on why I thought the cultures to be incompatible; when I cited parts of the Koran translation that I have, I was challenged as whether or not the translation had been provided by a Scholar, the only people validated to do that because of their deep understanding of the meaning behind the Arabic written in the original scripture. I couldn't answer that, but essentially they (the some who got this far into the discussion) were testing me to see how deep they would need to go. One offered me English language books on the subject of Islam versus Christianity. When I asked whether for Christianity I could substitute Judaism, I got what I judged to be a reluctant yes.

My take-away from this is the British Muslims won't commit to the validity of my fears because they've kept their answers vague. Apart from one close friend, nobody could indicate that my fears were wild fancy; of course none said that I should be practising my facing east.

How about you?


Chris 05-03-2022 18:39

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
So … to summarise … your close Muslim friend told you you were talking bolleaux, while those who know you less well were too polite to say so.

Sephiroth 05-03-2022 18:41

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36115717)
So … to summarise … your close Muslim friend told you you were talking bolleaux, while those who know you less well were too polite to say so.

An incorrect summary.

Hugh 05-03-2022 20:17

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115714)
As it happens, yes.

In every case, they were taken aback in varying degrees that I'd broached the subject with them. I approached it from the Madrasas aspect and the high take-up of Islam among the children and whether they thought there would ever be a point where there would be more Muslims than ethnic British. My friends were ambivalent on that point, perhaps sensing somewhere that they wouldn't want to conversation to go. Some turned the question on its head and asked me what I thought; so I told them. I got answers ranging from a sort of "nah", through possibly not to another question: would I fear if that happened? I told them, obviously yes and I was stunned, sort of, when they asked my why? Incompatible cultures, I replied. Some of them then tested me on why I thought the cultures to be incompatible; when I cited parts of the Koran translation that I have, I was challenged as whether or not the translation had been provided by a Scholar, the only people validated to do that because of their deep understanding of the meaning behind the Arabic written in the original scripture. I couldn't answer that, but essentially they (the some who got this far into the discussion) were testing me to see how deep they would need to go. One offered me English language books on the subject of Islam versus Christianity. When I asked whether for Christianity I could substitute Judaism, I got what I judged to be a reluctant yes.

My take-away from this is the British Muslims won't commit to the validity of my fears because they've kept their answers vague. Apart from one close friend, nobody could indicate that my fears were wild fancy; of course none said that I should be practising my facing east.

How about you?


I have discussed your theory with them - individually, and as couples/groups, they thought it was a strange concept; their take on it was that one group of Muslims (Wahhabism) trying to coerce/convince/deceive all the other groups of Muslims to have lots of children and make them follow a ruling to take over a country would be like the Roman Catholics doing the same in the U.K. with all the Christians (and asked how likely did I think that was?).

They also pointed out their (grown-up) kids were having smaller families (2 or 3 children), so that part of the proposition didn’t seem to hold water, either.

My daughter works at a University, and has quite a few Muslim friends/colleagues if the same ages as her (34), and I asked her to chat with them about the "Great Replacement" theory - her feedback was they thought it was a crazy theory, and they believed their generation were assimilating more than their parents did (while still being proud of their heritage & religion), and their intentions were only to have a couple of kids.

jonbxx 05-03-2022 20:38

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Well a nice side effect of this discussion is that I revisited A Man Like Mobeen on iPlayer this afternoon. Series 1, episode 4 (linkhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05pgnt0) was good on some of the discussions here

GrimUpNorth 05-03-2022 20:44

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36115718)
An incorrect summary.

I'm worried about you Seph, normally you're pretty open minded and reasonable (for a pro-brexit, a Conservative and a Francophobe ;)) but in this instance you seem to have willingly fallen hook line and sinker for the agenda of a right leaning newspaper that wrote an article that doesn't seem to be based on anything other than speculation, hearsay, opinion and (unfounded?) fear and I'm surprised and disappointed in you because I thought you were better than that.

If a left leaning newspaper wrote an article (note I don't say reported because that implies 'news' which the article in the Daily Mail obviously wasn't) where someone mentioned Wokingham was planning to demolish all houses except detached with a minimum of 5 bedrooms and introduce a minimum income to qualify for residence while at the same time ban any religions other than 'white' religions, most of us would laugh at it for what it was. The sad thing is some of the target audience of the paper would believe every word of it and for evermore keep trotting it out as fact.

I think your 90 year prediction will turn out as woefully wrong as Enoch Powell's 15 or 20 years and Old Boys 10 years.

TheDaddy 05-03-2022 22:38

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36115726)
I have discussed your theory with them - individually, and as couples/groups, they thought it was a strange concept; their take on it was that one group of Muslims (Wahhabism) trying to coerce/convince/deceive all the other groups of Muslims to have lots of children and make them follow a ruling to take over a country would be like the Roman Catholics doing the same in the U.K. with all the Christians (and asked how likely did I think that was?).

They also pointed out their (grown-up) kids were having smaller families (2 or 3 children), so that part of the proposition didn’t seem to hold water, either.

My daughter works at a University, and has quite a few Muslim friends/colleagues if the same ages as her (34), and I asked her to chat with them about the "Great Replacement" theory - her feedback was they thought it was a crazy theory, and they believed their generation were assimilating more than their parents did (while still being proud of their heritage & religion), and their intentions were only to have a couple of kids.

The only remaining solutions are that Seph is wrong or much more likely that the Muslims are lying to you and your daughter :)

Sephiroth 06-03-2022 00:10

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36115732)
I'm worried about you Seph, normally you're pretty open minded and reasonable (for a pro-brexit, a Conservative and a Francophobe ;)) but in this instance you seem to have willingly fallen hook line and sinker for the agenda of a right leaning newspaper that wrote an article that doesn't seem to be based on anything other than speculation, hearsay, opinion and (unfounded?) fear and I'm surprised and disappointed in you because I thought you were better than that.

If a left leaning newspaper wrote an article (note I don't say reported because that implies 'news' which the article in the Daily Mail obviously wasn't) where someone mentioned Wokingham was planning to demolish all houses except detached with a minimum of 5 bedrooms and introduce a minimum income to qualify for residence while at the same time ban any religions other than 'white' religions, most of us would laugh at it for what it was. The sad thing is some of the target audience of the paper would believe every word of it and for evermore keep trotting it out as fact.

I think your 90 year prediction will turn out as woefully wrong as Enoch Powell's 15 or 20 years and Old Boys 10 years.

Maybe not 90 years, and maybe Hugh's numbers will trump mine and my fears will not be realised. But I stand by my incompatible culture assessment and there is considerable Jihad evidence to support that.

Regarding the Mail, I don't read it. But that article stood out as a piece of research by an Asian. Ed Husain.

Quote:

The Muslim writer, who was himself radicalised in his youth and trained for Jihad by the same people as Omar Khyam, leader of the Bluewater bombers, grew up in a Bangladeshi family in Tower Hamlets, East London.
I am indeed open minded and reasonable, but I do have my convictions on this one.

Hugh 06-03-2022 01:16

Re: Calls to make black, asian and minority ethnic history compulsory
 
Strange - I thought Ed Husain was British, having been born and brought up in London…

You may be interested in an article he wrote a couple years ago.

https://institute.global/policy/reli...opolitics-2017

Quote:

Today, the lived reality of Islam as a religion of compassion, pluralism, coexistence, and peace is a far cry from how it is perceived by many in the West. Extremists, driven by Salafi-jihadi ideology, as well as extreme Khomeinist thought, that transcends groups and countries, have hijacked the religion and wrought terror far beyond the Middle East.

Sectarian strife is another dimension of this crisis. In the Middle East, regional powers have shrouded their geopolitical pursuits in sectarian garb, exacerbating tensions and transforming local or regional grievances into more politicised, international ones...

… In the West, many Muslim individuals and organisations are engaged in efforts to tackle violent extremism, often amid threats to their own safety. Their work would benefit from an administration that acknowledges and supports their efforts, viewing them not as potential threats, but as vital assets in the fight against violent extremism.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum