Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33705924)

Mick 18-01-2018 12:27

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Well it's from NYT, the ******* liberal journo's. They loved Obama, heavens knows why, the shit President that he was.

Damien 18-01-2018 12:33

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35932978)
Well it's from NYT, the ******* liberal journo's. They loved Obama, heavens knows why, the shit President that he was.

They complied a list too: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...umps-lies.html

The claim Trump made against what happened. I.E

Quote:

JAN. 25 “Take a look at the Pew reports (which show voter fraud.)”
(The report never mentioned voter fraud.)
JAN. 25 “So, look, when President Obama was there two weeks ago making a speech, very nice speech. Two people were shot and killed during his speech. You can't have that.” (There were no gun homicide victims in Chicago that day.)

Mick 18-01-2018 12:46

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Please, I have no desire to read anything associated with their website. They disgust me with that they did with the Manchester Arena Bomb photos, showing dead bodies and bomb components days after the event and sharing intelligence with whomever in the intelligence community shared it, was a massive offensive display of journalism I have ever seen. Total *******s @ New York Times.

Damien 18-01-2018 12:58

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35932985)
Please, I have no desire to read anything associated with their website. They disgust me with that they did with the Manchester Arena Bomb photos, showing dead bodies and bomb components days after the event and sharing intelligence with whomever in the intelligence community shared it, was a massive offensive display of journalism I have ever seen. Total *******s @ New York Times.

ok here ya go: http://www.politifact.com/personalit...yruling/false/

Mick 18-01-2018 13:32

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I am not interested, I don't care about the lies. Hillary lied, Bill Clinton lied, Obama lied, whether it's 10 lies or 100. They all do it as it has been said. Do we have any websites dedicated to other world leaders who have lied?

At the end of the day, it doesn't detract the fact that most news stories are full of negative hysteria nonsense as highlighted in the awards that Trump gave and they are well deserved.

Mr Banana 18-01-2018 17:09

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35932994)
I am not interested, I don't care about the lies. Hillary lied, Bill Clinton lied, Obama lied, whether it's 10 lies or 100. They all do it as it has been said. Do we have any websites dedicated to other world leaders who have lied?

At the end of the day, it doesn't detract the fact that most news stories are full of negative hysteria nonsense as highlighted in the awards that Trump gave and they are well deserved.

Do any other world leaders have fake news awards or tweet fake news?

To me Trump and the media are as bad as each other, the papers print fake news, the media broadcast fake news and Trump tweets fake news.

1andrew1 18-01-2018 17:21

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35933023)
Do any other world leaders have fake news awards or tweet fake news?

To me Trump and the media are as bad as each other, the papers print fake news, the media broadcast fake news and Trump tweets fake news.

To me, the fact that Trump doesn't acknowledge his fake news makes him worse than any news outlet that owns up to its errors. And that's before we 've looked at accuracy rates.

Mr K 18-01-2018 18:39

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
The guy is a narcissistic liar.

What I genuinely don't understand is his popularity with the religious right. He's got to be one of the biggest sinners on the planet, and has only declared an interest in God since running for president.

Hugh 18-01-2018 19:14

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
3 Attachment(s)
It’s reported Trump is 6’3".

Barack Obama is 6’1", Jeb Bush is 6’3", Alex Rodriguez (baseball player) is 6’3".

http://www.cableforum.uk/board/attac...1&d=1516302725

http://www.cableforum.uk/board/attac...2&d=1516302725

http://www.cableforum.uk/board/attac...3&d=1516302725

I would say he is 6’1" - your thoughts?

OLD BOY 18-01-2018 19:27

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933030)
The guy is a narcissistic liar.

What I genuinely don't understand is his popularity with the religious right. He's got to be one of the biggest sinners on the planet, and has only declared an interest in God since running for president.

A lot of people on the religious right are indeed sinners. They are constantly asking for forgiveness in their private worlds, and no wonder when you observe their attitude towards others.

So I am not at all surprised that they adore the Donald.

GrimUpNorth 18-01-2018 19:28

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35933035)
It’s reported Trump is 6’3".

Barack Obama is 6’1", Jeb Bush is 6’3", Alex Rodriguez (baseball player) is 6’3".

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2018/01/9.jpg

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2018/01/9.jpg

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2018/01/9.jpg

I would say he is 6’1" - your thoughts?

Fake - he is way taller than everyone (in fact he's the tallest man who ever has lived), he just crouches in public because he doesn't need to use his height advantage to prove he's the alpha dog.

Cheers

Dave

OLD BOY 18-01-2018 19:28

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35933035)
It’s reported Trump is 6’3".

Barack Obama is 6’1", Jeb Bush is 6’3", Alex Rodriguez (baseball player) is 6’3".

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2018/01/9.jpg

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2018/01/9.jpg

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2018/01/9.jpg

I would say he is 6’1" - your thoughts?

I really couldn't care less, and I don't see what it has to do with his ability to carry out his Presidential duties.

Hugh 18-01-2018 19:36

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35933044)
I really couldn't care less, and I don't see what it has to do with his ability to carry out his Presidential duties.

Why would he lie about it? It’s something that can be easily proved/disproved by seeing him next to other people, so why?

Is it because if he was below 6’3", he would be clinically obese? Is it because he needs to be ‘bigger’ than others? Is he so insecure, he needs to ‘enhance’ his height?

It points to how he thinks - if he lies about something this obvious, how can we trust him?

I think I may join the "Girther" Movement - we need to see Trump’s Girth Certificate (the long form, not the short form). ;)

passingbat 18-01-2018 19:47

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933030)
The guy is a narcissistic liar.

What I genuinely don't understand is his popularity with the religious right. He's got to be one of the biggest sinners on the planet, and has only declared an interest in God since running for president.

Do you realise that there is a Harlot in the bloodline of Jesus? She was saved by Faith.

The Jewish people were released from their 70 year captivity in Babylon by King Cyrus the great (not a nice guy!) when Cyrus conquered Babylon. The reason he did so was because he was shown a passage from Isaiah, written around 150 years before, that named Isaiah as an Instrument of God. Cyrus also gave them money to rebuild the Temple that the Babylonians had destroyed.

God can choose anyone he wants to achieve his purpose.

Trump has been talking with prominent Evangelical Christian and watching Christian TV for 10 years.

---------- Post added at 19:47 ---------- Previous post was at 19:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35933042)
A lot of people on the religious right are indeed sinners. They are constantly asking for forgiveness in their private worlds, and no wonder when you observe their attitude towards others.

So I am not at all surprised that they adore the Donald.

All Christians are sinners, saved by grace. If you find a Christian who says that he never messes up: Ignore him; he's not a Christian!

1andrew1 18-01-2018 21:15

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35933048)
If you find a Christian who says that he never messes up: Ignore him; he's not a Christian!

It's hard to ignore Trump though.

Mr K 18-01-2018 21:28

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35933048)
Trump has been talking with prominent Evangelical Christian and watching Christian TV for 10 years.

He's probably just lost his remote control ;)

Trump's only faith is in himself. If the gullible evangelcal masses think he's the Second Coming then more fool them. What's Christian about trying to deny the poor healthcare, or trying to deport immigrant children who are there through no fault of their own?

daveeb 18-01-2018 21:58

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933070)
He's probably just lost his remote control ;)

Trump's only faith is in himself. If the gullible evangelcal masses think he's the Second Coming then more fool them. What's Christian about trying to deny the poor healthcare, or trying to deport immigrant children who are there through no fault of their own?

Or he's just marking time until he gets the Gorilla channel back. ;)

But don't forget MrK that god (and seemingly Trump) work in mysterious ways, so no point in calling them out for anything bad.

Mick 18-01-2018 22:00

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933070)
He's probably just lost his remote control ;)

Trump's only faith is in himself. If the gullible evangelcal masses think he's the Second Coming then more fool them. What's Christian about trying to deny the poor healthcare, or trying to deport immigrant children who are there through no fault of their own?

No, more fool you because they seriously couldn't give a toss what you think and will vote for him again in 2020.

As for fault, it's the fault of their parents who entered the U.S illegally.

Again, because you have issues with democracy, Trump was elected on a mandate to put American citizens first, not illegals.

At the end of the day, President Obama lacked the Constitutional and legal Authority to implement DACA in the first place, which President Obama knew at the time but he implemented it anyway and then in 2014, he attempted to introduce DAPA which, like DACA, instead offered protections for the illegal parents but a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Nationwide Injunction against DAPA, which the Supreme Court allowed to stand.

The Executive Branch does not have the legislative power to change or amend laws and that is what Obama was trying to do, which sets a dangerous precedent as it weakens the constitutional balance of powers. This is why Trump, himself, cannot repeal and replace Obama care, that is a congressional responsibility, same with the tax cuts that have just passed.

1andrew1 18-01-2018 22:09

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933072)
No, more fool you because they seriously couldn't give a toss what you think and will vote for him again in 2020.

His name may not be on the voting slips though due to impeachment or similar. The Russian investigation is ongoing whatever Trump may pretend.

Mr Banana 18-01-2018 22:24

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933072)
No, more fool you because they seriously couldn't give a toss what you think and will vote for him again in 2020.

As for fault, it's the fault of their parents who entered the U.S illegally.

Again, because you have issues with democracy, Trump was elected on a mandate to put American citizens first, not illegals.

At the end of the day, President Obama lacked the Constitutional and legal Authority to implement DACA in the first place, which President Obama knew at the time but he implemented it anyway and then in 2014, he attempted to introduce DAPA which, like DACA, instead offered protections for the illegal parents but a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Nationwide Injunction against DAPA, which the Supreme Court allowed to stand.

The Executive Branch does not have the legislative power to change or amend laws and that is what Obama was trying to do, which sets a dangerous precedent as it weakens the constitutional balance of powers. This is why Trump, himself, cannot repeal and replace Obama care, that is a congressional responsibility, same with the tax cuts that have just passed.

By the letter of his new law yes but how can it be right that a 39 year old guy who was brought there illegally when he was 10, is married to a US citizen and has 2 US born kids gets deported. Morally that is wrong.

Mick 18-01-2018 22:39

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35933074)
His name may not be on the voting slips though due to impeachment or similar. The Russian investigation is ongoing whatever Trump may pretend.

The Russian collusion is a hoax, made up by the Democrats and rogue elements within the FBI, hence the 'Insurance Policy' they set up.

House Intel Committee, have today released a classified report to the rest of the House and from the feedback I am seeing from Republican Congressman on Twitter, it makes for disturbing reading suggesting serious abuses of power, before and during the U.S Election 2016 and are calling for it to be released to the American public regarding the corrupt behaviours of the Department of Justice and Comey led-FBI under the Obama Administration. Some Democrats have said they will vote against the report being released to the public, ah yes, I bet they bloody do, the corrupt set of pricks that that party are. :rolleyes:

The only collusion that is currently said to have existed and there is evidence of it, is the DNC and the Crooked Hillary Campaign allegedly paying for the Fake Russian Dossier and then involve rogue elements within the FBI, to get a FISA Warrant to illegally spy on their main opponent, Donald J. Trump. A scandal far far bigger than Watergate, dwarfing that massively.

---------- Post added at 22:39 ---------- Previous post was at 22:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35933075)
By the letter of his new law yes but how can it be right that a 39 year old guy who was brought there illegally when he was 10, is married to a US citizen and has 2 US born kids gets deported. Morally that is wrong.

That is nothing to do with DACA. If he's 39, he was too old to meet the DACA age limit.

Mr Banana 18-01-2018 22:49

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933076)
The Russian collusion is a hoax, made up by the Democrats and rogue elements within the FBI, hence the 'Insurance Policy' they set up.

House Intel Committee, have today released a classified report to the rest of the House and from the feedback I am seeing from Republican Congressman on Twitter, it makes for disturbing reading suggesting serious abuses of power, before and during the U.S Election 2016 and are calling for it to be released to the American public regarding the corrupt behaviours of the Department of Justice and Comey led-FBI under the Obama Administration. Some Democrats have said they will vote against the report being released to the public, ah yes, I bet they bloody do, the corrupt set of pricks that that party are. :rolleyes:

The only collusion that is currently said to have existed and there is evidence of it, is the DNC and the Crooked Hillary Campaign allegedly paying for the Fake Russian Dossier and then involve rogue elements within the FBI, to get a FISA Warrant to illegally spy on their main opponent, Donald J. Trump. A scandal far far bigger than Watergate, dwarfing that massively.

---------- Post added at 22:39 ---------- Previous post was at 22:33 ----------



That is nothing to do with DACA. If he's 39, he was too old to meet the DACA age limit.

Not saying its anything to do with Daca Mick. He has just been deported as an illegal. He had been trying to gain citizenship for a number of years and was granted extensions each year while being processed. This year was different and he was deported. He was taken there illegally by his parents as a 10 year old but is now 39, married to a US citizen with 2 kids, yet was still deported.

Damien 18-01-2018 22:50

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933076)
Some Democrats have said they will vote against the report being released to the public, ah yes, I bet they bloody do, the corrupt set of pricks that that party are. :rolleyes:

What do you think it is about the Democrats that make them so universally bad and the Republicans that make them so trustworthy? You believe things on Twitter if they're about the Democrats but think anything against the Republicans are a hoax.

Quote:

The only collusion that is currently said to have existed and there is evidence of it, is the DNC and the Crooked Hillary Campaign allegedly paying for the Fake Russian Dossier and then involve rogue elements within the FBI, to get a FISA Warrant to illegally spy on their main opponent, Donald J. Trump. A scandal far far bigger than Watergate, dwarfing that massively.
What evidence?

passingbat 18-01-2018 23:06

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933070)
He's probably just lost his remote control ;)

Trump's only faith is in himself. If the gullible evangelcal masses think he's the Second Coming then more fool them. What's Christian about trying to deny the poor healthcare, or trying to deport immigrant children who are there through no fault of their own?

They Don't.

The antichrist will Arrive before Jesus' second coming and many will be fooled thinking that he is Jesus. He will be a very charismatic person, and starting off as a politician, solve world problems and perform miracles. and build a false peace, but:

Daniel 8:25International Standard Version (ISV)

Through his skill he’ll cause deceit to prosper under his leadership. He’ll promote himself and will destroy many while they are secure.

But eventually he become a military leader, and unless you worship his image and accept his mark, your head will be chopped off! But if you accept the mark, you can never be saved.

Hugh 19-01-2018 09:59

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35933082)
They Don't.

The antichrist will Arrive before Jesus' second coming and many will be fooled thinking that he is Jesus. He will be a very charismatic person, and starting off as a politician, solve world problems and perform miracles. and build a false peace, but:

Daniel 8:25International Standard Version (ISV)

Through his skill he’ll cause deceit to prosper under his leadership. He’ll promote himself and will destroy many while they are secure.

But eventually he become a military leader, and unless you worship his image and accept his mark, your head will be chopped off! But if you accept the mark, you can never be saved.

Sounds like some Republican voters’ view of Trump...

Hugh 19-01-2018 21:55

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
From Trump’s speech at today’s March for Life anti-abortion rally in Washington DC.
Quote:

“Right now in a number of states the laws allow a baby to be born from his or her mother’s womb in the ninth month. It is wrong; it has to change,” he said.
https://t.co/o0Gior16PZ

Mr Banana 19-01-2018 22:10

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35933181)
From Trump’s speech at today’s March for Life anti-abortion rally in Washington DC.

https://t.co/o0Gior16PZ

Is that real or edited?

idi banashapan 19-01-2018 22:19

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
looks like a 'bad lip reading' video. check out youtube for them.

Mick 20-01-2018 05:22

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
BREAKING: U.S Government has shut down due to the U.S Senate failing to agree to pass the budget resolution bill by Midnight deadline (5 am UK time).

During a shutdown, nearly 40% of the government workforce is placed on unpaid leave and told not to work. Many, but not all, are non-defense federal employees. Active duty military personnel are not put on leave.

There have been 12 historical government shutdowns in the US since 1981. The longest occurred under Bill Clinton, lasting 21 days from December 1995 to January 1996, when the then House speaker, Newt Gingrich, demanded sharp cuts to government programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and welfare.

The most recent shutdown occurred under Obama in 2013, pitting then president against the Republican-led House of Representatives. Republicans refused to support a spending bill that included funding for Obama’s healthcare law, that shutdown lasted 16 days, at it's peak affected 850,000 federal employees.

Today's shutdown, is largely due to the Democrats who were attempting to include a non-budget issue in to the negotiations, DACA and were not willing to budge on protections for 800,000 DREAMers which is due to expire in March.

Maggy 20-01-2018 08:58

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Here is a more nuanced viewpoint.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42757091

Mr Banana 20-01-2018 09:08

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933194)
BREAKING: U.S Government has shut down due to the U.S Senate failing to agree to pass the budget resolution bill by Midnight deadline (5 am UK time).

During a shutdown, nearly 40% of the government workforce is placed on unpaid leave and told not to work. Many, but not all, are non-defense federal employees. Active duty military personnel are not put on leave.

There have been 12 historical government shutdowns in the US since 1981. The longest occurred under Bill Clinton, lasting 21 days from December 1995 to January 1996, when the then House speaker, Newt Gingrich, demanded sharp cuts to government programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and welfare.

The most recent shutdown occurred under Obama in 2013, pitting then president against the Republican-led House of Representatives. Republicans refused to support a spending bill that included funding for Obama’s healthcare law, that shutdown lasted 16 days, at it's peak affected 850,000 federal employees.

Today's shutdown, is largely due to the Democrats who were attempting to include a non-budget issue in to the negotiations, DACA and were not willing to budge on protections for 800,000 DREAMers which is due to expire in March.

From a moral perspective I think they are right to look for protection of the dreamers.

pip08456 20-01-2018 10:08

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35933200)
From a moral perspective I think they are right to look for protection of the dreamers.

From a moral perspective is it right to hold a country to ransom for a political end?

1andrew1 20-01-2018 10:18

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
A shutdown this weekend will be the first time ever when one party controls both houses.This is going to count against Trump. He's built his reputation on deal-making and failed miserably.

The only silver lining is that he can publish a sequel to his book and call it "The Art of No Deal". Extreme Brexiters will buy it just for its title. :D

Damien 20-01-2018 10:39

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35933202)
From a moral perspective is it right to hold a country to ransom for a political end?

This happens all the time. If you want support from another party you make concessions. This is also true of the border wall funding.

I don't think anyone looks good out of this to be honest. It's a further sign that the sheer partisanship is likely to harm the states more than any outside influence will.

Mr Banana 20-01-2018 10:42

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35933202)
From a moral perspective is it right to hold a country to ransom for a political end?

Why for a political end? They are human beings that they are trying to protect.

1andrew1 20-01-2018 10:48

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35933202)
From a moral perspective is it right to hold a country to ransom for a political end?

So, you'd prefer a North Korean style set-up where every politician votes as instructed?

pip08456 20-01-2018 11:35

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35933205)
Why for a political end? They are human beings that they are trying to protect.

What about the 8.9 million children on chips? That funding stopped yesterday.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35933206)
So, you'd prefer a North Korean style set-up where every politician votes as instructed?

Where does NK come into it?

Mr Banana 20-01-2018 11:53

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35933210)
What about the 8.9 million children on chips? That funding stopped yesterday.



Where does NK come into it?

Looks like the Republicans offered an extension

Republicans added a sweetener to the bill in the form of a six-year extension to a health insurance programme for children in lower-income families.
But Democrats want this programme extended permanently.

Mick 20-01-2018 12:20

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35933206)
So, you'd prefer a North Korean style set-up where every politician votes as instructed?

That makes absolutely no sense. North Korea doesn’t do democracy or votes on anything of any kind, there is no parliamentary democracy in North Korea. It’s one order from above, pure Dictatorship from Kim Jong Un.

---------- Post added at 12:20 ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35933211)
Looks like the Republicans offered an extension

Republicans added a sweetener to the bill in the form of a six-year extension to a health insurance programme for children in lower-income families.
But Democrats want this programme extended permanently.

There was actually no opposition to anything in the bill, it passed in the House but the Senate Democrats, took advantage of the fact that it needed 60 votes to pass. Democrats wanted DACA protections, which is a non budgetary issue.

If this was a majority ruling, Republicans could have passed this, they did have some Democrat support, about 3 or 4 Democrat Senators, including the new Alabama Dem, Doug Jones breaking ranks with Hardline Democrats who oppose everything.

It’s a serious Dysfuction of Government.

Hugh 20-01-2018 12:22

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Banana (Post 35933182)
Is that real or edited?

It’s real - which is why I included the video clip.

Damien 20-01-2018 12:25

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Let’s be honest here the Democrats are doing this because they see a political advantage and their base wants a deal on immigration. Personally I think Trump gets the wall and the Democrats get DACA and everyone is happy.

Hugh 20-01-2018 12:39

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35933210)
What about the 8.9 million children on chips? That funding stopped yesterday.



Where does NK come into it?

There is funding for it until March, because it had previously been given a 6 month extension - this could have been passed as a stand alone bill at any time, just like DACA, which was stopped by an Executive Order in September.

Anyway, as Trump previously stated on Fox and Friends
Quote:

“Well, if you say who gets fired it always has to be the top,” Trump said. “I mean, problems start from the top and they have to get solved from the top and the president’s the leader. And he’s got to get everybody in a room and he’s got to lead.”

He said that further down in history, “when they talk about the government shutdown, they’re going to be talking about the president of the United States, who the president was at that time.”

“They’re not going to be talking about who was the head of the House, the head the Senate, who’s running things in Washington,” Trump said.

“So I really think the pressure is on the president,” he added.


---------- Post added at 12:39 ---------- Previous post was at 12:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933213)
That makes absolutely no sense. North Korea doesn’t do democracy or votes on anything of any kind, there is no parliamentary democracy in North Korea. It’s one order from above, pure Dictatorship from Kim Jong Un.

---------- Post added at 12:20 ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 ----------



There was actually no opposition to anything in the bill, it passed in the House but the Senate Democrats, took advantage of the fact that it needed 60 votes to pass. Democrats wanted DACA protections, which is a non budgetary issue.

If this was a majority ruling, Republicans could have passed this, they did have some Democrat support, about 3 or 4 Democrat Senators, including the new Alabama Dem, Doug Jones breaking ranks with Hardline Democrats who oppose everything.

It’s a serious Dysfuction of Government.

4 Republicans also voted against it, and John McCain didn’t vote.

Sens. Lindsey Graham (SC), Rand Paul (KY), Mike Lee (UT), and Jeff Flake (AZ).

Mick 20-01-2018 14:21

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh
4 Republicans also voted against it, and John McCain didn’t vote.

Sens. Lindsey Graham (SC), Rand Paul (KY), Mike Lee (UT), and Jeff Flake (AZ).

I know, I am well aware of what happened because I was watching the Senate floor and commentary.

---------- Post added at 14:21 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35933219)
Let’s be honest here the Democrats are doing this because they see a political advantage and their base wants a deal on immigration. Personally I think Trump gets the wall and the Democrats get DACA and everyone is happy.

DACA needs to be legislated, in it's current form, it is unconstitutional and quite rightly, Trump and the Republicans are contesting it. This is not about any moral test, it's about upholding the Constitution, which all those right up to the President, have sworn to protect, people cannot pick and choose which laws to ignore. As I pointed out in an earlier post, President Obama did not have legislative authority to rescind or freeze laws, which is exactly what DACA does.

Mr K 20-01-2018 19:39

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933239)
I know, I am well aware of what happened because I was watching the Senate floor and commentary..

Don't you have something better to do on a weekend Mick? I went to the football, we lost, and ref needs specs, but it was more entertaining than the Senate floor ;)

Mick 20-01-2018 20:26

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
You play football at 5 am in the morning ?

Hugh 20-01-2018 22:16

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933239)
I know, I am well aware of what happened because I was watching the Senate floor and commentary.

---------- Post added at 14:21 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ----------



DACA needs to be legislated, in it's current form, it is unconstitutional and quite rightly, Trump and the Republicans are contesting it. This is not about any moral test, it's about upholding the Constitution, which all those right up to the President, have sworn to protect, people cannot pick and choose which laws to ignore. As I pointed out in an earlier post, President Obama did not have legislative authority to rescind or freeze laws, which is exactly what DACA does.

Recap of how we got here:
1 Trump rescinds DACA, demands Congress act within 6 months
2 Senate forms bipartisan talks on DACA
3 Trump promises to sign whatever group comes up with
4 Group reaches bipartisan deal
5 Trump does 180, rejects deal, leaving DACA kids to be deported

Mr Banana 20-01-2018 23:26

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Trump spoke to “Fox & Friends” in 2013 and was asked who would be fired during a government shutdown, as shown in a clip posted by "Morning Joe."

“Well, if you say who gets fired it always has to be the top,” Trump said. “I mean, problems start from the top and they have to get solved from the top and the president’s the leader. And he’s got to get everybody in a room and he’s got to lead.”
He said that further down in history, “when they talk about the government shutdown, they’re going to be talking about the president of the United States, who the president was at that time.”

“They’re not going to be talking about who was the head of the House, the head the Senate, who’s running things in Washington,” Trump said.

“So I really think the pressure is on the president,” he added.

Mick 21-01-2018 04:41

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35933282)
Recap of how we got here:
1 Trump rescinds DACA, demands Congress act within 6 months
2 Senate forms bipartisan talks on DACA
3 Trump promises to sign whatever group comes up with
4 Group reaches bipartisan deal
5 Trump does 180, rejects deal, leaving DACA kids to be deported

Your recap is just not accurate and shows a lack of insight in your quick dash to have another pop at Trump.

Trump kicked DACA in September 2017, down the road to Congress for it to be replaced with a proper legislative bill that is debated on and discussed and voted on, then DACA is Constitutionally sound.

Last week, President Trump and 16 Senators met up for a bipartisan congressional meeting on immigration, in the cabinet room in the White House, in which the scope of the meeting, DACA was discussed. DACA was not the sole reason for the meeting.

So to cut a long story short...the actual reason we are here with this current Government shutdown is because the Democrats have tried to hijack the new Budget by including a non-Budgetary item as leverage to have all parties avoid a government shutdown, they damn well know that even with the fact that GOP have majority in all three branches of government, it still requires a super majority of 60 in the Senate to pass the new Budget, so they will not agree to pass new budget unless DACA is protected.

Trump and Republicans are not prepared to negotiate and refusing to be held hostage over illegal immigration or DACA. So there is now a Stalemate.

There has not been a DACA Bill debated on to sign or Veto by Trump, so it's kinda of impossible for him to have done a 180 on a non-existent DACA Bill.

6 months from September 2017, is March 2018. Congress has over a month to get DACA legislated.

There is the real risk here that Trump may not be able to extend the DACA program further, even if he wanted to sign a new Executive Order that granted further protections, because it has not yet been properly legislated on and as has been pointed out several times now, President Obama, far exceeded his Executive overreach when he implemented DACA and with the fact that there is currently 10 States and their attorneys generals, threatening a lawsuit against it because, as it stands, it is unconstitutional.

Meanwhile while there is a blame game going on, I actually agree with what Damien said earlier on that no-one comes out on top here, real people are not getting paid, especially those on the front line and in first response roles.

Democrat Minority leader, Nancy Pelosi was apparently out celebrating the shutdown tonight with other House Democrats, bearing in mind the shutdown is currently affecting 9 Million kids with CHIP Insurance, real funding is running out here.

So let's get this straight here, Democrats do not oppose anything that is in the Budget, they are, most of them refusing to vote on it because it does not include DACA protections, so in essence, they are putting Illegal Immigration first over their own American citizens. This will not go down well come Mid terms later this year.

I am pleased to see that the newly elected Democratic Senator, Doug Jones did not side with the hard line obstructionist Democrats, who oppose absolutely everything because they cannot get over their prize star, Hillary losing an election. :rolleyes:

TheDaddy 21-01-2018 05:21

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933291)


I am pleased to see that the newly elected Democratic Senator, Doug Jones did not side with the hard line obstructionist Democrats, who oppose absolutely everything because they cannot get over their prize star, Hillary losing an election. :rolleyes:

They're following the republican play book then if they are, wasn't it Mitch McConnell who said he was not only not going to work with Obama but obstruct him at every opportunity (or words to that effect).

I found this opinion piece titled reap what they sow quite interesting to

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-what-they-sow

Mick 21-01-2018 07:15

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
It's fair to say, they obstruct each other and have been doing so for years, it's a big problem with having a two-party system in government.

While the Media may dis Trump for having around a 40% Approval rating, Congress itself has only an 18% approval rating, which highlights how the legislative branch is dysfunctional, because where they are at now, in the middle of another government shutdown.

TheDaddy 21-01-2018 07:44

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933301)
It's fair to say, they obstruct each other and have been doing so for years, it's a big problem with having a two-party system in government.

While the Media may dis Trump for having around a 40% Approval rating, Congress itself has only an 18% approval rating, which highlights how the legislative branch is dysfunctional, because where they are at now, in the middle of another government shutdown.

What do you think the solution is if they won't play nicely, they don't want to go through this every few years, it makes them a laughing stock and causes unnecessary hardship when we all know they'll come to a deal in the end

Mick 22-01-2018 01:11

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Bit by bit the jig-saw pieces are fitting together and more dots appear to be able to be joined up...as to just what I suspected of happening all along, during the U.S Election in 2016!!!

Was Lynch coordinating with Comey in the Clinton investigation?

Quote:

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew well in advance of FBI Director James Comey's 2016 press conference that he would recommend against charging Hillary Clinton, according to information turned over to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Friday.

The revelation was included in 384 pages of text messages exchanged between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and it significantly diminishes the credibility of Lynch's earlier commitment to accept Comey's recommendation — a commitment she made under the pretense that the two were not coordinating with each other.

And it gets worse. Comey and Lynch reportedly knew that Clinton would never face charges even before the FBI conducted its three-hour interview with Clinton, which was supposedly meant to gather more information into her mishandling of classified information.

On July 1, 2016, as the Lynch announcement became public, Page texted Strzok:

Page: And yeah, it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.

There are other revelations within the text messages. But in the cover letter accompanying them, the FBI notified Congress that many additional text messages are missing. According to the FBI, its “technical system for retaining text messages sent and received on FBI mobile devices failed to preserve text messages for Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page from December 14, 2016 to approximately to May 17, 2017.”

<snip>
So let me get this straight, there are Text messages disappearing, right up to the same day, Robert Mueller is brought in as special counsel, May 17th, 2017.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mueller

Special Counsel for the Department of Justice
Incumbent
Assumed office
May 17, 2017


What a hell of a coincidence.

Quote:

Strzok and Page communicated in a voluminous fashion via text message while allegedly having an illicit affair. Strzok was a key figure in the Hillary Clinton exoneration and reportedly interviewed President Trump's former national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (which resulted in Flynn pleading guilty to lying to the FBI). Until last summer, Strzok and Page were both members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team investigating the allegations of collusion between Russia and Trump's campaign. Neither has been accused of wrongdoing.

The text messages seem to indicate that some within the FBI were making investigatory decisions based on Trump’s ascendancy among the Republican field of presidential candidates.

On May 4, 2016 Strzok and Page had the following text message exchange:

Page: And holy shit Cruz just dropped out of the race. It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.

Strzok: What?!?!??

Page: You heard it right my friend.

Strzok: I saw trump won, figured it would be a bit…Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE…

Page: It sure does. We need to talk about follow up call tomorrow.

“MYE” stands for “midyear exam” and was the FBI case name for the Clinton email investigation.

<snip>

In previous text messages produced to the House of Representatives, Strzok and Page discussed needing an “insurance policy” in the event Trump were to become president. The newest batch of text messages turned over on Friday show that in February of 2016, Page texted Strzok that then-candidate Trump “simply can not [sic] be president.”

Any neutral observer would have to be concerned about supposed missing evidence from a premier law enforcement and intel collection agency as well as the types of discussions and conflicts of interest apparently at issue with key officials within the FBI. It’s one more piece of a developing story that unfortunately points to alleged misconduct by some at top levels in our intelligence community. If the allegations bear out, it could have huge implications for a number of investigations handled by the officials in question over the past decade — not just cases related to the 2016 campaign.
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/...-investigation

Chairman of Homeland Security Committee in the U.S Senate, has sent the following letter of concern to Christopher Wray, FBI Director regarding his concerns...

https://www.scribd.com/document/3696...dium=affiliate

Damien 22-01-2018 17:29

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Shutdown over, Enough Dems will back the CR.

Hugh 22-01-2018 17:35

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35933427)
Shutdown over, Enough Dems will back the CR.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3...o-end-shutdown
Quote:

Senate Democrats say they are accepting a deal with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for an immigration vote, clearing the way for passage of a bill to reopen the federal government.

McConnell early Monday promised to take up an immigration bill that would protect an estimated 800,000 Dreamers from deportation, under an open amendment process, if Democrats would agree to end the government shutdown.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y) said that pledge was enough for his caucus to accept a three-week government funding bill, which is now set to pass at noon.

"After several discussions, offers and counteroffers, the Republican leader and I have come to an arrangement. We will vote today to reopen the government to continue negotiating a global agreement," Schumer said.

If lawmakers aren't able to get an immigration bill as part of that larger agreement by Feb. 8, the Senate would then take up a separate bill and "the process will be neutral and fair to all sides," Schumer added.
I wonder if Trump and/or the House Republicans will accept this?

Damien 22-01-2018 18:05

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
They’ll lose that bill.

Still the Democrats probably lost their nerve, the minority leader was under pressure from Democrats defending their seats in Red states this November, and this at least gives them an out.

Hugh 22-01-2018 20:08

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35933433)
They’ll lose that bill.

Still the Democrats probably lost their nerve, the minority leader was under pressure from Democrats defending their seats in Red states this November, and this at least gives them an out.

Well, if they don't do it in three weeks, the Dems can say "we kept the Government going, and now the Republicans aren't keeping their promises".

The amusing thing is that the Republicans only need 51 votes in the Senate to pass a Budget Bill, but never put one together, continuing to rely on CRs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconc...tates_Congress)
Quote:

Congress passes a budget resolution, with a deadline of April 15. No presidential signature is needed; sometimes the resolution is delayed or never passed.

The budget goes to both houses.

It goes to the Senate with a special rule: it can pass with 51 votes and cannot be filibustered. Other legislation can be filibustered and requires 60 votes to end the filibuster.

The budget cannot affect entitlements such as Medicare unless the budget includes "reconciliation instructions." In that case, the Byrd rule applies and the primary result must be to reduce entitlement spending. Gregg notes, "If the budget calls for more revenue to reduce the deficit, then reconciliation can be used to produce that revenue via fees or taxes." A reconciliation instruction is a provision in a budget resolution directing one or more committees to submit legislation changing existing law in order to bring spending, tax revenues, or the debt ceiling into conformity with the budget resolution. The instructions specify the committees to which they apply, indicate the appropriate dollar changes to be achieved, and usually provide a deadline by which the legislation is to be reported or submitted.

After the changes are made, the Budget Committees consolidate them into one bill that is voted on by both houses; it needs 51 Senate votes.

The final reconciliation covers government spending and goes to the president who can sign it or veto it; the veto can be overturned by a two-thirds majority in both houses.
Somebody on FB explained it better than I could...
Quote:

The government is shut down because it doesn’t have a complete budget.

A budget, and reconciliation of a budget, cannot be filibustered. That includes regular order appropriations — or spending.

We do not have a complete budget with the necessary appropriations.

We do not have a complete budget because the GOP cannot come up with a budget and appropriations it can get a majority of House members and 50 senators to agree on.

This is because the House is controlled by the freedom caucus, and they will not agree to a budget that does not massively reduce spending.

Because the Republicans can’t agree on or pass their own budget and appropriations bills — something they don’t want or need Democrats to do (in fact, they have repeatedly locked Democrats out of meetings) — they are running the government through short term spending bills (continuing resolutions).

Stand-alone spending bills (continuing resolutions, omnibus spending bills, one-time appropriations, etc.) CAN be filibustered. They require 60 votes in the Senate.

Damien 22-01-2018 20:23

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I thought the 'no filibuster' rule could only be used once a year and McConnell blew it on the health care vote?

Maggy 22-01-2018 20:27

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35933429)
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3...o-end-shutdown I wonder if Trump and/or the House Republicans will accept this?

Tomorrow mornings tweet will no doubt give us some idea.

Mick 23-01-2018 02:25

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35933449)
I thought the 'no filibuster' rule could only be used once a year and McConnell blew it on the health care vote?

No such rule exists like that that I’m aware of. Majority leader can raise a point of order to the presiding officer that a simple majority is required, they can deny it but it is then appealed by the chair, then appealed and overturned by majority vote.

GOP actually used the no filibuster on Supreme Court Justice Nominee, Neil Gorsuch, when Democrats filibustered during his confirmation in the Senate, he was confirmed by simple majority. 52/48.

It’s interesting to note that the filibuster rule is not in the Constitution. It was a rule created in the Senate in 1806, but strangely wasn’t used until the late 1830s, it was strengthened more in the 1970s. So when there is talk of going ‘Nuclear’, which is precisely what President Trump suggested should happen if the Stalemate and government shutdown had continued, is in essence to go Constitutional, by means of winning a vote by simple majority, or i.e 51.

Personally, I think it’s a stupid rule, it’s unconstitutional and I’m surprised it’s been allowed to pass as a legal qualifier when it comes to passing or rejecting legislation.

Damien 23-01-2018 06:32

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933483)
No such rule exists like that that I’m aware of. Majority leader can raise a point of order to the presiding officer that a simple majority is required, they can deny it but it is then appealed by the chair, then appealed and overturned by majority vote.

They did something on the health care vote to allow it to pass with a sample majority. I think it might be making it a special budgetary vote.

Never mind, found it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconc...ates_Congress)

So not the same thing I thought of it as but it does allow them to avoid a lot of this hassle so long as they make it a spending/budget thing and can only do so once a year.

pip08456 23-01-2018 09:02

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35933493)

You have a space between congress and bracket.

EDIT It's actuall a bracket missing from the link.

Hugh 23-01-2018 09:25

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35933483)
No such rule exists like that that I’m aware of. Majority leader can raise a point of order to the presiding officer that a simple majority is required, they can deny it but it is then appealed by the chair, then appealed and overturned by majority vote.

GOP actually used the no filibuster on Supreme Court Justice Nominee, Neil Gorsuch, when Democrats filibustered during his confirmation in the Senate, he was confirmed by simple majority. 52/48.

It’s interesting to note that the filibuster rule is not in the Constitution. It was a rule created in the Senate in 1806, but strangely wasn’t used until the late 1830s, it was strengthened more in the 1970s. So when there is talk of going ‘Nuclear’, which is precisely what President Trump suggested should happen if the Stalemate and government shutdown had continued, is in essence to go Constitutional, by means of winning a vote by simple majority, or i.e 51.

Personally, I think it’s a stupid rule, it’s unconstitutional and I’m surprised it’s been allowed to pass as a legal qualifier when it comes to passing or rejecting legislation.

The 60/40 rule was designed to promote bi-partisanship, rather than just one party (be it Democrats or Republicans) riding roughshod over the other; if you need the other party votes, you have to negotiate.

When people say there should be a simple majority vote, they are only looking short-term; what happens when the other party gets in with a majority? (as is looking likely for the Dems in the 2018 mid-terms).

This is why Mitch McConnell is against it - he can see it might be a short-term gain to get Republican bills through for a year, but it could come back to bite the Republicans in the bum in November...

Mr K 23-01-2018 09:55

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Another brilliant Trump idea, slap a tariff on imported washing machines and solar panels ! It's going the make the US great again !
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42784380

It's certainly not going to go down well with anyone in the US needing a washing machine in the near future... Go Donald, hit the electorate in the pocket and spark off some revenge tariffs for US exports !

Wonder if Trump/ and or friends/family have shares in Whirlpool ? Up 2.5%....

heero_yuy 23-01-2018 10:00

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933506)

It's certainly not going to go down well with anyone in the US needing a washing machine in the near future.

You do realise that the USA does actually make it's own washing machines? :dozey:

Mr K 23-01-2018 10:04

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35933508)
You do realise that the USA does actually make it's own washing machines? :dozey:

Yes for which they can now increase the price :dozey:

pip08456 23-01-2018 10:05

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
And increase employment.

Mr K 23-01-2018 10:08

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35933510)
And increase employment.

They'll need the money for the increased tariffs and subsequent prices from other countries ! A tariff war never ends well.

pip08456 23-01-2018 10:42

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Not if they buy American made goods.

Maggy 23-01-2018 11:28

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
After all the hoo ha about Whirlpool driers catching fire I'd avoid them at all costs.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ires-in-london

Kursk 23-01-2018 12:28

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35933523)
After all the hoo ha about Whirlpool driers catching fire I'd avoid them at all costs.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ires-in-london

:notopic: ?

Hugh 23-01-2018 15:29

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42793236
Quote:

US Attorney General Jeff Sessions was questioned last week by investigators over alleged Trump campaign collusion with Russia.

A department of justice spokesperson confirmed the meeting.

Robert Mueller, the former FBI director, is leading the inquiry into the alleged collusion during the 2016 election.

The New York Times says it is the first time a member of President Trump's cabinet has been questioned.

The newspaper said he was questioned for several hours.

Stuart 23-01-2018 17:39

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35932818)
Who will also be subject to the Act otherwise the provision of info would be without lawful authority.

This is entirely speculation, but it seems logical that our official secrets act would have some dispensation to enable trangressions to be investigated, whether that dispensation involves ensuring the investigator(s) are rated to allow access to the correct levels of classified information. There are also provisions within our law that allow crimes involving classified data to be prosecuted and tried. Of course, they do require that any staff involved in trying the crime are cleared for the correct classification.

I would have thought that the Americans would also have a similar setup. Not necessarily the same laws, but they would have a way that crimes involving classified data can be investigated, prosecuted and tried. I would be suprised if Mueller has not ensured his team are already cleared to the correct level.

---------- Post added at 17:39 ---------- Previous post was at 17:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35933506)
Another brilliant Trump idea, slap a tariff on imported washing machines and solar panels ! It's going the make the US great again !
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42784380

It's certainly not going to go down well with anyone in the US needing a washing machine in the near future... Go Donald, hit the electorate in the pocket and spark off some revenge tariffs for US exports !

Wonder if Trump/ and or friends/family have shares in Whirlpool ? Up 2.5%....

Well, the tariff on Solar Panels is in keeping with Trump's apparent agenda. He does seem unusually lenient on Fossil fuels..

1andrew1 23-01-2018 23:38

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Nothing to see here, move along please ladies and gentlemen! Oh, hang on, this bit is a bit awkward.
Quote:

Trump-Russia links: Robert Mueller aims to question US President over potential obstruction of justice
Robert Mueller is reportedly seeking to question Donald Trump about his firing of James Comey and Michael Flynn, apparently intensifying his examination of whether the President was responsible for the possible obstruction of justice.
In the latest of a flurry of developments relating to the federal probe into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, it was reported that Mr Mueller would like to talk to the President in the coming weeks.
In particular, he wants to talk to him about the 2017 February firing of Mr Flynn and his ousting of Mr Comey in May 2017.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a8174946.html

Mick 24-01-2018 01:51

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
No, you were right first time nothing to see with the Russian collusion hoax started by the Democrats (and corrupt FBI agents).

Republican lawmaker claims a whistleblower in the FBI has come forward with claims that there was a ‘secret society’ that met offsite, when Trump won the presidency, they met to discuss methods to undermine his presidency.

Quote:

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) says that a whistleblower has told Congress about secret meetings between FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) officials who allegedly gathered to discuss ways to undermine President Trump following his victory in the 2016 election.

Johnson's comments come after House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said two FBI agents accused of anti-Trump bias made reference in text messages to a “secret society” within the FBI and DOJ in the aftermath of Trump’s election.

Speaking Tuesday on Fox New Channel’s “Special Report,” Johnson, the chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said he has an informant to back those claims up.

“The secret society — we have an informant talking about a group holding secret meetings off-site,” Johnson said.

“We have to continue to dig into it,” he added. “This is not a distraction. This is biased, potentially corruption at the highest levels of the FBI.”
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...trump-meetings

Maggy 24-01-2018 10:38

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35933538)
:notopic: ?

No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whirlpool_Corporation

Kursk 24-01-2018 14:19

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35933696)

Let me guess: President Trump & U S Election 2016 Investigation are, erm, American and, uuh, Whirlpool is an American Company that manufactures home appliances?

I see what you did there ;).

Mick 24-01-2018 21:25

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I have said this before and this applies to all members. Team members are the only people who should be determining issues with the topic.

Damien 25-01-2018 16:45

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Trump's visit to the UK is now scheduled to be towards the end of the year. Doesn't seem to be a state visit.

1andrew1 25-01-2018 23:30

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Looks like the much-predicted "citizenship for wall funding" deal is getting closer.
Quote:

The White House has outlined an immigration plan that would allow 1.8 million people to become US citizens in exchange for funding of a border wall.
The framework was described by a senior Trump aide in a conference call to Republicans ahead of legislative negotiations with Democrats.
The proposed bill, to be unveiled on Monday, requests $25bn (£17.6bn) in funds for a wall on the Mexican border.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42825431

Mick 26-01-2018 00:32

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
There was also talk that GOP May go Nuclear to avoid another government shutdown Feb 8th onwards.

Damien 26-01-2018 08:32

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
That's a good deal for the Democrats and Trump IMO. The DACA immigrants get citizenship and Trump gets border wall funding. That's unless there is something hidden in the detail somewhere.

In other news Trump ordered Mueller to be fired back before the summer but backed down after the White House legal team said they would resign before they did it. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/u...T.nav=top-news

Or a Fox News link: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...urce-says.html

Maggy 26-01-2018 10:31

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42829555#

Quote:

US president Donald Trump has said he is prepared to apologise for retweeting posts from a British far-right group.

In an interview with ITV's Piers Morgan, Mr Trump said he knew "nothing" about Britain First before sharing three of its videos in November.

"If you are telling me they're horrible people, horrible, racist people, I would certainly apologise if you'd like me to do that," he told Morgan.
Well I'll take it as the best we will get..

Hugh 26-01-2018 11:18

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
"I would certainly apologise if you’d like me to do that"

Father to little boy "you shouldn’t have broken that".

Little boy "I’ll say sorry if you want me to".

Disingenuous verbiage.

Here’s a handy hint to the most powerful individual in the world - don’t re-post random shit you see on the internet; you have a multitude of Intelligence agencies which costs around $70 billion per year - they are more reliable than some rando on Twitter.

pip08456 26-01-2018 11:50

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Missing FBI texts found.

This should put the cat amongst the pidgeons.

Damien 26-01-2018 12:35

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35934074)
Missing FBI texts found.

This should put the cat amongst the pidgeons.

Depends if they find anything on them. At least they've been found, better finding out the truth one way or another.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...election-hacks

Turns out the Dutch Intelligence Service had themselves hacked the Russian hackers and provided evidence of their activcities to the FBI back in 2016:

Quote:

The Dutch intelligence service passed on “crucial evidence” to the FBI about Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant reported Friday, citing the results of an investigation.

Hackers from the Dutch intelligence service known as the AIVD gained access to the network of Russian hacking group “Cozy Bear” in the summer of 2014. While monitoring the group’s activities, the AIVD learned of attacks launched on the Democratic Party, according to six unidentified American and Dutch sources cited by the investigation.

The information provided by the Dutch gave grounds for the FBI to start an investigation into the influence of Russian interference on the election race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, according to the newspaper report based on a collaborative investigation with Eelco Bosch van Rosenthal, a journalist at Dutch news program Nieuwsuur. A spokeswoman for the AIVD declined to comment on the report when contacted by phone on Friday.

Mick 26-01-2018 12:43

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35934074)
Missing FBI texts found.

This should put the cat amongst the pidgeons.

Yes found by the U.S Inspector General, I cannot wait to see his report, if and when it will be made public on the abuses that are said to have happened in the Department of Justice, under the Obama Administration.

These corrupt FBI agents never seemed to work, just text each other. Couldn’t have been very good agents, leaving a trail of their infectious investigative work.

Some texts released yesterday, saying Strzok wanted to go ‘Easy’ on the Investigation on Hillary Clinton, as she could be the president, thankfully that never happened. Then the left deploys it’s distraction technique by releasing old news about Trump wanting to fire Mueller. Trump today says it’s typical NYT Fake News.

There was a story floating about last year of a friend saying Trump wanted to fire Mueller but obviously he didn’t, he should and he does have the Authority to do so, but it would be a political disaster. The whole Mueller thing is a sham, allegedly manufactured by the Fake Russian Dossier, paid for by the Democrats and Crooked Hillary campaign.

Damien 26-01-2018 12:49

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35934085)
Hillary Clinton, as she could be the president, thankfully that never happened. Then the left deploys it’s distraction technique by releasing old news about Trump wanting to fire Mueller. Trump today says it’s typical NYT Fake News.

Yes because Trump denied it then it can't be true....

By the way Fox News also claims a source told them Trump had stated this to them: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...urce-says.html

Quote:

President Trump told top officials this past June that he wanted to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, but was talked out of doing so by White House counsel Don McGahn and other aides, a source close to the White House told Fox News late Thursday.
Is that the 'left's distraction technique' too?

Quote:

The whole Mueller thing is a sham, allegedly manufactured by the Fake Russian Dossier, paid for by the Democrats and Crooked Hillary campaign.
Alleged by Trump and some Republicans. Hell even Trump isn't directly suggesting it. Doesn't make it true. In fact the link above from Bloomberg suggests it was information passed by Dutch Intelligence that started the FBI investigation which in turn led to the Mueller investigation. Still it can't all be a sham since two people have already been charged and pled guilty....

By

Or is Bloomberg fake news too?

Mick 26-01-2018 12:56

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I believe the information coming from Republican lawmakers, that the Democrats and Hillary campaign were the real ones doing the colluding, those text messages are just the icing on the cake.

Damien 26-01-2018 12:56

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
BTW Since the texts have be found we now know about this secret society, worse than Watergate, that the FBI were up too: https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/956597413543927810

Quote:

“Sources familiar with the text exchange on the ‘secret society’ say the calendars Page mentioned are a reference to gag gift of Putin-themed calendars that Strzok purchased for those working on the early stage of the Russia investigation,”

Mick 26-01-2018 12:58

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I believe the information coming from Republican lawmakers, that the Democrats and Hillary campaign were the real ones doing the colluding, those text messages are just the icing on the cake.

And the crimes you are talking about that the two have Pledged guilty to are to crimes totally unrelated to any collusion, so go figure. :rolleyes:

Damien 26-01-2018 13:03

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35934090)
I believe the information coming from Republican lawmakers, that the Democrats and Hillary campaign were the real ones doing the colluding, those text messages are just the icing on the cake.

It's a matter of faith though isn't it? Because they haven't provided anything other than accusational tweets. That's not information, it's fan-fiction or at best speculation.

I wonder what it would actually take for you not to believe it because you don't believe multiple news organisations with seperate sources and at least one being Pro-Trump saying he did in fact try to fire Muller because Trump said he didn't. Yet you will believe vague Tweets from Republicans.

Mick 26-01-2018 13:09

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35934094)
It's a matter of faith though isn't it? Because they haven't provided anything other than accusational tweets. That's not information, it's fan-fiction or at best speculation.

I wonder what it would actually take for you not to believe it because you don't believe multiple news organisations with seperate sources and at least one being Pro-Trump saying he did in fact try to fire Muller because Trump said he didn't. Yet you will believe vague Tweets from Republicans.

So the ‘insurance policy’ text means nothing?

Text messages between a certain date go missing and the last date they start up again is the same day Robert Mueller is appointed Special Counsel.

Come off it Damien. Jeez. :rolleyes:

Damien 26-01-2018 13:15

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35934092)
And the crimes you are talking about that the two have Pledged guilty to are to crimes totally unrelated to any collusion, so go figure. :rolleyes:

Not collusion no but Mullers remit was wider than that. Here is the official task he was given:

Quote:

On May 17, 2017, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller to serve as special counsel for the United States Department of Justice. In this capacity, Mueller oversees the investigation into “any links and/or coordination between Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump, and any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation"
It's been clear for some time now that Muller's been investigating illegal payments and obstruction of justice into the FBI's investigation into those payments rather than electoral interference. We know this much from Corney's own testimony after he was fired.

I don't think they will find any collusion. I said back at the time that it didn't make sense for either Russia or Trump to bother with colluding. I do believe Russia interfered against Clinton but they didn't need to be directed by Trump....

Mick 26-01-2018 13:23

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I wouldn’t trust Comey, he is unreliable, just look at text messages saying AG, Loretta Lynch knew what Comey was going to announce but pretended otherwise and she told him not to call it an investigation, call it a matter, he got a queasy feeling, but said it wasn’t a hill worth dying on and went along with what she told him to say, but she was wrong to do that.

Damien 26-01-2018 13:27

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35934097)
So the ‘insurance policy’ text means nothing?

Text messages between a certain date go missing and the last date they start up again is the same day Robert Mueller is appointed Special Counsel.

Come off it Damien. Jeez. :rolleyes:

Well the texts have been found so let's see what there is. We know of at least one 'shocking' revelation that on reveal of the messages where a joke.

And I have not said that these two agents didn't do anything. I have said they should be investigated. If that investigation then leads to other people being taken down so be it. However I haven't seen anything yet that escalates this story beyond the two people involved. Having a test message that talks of a 'insurance policy' means nothing in isolation. Maybe their 'insurance policy' was that the bung £100 on a Trump win to cash in? That was my insurance policy.

It's also possible for two things to be true: People in Trump's camp were up to no good and some people in the FBI were up to no good. Investigate possible crimes amongst the Democrats, Republicans and FBI if there is evidence to do so.

I didn't call the New York Times fake news when they broke the story about Clinton's e-mails. If there is a case then investigate it.

---------- Post added at 13:27 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35934102)
I wouldn’t trust Comey, he is unreliable, just look at text messages saying AG, Loretta Lynch knew what Comey was going to announce but pretended otherwise and she told him not to call it an investigation, call it a matter, he got a queasy feeling, but said it wasn’t a hill worth dying on and went along with what she told him to say, but she was wrong to do that.

His testimony wouldn't be enough. If Muller comes out and this entire case is 'Corney told me so' then yes this is a nothing story.

Mick 26-01-2018 13:34

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I do research things and I dig deep. Sure there is political allegiances and I did say at start of U.S Election, I wanted Hillary to win, but not after a mate in the States said I needed to weigh things up on her and he was a Staunch Democrat. He did not end up voting in the end.

Mick 26-01-2018 21:04

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
The Democrats secret weapon against Trump perhaps?....

....The rising star of Democratic Congressman, Joseph Kennedy, Great Nephew of President John F. Kennedy. According to thehill, he has been selected to respond on behalf of the Democrats, to President Trump's State of the Union Address on Tuesday night.

Quote:

Rep. Joseph Kennedy (D-Mass.) has been selected to deliver the Democratic Party's response to President Trump's State of the Union address on Tuesday night, party leaders announced.

Kennedy, the great-nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, is a 37-year-old rising star in the Democratic Party and is currently serving his third term as a Massachusetts congressman.

“Congressman Kennedy is a relentless fighter for working Americans,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a statement.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...e-of-the-union

passingbat 26-01-2018 23:16

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35934204)
The Democrats secret weapon against Trump perhaps?....

....The rising star of Democratic Congressman, Joseph Kennedy, Great Nephew of President John F. Kennedy. According to thehill, he has been selected to respond on behalf of the Democrats, to President Trump's State of the Union Address on Tuesday night.



http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...e-of-the-union


Maybe he will try to do what JFK tried to do: Expose secret societies; that would come in handy right about now!


Didn't do JFK any favours though.


And yes, Hugh, I do know that is an unproven conspiracy theory.

Hugh 26-01-2018 23:23

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
I thought it was the Aliens?

passingbat 26-01-2018 23:41

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 
Good to see Trump mention 'Sovereign' nations' in his Davos speech. That can't have gone down too well with the NWO Globalists.

---------- Post added at 23:41 ---------- Previous post was at 23:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35934213)
I thought it was the Aliens?


Naaa.... Humans


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum