Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702703)

Stop It 07-04-2016 11:42

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831208)
Do you mean support or agree with .We all have to support and abide by laws ,we don't necessarily have to agree with them .Your premise that i must support everything that is legal until proven otherwise is correct ,i don't have to agree with it ,Heero doesn't have to agree with legal highs but he does have to support peoples right to use them .People using loopholes in tax law are free to do so until the hole is closed regardless of who agrees and who does not .It is the basis of our legal system

As I made clear above, I mean support. In the US Supreme Court there are Constitutional originalists and those who think that it is a framework and thus open to interpretation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Constitution

Both views have perfectly valid arguments. I am a supporter of a living framework for our legal system. Many things would've been written into law if they were known about and a legal framework needs to be flexible to adapt to new challenges and more importantly, that people should respect the intention, as well as the letter of the law.

If a bad law is created, the best way to prove it is bad, and thus punish whoever thought it via the democratic process. In the case of Tax law, if certain tax classes are too high, then push for them to be lowered. In a country which running a deficit however, that is certainly up for debate.

Osem 07-04-2016 12:03

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Everyone's talking about tax havens and I hear a lot of TV commentators criticising them but how many of them run their affairs as limited companies to avoid tax? All perfectly legal of course but they can wind up earing far more and paying far less tax than ordinary people. Is that more of less morally wrong than having funds offshore and avoiding tax that way?

Quote:

Here are 10 advantages you should bear in mind when deciding what business structure you should use for your venture;

1. Tax

The main advantage of running your business as a limited company is that you are likely to pay less personal tax than a sole trader.

Company profits are subject to Corporation Tax. Small businesses are taxed at the ‘small profits rate’ which is currently set at 20%. Larger companies currently pay corporation tax at the ‘main rate’ of 21% on profits over £1.5 million. From April 2015, both rates will be 20%.

If you are the director and shareholder of a limited company, you may choose to take a small salary and take most of your income in the form of dividends. By doing this you can minimise the amount of National Insurance Contributions (NICs) you have to pay because dividends are taxed separately, and are not subject to NICs.

As a sole trader, your entire income is subject to NIC rules. Running your business as a limited company could therefore help you to take home more of your earnings.
http://www.bytestart.co.uk/limited-c...dvantages.html

A quick check of the Companies House website will reveal how many wealthy celebrity types run their affairs in this manner.

heero_yuy 07-04-2016 12:24

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831203)
They have - it came into effect late last year.

https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...blishing-3.pdf

Good news! Thanks for the link Hugh. :tu:

---------- Post added at 13:24 ---------- Previous post was at 13:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35831215)

A quick check of the Companies House website will reveal how many wealthy celebrity types run their affairs in this manner.

And the not so wealthy. In my sector many one-man-bands like myself run our affairs this way and not just for tax purposes. As a limited company clients, suppliers etc can only sue the company, not myself personally, so long as I have acted in good faith and professionally. Only company assets can be siezed in pursuit of defaulted debt payments.

It is also the case that many larger companies that come to the independant sector prefer to work with a properly constituted limited company that is also VAT registered. I take care of payroll, VAT, dividends, liability insurance and sending out quotes, whilst the client just deals with specifications, contracts / purchase orders and final payment.

There is one other aspect where HMRC really needs to tighten up is where somebody, like a footballer, is only really employed by one employer (The club) and is likely to be in contravention of IR35. They seem to wangle a way round this.

martyh 07-04-2016 12:27

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stop It (Post 35831206)
No, and you're deliberately being obtuse.

Creations of schemes that are tax evasion and only count as avoidance because nobody thought of the scheme in question when writing a tax law is still evasion. It just hasn't been found out until someone finds the loophole.
.

Tax schemes usually operate within the letter of the law and are legal ,the only reason they fail is because a tribunal rules that more tax is due because certain criteria have not been met negating the benefits of the scheme .Tax evasion is the deliberate attempt to not pay tax through misrepresentation of facts.You simply cannot say that all schemes are evasion because they are not and 20% of people using such schemes face no penalties at all and even more have the liability reduced on appeal .Tax evasion makes you a criminal ,tax avoidance does not even if more tax is due after the tribunal.

Quote:

Again, for the umpteenth time. Tax avoidance, that is intended under the law is fine. Creating ways to get around the intention, if not the letter of the law is not. How many times must I say this? Your assertion that you cannot evade tax by using loopholes is ridiculous as we have seen examples time and time again of this occurring
Only in the court of public opinion .

Here's an example of deliberate avoidance .I had a choice a month ago to either buy a new van for work outright or lease one for 3 yrs , I chose leasing because the cost is 100% allowable against tax thus reducing my tax burden ,do you think that is acceptable or do you think i should be forced to take the less tax efficient option of purchasing a van because the country is getting less tax ?

Osem 07-04-2016 12:33

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35831216)
Good news! Thanks for the link Hugh. :tu:

---------- Post added at 13:24 ---------- Previous post was at 13:08 ----------



And the not so wealthy. In my sector many one-man-bands like myself run our affairs this way and not just for tax purposes. As a limited company clients, suppliers etc can only sue the company, not myself personally, so long as I have acted in good faith and professionally. Only company assets can be siezed in pursuit of defaulted debt payments.

It is also the case that many larger companies that come to the independant sector prefer to work with a properly constituted limited company that is also VAT registered. I take care of payroll, VAT, dividends, liability insurance and sending out quotes, whilst the client just deals with specifications, contracts / purchase orders and final payment.

There is one other aspect where HMRC really needs to tighten up is where somebody, like a footballer, is only really employed by one employer (The club) and is likely to be in contravention of IR35. They seem to wangle a way round this.

That goes without saying of course, they're probably the majority. However, plenty of wealthy and high profile people do it simply as an easy way to avoid large amounts of tax. Think of some of our best known personalities and put their names into the Companies House website then see how many turn up their as directors with partners as secretaries etc. It's certainly not illegal but it is being done in many cases primarily for tax avoidance IMHO and I dare say a lot of major organisations also benefit from engaging their services by that means too - i.e. by not actually being their employer with all that entails.

Stop It 07-04-2016 13:10

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831222)
Tax schemes usually operate within the letter of the law and are legal ,the only reason they fail is because a tribunal rules that more tax is due because certain criteria have not been met negating the benefits of the scheme .Tax evasion is the deliberate attempt to not pay tax through misrepresentation of facts.You simply cannot say that all schemes are evasion because they are not and 20% of people using such schemes face no penalties at all and even more have the liability reduced on appeal .Tax evasion makes you a criminal ,tax avoidance does not even if more tax is due after the tribunal.



Only in the court of public opinion .

Here's an example of deliberate avoidance .I had a choice a month ago to either buy a new van for work outright or lease one for 3 yrs , I chose leasing because the cost is 100% allowable against tax thus reducing my tax burden ,do you think that is acceptable or do you think i should be forced to take the less tax efficient option of purchasing a van because the country is getting less tax ?

Not only in the court of public opinion, but the opinion of HMRC and thus the Government of this country. As stated above, they now have the right to review any tax schemes before they are enacted and can rule them illegal. Before they had to discover them and then rule upon them.

Again, I am not saying that all schemes are illegal. If they are cleared by HMRC, then by all means, go ahead. However, the cycle of schemes that were re-written purely to get around rulings against them was dubious at best.

And no, your example is a case of intention of tax laws. Leasing is tax efficient for a reason. If you however said you were leasing for tax purposes but in fact bought it using a shell company (That you owned and controlled, but did not declare to HMRC) and "leased it" from there (i.e. from yourself) in order to claim the tax relief, that would be evasion*.

* Probably, this isn't legal advice.

Ramrod 07-04-2016 19:33

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Interesting article from the Spectator
Quote:

Couldn’t the International Consortium of International Journalists, which grabbed this alleged super-scoop, have saved itself and us an awful lot of bother and just run the headline: “Official: Bears **** In Woods. Now we LIST the species that do so”?
Here’s the thing that should most disgust us about this overblown story: it is just another power grab by the global governing elite.

Yeah, sure it’s disgusting that kleptocrat dictators and other low lives are leeching their people’s resources and stashing their cash in secret vaults, and if we help their people get the money back and then send the dictators back home to be lynched, then sure, that would be poetic.

But this stuff is a distraction. A side show. It’s going to do nothing to make our own lives better or solve the world’s most serious problems.

And the world’s most serious problem – one of the the most serious, at any rate – is this: governments are trying each year to take more and more of our money and spend it either on ever more pointless crap – like David Cameron’s ring-fenced foreign aid budget – or on expanding the role of government generally.
...........when the leaders of all the world’s countries start making noises about ensuring that no one, ever again, can hide their money from the grasping claws of the state, well that’s when you really need to start worrying because it brings the One World Government so dearly beloved by the Communitarian left one step closer.

There’s a basic truth about tax which our global elite seems determined to ignore. If you keep it low enough and fair enough, nobody tries to avoid it.

How many magnates from Hong Kong are on the Panama naughty list? None, I’d guess. When the tax rate is as low as 10 per cent, it’s just not worth the hassle of not paying it.


downquark1 07-04-2016 19:45

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Well Saudi-Arabia doesn't have tax, but their names are on it, likely for .... other reasons.

I think the greater fall out from all this will be about the outright criminal money laundering rather than the simple tax evasion.

Ramrod 07-04-2016 20:30

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 35831327)
Well Saudi-Arabia doesn't have tax, but their names are on it, likely for .... other reasons.

Yeah. BBc R4 ran an interesting programme on Tuesday night about how these companies are used by people who shouldn't have access to international financial institutions because they are subject to sanctions or are funding terrorists.

---------- Post added at 21:30 ---------- Previous post was at 21:11 ----------

Will the Guardian now investigate its own tax arrangements?
Amazing, gobsmacking hypocrisy. You couldn't make it up! :dozey:

Gary L 07-04-2016 20:59

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Dave's going to resign!

can you believe that the hypocrite with the slap head who thinks he's God is going to resign?!

Hugh 07-04-2016 21:05

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35831344)
Dave's going to resign!

can you believe that the hypocrite with the slap head who thinks he's God is going to resign?!

Bless...

Gary L 07-04-2016 21:09

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831346)
Bless...

You sound like my gran again.

can you go and find my post where I said ages ago about Dave, money and running abroad with it?

good boy :)

Hugh 07-04-2016 21:16

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Your understanding of finance is only exceeded by your wit.

Arthurgray50@blu 07-04-2016 21:16

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
DC has lied to the Country, so he should resign. Osborne, walked out of an interview as he was asked about the Haven.

Why do you think all these millionaires, have so much money. Because they put there accounts oversea's.

If it was Joe Bloggs, we would get nicked. The same applies to DC. He should resign

Hugh 07-04-2016 21:20

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35831350)
DC has lied to the Country, so he should resign. Osborne, walked out of an interview as he was asked about the Haven.

Why do you think all these millionaires, have so much money. Because they put there accounts oversea's.

If it was Joe Bloggs, we would get nicked. The same applies to DC. He should resign

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-04-07/d...ffshore-trust/

Quote:

Today the prime minister told ITV News: "We owned 5,000 units in Blairmore Investment Trust, which we sold in January 2010. That was worth something like £30,000.

"I paid income tax on the dividends. There was a profit on it but it was less than the capital gains tax allowance so I didn't pay capital gains tax. But it was subject to all the UK taxes in all the normal way.
Which taxes did he avoid, Arthur?

Damien 07-04-2016 22:00

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Does anyone actually understand what Cameron is alleged to have done or not? Everyone is angry, it's all over the papers and I don't understand it and suspect most people reading it don't understand either. We need to know more than 'tax haven' because if, as the interview said, he said tax on it then what taxes did he dodge?

God I wish some papers would just print a unbiased fact-check of why/how etc of these kinds of stories.

It's impossible to form a fair judgement of this if you don't understand what 'it' is.

nomadking 07-04-2016 22:19

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Strange that Tessa Jowell got away with being involved with dodging paying tax and laundering money and Geoffrey Robinson got away being involved with a multimillion pound trust.
Quote:

In a statement in 2009 after her husband was found guilty of accepting the bribe, Dame Tessa said: ‘This is a terrible blow to David and, although we are separated, I have never doubted his innocence.’

She was dragged into her husband’s controversial financial affairs in 2006 when it emerged that she had signed papers for a loan secured on their London home – which was subsequently paid off with the help of the alleged bribe.


Quote:

Mr Robinson - a former chief executive of Jaguar Cars - is reported in the Independent on Sunday to be the beneficiary of an offshore trust with assets of more than £12m.

Arthurgray50@blu 07-04-2016 22:25

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I think the main reason why people are calling on DC to resign, is that after three or four dismissals, he has admitted that he DID have dealings in the Tax Haven, and sold them the shares in 2010 (according to Sky News).

Therefore he lied, and was PM at the time. He criticised lots of people, plus he said that he would BLOCK the tax haven scandal.

BUT, he was involved in the scandal HIMSELF. Therefore, he should do the honourable thing and resign.

This is what l think they are demanding.

He, l believe has breached the 'integrity and honesty code of MPs. and as he is the MAIN MAN, he should quit.

GrimUpNorth 07-04-2016 22:29

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
People are smelling a rat with David Cameron at the moment. It's his own fault (or the fault of his advisors). When he's changed the story is it four or five times now it makes him look like he's squirming and has got more to tell. On the news tonight he looked very uncomfortable and the bead of sweat on his chin just made him look more shifty.

He's not done himself any favours these last few days and I reckon it'll be sometime until we hear him or George Osborne tell us we're all in it together because if nothing else he's shown that some of us are more in it than others.

Cheers

Grim

nomadking 07-04-2016 22:29

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35831363)
I think the main reason why people are calling on DC to resign, is that after three or four dismissals, he has admitted that he DID have dealings in the Tax Haven, and sold them the shares in 2010 (according to Sky News).

Therefore he lied, and was PM at the time. He criticised lots of people, plus he said that he would BLOCK the tax haven scandal.

BUT, he was involved in the scandal HIMSELF. Therefore, he should do the honourable thing and resign.

This is what l think they are demanding.

He, l believe has breached the 'integrity and honesty code of MPs. and as he is the MAIN MAN, he should quit.

It was legal at the time. As long as tax is paid on any money coming out, that is all that matters. The company could have been based anywhere but the UK, and still not paid UK tax. Eg I could buy shares in a US company and that company not be liable for UK tax.

adzii_nufc 08-04-2016 00:19

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I'm not bothered about it tbf. I'm more bothered about the way he called out the likes of Jimmy Carr for stuff like this.

As far as I'm aware, it was legal and paid UK taxes upon being withdrawn back to a UK account as well as occurring before he was even PM

Stop It 08-04-2016 06:55

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35831358)
Does anyone actually understand what Cameron is alleged to have done or not? Everyone is angry, it's all over the papers and I don't understand it and suspect most people reading it don't understand either. We need to know more than 'tax haven' because if, as the interview said, he said tax on it then what taxes did he dodge?

God I wish some papers would just print a unbiased fact-check of why/how etc of these kinds of stories.

It's impossible to form a fair judgement of this if you don't understand what 'it' is.

Starting with Cameron, he's in the clear legally, but boy has he made a hash of getting there. Going from "Nope, it's private" to "What tax haven funds, never seen them" to "Well I may have had shares but I put it through HMRC" was pretty dumb.

I don't think he's done anything wrong, but his "crime" is truth evasion, rather than tax evasion. No, he doesn't need to resign, and I'm sure he took his approach out of dis-respect to the press rather than the taxpayer, but it doesn't set a good example for honesty in politics.

Anyway, yes we are nowhere near the full facts of this whole leak due to the sheer magnitude of it. I want there to be a proper analysis of the "big" cases here categorised (By impartial economic experts, not journalists):

1: Tax Avoidance, those people who used Panama as a source of privacy, not to break the law
2: Tax Evaders, the people who used Panama as a way to lie to tax authorities and hide wealth from proper taxation.
3: Dodgy dealings, money laundering, sanctions evasion etc.

At the moment, we keep on getting spoonfed information that journalists are crowing about looking dodgy, but using ambiguous language as THEY likely don't know if it is category 1 or 2 either. Things like Cameron's family affairs are being presented as category 1 by some parts of the media when there is little actual evidence to suggest it when you properly look at it.

Hugh 08-04-2016 07:39

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I see Tom Watson is accusing the PM of hypocrisy by gaining money from an offshore company.

Is this the same Tom Watson, who accepted a donation from Sir Trevor Chinn, Senior Advisor to CVC Capital Partners, which is based in the Cayman Islands?

http://search.electoralcommission.or...tions/C0238610

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Chinn

http://powerbase.info/index.php/CVC_Capital_Partners

Stop It 08-04-2016 07:51

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831386)
I see Tom Watson is accusing the PM of hypocrisy by gaining money from an offshore company.

Is this the same Tom Watson, who accepted a donation from Sir Trevor Chinn, Senior Advisor to CVC Capital Partners, which is based in the Cayman Islands?

http://search.electoralcommission.or...tions/C0238610

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Chinn

http://powerbase.info/index.php/CVC_Capital_Partners

Heh, not shocked one bit.

The joy of political muck slinging, everyone ends up covered in it.

denphone 08-04-2016 08:13

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Nothing surprises me from whatever party it is as most of them seem to have their noses in the trough.

downquark1 08-04-2016 08:33

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35831358)
Does anyone actually understand what Cameron is alleged to have done or not? Everyone is angry, it's all over the papers and I don't understand it and suspect most people reading it don't understand either. We need to know more than 'tax haven' because if, as the interview said, he said tax on it then what taxes did he dodge?

God I wish some papers would just print a unbiased fact-check of why/how etc of these kinds of stories.

It's impossible to form a fair judgement of this if you don't understand what 'it' is.

Assuming everything Cameron says is true, the remaining implication Tom Watson seems to be running with, is that he profited from an overseers company helping people avoid tax.

Hugh 08-04-2016 10:35

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I saw this guy on the BBC news this morning.

BBC
Quote:

But James Quarmby, a specialist in tax planning and wealth structuring at law firm Stephenson Harwood, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme there was a "massive misunderstanding" about what Mr Cameron had invested in.

He said it was a hedge fund that was "about as boring as it gets for investments", adding that it would not be used for avoiding tax.

"It's no different from Mr Cameron investing in a UK stock," he said.

And Mr Boles told BBC Breakfast that tax evasion was a "terrible thing" but no-one was suggesting the prime minister had not made all of the payments "he was required to make under UK law or that he has in any way used any of this to try to avoid tax".

"People have to pay tax," he said. "They have to pay tax on all income, from their work or from investments and I don't care where that investment is... that is what matters, that people pay the tax that is due. The prime minister has done so."

Stop It 08-04-2016 11:03

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831414)
I saw this guy on the BBC news this morning.

BBC

That gentleman clearly knows his onions.

I'll repeat what I said before, that we need to find the truly dodgy stuff and hit those guys hard. People in the media have seen "Cameron" and have gone nuts without actually understanding what they're going nuts about. If the financial and legal industry are looking at this and saying a collective "meh" then it's nothing to really care about.

Of course, that's not going to happen. When have the media ever taken a pragmatic view on anything?

nomadking 08-04-2016 11:14

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 35831396)
Assuming everything Cameron says is true, the remaining implication Tom Watson seems to be running with, is that he profited from an overseers company helping people avoid tax.

As long as income was declared on the money people paid in and any money paid out to them, then all is above board. It could be one person is liable for tax in the UK, another in Germany, and another in Monaco. The tax would be paid in the appropriate countries.

But if somebody receives a payment from a tax haven, and doesn't declare it as income and uses it to pay off a loan that was contrived to sidestep money laundering checks, then that is corrupt and criminal. But not apparently if a Labour Minister is involved, ie Tessa Jowell.

Osem 08-04-2016 12:08

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831386)
I see Tom Watson is accusing the PM of hypocrisy by gaining money from an offshore company.

Is this the same Tom Watson, who accepted a donation from Sir Trevor Chinn, Senior Advisor to CVC Capital Partners, which is based in the Cayman Islands?

http://search.electoralcommission.or...tions/C0238610

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Chinn

http://powerbase.info/index.php/CVC_Capital_Partners

Maybe it's another Tom Watson and someone who isn't a hypocrite. :rolleyes:

Mr K 08-04-2016 12:41

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I see the 'usual suspects' are trying to deflect any criticism from St. Dave ;)

He's been caught with his pants down as can be seen seen from his bright red complexion in interviews he gave yesterday. He had the opportunity to be clear earlier in the week, but the truth has had to be slowly wrung out of him. The plonker wrote a letter to other EU leaders on 2013 advising against offshore trusts being opened to scrutiny, wonder why? Saying one thing and doing another, silly boy. He may not have done anything illegal, but he's certainly been hypocritical. He's doomed, just a question of when and which inbred public schoolboy is next.

Hugh 08-04-2016 12:56

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Could you point out what illegal act he has committed, or which taxes he hasn't paid, or is that irrelevant?

Mr K 08-04-2016 12:59

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831438)
Could you point out what illegal act he has committed, or which taxes he hasn't paid, or is that irrelevant?

Don't think you've read my post Hugh.

heero_yuy 08-04-2016 13:49

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831433)
He's doomed, just a question of when and which inbred public schoolboy is next.

Not Gideon:

Quote:

GEORGE Osborne’s hopes of succeeding David Cameron as Tory leader were dealt a blow today as party members ranked him last in a league table of Cabinet performance.

It is a dramatic tumble for the Chancellor, who led the grassroots Conservative Home survey for six months in a row before his approvals ratings started plummeting over the tax credits fiasco last October.

Since then Mr Osborne has suffered a series of self-inflicted blows, including branding the controversial Google tax deal a “major success” and being forced into a £4.4billion Budget U-turn over disability benefit cuts.
Linky

Hugh 08-04-2016 14:32

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831439)
Don't think you've read my post Hugh.

So he should have said earlier in the week that he had paid all his tax and not committed any illegal acts?

So he's been hypocritical by selling his shares before he became PM, three years before he sent the letter to the EU.

The thing is, people like Tom Watson are comparing apples and anchovies, and deliberately conflating two different things to create a cloud of confusion and smear.
Quote:

Labour's deputy leader Tom Watson said Mr Cameron could not be blamed for his father's actions but had not been "entirely straight with the British people about what his own financial arrangements were".

"That wouldn't be so bad if he hadn't also been lecturing very prominent people about their own tax arrangements, some he called morally wrong for being invested in similar schemes," he said.
Jimmy Carr's (and others) schemes were to avoid paying tax on dividends and earnings, whilst it has been shown that any dividends and earnings from Blairmore shares were taxed in the country of the share-owners' residence, in Mr. Cameron's case, the UK. But let's not let facts get in the way of a witch-hunt.

Regarding the letter to the EU, here is the actual information, rather than Tom Watson's twisted version of it - context is all.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0e7c0a20-f...#axzz45EpVDNix

Quote:

In the letter, seen by the Financial Times, Mr Cameron said: “It is clearly important we recognise the important differences between companies and trusts. This means that the solution for addressing the potential misuse of companies, such as central public registries, may well not be appropriate generally.”

Britain has emerged as the strongest European rival to Switzerland for private banking and wealth management, administering £1.2tn of assets, according to Deloitte. The sector contributed £3.2bn to the economy, according to 2014 estimates from the British Bankers’ Association.

A senior government source said that Mr Cameron’s letter reflected official advice that creating a central registry for trusts would have been complex and would have distracted from the main objective of shining a light on the ownership of shell companies.

“It would have slowed down the process because of the different types of trust involved,” the official said. “They are sometimes used to protect vulnerable people, so that would have been an extra complication.

“As the directive went through we reached a position where trusts which generate tax consequences had to demonstrate their ownership to HM Revenue & Customs.”
btw, your inverted snobbery is showing with phrases like 'inbred public schoolboy' - I am sure you would be the first up in arms if someone called you a common inbred working-class oik, but it's OK to do the reverse.

TheDaddy 08-04-2016 15:00

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831438)
Could you point out what illegal act he has committed, or which taxes he hasn't paid, or is that irrelevant?


Was he supposed to declare his off shore activities in the register of members interests? Wonder if the committee for standards in public life will be interested.

Hugh 08-04-2016 15:19

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831477)
Was he supposed to declare his off shore activities in the register of members interests? Wonder if the committee for standards in public life will be interested.

Only if the shareholding was worth more than a year's salary - an MP's salary in 2009 was £64,766, and the shares were sold in 2010 for around £30k.

http://www.publications.parliament.u.../735/73504.htm
Quote:

16. Financial thresholds below which interests are not registrable apply except in Categories 1, 2 and 3, and the thresholds for the categories vary. All single benefits of whatever kind which exceed the applicable threshold (if any) should be registered in the appropriate Category. Category 4 requires the registration of all benefits received from the same source which amount to more than £1,500 in a calendar year, in increments of more than £500. Categories 5, 6 and 7 require the registration of all benefits, received from the same source in the course of a calendar year, which cumulatively amount to more than 1 per cent of the current parliamentary salary.[9] Category 8 requires the registration of property worth more than 100% of a Member's annual parliamentary salary[10] or rental income worth 10% of that salary.[11] Category 9 requires the registration of shareholdings worth more than 100% of the annual parliamentary salary. Category 10 applies the same threshold as Category 4. In addition, if a Member considers that any benefit he or she has received falls within the definition of the main purpose of the Register set out in paragraph 11, even though it does not exceed the 1 per cent threshold, the Member should register it under Category 11 (Miscellaneous). The threshold for Category 12 is, again 1% of the annual parliamentary salary.

Mr K 08-04-2016 15:24

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831477)
Was he supposed to declare his off shore activities in the register of members interests? Wonder if the committee for standards in public life will be interested.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...m-fathers-off/
Apparently they are going to be wanting a word with Dave. And JC has to overtaken him in the popularity ratings... Never mind Dave, at least there's no Scottish/welsh/council/London mayor/referendum votes imminent... ;)

nomadking 08-04-2016 15:27

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831477)
Was he supposed to declare his off shore activities in the register of members interests? Wonder if the committee for standards in public life will be interested.

The registers(past and present) are available on the internet and so are the rules(past and present). At some point everything will have been handed over to a blind trust, so that he would have no idea what was going on.

Gary L 08-04-2016 21:51

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2016/04/21.jpg

On his way to the airport with suitcases full of money :)

nomadking 08-04-2016 22:06

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Look at it this way. The arrangement maximised income for the shareholders, which in turn MAXIMISED the tax they paid.

Mr Banana 08-04-2016 22:11

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831487)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...m-fathers-off/
Apparently they are going to be wanting a word with Dave. And JC has to overtaken him in the popularity ratings... Never mind Dave, at least there's no Scottish/welsh/council/London mayor/referendum votes imminent... ;)

I will look forward to a labour landslide in the election then. LOL

Ramrod 08-04-2016 22:12

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 35831535)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2016/04/21.jpg

On his way to the airport with suitcases full of money :)

Gary L at home




See what I did there? Random picture, attach words to it :dozey::D

Gary L 08-04-2016 23:05

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35831539)
Gary L at home

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2016/04/21.jpg

Hugh 08-04-2016 23:56

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
A letter in Friday's Times.

Quote:

Sir, David Cameron wants to lead the global campaign to stamp out tax avoidance but his actions suggest he is encouraging the practice rather than battling it. He stopped the EU developing a register of personal trusts, which allow rich individuals to hide their money. He changed tax rules, like the controlled foreign company rules, to create tax haven conditions in the UK so that global companies set up artificial structures here to avoid tax.

And he has yet to deliver on tax havens. Transparency is critical so that we know who owns the assets hidden across the world. We can then identify unlawful activity and collect the appropriate taxes. Having public registers of ownership in the tax havens matters. Our overseas territories include the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and Bermuda. Some refuse to compile such registers, others to publish them.

In 1991 a Conservative government used Privy Council powers to instruct the overseas territories to abolish capital punishment. In 2000 Labour used the same powers to outlaw discrimination against gays. Cameron now has the chance to use the powers to instruct the UK tax havens to compile and publish registers of beneficial ownership. He should do so.

Dame Margaret Hodge MP (Lab)

Chair, public accounts select committee 2010-15
http://www.offshoreumbrellacompanies...x-avoider-too/

Quote:

Offshore Tax Avoider

You couldn’t make it up. Not too long after it was revealed that two senior managers at HMRC were putting their salaries through Limited Companies to save tax, whilst hunting down genuine contractors who were doing so, it’s now being revealed that the Hammer of Google, Facebook, Starbucks etc., Labour MP Margaret Hodge, has a share in an offshore fund as well and is an offshore tax avoider.

Just as it was revealed that Chancellor Osborne is an offshore tax avoider and has an offshore family trust worth £4.5m and that David Cameron’s father Ian was an offshore tax avoider and made most of his money (and David Cameron’s inheritance) from offshore funds, it is now being revealed that the Chairperson of the Committee which looks into tax affairs and tax avoidance has a share in an offshore fund too and is an offshore tax avoider too.

Stemcor

She has a shareholding in Stemcor – which paid just 0.01% tax last year. Google and Amazon would be proud of that. Hodge claimed in a grilling by Michael Crick that she just had a small shareholding in the company run by her brother who is an offshore tax avoider.

However it turns out that her shareholding is 1.26% of the company. That would mean that she would have been paid out £56,939 in dividends last year. Her shareholding is now worth £1.8m – hardly a tiny, tiny amount as she claimed.

Stemcor have confirmed that it doesn’t even include shareholdings in her children’s names. It turns out that she owns several million pounds worth of shares when you include her children’s shareholdings – which will now pay no inheritance tax on it.

She was asked to explain what other purpose that there could be other than avoiding tax for her share in the trust? She hadn’t replied so far.

It’s always been the case that those in the know have been using these tax avoidance schemes to save paying their full whack of taxes. The top Tories have been offshore tax avoiders for a long time. Now it looks like Labour MPs are at it too – while bashing multinational companies and genuine contractors who now use offshore umbrella companies.

denphone 09-04-2016 06:14

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Now if l hear any more politicians come out with "We are all in this together" then they will get this :upyours:

heero_yuy 09-04-2016 06:26

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35831548)
Now if l hear any more politicians come out with "We are in this together" then they will get this :upyours:

I think a new phrase is needed: "They're all in it together"

denphone 09-04-2016 06:36

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35831551)
I think a new phrase is needed: "They're all in it together"

Its still early in the morning old bean.:)

martyh 09-04-2016 08:23

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35831375)
I'm not bothered about it tbf. I'm more bothered about the way he called out the likes of Jimmy Carr for stuff like this.

As far as I'm aware, it was legal and paid UK taxes upon being withdrawn back to a UK account as well as occurring before he was even PM

It's nothing like the Jimmy Carr affair . Jimmy Carr used the K2 avoidance scheme ,Cameron invested £12,000 in an offshore bank account and paid tax on the profit from the interest he earned

Maggy 09-04-2016 08:49

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I think the shares issue is a sideshow..I want more pressure/leverage being used to get this government to actually to ensure more transparency over offshore companies/individuals tax affairs and to finally get some of the tax being salted away back into this country's coffers so we can pay down the country's debt.

Soon there is going to be no more fat to pare down to pay off that debt.

nomadking 09-04-2016 09:04

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35831561)
I think the shares issue is a sideshow..I want more pressure/leverage being used to get this government to actually to ensure more transparency over offshore companies/individuals tax affairs and to finally get some of the tax being salted away back into this country's coffers so we can pay down the country's debt.

Soon there is going to be no more fat to pare down to pay off that debt.

It may have escaped your notice, but in this country tax is NOT paid on capital or money invested. It is paid on the income that arises from it.

If the fund had been set up in a non-tax haven country that wasn't the UK, the amount of UK tax paid wouldn't have been any more and might have been less as the tax on the company income(rather than the fund income) would have cut into the dividends and REDUCED the UK tax paid by any UK shareholders.

martyh 09-04-2016 09:14

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35831561)
I think the shares issue is a sideshow..I want more pressure/leverage being used to get this government to actually to ensure more transparency over offshore companies/individuals tax affairs and to finally get some of the tax being salted away back into this country's coffers so we can pay down the country's debt.

Soon there is going to be no more fat to pare down to pay off that debt.

Would you be happy having all your financial affairs posted for all to see .I think things are getting ridiculous now where people are pilloried for being well off or financially astute

---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35831563)
It may have escaped your notice, but in this country tax is NOT paid on capital or money invested. It is paid on the income that arises from it.

If the fund had been set up in a non-tax haven country that wasn't the UK, the amount of UK tax paid wouldn't have been any more and might have been less as the tax on the company income(rather than the fund income) would have cut into the dividends and REDUCED the UK tax paid by any UK shareholders.

Here's another way to look at this. This country has one of the lowest corporation tax limits in the world meaning that companies set up here instead of other countries because the tax rate is lower ,most definitely tax avoidance just of the sort we approve of because we benefit

Osem 09-04-2016 10:59

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Some folks clearly are so keen to jump on the hate bandwagon that they haven't bothered to first take a look at their own affairs. There is an astonishing amount of hypocrisy going on right now and Cameron's certainly isn't going to be the only red face which is going to be exposed for all to see. Of course they rely on the often short and highly selective memories of those they aim to influence. Unfounded innuendo is all that's required for some people to present as facts...

It's all rather familiar isn't it - the usual suspects rushing rabidly to grab the headlines before they scuttle off when their cynical opportunism backfires and they're exposed to be what they really are.

Hugh 09-04-2016 11:16

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831565)
Would you be happy having all your financial affairs posted for all to see .I think things are getting ridiculous now where people are pilloried for being well off or financially astute

---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------



Here's another way to look at this. This country has one of the lowest corporation tax limits in the world meaning that companies set up here instead of other countries because the tax rate is lower ,most definitely tax avoidance just of the sort we approve of because we benefit

For info, here is a table of Countries Corporation Taxes.

https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/ser...tes-table.html

Osem 09-04-2016 12:29

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I see those 'thousands' are out marching again, this time demanding Cameron's resignation about well, I'm not sure they really know ,apart from him being a Tory who at this stage has done nothing illegal and something an awful lot of other people/organisations have done (including those who've queued up to stick the knife in) without too much scrutiny or complaint from anyone much.

Anyway, from what little I've seen so far, the 'thousands' don't seem to be that many and I'm actually wondering whether they're the same countless 'thousands' who thronged towards and managed to half fill Trafalgar Square a while back to worship the likes of Corbyn and Sturgeon as they denounced Trident.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...pers-leak.html

Quote:

Events started at 11am and around 2,000* people are expected at Downing Street over the course of the day.
Wow I'm staggered by the numbers who feel so outraged. :rolleyes:

(* 'Thousands' sounds a lot more impressive than 2 or 3 thousand doesn't it.)

papa smurf 09-04-2016 13:02

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35831614)
I see those 'thousands' are out marching again, this time demanding Cameron's resignation about well, I'm not sure they really know ,apart from him being a Tory who at this stage has done nothing illegal and something an awful lot of other people/organisations have done (including those who've queued up to stick the knife in) without too much scrutiny or complaint from anyone much.

Anyway, from what little I've seen so far, the 'thousands' don't seem to be that many and I'm actually wondering whether they're the same countless 'thousands' who thronged towards and managed to half fill Trafalgar Square a while back to worship the likes of Corbyn and Sturgeon as they denounced Trident.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...pers-leak.html



Wow I'm staggered by the numbers who feel so outraged. :rolleyes:

(* 'Thousands' sounds a lot more impressive than 2 or 3 thousand doesn't it.)

yes its awful when people play tricks with numbers and hide the true facts about those numbers ;)

Maggy 09-04-2016 13:03

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831565)
Would you be happy having all your financial affairs posted for all to see .I think things are getting ridiculous now where people are pilloried for being well off or financially astute

---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------



Here's another way to look at this. This country has one of the lowest corporation tax limits in the world meaning that companies set up here instead of other countries because the tax rate is lower ,most definitely tax avoidance just of the sort we approve of because we benefit

You have deliberately misunderstood me.My financial affairs are beyond reproach so I have nothing to worry about..and I'm not envious at all for people who are hard working and making money.I just want tax loopholes plugged and for there to be less avenues for money laundering and for EVERYONE to pay their fair share of the tax burden.It's criminality I want to be sorted out.

denphone 09-04-2016 13:05

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35831620)
You have deliberately misunderstood me.My financial affairs are beyond reproach so I have nothing to worry about..and I'm not envious at all for people who are hard working and making money.I just want tax loopholes plugged and for there to be less avenues for money laundering and for EVERYONE to pay their fare share of the tax burden.It's criminality I want to be sorted out.

This.:tu:

Osem 09-04-2016 15:50

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831618)
yes its awful when people play tricks with numbers and hide the true facts about those numbers ;)

Even more so when they actually break the law doing so eh? ;)

Anyway having heard Red Ken pontificating oh so morally again this morning on LBC I found this interesting:

Quote:

Ken Livingstone has gone on Russia Today to call for Cameron to be jailed over his taxes. That is the same Ken Livingstone who sheltered his earnings in a company so he could save £1,000-a-week in tax. Ken paid 21% corporation tax rate on £319,478 of earnings by invoicing to Silveta Ltd, instead of paying the 50% top rate of income tax. He also owned 99% of a similar company twice prosecuted for non-payment of taxes. Ken’s effective tax rate in 2012 was 14.5%. Today he laughably calls Cameron “the most hypocritical prime minister of my lifetime”…
http://order-order.com/2016/04/08/ke...tax-hypocrisy/

On LBC this morning he actually called Cameron "the most dishonest prime-minister of my lifetime..."

Maybe his memory is as suspect as his morals.

:rofl:

Hugh 09-04-2016 16:28

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
It's the old 'throw enough *stuff against the wall, some of it might stick' ploy - see Tom Watson, John Mann for other examples; they both knew the value of Cameron's shareholding was under the reporting limit, but still bloviated on about it anyway....

*ordure

heero_yuy 09-04-2016 16:30

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Given that Cameron's the stay's fan boi, sticking mud is a Brexit's dream.:D

Osem 09-04-2016 17:08

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831648)
It's the old 'throw enough *stuff against the wall, some of it might stick' ploy - see Tom Watson, John Mann for other examples; they both knew the value of Cameron's shareholding was under the reporting limit, but still bloviated on about it anyway....

*ordure

I seem to recall Livingstone using ignorance of his financial affairs as an excuse. Odd how he seems to be more interested in Cameron's than his own? :confused:

Quote:

Curiously, for a man who repeatedly emphasised his mastery of detail, he pleaded ignorance when quizzed about his tax affairs. Most surprisingly of all, he said he has no idea how much his wife Emma Beal is paid by Silveta Ltd, which they set up to handle his private earnings and expenses.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/mayor...t-7660632.html

TheDaddy 09-04-2016 18:41

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831648)
It's the old 'throw enough *stuff against the wall, some of it might stick' ploy - see Tom Watson, John Mann for other examples; they both knew the value of Cameron's shareholding was under the reporting limit, but still bloviated on about it anyway....

*ordure

Really I thought it was the old stall, tell half truths and general sneakieness that allowed for the muck to be slung. If he'd told the truth at the start this would've gone away in an afternoon and I still don't think he's being truthful about not benefiting from off shore cash.

papa smurf 09-04-2016 19:55

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831672)
Really I thought it was the old stall, tell half truths and general sneakieness that allowed for the muck to be slung. If he'd told the truth at the start this would've gone away in an afternoon and I still don't think he's being truthful about not benefiting from off shore cash.

well he's in the limelight now

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...pers-leak.html

Hugh 09-04-2016 20:15

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831672)
Really I thought it was the old stall, tell half truths and general sneakieness that allowed for the muck to be slung. If he'd told the truth at the start this would've gone away in an afternoon and I still don't think he's being truthful about not benefiting from off shore cash.

I agree that he should have told it all at the beginning - that was an error on his part (which he has owned).

---------- Post added at 21:15 ---------- Previous post was at 21:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831695)

Class War and Socialist Worker - it doesn't take much to get them marching.... ;)

Osem 09-04-2016 20:40

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
The usual suspects.

Still waiting for any of Gary's predictions to come to fruition... :D

Arthurgray50@blu 09-04-2016 20:55

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
I think the problem is with all this, is quite simple. When someone becomes a councillor or MP. They have to disclose anything to do with a second job, financies.

This is what DC has failed to do, with the tax haven. And the worse thing is that he critised heavily people that were doing this, and he was going to close these havens.

And hey, he had shares in a Tax Haven, he sold these shares. So what did he do with the money ?

To me DC is a hypocrite, he may not have done anything illegal - as people have said. But he has lied, lied and lied about the whole issue.

And he should do the honourable thing and resign.

IF, he had told the relevant people about this, then everything would be fine.

Its like me, if l told a future employer on an application form that l didn't have something wrong BEFORE l joined. And they found out l did. Then you could get fired, and you don't have a leg to stand on.

TheDaddy 10-04-2016 01:48

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831698)
I agree that he should have told it all at the beginning - that was an error on his part (which he has owned).

---------- Post added at 21:15 ---------- Previous post was at 21:13 ----------


Class War and Socialist Worker - it doesn't take much to get them marching.... ;)

He hasn't owned it at all, it's owned him and it might even bring him down, his love of a meaningless soundbite could do for him, all that pontificating when he was naming and shaming celebrities whilst he was benefitting from the exact same thing make him look like the hypocrite he is, the fact he insisted the EU water down proposals to exclude the very sort he benefited from make him look dishonest and all his attempted weaseling
out of it make him look like the shyster he is. He even wheeled out another meaningless soundbite earlier, lessons have been learnt, really Dave what lessons exactly and whilst you're keen to show us your tax returns dating back to 2009 the one I most keen for the public to get their hands on is 2008.

papa smurf 10-04-2016 06:37

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831740)
He hasn't owned it at all, it's owned him and it might even bring him down, his love of a meaningless soundbite could do for him, all that pontificating when he was naming and shaming celebrities whilst he was benefitting from the exact same thing make him look like the hypocrite he is, the fact he insisted the EU water down proposals to exclude the very sort he benefited from make him look dishonest and all his attempted weaseling
out of it make him look like the shyster he is. He even wheeled out another meaningless soundbite earlier, lessons have been learnt, really Dave what lessons exactly and whilst you're keen to show us your tax returns dating back to 2009 the one I most keen for the public to get their hands on is 2008.

:clap::clap::clap:

martyh 10-04-2016 07:07

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35831740)
all that pontificating when he was naming and shaming celebrities whilst he was benefitting from the exact same thing make him look like the hypocrite he is,

He wasn't doing the same thing at all ,there have been no allegations of using avoidance schemes .

Quote:

the fact he insisted the EU water down proposals to exclude the very sort he benefited from make him look dishonest and all his attempted weaseling
Trusts where not excluded ,they still have to revealed ,the only difference is that trusts are declared in private to HMRC and shell companies are declared publicly ,which is perfectly understandable

Quote:

whilst you're keen to show us your tax returns dating back to 2009 the one I most keen for the public to get their hands on is 2008.
and when that one shows no irregularities should he then produce the years before and so on .He has gone over and above what should be expected of him .

papa smurf 10-04-2016 07:28

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Ian Cameron left PM £300,000 when he died in 2010 while his mother gave him an extra £200,000 some months later
It meant he avoided paying Inland Revenue £70,000 inheritance tax that he would have paid on a £500,000 lump sum
All bequests over £325,000 are subject to a 40 per cent tax levy - PM source says he denies any wrongdoing


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz45PGJDsOs
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Hugh 10-04-2016 08:03

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831748)
Ian Cameron left PM £300,000 when he died in 2010 while his mother gave him an extra £200,000 some months later
It meant he avoided paying Inland Revenue £70,000 inheritance tax that he would have paid on a £500,000 lump sum
All bequests over £325,000 are subject to a 40 per cent tax levy - PM source says he denies any wrongdoing


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz45PGJDsOs
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

From previous editions of the Daily Express, Daily Mail, the Telegraph, and the BBC, giving advice on how to mitigate/minimise Inheritance Tax.

http://www.express.co.uk/finance/per...nheritance-tax

http://www.express.co.uk/finance/per...mily-household

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/new...heritance.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/p...-avoid-it.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29756520

And this one, from a Mail on Sunday financial reporter.

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/b...-avoid-it.html

So all these papers feigning outrage at Cameron doing what they recommend to their readers.

martyh 10-04-2016 08:18

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831748)
Ian Cameron left PM £300,000 when he died in 2010 while his mother gave him an extra £200,000 some months later
It meant he avoided paying Inland Revenue £70,000 inheritance tax that he would have paid on a £500,000 lump sum
All bequests over £325,000 are subject to a 40 per cent tax levy - PM source says he denies any wrongdoing


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz45PGJDsOs
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

This just shows how desperate people are to find some wrongdoing .In this country there is no inheritance tax on estates passed to a spouse or civil partner ,in this case the portion of the estate left to Cameron(£300,000) had tax paid on it.The £200,000 gift from his mother may be subject to inheritance tax under the 7 year rule if she dies within 7 yrs of making the gift but that i'm not sure about because usually gifts are not classed as income and therefore not subject to tax

Hugh 10-04-2016 08:35

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/overview

https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/gifts

Quote:

7-year rule
The original owner must live for 7 years after giving the gift. Any gifts made less than 7 years before death count towards the Inheritance Tax threshold (£325,000). They count towards the threshold before the rest of the estate.

If the donor gave away more than £325,000 of gifts in their final 7 years, tax is due on everything over that threshold.

Gifts made 3 to 7 years before the death

The rate of tax is reduced for gifts over the threshold made between 3 and 7 years before the person died. This is known as ‘taper relief’.

Years between gift and death Tax you pay
(if not qualified for reduced rate)
less than 3 40%
3 to 4 32%
4 to 5 24%
5 to 6 16%
6 to 7 8%
When you have to pay Inheritance Tax on a gift you received
If you received a gift from someone who died, you may have to pay Inheritance Tax on it. This could happen if both of the following are true:

they gave you the gift less than 7 years before they died
they gave £325,000 or more in gifts in the last 7 years of their life
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will tell you if you have to pay Inheritance Tax.

Mr K 10-04-2016 08:38

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Still waiting for the full tax returns, not just the edited highlights he's chosen to reveal. What's there is embarrassing, make you wonder what details have been omitted. 200k from Mum - nice; my Mother is going to have to up the stakes on birthday presents!

What it does show is that we are clearly not 'all in this together' and austerity and paying full tax is only for one section of society ( the 'not we').

Chris 10-04-2016 08:47

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Well he hasn't done anything wrong, has he? Inheritance tax planning is absolutely standard. Everyone whose estate is likely to qualify does it, and it's entirely legal. The law even allows for gifts being given prior to death (of Cameron's mother in this case), via the seven year tapering liability which Hugh quoted above.

Mr K 10-04-2016 08:57

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Things like inheritance tax planning and overseas tax havens are irrelevant to 95% of people. The fact that these loopholes haven't been closed shows where the govts. priorities lie. Doing something wrong and something illegal are different things. Call me picky but I'd want the standard for PM to be a little higher than ' he's done nothing illegal'.

martyh 10-04-2016 09:09

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831756)
Still waiting for the full tax returns, not just the edited highlights he's chosen to reveal. What's there is embarrassing, make you wonder what details have been omitted. 200k from Mum - nice; my Mother is going to have to up the stakes on birthday presents!
.

If you've ever filled out a tax return you will know that the first 4 or 5 pages are simply questions about name,DOB,NI,are you registered blind ,have you received any UK benefits etc .The majority is not applicable to most people in Camerons position

In what way are they embarrassing?

Quote:

What it does show is that we are clearly not 'all in this together' and austerity and paying full tax is only for one section of society ( the 'not we').
What it shows is the enormous chip on your shoulder against people more wealthy than you

---------- Post added at 10:09 ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831759)
Things like inheritance tax planning and overseas tax havens are irrelevant to 95% of people. The fact that these loopholes haven't been closed shows where the govts. priorities lie. Doing something wrong and something illegal are different things. Call me picky but I'd want the standard for PM to be a little higher than ' he's done nothing illegal'.

Are you serious ? plenty of the 95% of people you speak of profit from inheritance tax planning ,it's something that anyone who owns their house has to be aware of ,it is nothing like a tax haven

papa smurf 10-04-2016 09:15

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831759)
Things like inheritance tax planning and overseas tax havens are irrelevant to 95% of people. The fact that these loopholes haven't been closed shows where the govts. priorities lie. Doing something wrong and something illegal are different things. Call me picky but I'd want the standard for PM to be a little higher than ' he's done nothing illegal'.

this is a quote from dave in 2014
“I think we should be very clear — tax evasion is illegal, and for that you can be prosecuted, you can go to prison,” he said. “These very aggressive tax avoidance schemes, they are wrong, and we should really persuade people not to do them.”
he's not talking about himself obviously or his tax affairs :)

martyh 10-04-2016 09:16

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831759)
The fact that these loopholes haven't been closed shows where the govts. priorities lie

Calling Inheritance tax planning a loophole is like calling your personal tax free allowance a loophole

Chris 10-04-2016 09:19

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831759)
Things like inheritance tax planning and overseas tax havens are irrelevant to 95% of people. The fact that these loopholes haven't been closed shows where the govts. priorities lie. Doing something wrong and something illegal are different things. Call me picky but I'd want the standard for PM to be a little higher than ' he's done nothing illegal'.

In law, "wrong" and "illegal" are exactly the same, and as the law is the only code upon which we all agree, what else is there? Morality is a very slippery thing unless we can all agree what is its source and definition. You're going to have to pin something legally dubious on the PM if you're hoping for a resignation.

The Cameron family's inheritance tax planning is precisely what every family in their position does. That may be only 5% of estates but we are still talking about something like 40,000 estates per year. It is a far, far larger number than that of the super-rich who spend a small fortune on accountants in order to save a large fortune in tax. And given the meteoric rise in property values we are also talking about plenty of people of relatively modest means.

These "loopholes" as you call them have been in the system for a very, very long time, so making insinuations about this government's "priorities" won't wash.

martyh 10-04-2016 09:31

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831766)
this is a quote from dave in 2014
“I think we should be very clear — tax evasion is illegal, and for that you can be prosecuted, you can go to prison,” he said. “These very aggressive tax avoidance schemes, they are wrong, and we should really persuade people not to do them.”
he's not talking about himself obviously or his tax affairs :)

No he's not because he's just proven that he's not doing any of that despite how much some people wish he was

papa smurf 10-04-2016 09:39

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831770)
No he's not because he's just proven that he's not doing any of that despite how much some people wish he was

well lets not get too exited about his innocence/guilt just yet, i'm sure more evidence will be dug out in the coming days " the truth will out" .;)

April 2015: an Election Pledge to Crack Down

“Tackling tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance and tax planning is an important part of our long-term economic plan,” Mr. Cameron said ahead of his Conservative Party’s electoral victory.

martyh 10-04-2016 09:43

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831771)
well lets not get too exited about his innocence/guilt just yet, i'm sure more evidence will be dug out in the coming days " the truth will out" .;)

If the evidence you speak of is anything like the deliberately misinterpreted and grasped at straws we've seen the last few days i wouldn't hold your breath.

Mr K 10-04-2016 10:23

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831760)

Are you serious ? plenty of the 95% of people you speak of profit from inheritance tax planning ,it's something that anyone who owns their house has to be aware of ,it is nothing like a tax haven

Why does inheritance tax exist? To raise money certainly. Also to encourage those with money to put it into the economy and make the next generation earn their way.

What has DC done to earn his millions. Nothing, he's inherited it, as we now know some of it from his Dads dodgy tax haven. No jobs before politics and a paid for Philosophy degree from Oxford; very useful that. Never mind his tax affairs how on earth did he become PM?

papa smurf 10-04-2016 10:25

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831772)
If the evidence you speak of is anything like the deliberately misinterpreted and grasped at straws we've seen the last few days i wouldn't hold your breath.

i will wait and see what comes to light before i come to a conclusion ,i am sure this matter will be well scruitinised over the coming days ,if there are any skeletons in the cupboard they will be brought to light and if he is squeaky clean this will also be brought to light.

Osem 10-04-2016 11:05

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Just listening to George Galloway on the Sunday Politics asking people to believe that whilst his non-parliamentary earnings were handled via a company and subject to corporation tax (substantially lower than the relevant personal rate) he really believes people like him ought to pay more in tax than they do. Surprisingly, he didn't confirm whether his awful quilt about this unfairness extends to donating the difference in the tax he actually paid and that which he would have been required to cough up (had he chosen to run his affairs differently) in order to benefit of all those poor and needy he'd just cited. When pressed about what he actually paid on his earnings outside of parliament (c.£250k in 2014 apparently) his reply was "I paid a very, very, great deal/amount of money in tax exactly as I was required to do..." Sounds rather like Cameron then.

Just another rose tinted hypocrite amongst a very extensive list of those champagne socialists.

Hugh 10-04-2016 12:09

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831766)
this is a quote from dave in 2014
“I think we should be very clear — tax evasion is illegal, and for that you can be prosecuted, you can go to prison,” he said. “These very aggressive tax avoidance schemes, they are wrong, and we should really persuade people not to do them.”
he's not talking about himself obviously or his tax affairs :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831777)
i will wait and see what comes to light before i come to a conclusion ,i am sure this matter will be well scruitinised over the coming days ,if there are any skeletons in the cupboard they will be brought to light and if he is squeaky clean this will also be brought to light.

You appear to have already come to a conclusion...

Cameron paid tax on his dividends, he paid tax on his sale of the shares, and his mother gifted him money under existing HMRC rules, which my mother-in-law has done to her grand-children, like lots of others - could you please highlight which very aggressive tax avoidance schemes Cameron has undertaken?

papa smurf 10-04-2016 12:23

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831791)
You appear to have already come to a conclusion...

Cameron paid tax on his dividends, he paid tax on his sale of the shares, and his mother gifted him money under existing HMRC rules, which my mother-in-law has done to her grand-children, like lots of others - could you please highlight which very aggressive tax avoidance schemes Cameron has undertaken?

no i'm awaiting input [not selective tidbits]

i never said he had undertaken aggressive tax avoidance -i quoted the man himself
this is a quote from dave in 2014
“I think we should be very clear — tax evasion is illegal, and for that you can be prosecuted, you can go to prison,” he said. “These very aggressive tax avoidance schemes, they are wrong, and we should really persuade people not to do them.”
he obviously never mentioned fluffy tax avoidance .

martyh 10-04-2016 12:39

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831776)
Why does inheritance tax exist? To raise money certainly. Also to encourage those with money to put it into the economy and make the next generation earn their way.

What has DC done to earn his millions. Nothing, he's inherited it, as we now know some of it from his Dads dodgy tax haven. No jobs before politics and a paid for Philosophy degree from Oxford; very useful that. Never mind his tax affairs how on earth did he become PM?

So basically instead of backing up your assertions that Cameron is a tax dodger you've resorted to calling him a lazy thicko:rolleyes: It must be very hard work hating everyone that's done better in life than you

---------- Post added at 13:39 ---------- Previous post was at 13:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831797)
no i'm awaiting input [not selective tidbits]

i never said he had undertaken aggressive tax avoidance -i quoted the man himself
this is a quote from dave in 2014
“I think we should be very clear — tax evasion is illegal, and for that you can be prosecuted, you can go to prison,” he said. “These very aggressive tax avoidance schemes, they are wrong, and we should really persuade people not to do them.”
he obviously never mentioned fluffy tax avoidance .

The sound of your backpeddling is deafening

Sirius 10-04-2016 12:44

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
So the SNP and Labour want tax returns and confirmation that the cabinet are not using tax havens, i hope the Shadow cabinet will do the same to prove they have nothing to hide ether?. I dont think the others will be willing to divulge there information however as in true Labour process they will stick to "what's yours is mine but what's mine is my own"

papa smurf 10-04-2016 13:02

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35831800)
So basically instead of backing up your assertions that Cameron is a tax dodger you've resorted to calling him a lazy thicko:rolleyes: It must be very hard work hating everyone that's done better in life than you

---------- Post added at 13:39 ---------- Previous post was at 13:36 ----------



The sound of your backpeddling is deafening

is that a real word ?

heero_yuy 10-04-2016 13:24

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831805)
is that a real word ?

Someone who sells backs?:D

Hugh 10-04-2016 13:43

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Martin Lewis, of the Moneysavingexpert website, just posted this on FB.

Quote:

The Sunday Times front page is today implying Cameron's mother's £200,000 gift to him is an inheritance tax 'dodge' and 'avoidance'; yet I'm sure its own money section has often rightly recommended doing just that as legitimate tax planning. What next will we see "Cameron dodged £15,240 of saving tax by putting money in an ISA"?

So far in this debate I've been vocal on the fact we have a moral duty to pay our taxes - its the cost of living in a legitimate civil society. And offshore complex financial avoidance and dodgy hidden manipulative trusts should rightly be called avoidance and castigated

Yet lets call it avoidance when it is avoidance and not using government allowances to do things that we're supposed to do - even if you're prime minister. To try and grow this story by trying to darken the act of standard tax planning, isn't a good route,

The rules are plain you can give money from income, or give money more than 7 years before you die and there's no inheritence tax. Utilising that isn't dodgy.

papa smurf 10-04-2016 13:59

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831818)
Martin Lewis, of the Moneysavingexpert website, just posted this on FB.

is that the martin Lewis who advised locking into an energy tariffs before they went up- only they went down :dunce:

i'm waiting until jamie oliver backs him .

Osem 10-04-2016 14:03

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
More on the Guardian's staggering hypocrisy so typical of the left:

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/04...-arrangements/

Quote:

Now, I can think of three possible explanations. First, they either didn’t know or had forgotten about the Guardian Media Group’s use of a tax-exempt shell company in the Cayman Islands to avoid paying corporation tax when it sold its 50 per cent holding in Auto Trader to Apax Partners in 2008 (hat tip to Guido Fawkes). Further, they were similarly ignorant about the hundreds of millions GMG has invested in offshore hedge funds over the years. But that seems unlikely. After all, right-wing hacks like me lose no opportunity to draw attention to the paper’s creative tax affairs, particularly when confronted with self-righteous columnists like Owen Jones and Polly Toynbee wagging their fingers at Vodafone and Starbucks for avoiding paying their ‘fair share’.

Hugh 10-04-2016 14:04

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35831776)
Why does inheritance tax exist? To raise money certainly. Also to encourage those with money to put it into the economy and make the next generation earn their way.

What has DC done to earn his millions. Nothing, he's inherited it, as we now know some of it from his Dads dodgy tax haven. No jobs before politics and a paid for Philosophy degree from Oxford; very useful that. Never mind his tax affairs how on earth did he become PM?

Strange - if you look at his tax returns, most of his money has been earned, by being the Prime Minister...

And as for 'no jobs before politics', you obviously missed the seven years he worked at Carlton - remind me again of Jeremy Corbyn's extensive employment portfolio (outside of being a Union rep, councillor, and MP)...

Osem 10-04-2016 14:07

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831821)
Strange - if you look at his tax returns, most of his money has been earned, by being the Prime Minister...

And as for 'no jobs before politics', you obviously missed the seven years he worked at Carlton - remind me again of Jeremy Corbyn's extensive employment portfolio (outside of being a Union rep, councillor, and MP)...

Some folks really do find differentiating between facts and fiction difficult don't they. On the other hand they might just be reduced to clutching at straws. I imagine a good few of them learned all about hypocrisy from the Guardian.

Hugh 10-04-2016 14:16

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35831819)
is that the martin Lewis who advised locking into an energy tariffs before they went up- only they went down :dunce:

He's the one that runs Britains's biggest consumer and personal finance website, with 15 million users per month, and 10 million receiving a monthly advice update email, yes...;)

papa smurf 10-04-2016 14:21

Re: Tax havens exposed in huge law firm leak
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35831824)
He's the one that runs Britains's biggest consumer and personal finance website, with 15 million users per month, and 10 million receiving a monthly advice update email, yes...;)

so the same martin lewis who wrongly advised millions over fuel bills .


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum