Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Westminster Sexual Allegations (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33705573)

papa smurf 03-11-2017 14:09

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923096)
Correct not much actual proof of anything yet but how can there be proof that someone slapped someone else's bum in a lift? God only knows how this will all be decided but that's why suspensions are in the offing right now not worse punishments.

Meanwhile it appears Corbyn new that a complaint had been made against Hopkins at the time he was promoted to the front bench.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41857136 .

If he wasn't aware of the full nature of the complaint against Hopkins why didn't he find out before promoting him?

if memory serves jezza had a full blown rebellion on his hands the front bench was empty at one time or another ;)

Osem 03-11-2017 14:13

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923099)
if memory serves jezza had a full blown rebellion on his hands the front bench was empty at one time or another ;)

Oh yes, that's right. It suited him. That'll be those famous 'principles' in action again eh?... :rolleyes:


Neither side has he monopoly on what's wrong has been done here so let's not pretend that Labour are somehow any better/more moral than anyone else.

papa smurf 03-11-2017 14:22

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923100)
Oh yes, that's right. It suited him. That'll be those famous 'principles' in action again eh?... :rolleyes:


Neither side has he monopoly on what's wrong has been done here so let's not pretend that Labour are somehow any better/more moral than anyone else.

it was the best of a bad bunch he had to put bums on seats :D


haven't seen anything from the liberal demoncrats yet can't wait till that news breaks

Osem 03-11-2017 14:51

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923102)
it was the best of a bad bunch he had to put bums on seats :D


haven't been anything from the liberal demoncrats yet can't wait till that news breaks

and the rest.

papa smurf 03-11-2017 14:53

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923106)
and the rest.

yes it could be just the greens that come out squeaky clean unless she's been pinching her own bum ;)

Damien 03-11-2017 15:17

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923100)
Oh yes, that's right. It suited him. That'll be those famous 'principles' in action again eh?... :rolleyes:

Same reason that May can't really suspend the whip from Stephen Crabb or the others. They would lose their majority. Westminster is coming across as just one big boys club. All as bad as each other it seems.

denphone 03-11-2017 15:18

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35923108)
Same reason that May can't really suspend the whip from Stephen Crabb or the others. They would lose their majority. Westminster is coming across as just one big boys club. All as bad as each other it seems.

That just about sums it up.

Osem 03-11-2017 17:59

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35923108)
Same reason that May can't really suspend the whip from Stephen Crabb or the others. They would lose their majority. Westminster is coming across as just one big boys club. All as bad as each other it seems.

Exactly, hence my long standing belief that, despite their protestations to the contrary, Labour are really no better the Tories they despise whether it comes to sexual abuse in parliament, the misuse of expenses, cash for questions, cronyism and just about anything else you can mention. I'm glad we've established that after all this time because that's what sticks in my throat. ;)

papa smurf 03-11-2017 19:30

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Labour launches formal investigation after Clive Lewis accused of groping woman at party's 2017 conference

A formal investigation has been launched by Labour after a woman accused Clive Lewis of groping her at the party’s annual conference in Brighton.

The 39-year-old woman has alleged that Mr Lewis, a former frontbencher and ally of Jeremy Corbyn, had given her backside a “big squeeze” when he had hugged her in a packed room.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...cused-groping/

1andrew1 03-11-2017 20:15

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35923109)
That just about sums it up.

Spot on! The forum unites.
Hang on, that would never do!
We'd better talk about Brexit or Trump before we all agree too much! :D

Osem 03-11-2017 20:24

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923134)
Labour launches formal investigation after Clive Lewis accused of groping woman at party's 2017 conference

A formal investigation has been launched by Labour after a woman accused Clive Lewis of groping her at the party’s annual conference in Brighton.

The 39-year-old woman has alleged that Mr Lewis, a former frontbencher and ally of Jeremy Corbyn, had given her backside a “big squeeze” when he had hugged her in a packed room.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...cused-groping/

Such a nice chap too. The guy who calls people who support managed migration racists.



Back to the accusations in general anyway. Few who're innocent are likely to say they're guilty but how many of the guilty are going to admit that they've done wrong? In many cases it's likely to boil down to one person's word against another so many of these 'assaults' are going to be hard to prove or aren't they?... :shrug:

I'm sure we all have sympathy for any victims but adding the wrongly 'convicted' to the list of victims doesn't really help.

papa smurf 03-11-2017 20:32

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
i wonder how much tactical accusing will be going on to alter the shape of the front benches this is too good an opportunity for politicians to miss

Osem 03-11-2017 21:11

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923144)
i wonder how much tactical accusing will be going on to alter the shape of the front benches this is too good an opportunity for politicians to miss

They wouldn't stoop to that would they? OH that's right, yes they would. Just look at their track record of dishonesty or being 'economical with the truth' when it suits.

The genie is out of the bottle and we could very well see chaos ensue. Someone needs to get a grip of this and display some real leadership.

---------- Post added at 21:11 ---------- Previous post was at 20:55 ----------

and here's another suspension:

https://order-order.com/2017/11/03/t...rlie-elphicke/

It's from a supposedly Tory mouthpiece so it ought to be treated with huge scepticism...

pip08456 03-11-2017 21:29

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923149)
here's another suspension:

https://order-order.com/2017/11/03/t...rlie-elphicke/

It's from a supposedly Tory mouthpiece so it ought to be treated with huge scepticism...

BBC seem to confirm it without detail though.

Damien 03-11-2017 21:43

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
First suspension from the Tories on this. Referred to the police as well. Must be bad.

Osem 03-11-2017 22:30

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35923153)
BBC seem to confirm it without detail though.

My comment about the source was intended to be taken with a hint or sarchasm since some people seem to think GF only deals in anti-Labour stuff. ;)

It'll be interesting to see how serious this all turns out to be but right now I get the feeling that some people are going to be hung out to dry because it's too awkward for our glorious leaders to do otherwise. :shrug:

denphone 04-11-2017 05:33

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35923140)
Spot on! The forum unites.
Hang on, that would never do!
We'd better talk about Brexit or Trump before we all agree too much! :D

Sadly Andrew this is going to get worse then the sleaze scandal's IMO.

papa smurf 04-11-2017 09:50

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Andrea Leadsom ‘KNIFED Sir Michael Fallon to keep her job', former minister claims

ANDREA Leadsom “knifed” Sir Michael Fallon with sex pest claims following his suggestion she was a “dud” who would need to “fall away” so a Brexit deal could be done, it has been claimed.

tactical accusing in action

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/875...er-scandal-may

A former minister said Andrea Leadsom launched a “preemptive strike” against Sir Michael Fallon in a plea to keep her job.

According to the former minister the MP, who ran for the Tory leadership last year, is now “unsackable” after she triggered the resignation of the Defence Secretary.

Sir Michael believed Mrs Leadsom might try to damage any Brexit deal that involved concessions to the EU.

One Government minister said: “It was self-protection on her part and she has basically destroyed Fallon.

Osem 04-11-2017 10:04

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923195)
Andrea Leadsom ‘KNIFED Sir Michael Fallon to keep her job', former minister claims

ANDREA Leadsom “knifed” Sir Michael Fallon with sex pest claims following his suggestion she was a “dud” who would need to “fall away” so a Brexit deal could be done, it has been claimed.

tactical accusing in action

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/875...er-scandal-may

A former minister said Andrea Leadsom launched a “preemptive strike” against Sir Michael Fallon in a plea to keep her job.

According to the former minister the MP, who ran for the Tory leadership last year, is now “unsackable” after she triggered the resignation of the Defence Secretary.

Sir Michael believed Mrs Leadsom might try to damage any Brexit deal that involved concessions to the EU.

One Government minister said: “It was self-protection on her part and she has basically destroyed Fallon.

But could a woman possibly do such a thing? Be just as self centred and conniving as all those men? Surely not... ;)

papa smurf 04-11-2017 10:10

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923198)
But could a woman possibly do such a thing? Be just as self centred and conniving as all those men? Surely not... ;)

you haven't met my ex have you

Maggy 04-11-2017 10:57

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
As I said earlier shouting and pointing the finger at a specific party/ideology just doesn't work. It's not about politics,it's about abuse of power and it's a matter for the institution of Parliament to bring about change and to set up some sort of HR committee/rules to address the issue. This means that the finger pointing needs to cease and some actual cross party discussion/committee needs to be set up to come up with a solution.

papa smurf 04-11-2017 13:15

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Tory MP warns sexual harassment claims may be 'a witch hunt'
Sir Roger Gale said outside bodies would have to be brought in to mitigate the ongoing scandal

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a8037211.html


A veteran Tory MP has said the sexual harassment scandal engulfing Westminster has become a "witch hunt."

Sir Roger Gale, who has been MP for North Thanet for 34 years, said MPs and other prominent figures were on a "hiding to nothing" as allegations could be made that would almost impossible to refute.

Mr K 04-11-2017 14:20

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923213)
Tory MP warns sexual harassment claims may be 'a witch hunt'
Sir Roger Gale said outside bodies would have to be brought in to mitigate the ongoing scandal

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a8037211.html

A veteran Tory MP has said the sexual harassment scandal engulfing Westminster has become a "witch hunt."

Sir Roger Gale, who has been MP for North Thanet for 34 years, said MPs and other prominent figures were on a "hiding to nothing" as allegations could be made that would almost impossible to refute.

Mmm, is Sir Roger the next ? Sunday papers tomorrow, bound to be a few more....

papa smurf 04-11-2017 14:22

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35923222)
Mmm, is Sir Roger the next ? Sunday papers tomorrow, bound to be a few more....

Sunday politics on telly will be interesting:)

Osem 04-11-2017 19:17

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

A Scottish government minister has resigned over previous actions which he said were considered "inappropriate".
Mark McDonald, the SNP MSP for Aberdeen Donside, said he was stepping down from his role as childcare and early years minister.
He apologised and said his attempts to be "humourous" or "friendly" may have led others to become uncomfortable.
It is understood he is one of two SNP members currently being investigated by the party over possible misconduct.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...itics-41872427

Not just Westminster then. Maybe we need another title change...

papa smurf 04-11-2017 19:22

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923260)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...itics-41872427

Not just Westminster then. Maybe we need another title change...

shenanigans at holyrude:)

1andrew1 05-11-2017 00:10

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Full explanation as to why Falon left.
Quote:

The cabinet heavyweight’s shock departure on Wednesday followed a phone call from the journalist, Jane Merrick, who informed Downing Street that he had lunged at her and attempted to kiss her on the lips in 2003 after they had lunched together...
Merrick’s account offers a corrective to the suggestion that Fallon was forced out because of his alleged comments to Leadsom. Rather, it seems a pattern of allegedly unacceptable behaviour over the course of many years was the real reason for his spectacular fall.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ual-harassment

Mr K 05-11-2017 08:34

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35923222)
Mmm, is Sir Roger the next ? Sunday papers tomorrow, bound to be a few more....

And the next is Theresa's Deputy ...
Quote:

Theresa May’s deputy, Damian Green, was rocked last night by a former police chief’s claim that pornographic material was discovered on one of his parliamentary computers.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...ters-s7lkjpgcb

denphone 05-11-2017 08:39

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
So much for some politicians in setting a right and proper example to their constituents when they cannot set it to themselves..

1andrew1 05-11-2017 09:40

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35923303)
And the next is Theresa's Deputy ...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...ters-s7lkjpgcb

Worth pointing out that Damien Green is denying it. I suspect if he goes, so does the "strong and stable Government" shortly afterwards so the stakes are high in this case.

papa smurf 05-11-2017 09:43

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35923315)
Worth pointing out that Damien Green is denying it. I suspect if he goes, so does the "strong and stable Government" shortly afterwards so the stakes are high in this case.

the burden of proof is on the accuser

1andrew1 05-11-2017 10:11

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35923317)
the burden of proof is on the accuser

It's up to Theresa May what burden of proof is needed. Although to me he's innocent until proven guilty.
According to the paper:
Quote:

Quick, who headed the leak investigation, confirmed to The Sunday Times yesterday that his officers had reported finding “extreme” pornographic material on a parliamentary computer from Green’s office. He will give evidence tomorrow to an inquiry into Green already under way by Sue Gray, Whitehall’s head of propriety and ethics.

denphone 05-11-2017 12:43

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35923303)
And the next is Theresa's Deputy ...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...ters-s7lkjpgcb

And here is another.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-allegations

Osem 05-11-2017 13:56

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Thornberry doesn't seem very happy to comment on anything much to do with her party's handling of this.

https://order-order.com/2017/11/05/t...m-happy-to-go/

Typical really, criticise the other side for their actions (or lack of) but say nothing about your own.

Maggy 05-11-2017 15:56

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
To be fair and unbiased there other MPs on the other side who are doing the same..But beware if the female MPs of all parties decide to band together and insist on a system that will investigate and uphold or dismiss each case on the evidence.

1andrew1 05-11-2017 16:07

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35923374)
To be fair and unbiased there other MPs on the other side who are doing the same..But beware if the female MPs of all parties decide to band together and insist on a system that will investigate and uphold or dismiss each case on the evidence.

A poster on the Order-Order website says that the only Conservative MPs under investigation are Brexiters. Whether this is true or not I don't know but it's another way of splitting the cake be it male-female, Labour-Conservative etc.

Osem 05-11-2017 16:20

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35923374)
To be fair and unbiased there other MPs on the other side who are doing the same..But beware if the female MPs of all parties decide to band together and insist on a system that will investigate and uphold or dismiss each case on the evidence.

But Labour are supposed to be better aren't they? The party of respect and all that...

As regards the female contingent, I dare say they'll want to be sure that all of them are squeaky clean first because what goes around eventually comes around.

nashville 05-11-2017 16:23

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
There will be more shortly. SNP now has two mentioned today

Osem 05-11-2017 16:28

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nashville (Post 35923380)
There will be more shortly. SNP now has two mentioned today

A whole can of juicy worms has been opened and the media is feasting on the contents.

How long before we start getting a few senior media personnel implicated I wonder. Just think of all those Christmas parties during which important people, male and female, have got drunk and let their hands, lips and other things stray...

heero_yuy 05-11-2017 17:55

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923382)
A whole can of juicy worms has been opened and the media is feasting on the contents.

How long before we start getting a few senior media personnel implicated I wonder. Just think of all those Christmas parties during which important people, male and female, have got drunk and let their hands, lips and other things stray...

Yep. This one is going to run and run. Especially historical stuff that today is frowned upon that at the time was just "a bit of fun"

Of course one has to ask the question of members: Is there nothing in your past that could be considered as harassment by today's standards?

OLD BOY 05-11-2017 19:03

Re: Labour MP's homophobic & sexist remarks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35922386)
Yes because they all too often have the required power, money, influence and opportunity.

I know this is all being portrayed as someone a uniquely male v female issue but I've heard plenty of stories about the abuse of men in predominantly female workplaces which goes to prove that neither sex has the monopoly on this sort of thing. As more men start to learn about the abuse others have suffered they're going to start speaking up and we're going to see that what's at the bottom of most of this is not the sex of the perpetrators and victims, it's their relative positions of opportunity and power.

Many men never speak about this sort of thing at the time but that doesn't mean they haven't been victims too. Way back when I was groped by a couple of girls in a bar who walked past me and one after the other quickly grabbed my crotch. I was stunned and would never have thought to complain to anyone - they'd have laughed at me after all - but it was a sexual assault nonetheless and if I were to 'return the favour' now I'd be arrested quick smart.

That's right, and it is refreshing to read someone recounting such an experience and not claiming that it has totally ruined their life, self confidence, etc.

Serious sexual assaults such as rape are one thing but complaints that 'he once brushed my knee' (but it might have just been the tablecloth) are pathetic.

Never mind the university students who cannot bear to hear anything remotely unsettling to their sensibilities, we are rapidly becoming a snowflake nation.

denphone 05-11-2017 21:03

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
More MPs caught up in sexual harassment scandal.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-allegations

Gary L 05-11-2017 22:30

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Have they got anything on Dave?

I'd guess it would be from a male if there is.

heero_yuy 06-11-2017 09:45

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35923437)
Have they got anything on Dave?

I'd guess it would be from a male if there is.

There was the pigs head... Maybe it was a boar. :D

OLD BOY 06-11-2017 13:59

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35923463)
There was the pigs head... Maybe it was a boar. :D

The whole thing is a bore, if you ask me!

Osem 07-11-2017 13:19

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Far too early to say what's happened here:

Quote:

Welsh Labour's Carl Sargeant, who faced party investigation into allegations about his personal conduct, dies
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-41904161

Whatever the facts turn out to be you have to feel sorry for his family and loved ones.

heero_yuy 07-11-2017 14:40

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

THE Lib Dems have been accused of covering up a rape allegation as the party was dragged into the Westminster sleaze scandal.

The party was said to have taken six months to suspend a man accused of raping a teenager at last year’s conference.

His alleged victim was one of four women who claimed they were harassed by the same man.

She claimed no action was taken for months until last week when her friend “kicked up a fuss”.

Yesterday, she also accused the party of “victim shaming” because “they give victims no support, they’re just tossed about”.
Source

They just cannot resist getting their noses into it. :D

papa smurf 07-11-2017 14:52

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
wow Westminster is full of alligators at the moment

Osem 07-11-2017 15:00

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Well it seems Welsh Labour MP Carl Sargeant committed suicide.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-41904161

papa smurf 07-11-2017 15:27

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923629)
Well it seems Welsh Labour MP Carl Sargeant committed suicide.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-41904161

wow that's drastic

Paul 07-11-2017 15:39

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Perhaps the witch hunters are happy now.

Osem 07-11-2017 17:25

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35923637)
Perhaps the witch hunters are happy now.

Well I've noticed the tone in the media has changed quite a lot today. Naming names and 'Baying for blood' is all very well until some is spilled and regardless of what this guy did/didn't do his family certainly don't deserve this. I wouldn't be surprised if more don't follow, some who've done very little wrong. :shrug:

I heard a guy on radio earlier. He'd called in to relate what'd happened to him. He'd been accused of a serious matter and the police had immediately taken away all his phones, computers for forensic examination etc. The 'investigation' lasted '16 months of hell' before it was decided that there was no basis to the allegations and the whole thing was dropped. He suffered terribly, lost his job, became depressed and suicidal and is still living with the aftermath of the whole episode. His accuser was never named and no action was taken against her...

heero_yuy 08-11-2017 09:40

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

A TOP aide to Jeremy Corbyn has reportedly been suspended over allegations of sexual harassment.

David Prescott - son of former deputy PM John Prescott - is said to have been suspended at some point in the past few days.

The exact allegations against Mr Prescott are not currently known.

He is one of the Labour leader's​ closest advisers, writing Mr Corbyn's speeches and helping to prepare him for Prime Minister's Questions.

He stood as a parliamentary candidate in 2015 and has failed in attempts to be selected for a safe seat.

The party has refused to comment directly on Mr Prescott's case.
Source

Another one bites the dust. This looks like it will run and run.

denphone 08-11-2017 09:54

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35923779)
Source

Another one bthe ites the dust. This looks like it will run and run.

Indeed there is quite a lot more sexual-harassment allegations to come out from what the PM and opposition leader were told late last week.

Damien 08-11-2017 10:25

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923665)
I heard a guy on radio earlier. He'd called in to relate what'd happened to him. He'd been accused of a serious matter and the police had immediately taken away all his phones, computers for forensic examination etc. The 'investigation' lasted '16 months of hell' before it was decided that there was no basis to the allegations and the whole thing was dropped. He suffered terribly, lost his job, became depressed and suicidal and is still living with the aftermath of the whole episode. His accuser was never named and no action was taken against her...

I think the police need to work on the speed of forensic examinations. There have been many stories of people being left in limbo for over a year whilst these take place.

I am not sure the case you are talking about as I didn't hear it but as for no action being taken against her it's important to remember that an unproven accusation is not therefore malicious or fake. We don't want a justice system where the accusation of a crime is either proven or the accuser is in trouble.

---------- Post added at 10:25 ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35923637)
Perhaps the witch hunters are happy now.

Labour could well have handled the accusations better for all concerned here. It's still right though that accusers feel safe to come forward and their complaints are investigated and, so long as they didn't make it up, the accusers are not responsible for it.

Osem 08-11-2017 14:13

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35923785)
I think the police need to work on the speed of forensic examinations. There have been many stories of people being left in limbo for over a year whilst these take place.

I am not sure the case you are talking about as I didn't hear it but as for no action being taken against her it's important to remember that an unproven accusation is not therefore malicious or fake. We don't want a justice system where the accusation of a crime is either proven or the accuser is in trouble.

---------- Post added at 10:25 ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 ----------



Labour could well have handled the accusations better for all concerned here. It's still right though that accusers feel safe to come forward and their complaints are investigated and, so long as they didn't make it up, the accusers are not responsible for it.

No we don't but what we have is a situation in which you, I our one of our loved ones can have their entire lives turned upside down (including their innocent families and loved ones) and even destroyed when there's no evidence at all. That's where we're at right now and have been for far too long with people even being named publicly. If we're going to take every allegation seriously then I'm afraid the authorities need to get their act together or take responsibility for the incredible damage done to those who were innocent. All too many of them. Time will tell whether Mr Sargeant did anything much wrong and if it turns out he didn't then maybe the powers that be will start to take this seriously. They're certainly not right now, in their clamour to support 'victims' they're entirely overlooking the accused.

Damien 08-11-2017 14:18

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923845)
No we don't but what we have is a situation in which you, I our one of our loved ones can have their entire lives turned upside down and even destroyed when there's no evidence at all. That's where we're at right now and have been for far too long.

Yes and we probably need to revise how we handle these cases. I don't know a lot of how these things are handled but it seems to me anonymity should be given to the accused until they're convicted or if a judge deems it in the public interest.

I think historically the rate of false accusations is very low and clearly a lot of people have been getting away with sexual assault for far too long though so we also need to be careful we don't fall back into that kind of environment.

Damien 08-11-2017 14:18

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923845)
No we don't but what we have is a situation in which you, I our one of our loved ones can have their entire lives turned upside down and even destroyed when there's no evidence at all. That's where we're at right now and have been for far too long.

Yes and we probably need to revise how we handle these cases. I don't know a lot of how these things are handled but it seems to me anonymity should be given to the accused until they're convicted or if a judge deems it in the public interest.

I think historically the rate of false accusations is very low and clearly a lot of people have been getting away with sexual assault for far too long though so we also need to be careful we don't fall back into that kind of environment.

pip08456 08-11-2017 14:37

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35923846)
Yes and we probably need to revise how we handle these cases. I don't know a lot of how these things are handled but it seems to me anonymity should be given to the accused until they're convicted or if a judge deems it in the public interest.

I think historically the rate of false accusations is very low and clearly a lot of people have been getting away with sexual assault for far too long though so we also need to be careful we don't fall back into that kind of environment.

What possible public interest could be served by revealing the name of the accused when they (I quote Osem here) "can have their entire lives turned upside down and even destroyed when there's no evidence at all."?

What possible public interest other than gossip could exist?

Damien 08-11-2017 14:51

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35923852)
What possible public interest could be served by revealing the name of the accused when they (I quote Osem here) "can have their entire lives turned upside down and even destroyed when there's no evidence at all."?

What possible public interest other than gossip could exist?

In the case of historical allegations a case can be built up by more people coming forward to the police and their testimony being similar. If there are details to the assaults that show a pattern and those details were not public then the prosecution can use that in court. If Saville had been alive when it all came out then that's how they would have gotten him because in the end all these women had similar stories.

Osem 08-11-2017 15:00

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35923852)
What possible public interest could be served by revealing the name of the accused when they (I quote Osem here) "can have their entire lives turned upside down and even destroyed when there's no evidence at all."?

What possible public interest other than gossip could exist?

Yes, maybe someone could explain that for us and what attention is ever paid to the impact on innocent families, children etc.

It's perfectly obvious that achieving political advantage is a key factor in much of what's going on here with regard to Westminster. In the current media feeding frenzy we're witnessing a great many people have been so keen to smear their opponents at every opportunity that they've overlooked possible skeletons in their own cupboards. It's very unedifying and says a lot about the sort of people some of our political masters are and what depths they'll plumb to get their way.

---------- Post added at 15:00 ---------- Previous post was at 14:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35923855)
In the case of historical allegations a case can be built up by more people coming forward to the police and their testimony being similar. If there are details to the assaults that show a pattern and those details were not public then the prosecution can use that in court. If Saville had been alive when it all came out then that's how they would have gotten him because in the end all these women had similar stories.

All the more reason for the media not to publicise the very 'facts' which could be used by others to make false claims. Let's be clear, that right now innocent people are being subjected to a process of investigation which leaves them being treated as guilty until proven innocent for very long periods of time with permanent damage to their lives, careers and finances. I don't see how that can be justified at all.

OLD BOY 08-11-2017 17:09

Re: Westminster Sexual Allegations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35923857)
Yes, maybe someone could explain that for us and what attention is ever paid to the impact on innocent families, children etc.

It's perfectly obvious that achieving political advantage is a key factor in much of what's going on here with regard to Westminster. In the current media feeding frenzy we're witnessing a great many people have been so keen to smear their opponents at every opportunity that they've overlooked possible skeletons in their own cupboards. It's very unedifying and says a lot about the sort of people some of our political masters are and what depths they'll plumb to get their way.

---------- Post added at 15:00 ---------- Previous post was at 14:54 ----------



All the more reason for the media not to publicise the very 'facts' which could be used by others to make false claims. Let's be clear, that right now innocent people are being subjected to a process of investigation which leaves them being treated as guilty until proven innocent for very long periods of time with permanent damage to their lives, careers and finances. I don't see how that can be justified at all.

I can see both sides of the argument, and I know that such investigations can be assisted by the publicity. However, they can also be hampered by publicity seeking idiots and those seeking financial compensation.

I think the rules need looking at again, and the name of the accused should be revealed only if a judge considered there to be compelling evidence to justify doing so.

Anyone accused of such a crime is very vulnerable the way things stand, because the old adage that you are found guilty only if the charge can be proved 'beyond reasonable doubt' seems to be watered down for these sorts of allegations.

However, the victims of these crimes are vulnerable too, because proving that someone committed a serious sexual assault is difficult, as there are normally only two witnesses.

I would have thought that the police should investigate such crimes carefully, using modern techniques, but they should not make assumptions either way until they have the evidence.

What happened in the Ted Heath case is an example of the deplorable standards of investigation that are taking place these days. It is quite disturbing.

Maybe a Royal Commission should be set up to review how these cases are dealt with. The Justice system doesn't seem to be fit for purpose at the moment, with people who are innocent being put through the ringer and often prosecuted, while too many victims don't get treated properly or have their complaints properly investigated. Omnishambles is the word that comes to mind.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum