Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   U.S Election 2020 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709208)

Mr K 11-08-2020 07:42

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045937)
I think the US peaked recently with Obama. Whilst he was not perfect, he had obvious intelligence, a strong work ethic, relative youth, a guiding purpose, international popularity and an engaging personality.

I think today's candidates tick far fewer of these boxes.

Absolutely, that's why Obama was totally unsuitable as President.
Qualities needed are being geriatric, bonkers, very rich, white and male.

Carth 11-08-2020 10:02

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36046256)
Absolutely, that's why Obama was totally unsuitable as President.
Qualities needed are being geriatric, bonkers, very rich, white and male.

You're slipping Mr K, you forgot to add lying, corrupt and racist to your post :p:

Mad Max 11-08-2020 14:30

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36046253)
Had nothing to do with him just an idiot outside. He was back in the briefing within 9 mins.

You've picked me up wrong there, pip, I was talking about the shooter, not Trump.

pip08456 11-08-2020 15:46

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36046318)
You've picked me up wrong there, pip, I was talking about the shooter, not Trump.

Fair enough.

Hugh 11-08-2020 16:06

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Apparently the 1917 (1918 surely) Spanish Flu Virus probably ended the Second World War, as all the soldiers were sick...

Mick 11-08-2020 17:48

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Remember though, he is a Stable Genius. ;)

Hugh 11-08-2020 18:25

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36046337)
Remember though, he is a Stable Genius. ;)

and a very stable genius at that!

---------- Post added at 18:25 ---------- Previous post was at 17:55 ----------

Latest Trumpy Bear commercial (this is not a spoof or parody, but a real commercial that has been shown on Fox TV in the USA).


pip08456 11-08-2020 20:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046338)
and a very stable genius at that!

---------- Post added at 18:25 ---------- Previous post was at 17:55 ----------

Latest Trumpy Bear commercial (this is not a spoof or parody, but a real commercial that has been shown on Fox TV in the USA).


Made in China like everything else.

https://www.thecut.com/2018/11/is-trumpy-bear-real.html

Mick 11-08-2020 21:20

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
BREAKING: Former Vice President and Presidential Candidate Joe Biden picks Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate.

His website now updated:

https://joebiden.com/

Pierre 11-08-2020 21:34

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36046361)
BREAKING: Former Vice President and Presidential Candidate Joe Biden picks Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate.

His website now updated:

https://joebiden.com/

Tokenism.

Hugh 11-08-2020 21:52

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046363)
Tokenism.

In what way?

Pierre 11-08-2020 21:55

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046364)
In what way?

To get the black vote, even though his actions throughout his political career in regards to the black community are questionable, to be polite.

Mick 11-08-2020 22:13

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046365)
To get the black vote, even though his actions throughout his political career in regards to the black community are questionable, to be polite.

Not just his, hers:-

https://www.latimes.com/politics/sto...lifornia-crime

Quote:

Still, her home state’s high rate of incarcerating people of color goes a long way in explaining the trouble she has had selling her candidacy to black voters nationwide. In California and many other states, racial disparities in imprisonment have intensified resentments of what many see as deeply ingrained discrimination in America’s criminal justice system.
In other words she did nothing of significance for blacks. She isn't even African-American, she is of mixed race, her mother was of Indian origin and her father Jamaican.

Paul 11-08-2020 22:17

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046363)
Tokenism.

I suspect that played a part, although she has apparently been a front runner for the position anyway.

Damien 11-08-2020 22:20

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046363)
Tokenism.

Kamala Harris is hardly a nobody in Democratic politics. She was always going to be one of the front runners.

It's interesting because of the hits against her is she was seen as been overly authoritarian as Attorney General and was disliked by the left of the Democratic Party. I wonder if this is a move to undercut the Trump campaign's message that Biden is in league with 'radical leftists'.

Certainly Biden/Harris is a pretty conservative ticket as far as the Democrats go.

Mick 11-08-2020 22:37

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36046368)
I suspect that played a part, although she has apparently been a front runner for the position anyway.

Yeah but she didn't even make it to the Iowa Caucuses.

---------- Post added at 22:37 ---------- Previous post was at 22:30 ----------

https://twitter.com/ForAmerica/statu...97946872745984

Monopoly: Kamala Harris edition.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EfK3ndSW...jpg&name=small

:rofl:

Chris 11-08-2020 23:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Sometimes I think American politics is fascinating, occasionally I think it would be interesting to read up on the details of it, the better to follow the final days of the campaign and the count.

Then I see attack ads and internet memes popping up with tedious certainty, that have obviously been pre-produced for every possible candidate, and I throw up my hands and think stuff them, leave them to their childish games ...

1andrew1 12-08-2020 08:47

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Attention those who like their news fake, pro-Trump and with an occasional Trumpy Bear advert thrown in for good measure! Fox News plans a UK streaming launch on September 17th. https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/fox...tv-1234731690/

Mr K 22-08-2020 17:57

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
The nutter's latest conspiracy theory is that 'Deep State' is hiding a covid vaccine until after the election...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a9683406.html

Either he's seriously deranged or he thinks the electorate is. Possibly it's both.

Carth 22-08-2020 18:02

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36047398)
The nutter's latest conspiracy theory is that 'Deep State' is hiding a covid vaccine until after the election...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a9683406.html

Either he's seriously deranged or he thinks the electorate is. Possibly it's both.

I think he's taking the P, and laughing at those who bite :D

Pierre 22-08-2020 18:17

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I really want Trump to win, just for the hell of it and to see people totally lose their ............over it.

OLD BOY 22-08-2020 19:39

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047401)
I really want Trump to win, just for the hell of it and to see people totally lose their ............over it.

As long as he doesn't provoke world conflict in the process...:dmonk:

Damien 22-08-2020 19:51

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Whoever loses at the election will provoke people losing their minds. QAnon will go nuts.

Mad Max 22-08-2020 20:55

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36047405)
As long as he doesn't provoke world conflict in the process...:dmonk:

Be ok against the chinky flu....:D

jfman 22-08-2020 23:50

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047401)
I really want Trump to win, just for the hell of it and to see people totally lose their ............over it.

I did find it entertaining when he won the first time that students needed time off of University to cope.

I'm not convinced people with so little resilience should be getting the expensive educations that US universities offer if they cannot cope with democratic outcomes to the point they need time off.

Can't they just join a cable tv forum and have hearty discussions that way?

OLD BOY 24-08-2020 14:24

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36047429)
I did find it entertaining when he won the first time that students needed time off of University to cope.

I'm not convinced people with so little resilience should be getting the expensive educations that US universities offer if they cannot cope with democratic outcomes to the point they need time off.

Can't they just join a cable tv forum and have hearty discussions that way?

I think that would be likely to give them all heart attacks.!.

Mick 24-08-2020 15:27

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047401)
I really want Trump to win, just for the hell of it and to see people totally lose their ............over it.

I just want him to win because the Democrats have gone stone cold crazy to the hard left, with stupid arse policies, "Defund the Police." What in the actual feck are they playing at with this nonsense, so damn stupid?

And Biden is a real hard lost cause.

Basically the DNC Convention last week was running on a "We hate Trump." Ticket. Yawn. :zzz:

OLD BOY 24-08-2020 16:32

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36047566)

I just want him to win because the Democrats have gone stone cold crazy to the hard left, with stupid arse policies
, "Defund the Police." What in the actual feck are they playing at with this nonsense, so damn stupid?

And Biden is a real hard lost cause.

Basically the DNC Convention last week was running on a "We hate Trump." Ticket. Yawn. :zzz:

Me too. The Americans deserve a better choice of candidates. But Trump looks like their best option.

1andrew1 26-08-2020 09:10

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36047566)
I just want him to win because the Democrats have gone stone cold crazy to the hard left, with stupid arse policies, "Defund the Police." What in the actual feck are they playing at with this nonsense, so damn stupid?

And Biden is a real hard lost cause.

Basically the DNC Convention last week was running on a "We hate Trump." Ticket. Yawn. :zzz:

I thought defund the police is BLM not the Democrats? :confused:

Which President is best for a UK trade deal should negotiations resume next year?

Mick 26-08-2020 10:54

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36047795)
I thought defund the police is BLM not the Democrats? :confused:

Which President is best for a UK trade deal should negotiations resume next year?

Joe Biden has not said directly about Defunding police if he gets in office. But he was asked about police funding and said it should be directed elsewhere. So in essence this policy of his, is surely a defund of the police in some form.

Damien 26-08-2020 11:00

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I think the Democrats want to do more of what we essentially do. So less money for the police overall but that money going to more prevention programs.

Police funding is HUGE in a lot of American states. Dwarfes any other department: https://www.citymetric.com/politics/...-agencies-5186

You could cut some of their budgets and still have them as the best funded area of the cities.

But it's not the White Houses responsibility anyway.

Carth 26-08-2020 12:26

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Aren't they funded by speed cameras, the same as our police are?

Mr K 26-08-2020 12:39

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36047821)
Aren't they funded by speed cameras, the same as our police are?

But you could scupper them by not breaking the speed limits. Sneaky eh?;)

Carth 26-08-2020 13:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36047823)
But you could scupper them by not breaking the speed limits. Sneaky eh?;)

spoken like a true pedestrian/cyclist :p:

Hom3r 28-08-2020 21:20

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
With the way 2020 is going this is my belief


B = Brexit
C = Covid-19
D = Donald Trump wins US President

pip08456 06-09-2020 17:45

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Michael Caputo, head of DHHS.

https://twitter.com/peltzmadeline/st...59525773824000

Hom3r 06-09-2020 21:53

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I'm expecting Trump to win, thanks to the alphabet and here's why.


A = Australian bush fires
B = Brexit
C = Covid-19
D = Donald Trump US president again.

papa smurf 09-09-2020 11:41

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize - US president 'has done more than most'


The US President’s nomination came from right-wing Norwegian politician Christian Tybring-Gjeddee who praised Donald Trump for his efforts towards resolving conflicts worldwide. He particularly commended the President for his key role in the “historic peace agreement” between Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world...Tybring-Gjedde

Carth 09-09-2020 13:05

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
That's just crazy, I had the peace prize down as going to the BLM organizers ;)

Shows how my joined up thinking has failed :D

Damien 09-09-2020 13:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36049231)
That's just crazy, I had the peace prize down as going to the BLM organizers ;)

They may have been nominated too. You get a few hundred nominees every year I think.

papa smurf 09-09-2020 14:57

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36048853)
I'm expecting Trump to win, thanks to the alphabet and here's why.


A = Australian bush fires
B = Brexit
C = Covid-19
D = Donald Trump US president again.

I love science;)

Stephen 10-09-2020 09:23

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36047809)
Joe Biden has not said directly about Defunding police if he gets in office. But he was asked about police funding and said it should be directed elsewhere. So in essence this policy of his, is surely a defund of the police in some form.

Its not defending the police but directing some of the monies to other areas, where it is heavily needed. Such as social care, counselling etc... trying to prevent crime before it gets to the police.

No-one actually said to defend or get rid off the police all together. Just direct some dunding to areas it is much needed

Sephiroth 10-09-2020 10:41

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Never defund police in an armed society - nor anywhere for that matter.

Pierre 11-09-2020 11:42

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36049216)
Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize - US president 'has done more than most'

Well he's done more than Obama did, and he got one.

Hugh 11-09-2020 12:17

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36049523)
Well he's done more than Obama did, and he got one.

Will it be for all the progress on North Korea?

Mick 11-09-2020 13:15

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36049534)
Will it be for all the progress on North Korea?

Your Google broken Hugh? :angel:

I am sure it's for the peace agreement between UAE and Israel.

Of course the Don has only been nominated, he has to win it yet, given the amount of people in the world with TDS, it will go to someone else more likely.

Obama got one in 2009, just for being elected U.S President that year.

Damien 11-09-2020 13:29

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I highly doubt he'll make the shortlist tbh. They're probably still embarrassed by awarding to Obama anyway.

Kushan 11-09-2020 16:01

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36049376)
Never defund police in an armed society - nor anywhere for that matter.

What if instead of saying "defund the police", we instead say "reallocate funds to prevent crime"?

Same difference.

Mick 11-09-2020 16:31

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 36049564)
What if instead of saying "defund the police", we instead say "reallocate funds to prevent crime"?

Same difference.

In what universe is this the same thing?

Defund the Police means they get no funds at all, reallocate funds to where else that combats crime, surely that's the function of an authoritative body, um, that's commonly known as the police?

Kushan 11-09-2020 16:42

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36049570)
In what universe is this the same thing?

Defund the Police means they get no funds at all

Not necessarily. It means they get less funds.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36049570)
reallocate funds to where else that combats crime, surely that's the function of an authoritative body, um, that's commonly known as the police?

Is it? Do the police decide their budget? Do the police write themselves a cheque each year?

I thought that was government that decided where public money went.

Carth 11-09-2020 16:43

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Reallocate funds where and in what way?

Will it be TV adverts saying that 'crime doesn't pay'?
Printing and delivering leaflets to the 'poorer' areas, stating that jobs are out there if you look hard enough?
A few hundred more 'drop in centers' where people tell you drugs are no good for society?
How about 'social awareness personnel' visiting schools and passing the message on that doing homework leads to a better life than stealing cars?


:shrug: . . any ideas that might work, that haven't already been tried?

Sephiroth 11-09-2020 16:47

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 36049564)
What if instead of saying "defund the police", we instead say "reallocate funds to prevent crime"?

Same difference.

No it isn't. The funding crime protection at the expense of an effective police force is pie in the sky. Criminals don't recognise do-goodism.

What's happened to you, Kush?

Hugh 11-09-2020 16:54

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36049570)
In what universe is this the same thing?

Defund the Police means they get no funds at all, reallocate funds to where else that combats crime, surely that's the function of an authoritative body, um, that's commonly known as the police?

From that Radical magazine, Good Housekeeping.

Quote:

It's a common misconception that "defunding the police" means completely stripping law enforcement of all of their funding. While while some organizations are indeed calling for the abolishment or dismantling of police altogether, "defunding the police" simply means reducing police department budgets and redistributing those funds towards essential social services that are often underfunded, such as housing, education, employment, mental health care, and youth services.
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/lif...olice-meaning/

Kushan 11-09-2020 17:04

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36049573)
No it isn't. The funding crime protection at the expense of an effective police force is pie in the sky. Criminals don't recognise do-goodism.

What's happened to you, Kush?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36049572)
Reallocate funds where and in what way?

Will it be TV adverts saying that 'crime doesn't pay'?
Printing and delivering leaflets to the 'poorer' areas, stating that jobs are out there if you look hard enough?
A few hundred more 'drop in centers' where people tell you drugs are no good for society?
How about 'social awareness personnel' visiting schools and passing the message on that doing homework leads to a better life than stealing cars?


:shrug: . . any ideas that might work, that haven't already been tried?

How about this paper from 1998:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2020/09/2.png

Or this one from 2002: https://www.researchgate.net/publica...e_a_difference

Quote:

Our analyses suggest that COPS hiring and innovative grant programs have resulted in significant reductions in local crime rates in cities with populations greater than 10,000 for both violent and nonviolent offenses. Multivariate analysis shows that in cities with populations greater than 10,000, an increase in one dollar of hiring grant funding per resident contributed to a corresponding decline of 5.26 violent crimes and 21.63 property crimes per 100,000 residents.
The research is out there and it's plentiful. Preventative measures save more money than just throwing more police at it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36049573)
What's happened to you, Kush?

I never lost my compassion for my fellow man. What happened to you?

Sephiroth 11-09-2020 17:30

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
@Kushan

You have to catch persistent (or any) ofenders first. Needs a decent police force.

The problem with some younger people is that they have little life experience beyond their adolescence/childhood and they think they know best. You and I both know that. Altruism always fails.


Kushan 11-09-2020 18:20

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Why are you bringing the debate about young people into this thread as well? Is there anything that isn't young people's fault?

As stated, Seph, nobody's saying get rid of the police or remove all funding, that's a misrepresentation of the argument. However it's clear that, where America is concerned, the police have largely failed in their job to prevent crime. The disproportionate responses, particularly amongst black people, has gone on too long with too little done. It's clear that spending money doing the same things over and over isn't working, so it's time to spend some of that money elsewhere.

Preventative action is better and cheaper than reactive action.

Carth 11-09-2020 18:28

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 36049576)
How about this paper from 1998:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2020/09/2.png

Or this one from 2002: https://www.researchgate.net/publica...e_a_difference



The research is out there and it's plentiful. Preventative measures save more money than just throwing more police at it.


Given the state of the USA, I'd cautiously suggest neither of the above have worked particularly well to reduce crime. Of course, the lack of job opportunities doesn't help . . which is something I think Trump was trying to address?

Kushan 11-09-2020 18:32

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Poverty does lead to crime, I certainly agree with that. Get people out of poverty and crime drops significantly.

Sephiroth 11-09-2020 18:50

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 36049600)
Why are you bringing the debate about young people into this thread as well? Is there anything that isn't young people's fault?

As stated, Seph, nobody's saying get rid of the police or remove all funding, that's a misrepresentation of the argument. However it's clear that, where America is concerned, the police have largely failed in their job to prevent crime. The disproportionate responses, particularly amongst black people, has gone on too long with too little done. It's clear that spending money doing the same things over and over isn't working, so it's time to spend some of that money elsewhere.

Preventative action is better and cheaper than reactive action.

You may have a point there!

Mick 12-09-2020 01:37

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36049574)
From that Radical magazine, Good Housekeeping.



https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/lif...olice-meaning/

And they and you are wrong as well, as all know what BLM protestors were calling for in some of those States the in the US, for the complete removal of the police.

So I reiterate, in what universe does it mean to Defund, to not mean not remove funds in their entirety, I do not want the pathetic communist and leftist understanding of it thrown at me.

Kushan 13-09-2020 19:08

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36049672)
And they and you are wrong as well, as all know what BLM protestors were calling for in some of those States the in the US, for the complete removal of the police.


This is what's called a strawman argument. You're deliberately misrepresenting the argument to make it easier to attack.

Nobody in this thread is suggesting to get rid of the police and that misconception has been addressed several times. You are point blank refusing to accept this by saying "they and you are wrong".

How can we be wrong about our own point of view?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36049672)
So I reiterate, in what universe does it mean to Defund, to not mean not remove funds in their entirety, I do not want the pathetic communist and leftist understanding of it thrown at me.

Simple: This universe. The one you refuse to engage in.

Hugh 15-09-2020 12:37

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...an-jets-414883
Quote:

A digital ad released by a fundraising arm of the Trump campaign on Sept. 11 calling on people to “support our troops” uses a stock photo of Russian-made fighter jets and weapons.

The ad, which was made by the Trump Make America Great Again Committee*, features silhouettes of three soldiers walking as a fighter jet flies over them...

... After this story was published, the creator of the image, Arthur Zakirov, confirmed in a Facebook message that it shows a 3D model of a MiG-29, and that the soldiers were Russian models.

* The Trump Make America Great Again Committee is run by both the Republican National Committee and the campaign.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1600169692

1andrew1 15-09-2020 16:01

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36050229)

:D:D:D

Pierre 15-09-2020 16:27

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
https://apple.news/A4okVB9eKSDusZx-G12idhg

Trump apparently ahead of Biden on the Latino vote

Damien 15-09-2020 17:05

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Florida looks like it'll be close. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ While the other states have had stable polls Flordia is the main one edging away from Biden.

Hugh 15-09-2020 17:06

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36050257)
https://apple.news/A4okVB9eKSDusZx-G12idhg

Trump apparently ahead of Biden on the Latino vote

Except...

Quote:

Biden is winning Hispanics right now, but just by 28 points in an average of live interview polls taken over the last few months.
and

Quote:

An average of live interview non-partisan Florida polls taken since the summer gives Biden just a six-point lead with Hispanics.
Not as much support as Clinton had, but still more than Trump.

1andrew1 16-09-2020 17:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Do reports like this impact Trump's election chances? I suspect that because America is so divided this won't. I'm still quite shocked - guess I shouldn't be!
Quote:

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump got a rare grilling at an ABC News town hall in Philadelphia on Tuesday.

He responded to a series of tough questions from Pennsylvania voters, and some more from moderator George Stephanopoulos, much like he responds to easy questions from his favorite conservative television hosts -- with a barrage of dishonesty.

Trump made at least 20 false or misleading claims over the hour-and-a-half event, according to our preliminary count.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/16/p...all/index.html

Mick 16-09-2020 18:59

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Nothing on Biden initially saying he was going to ban fracking and then when challenged again on this, when Journalists were finally allowed to ask him unscripted questions, he now says he won't?

I suspect he then fell asleep at 4.30pm. In his basement Hiden Biden.

---------- Post added at 18:59 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ----------

WTF is this cringeworthy bullshit from yesterday?



Btw Despacito in Spanish means "slowly", which is the perfect characterisation of Joe Hiden. :rolleyes:

jfman 16-09-2020 19:03

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36050398)
Do reports like this impact Trump's election chances? I suspect that because America is so divided this won't. I'm still quite shocked - guess I shouldn't be!

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/16/p...all/index.html

Not on CNN they don’t.

1andrew1 16-09-2020 19:10

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36050413)
Not on CNN they don’t.

I suspect you're correct.

Hugh 16-09-2020 19:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36050406)
Nothing on Biden initially saying he was going to ban fracking and then when challenged again on this, when Journalists were finally allowed to ask him unscripted questions, he now says he won't?

I suspect he then fell asleep at 4.30pm. In his basement Hiden Biden.

---------- Post added at 18:59 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ----------

WTF is this cringeworthy bullshit from yesterday?



Btw Despacito in Spanish means "slowly", which is the perfect characterisation of Joe Hiden. :rolleyes:

Don’t forget that Michigan gave us the Ford Motang, or was it the Motang Sound?

A good example of what "despacito" means is "despacito quiero bajar la rampa".

Damien 16-09-2020 20:16

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Talking of the Flordia polling this article shows where they have made the most progress or lost it in the last few months: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...e-most-ground/

Flordia moving away from Biden. Minnesota moved the most towards him.

Mick 16-09-2020 20:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Kamala Harris, Biden's running mate, made a Freudian slip yesterday when she referred to polices as her Administration, should Biden win, she said The "Harris Administration, together with Joe Biden."

If Biden wins, it's his Administration, not yours Harris. Unless you're already jumping the gun and enacting the 25th Amendment because of Hiden Biden's health, mainly very strong concerns that he has got some form of Dementia.


Pierre 16-09-2020 20:39

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I have to say, watching several recent videos of Biden, I don’t think he’s all there. He certainty in several instances did not look present in the moment, and seemed to lose his train of thought.

Presidential debates may be interesting.

Hugh 16-09-2020 23:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36050427)
I have to say, watching several recent videos of Biden, I don’t think he’s all there. He certainty in several instances did not look present in the moment, and seemed to lose his train of thought.

Presidential debates may be interesting.

That’s just "herd mentality"... ;)

I think you’re up-playing it, or down-playing it - apparently it’s possible to do both.

Carth 17-09-2020 00:23

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I hardly ever watch anything concerning US elections, but if Biden has entered the strange world of coffee on his cornflakes or wearing a 3 piece suit in bed, spitting image will far surpass the excellent Reagan stuff ;)

Sephiroth 17-09-2020 08:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I'm sure that Spitting Image has all this perfectly in hand; two perfect characters.

1andrew1 17-09-2020 08:50

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36050462)
I'm sure that Spitting Image has all this perfectly in hand; two perfect characters.

I'm looking forward to its return!

Hom3r 17-09-2020 12:11

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36050462)
I'm sure that Spitting Image has all this perfectly in hand; two perfect characters.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36050463)
I'm looking forward to its return!


I was, until I found out its on Britbox:mad:

Sephiroth 17-09-2020 12:41

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36050484)
I was, until I found out its on Britbox:mad:

That's why I subscribed to Britbox - to watch Spitting Image.

Chris 17-09-2020 14:14

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36050488)
That's why I subscribed to Britbox - to watch Spitting Image.

Smug left-wing satire surely isn’t a reason to subscribe to anything ...

Carth 17-09-2020 14:26

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36050506)
Smug left-wing satire surely isn’t a reason to subscribe to anything ...

True . . . good job Twitter is free isn't it :D

Sephiroth 17-09-2020 14:36

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36050506)
Smug left-wing satire surely isn’t a reason to subscribe to anything ...

You've lost me there.

Carth 17-09-2020 14:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36050510)
You've lost me there.

Maybe you're trying to overthink it in complicated terms, if you're lucky someone may post a graph or retweet an analysts view complete with spreadsheet ;)

1andrew1 17-09-2020 14:42

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36050488)
That's why I subscribed to Britbox - to watch Spitting Image.

I think I may have to give it a go for that too!

Chris 17-09-2020 15:39

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36050510)
You've lost me there.

Sorry, I always assumed you were old enough to have seen Spitting Image on TV first time round.

Sephiroth 17-09-2020 16:14

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36050528)
Sorry, I always assumed you were old enough to have seen Spitting Image on TV first time round.

... and yes, I've got the VHS tapes. I just didn't understand your turn of phrase.

jfman 17-09-2020 17:05

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
VHS? If it’s not on streaming it’s not worth watching ;)

Channeling my inner OB there.

Carth 17-09-2020 17:37

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Betamax Matters Too :p:

Mick 19-09-2020 02:14

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
BREAKING: U.S Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died aged 87. R.I.P

This means President Trump’s new Justice Nominee will in all likelihood get a vote on the Senate floor when there is only six weeks to go until the U.S Election.

Damien 19-09-2020 07:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I assumed he would apply the same rules he did for Obama's nominee....

This is gonna be a massive fight. The Republicans and the President are perfectly entitled to nominate someone but they set their own precedient last time.

I also think this would give them the majority they need to ban abortion.

Hugh 19-09-2020 10:11

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36050778)
I assumed he would apply the same rules he did for Obama's nominee....

This is gonna be a massive fight. The Republicans and the President are perfectly entitled to nominate someone but they set their own precedient last time.

I also think this would give them the majority they need to ban abortion.

Quote:

February 13, 2016: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice,” McConnell said in a statement released after Scalia’s death. “Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”
Quote:

February 23, 2016: “I can now confidently say the view shared by virtually everybody in my conference, is that the nomination should be made by the president the people elect in the election that’s underway right now,” McConnell told reporters following Senate Republicans’ first closed-door meeting after Scalia’s death.
Quote:

May 18, 2016: Reacting to a forum called by Senate Democrats to discuss the lingering nomination of Garland, a statement from McConnell’s office called it a “sham hearing” and claimed Democrats were being hypocritical about the need to confirm Garland in an election year: “It seems the more we hear from Democrats about the Supreme Court the more we’re reminded by comparison of how reasonable and common-sense the Republican position is today.”

Mick 19-09-2020 10:54

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
America doesn’t run on precedents, we do, they have a written Constitution, we don’t. What McConnell said in 2016 is not in the Constitution. Obviously in 2016, it was Republican Senate and a Democrat President. This time it’s both a Republican controlled Senate and White House.

The other important factor is that the Supreme Court most definitely needs a full compliment of Justices in highly heated contest like Bush vs. Gore election, required Supreme Court intervention.

Also, McConnell should steam ahead, the way the pathetic Democrats have behaved this last four years, the hoax investigations and the crap they threw at an honourable man in Justice Kavanaugh, they do not deserve this seat at all.

Chris 19-09-2020 11:49

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Not entirely true. The Supreme Court’s rulings become precedent without then requiring legislation or constitutional amendment. Granted the court is interpreting the constitution in specific circumstances but their rulings can and do permanently alter the way public life is conducted. (Roe v Wade is a historic example which determined a woman’s basic right under the constitution to have an abortion). Lower courts’ rulings may set precedent or be regarded as ‘persuasive’ in subsequent cases.

I think what’s at issue here is what we in the UK would understand as convention rather than precedent. We often do stuff in government because that’s how it has been done before, and it is widely regarded as politically difficult (though not illegal) to behave differently without good cause. Giving parliament a vote on military involvement in Syria is a good example of this. Even though it was only done once, hard questions will be asked if the government moves to deploy armed forces to a foreign battlefield in future, without asking parliament first.

I suspect - though I don’t know for sure - that what’s at play in the US right now is similar to our unwritten system of convention rather than the legal process we would call precedent. Trump’s opponents are pointing out that he is not behaving conventionally. It’s not a legal claim, but a political one, which in the middle of an election campaign, seems a perfectly reasonable course of action.

Maggy 19-09-2020 11:50

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I'm just concerned about all those women who could find themselves facing a further erosion of their reproductive rights if there isn't a careful choice made by whomever.

Mick 19-09-2020 13:02

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36050788)
Not entirely true. The Supreme Court’s rulings become precedent without then requiring legislation or constitutional amendment. Granted the court is interpreting the constitution in specific circumstances but their rulings can and do permanently alter the way public life is conducted. (Roe v Wade is a historic example which determined a woman’s basic right under the constitution to have an abortion). Lower courts’ rulings may set precedent or be regarded as ‘persuasive’ in subsequent cases.

I think what’s at issue here is what we in the UK would understand as convention rather than precedent. We often do stuff in government because that’s how it has been done before, and it is widely regarded as politically difficult (though not illegal) to behave differently without good cause. Giving parliament a vote on military involvement in Syria is a good example of this. Even though it was only done once, hard questions will be asked if the government moves to deploy armed forces to a foreign battlefield in future, without asking parliament first.

I suspect - though I don’t know for sure - that what’s at play in the US right now is similar to our unwritten system of convention rather than the legal process we would call precedent. Trump’s opponents are pointing out that he is not behaving conventionally. It’s not a legal claim, but a political one, which in the middle of an election campaign, seems a perfectly reasonable course of action.

If it’s not Constitutional Chris, no precedent can persist. Roe vs Wade, could be overturned in a Supreme Conservative led Court. The court cannot invent laws, that’s the job of the legislature. Republicans have tried to legislate and have passed legislation, only for it to be vetoed by then President Bill Clinton.

What McConnell said in 2016 wasn’t a legal ruling or precedent. It’s just he was Senate Majority leader and he wasn’t going to allow a Democrat President get his Nomination confirmed, in an election year where a Republican president could win and get his nomination in, there is nothing unjust about this. It’s called party affiliation. If Democrats want to appoint justices they have to win elections and be in control of the Senate.

The issue of abortion is a highly emotive and separate topic.

Chris 19-09-2020 13:55

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36050798)
If it’s not Constitutional Chris, no precedent can persist. Roe vs Wade, could be overturned in a Supreme Conservative led Court. The court cannot invent laws, that’s the job of the legislature. Republicans have tried to legislate and have passed legislation, only for it to be vetoed by then President Bill Clinton.

What McConnell said in 2016 wasn’t a legal ruling or precedent. It’s just he was Senate Majority leader and he wasn’t going to allow a Democrat President get his Nomination confirmed, in an election year where a Republican president could win and get his nomination in, there is nothing unjust about this. It’s called party affiliation. If Democrats want to appoint justices they have to win elections and be in control of the Senate.

The issue of abortion is a highly emotive and separate topic.

I’m basically agreeing with you. ;). The abortion issue is relevant here only to the extent that it illustrates the operation of legal, constitutional precedent in the US system.

That’s why I was chewing over what we call convention, because that’s the concept that I think they’re actually appealing to as we would understand it. The principle of Precedent does apply in the USA as it does here, and is not absolute in the USA or the U.K.; the difference is that Parliament in the U.K. can always legislate to overturn a precedent even if it’s set by a ruling of our Supreme Court because the UK’s Supreme Court is not a constitutional court, but is really just the final court of appeal. In the USA, however, if the constitution needs to be interpreted, their Supreme Court performs that function and once it has ruled, then that is the interpretation that stands, unless it is modified in future by the Supreme Court again, or in the highly unlikely event of a constitutional amendment being passed by the appropriate supermajority in both legislative houses.

I don’t know the US system well enough to know how persuasive past political decisions are in creating convention (or precedent as they call it). I suspect that it is not as strong as the Democrats are making out, and that this is all part of the heat and noise of the election campaign rather than a genuine democratic outrage.

pip08456 19-09-2020 14:03

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Sen. Lindsey Graham said in 2018 that the Senate would wait until the next election to vote on a Supreme Court pick should a seat become vacant during the last year of President Donald Trump's term.

The remarks by the South Carolina Republican and Senate Judiciary Committee chairman resonated Friday in the wake of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, less than two months before the presidential election. Ginsburg died at the age of 87 from pancreatic cancer.
Link

Mick 19-09-2020 15:00

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36050803)

He has since walked back on this.

The way Democrat’s have behaved in this last few years, they have let their Trump hatred lose their minds, veer to the far left. Allowed rioters to destroy some of their own districts by lawlessness, look at the crime rate in New York, it has absolutely soared under Democrat rule, other areas under their governances refusing federal assistance to curb the rioting and arsonists.

Do I think for one minute if circumstances would be in reverse that Democrats would leave a S.C. seat open. I highly doubt it.

1andrew1 19-09-2020 20:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
If Trump was half confident of winning the election the he'd happily wait until November before installing a Republican judge. However, he's shrewd enough to know the game is up and so is trying to make mischief for the Biden administration.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum